Find the number of ways that 5 boys and 6 girls can stand in a row if no boy stands next to another boy












5












$begingroup$


The most straight-forward answer is to arrange 6 girls and put 5 boys in the remaining seven slots by order:



$$square g square g square g square g square g square gsquare$$
Therefore, we come up with:



$$6!cdot 7P5=1space 814space 400$$



However, I notice that if you take one of the girls away (let's label her as $^*$), we have:



$$^*square^*g^*square^*g^*square^*g^*square^*g^*square^*g^*square^*$$



We see that no matter where girl$^*$ stands, the boys will still not stand next to each others. Now we can arrange 5 girls and put all the boys in and put girl$^*$ in the 12 places by order:
$$5!cdot6P5cdot12=1space036space800$$



Let's say we have 5 boys and 5 girls, we then have two possible arrangements:
$$gspace bspace gspace bspace gspace bspace gspace bspace gspace b + bspace gspace bspace gspace bspace gspace bspace gspace bspace g$$



Now, we add in girl$^*$. Here we have 2 different ways of arranging 5 boys and 5 girls and we are left with six slots for girl$^*$ in each case:



$$^*gspace ^*bspace ^*gspace ^*bspace ^*gspace ^*bspace ^*gspace ^*bspace ^*gspace ^*b ^*+ ^*bspace ^*gspace ^*bspace ^*gspace ^*bspace ^*gspace ^*bspace ^*gspace ^*bspace ^*g ^*$$
In which we have:
$$2(5!)^2cdot6=172space800$$



So which is right? Is there anything wrong with each logic?



Thank you.






combinatorics permutations







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    5












    $begingroup$


    The most straight-forward answer is to arrange 6 girls and put 5 boys in the remaining seven slots by order:



    $$square g square g square g square g square g square gsquare$$
    Therefore, we come up with:



    $$6!cdot 7P5=1space 814space 400$$



    However, I notice that if you take one of the girls away (let's label her as $^*$), we have:



    $$^*square^*g^*square^*g^*square^*g^*square^*g^*square^*g^*square^*$$



    We see that no matter where girl$^*$ stands, the boys will still not stand next to each others. Now we can arrange 5 girls and put all the boys in and put girl$^*$ in the 12 places by order:
    $$5!cdot6P5cdot12=1space036space800$$



    Let's say we have 5 boys and 5 girls, we then have two possible arrangements:
    $$gspace bspace gspace bspace gspace bspace gspace bspace gspace b + bspace gspace bspace gspace bspace gspace bspace gspace bspace g$$



    Now, we add in girl$^*$. Here we have 2 different ways of arranging 5 boys and 5 girls and we are left with six slots for girl$^*$ in each case:



    $$^*gspace ^*bspace ^*gspace ^*bspace ^*gspace ^*bspace ^*gspace ^*bspace ^*gspace ^*b ^*+ ^*bspace ^*gspace ^*bspace ^*gspace ^*bspace ^*gspace ^*bspace ^*gspace ^*bspace ^*g ^*$$
    In which we have:
    $$2(5!)^2cdot6=172space800$$



    So which is right? Is there anything wrong with each logic?



    Thank you.






    combinatorics permutations







    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      5












      5








      5





      $begingroup$


      The most straight-forward answer is to arrange 6 girls and put 5 boys in the remaining seven slots by order:



      $$square g square g square g square g square g square gsquare$$
      Therefore, we come up with:



      $$6!cdot 7P5=1space 814space 400$$



      However, I notice that if you take one of the girls away (let's label her as $^*$), we have:



      $$^*square^*g^*square^*g^*square^*g^*square^*g^*square^*g^*square^*$$



      We see that no matter where girl$^*$ stands, the boys will still not stand next to each others. Now we can arrange 5 girls and put all the boys in and put girl$^*$ in the 12 places by order:
      $$5!cdot6P5cdot12=1space036space800$$



      Let's say we have 5 boys and 5 girls, we then have two possible arrangements:
      $$gspace bspace gspace bspace gspace bspace gspace bspace gspace b + bspace gspace bspace gspace bspace gspace bspace gspace bspace g$$



      Now, we add in girl$^*$. Here we have 2 different ways of arranging 5 boys and 5 girls and we are left with six slots for girl$^*$ in each case:



      $$^*gspace ^*bspace ^*gspace ^*bspace ^*gspace ^*bspace ^*gspace ^*bspace ^*gspace ^*b ^*+ ^*bspace ^*gspace ^*bspace ^*gspace ^*bspace ^*gspace ^*bspace ^*gspace ^*bspace ^*g ^*$$
      In which we have:
      $$2(5!)^2cdot6=172space800$$



      So which is right? Is there anything wrong with each logic?



      Thank you.






      combinatorics permutations







      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      The most straight-forward answer is to arrange 6 girls and put 5 boys in the remaining seven slots by order:



      $$square g square g square g square g square g square gsquare$$
      Therefore, we come up with:



      $$6!cdot 7P5=1space 814space 400$$



      However, I notice that if you take one of the girls away (let's label her as $^*$), we have:



      $$^*square^*g^*square^*g^*square^*g^*square^*g^*square^*g^*square^*$$



      We see that no matter where girl$^*$ stands, the boys will still not stand next to each others. Now we can arrange 5 girls and put all the boys in and put girl$^*$ in the 12 places by order:
      $$5!cdot6P5cdot12=1space036space800$$



      Let's say we have 5 boys and 5 girls, we then have two possible arrangements:
      $$gspace bspace gspace bspace gspace bspace gspace bspace gspace b + bspace gspace bspace gspace bspace gspace bspace gspace bspace g$$



      Now, we add in girl$^*$. Here we have 2 different ways of arranging 5 boys and 5 girls and we are left with six slots for girl$^*$ in each case:



      $$^*gspace ^*bspace ^*gspace ^*bspace ^*gspace ^*bspace ^*gspace ^*bspace ^*gspace ^*b ^*+ ^*bspace ^*gspace ^*bspace ^*gspace ^*bspace ^*gspace ^*bspace ^*gspace ^*bspace ^*g ^*$$
      In which we have:
      $$2(5!)^2cdot6=172space800$$



      So which is right? Is there anything wrong with each logic?



      Thank you.






      combinatorics permutations




      combinatorics permutations






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 32 mins ago







      Huy Tran Van

















      asked 1 hour ago









      Huy Tran VanHuy Tran Van

      264




      264






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Your first computation is correct.



          The latter two computations undercount because they start off by taking one of the girls away. Let's say they always take girl #1 away.



          Now if we number the girls, those solutions can contain as an example $1 2 b 3 b 4 b 5 b 6b$. But they can not contain $1b2b34b5b6b$. We've lost the ability to have two girls next to eachother without involving girl #1.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Now, I know the last two undercount somehow but I can't see why '$1b2b3b4b5b6b$' is not possible in the second case?
            $endgroup$
            – Huy Tran Van
            6 mins ago





















          1












          $begingroup$

          In the last one you're obviously leaving some out, which could be gotten by swapping some of bg combinations in either sum.



          In the second, also, you're not counting certain arrangements, which could be gotten by, again, swapping at least some bg combinations.



          The right one is the first.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$





















            0












            $begingroup$

            You are on the right track with thinking that there are 7 possible slots with 5 boys to be arranged into those slots. This is a combination problem with can be treated as a 7 choose 5 or a $7 choose 5$.

            A $7 choose 5$ is calculated as
            $$
            frac{7!}{5!*(7-5)!} = 21
            $$
            Therefore there are 21 combinations in which the boys could be arranged.



            I have also used an excel spreadsheet to show the possible ways that they could be arranged which ends up equaling 21.



            Picture of how the boys and girls could be arranged in 21 combinations






            share|cite|improve this answer








            New contributor




            Tucktuckgoose is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              My answer is predicated that this is a combination problem, not a permutation problem. As they are described as boys and girls, they are likely interchangeable and this is a combination. If the question was how many ways can Tom, Dick, Harry, Sam, and Bob be arranged, that would be a different question with a much larger answer.
              $endgroup$
              – Tucktuckgoose
              20 mins ago











            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084008%2ffind-the-number-of-ways-that-5-boys-and-6-girls-can-stand-in-a-row-if-no-boy-sta%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            Your first computation is correct.



            The latter two computations undercount because they start off by taking one of the girls away. Let's say they always take girl #1 away.



            Now if we number the girls, those solutions can contain as an example $1 2 b 3 b 4 b 5 b 6b$. But they can not contain $1b2b34b5b6b$. We've lost the ability to have two girls next to eachother without involving girl #1.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Now, I know the last two undercount somehow but I can't see why '$1b2b3b4b5b6b$' is not possible in the second case?
              $endgroup$
              – Huy Tran Van
              6 mins ago


















            2












            $begingroup$

            Your first computation is correct.



            The latter two computations undercount because they start off by taking one of the girls away. Let's say they always take girl #1 away.



            Now if we number the girls, those solutions can contain as an example $1 2 b 3 b 4 b 5 b 6b$. But they can not contain $1b2b34b5b6b$. We've lost the ability to have two girls next to eachother without involving girl #1.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Now, I know the last two undercount somehow but I can't see why '$1b2b3b4b5b6b$' is not possible in the second case?
              $endgroup$
              – Huy Tran Van
              6 mins ago
















            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            Your first computation is correct.



            The latter two computations undercount because they start off by taking one of the girls away. Let's say they always take girl #1 away.



            Now if we number the girls, those solutions can contain as an example $1 2 b 3 b 4 b 5 b 6b$. But they can not contain $1b2b34b5b6b$. We've lost the ability to have two girls next to eachother without involving girl #1.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Your first computation is correct.



            The latter two computations undercount because they start off by taking one of the girls away. Let's say they always take girl #1 away.



            Now if we number the girls, those solutions can contain as an example $1 2 b 3 b 4 b 5 b 6b$. But they can not contain $1b2b34b5b6b$. We've lost the ability to have two girls next to eachother without involving girl #1.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 31 mins ago









            orlporlp

            7,4111330




            7,4111330












            • $begingroup$
              Now, I know the last two undercount somehow but I can't see why '$1b2b3b4b5b6b$' is not possible in the second case?
              $endgroup$
              – Huy Tran Van
              6 mins ago




















            • $begingroup$
              Now, I know the last two undercount somehow but I can't see why '$1b2b3b4b5b6b$' is not possible in the second case?
              $endgroup$
              – Huy Tran Van
              6 mins ago


















            $begingroup$
            Now, I know the last two undercount somehow but I can't see why '$1b2b3b4b5b6b$' is not possible in the second case?
            $endgroup$
            – Huy Tran Van
            6 mins ago






            $begingroup$
            Now, I know the last two undercount somehow but I can't see why '$1b2b3b4b5b6b$' is not possible in the second case?
            $endgroup$
            – Huy Tran Van
            6 mins ago













            1












            $begingroup$

            In the last one you're obviously leaving some out, which could be gotten by swapping some of bg combinations in either sum.



            In the second, also, you're not counting certain arrangements, which could be gotten by, again, swapping at least some bg combinations.



            The right one is the first.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              In the last one you're obviously leaving some out, which could be gotten by swapping some of bg combinations in either sum.



              In the second, also, you're not counting certain arrangements, which could be gotten by, again, swapping at least some bg combinations.



              The right one is the first.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                In the last one you're obviously leaving some out, which could be gotten by swapping some of bg combinations in either sum.



                In the second, also, you're not counting certain arrangements, which could be gotten by, again, swapping at least some bg combinations.



                The right one is the first.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                In the last one you're obviously leaving some out, which could be gotten by swapping some of bg combinations in either sum.



                In the second, also, you're not counting certain arrangements, which could be gotten by, again, swapping at least some bg combinations.



                The right one is the first.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited 24 mins ago

























                answered 31 mins ago









                Chris CusterChris Custer

                11.5k3824




                11.5k3824























                    0












                    $begingroup$

                    You are on the right track with thinking that there are 7 possible slots with 5 boys to be arranged into those slots. This is a combination problem with can be treated as a 7 choose 5 or a $7 choose 5$.

                    A $7 choose 5$ is calculated as
                    $$
                    frac{7!}{5!*(7-5)!} = 21
                    $$
                    Therefore there are 21 combinations in which the boys could be arranged.



                    I have also used an excel spreadsheet to show the possible ways that they could be arranged which ends up equaling 21.



                    Picture of how the boys and girls could be arranged in 21 combinations






                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    New contributor




                    Tucktuckgoose is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.






                    $endgroup$













                    • $begingroup$
                      My answer is predicated that this is a combination problem, not a permutation problem. As they are described as boys and girls, they are likely interchangeable and this is a combination. If the question was how many ways can Tom, Dick, Harry, Sam, and Bob be arranged, that would be a different question with a much larger answer.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Tucktuckgoose
                      20 mins ago
















                    0












                    $begingroup$

                    You are on the right track with thinking that there are 7 possible slots with 5 boys to be arranged into those slots. This is a combination problem with can be treated as a 7 choose 5 or a $7 choose 5$.

                    A $7 choose 5$ is calculated as
                    $$
                    frac{7!}{5!*(7-5)!} = 21
                    $$
                    Therefore there are 21 combinations in which the boys could be arranged.



                    I have also used an excel spreadsheet to show the possible ways that they could be arranged which ends up equaling 21.



                    Picture of how the boys and girls could be arranged in 21 combinations






                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    New contributor




                    Tucktuckgoose is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.






                    $endgroup$













                    • $begingroup$
                      My answer is predicated that this is a combination problem, not a permutation problem. As they are described as boys and girls, they are likely interchangeable and this is a combination. If the question was how many ways can Tom, Dick, Harry, Sam, and Bob be arranged, that would be a different question with a much larger answer.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Tucktuckgoose
                      20 mins ago














                    0












                    0








                    0





                    $begingroup$

                    You are on the right track with thinking that there are 7 possible slots with 5 boys to be arranged into those slots. This is a combination problem with can be treated as a 7 choose 5 or a $7 choose 5$.

                    A $7 choose 5$ is calculated as
                    $$
                    frac{7!}{5!*(7-5)!} = 21
                    $$
                    Therefore there are 21 combinations in which the boys could be arranged.



                    I have also used an excel spreadsheet to show the possible ways that they could be arranged which ends up equaling 21.



                    Picture of how the boys and girls could be arranged in 21 combinations






                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    New contributor




                    Tucktuckgoose is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.






                    $endgroup$



                    You are on the right track with thinking that there are 7 possible slots with 5 boys to be arranged into those slots. This is a combination problem with can be treated as a 7 choose 5 or a $7 choose 5$.

                    A $7 choose 5$ is calculated as
                    $$
                    frac{7!}{5!*(7-5)!} = 21
                    $$
                    Therefore there are 21 combinations in which the boys could be arranged.



                    I have also used an excel spreadsheet to show the possible ways that they could be arranged which ends up equaling 21.



                    Picture of how the boys and girls could be arranged in 21 combinations







                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    New contributor




                    Tucktuckgoose is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.









                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer






                    New contributor




                    Tucktuckgoose is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.









                    answered 22 mins ago









                    TucktuckgooseTucktuckgoose

                    11




                    11




                    New contributor




                    Tucktuckgoose is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.





                    New contributor





                    Tucktuckgoose is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.






                    Tucktuckgoose is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.












                    • $begingroup$
                      My answer is predicated that this is a combination problem, not a permutation problem. As they are described as boys and girls, they are likely interchangeable and this is a combination. If the question was how many ways can Tom, Dick, Harry, Sam, and Bob be arranged, that would be a different question with a much larger answer.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Tucktuckgoose
                      20 mins ago


















                    • $begingroup$
                      My answer is predicated that this is a combination problem, not a permutation problem. As they are described as boys and girls, they are likely interchangeable and this is a combination. If the question was how many ways can Tom, Dick, Harry, Sam, and Bob be arranged, that would be a different question with a much larger answer.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Tucktuckgoose
                      20 mins ago
















                    $begingroup$
                    My answer is predicated that this is a combination problem, not a permutation problem. As they are described as boys and girls, they are likely interchangeable and this is a combination. If the question was how many ways can Tom, Dick, Harry, Sam, and Bob be arranged, that would be a different question with a much larger answer.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Tucktuckgoose
                    20 mins ago




                    $begingroup$
                    My answer is predicated that this is a combination problem, not a permutation problem. As they are described as boys and girls, they are likely interchangeable and this is a combination. If the question was how many ways can Tom, Dick, Harry, Sam, and Bob be arranged, that would be a different question with a much larger answer.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Tucktuckgoose
                    20 mins ago


















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084008%2ffind-the-number-of-ways-that-5-boys-and-6-girls-can-stand-in-a-row-if-no-boy-sta%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    -

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Ponta tanko

                    Image
                    Usona ponta tanko M60A1 Ponta tanko estas, simile kiel kirasita savveturilo, inter specialaj kirasitaj transportiloj. Kiel pontaj tankoj eblas konsideri ĉiujn memmovigaj rimedoj ebligantaj superi obstaklojn ĝis larĝeco 24 metroj rekte en spaco de bataloperacoj. Ties ĉefa tasko estas ebligi al la propraj taĉmentoj daŭrigi en rapida antaŭenirado sen senbezona reteniĝo. El tio pli-malpli rezultas taktikaj-teknikaj postuloj, kiujn ili devas plenumi. Precipe temas pri kapablo operacii komune kun unue-sinsekvaj taĉmentoj kaj transpontigi obstaklojn dum kelke da minutoj. This page is only for reference, If you need detailed information, please check here
                    Read more

                    Tantalo (mitologio)

                    Image
                    Ĉi tiu artikolo temas pri mitologio. Por aliaj signifoj vidu la paĝon Tantalo (apartigilo) . Tantalo , laŭ Gioacchino Assereto. Laŭ la helena mitologio, Tantalo (el la greka Τάνταλος , ŝancelanta aŭ tre malfeliĉa ) estis filo de Zeŭso kaj la oceanidino Pluto, laŭ la plej divastigata versio. Li estis reĝo de Frigio [1] aŭ de la monto Sipilo, en Lidio (Malgrandazio) [2] kaj post sia morto li suferis eternan torturadon ĉe la Tartaro, la plej profunda parto de Hadeso, rezervita por la plej perversaj homoj. Tamen, kelkaj rakontoj asertas ke li estis reĝo de Argo aŭ de Korinto [3] , aŭ ke li migris norden el la monto Sipilo por akiri la tronon de Paflagonio, el kie Ilo forpelis lin pro tio, ke Tantalo forkaptis kaj seksperfortis lian fraton Ganimedon [4] , kaj tiel ofendis la diojn. Verŝajne li ankaŭ regis urbon en okcidenta Anatolio, kiun oni nomis Tantalis [5] pro li, aŭ Sipilo , pro la monto sur kies flanko ankoraŭ staras ĝiaj ruinaĵoj [6] . Laŭ la geografiisto Strabo,...
                    Read more

                    Erzsébet Schaár

                    Image
                    Erzsébet Schaár Memportreto de Erzsébet Schaár en Pécs Personaj informoj Naskiĝo 27-an de julio 1908 ( 1908-07-27 ) en Budafok Morto 29-an de aŭgusto 1975 ( 1975-08-29 ) (67-jara) en Budapeŝto Ŝtataneco Hungario Profesio skulptisto Familianoj Edz(in)o Tibor Vilt v   •   d   •   r Erzsébet Schaár [erĵEbet ŝAr], laŭ hungarlingve kutima sinsekvo Schaár Erzsébet estis hungara skulptisto. Ŝia edzo estis Tibor Vilt. Déryné Széppataki Róza en Miskolc fare de Erzsébet Schaár Erzsébet Schaár [1] naskiĝis la 27-an de julio 1908 en Budafok, ŝi mortis la 29-an de aŭgusto 1975 en Budapeŝto. Enhavo 1 Biografio 2 Elektitaj solaj ekspozicioj 3 Elektitaj kolektivaj ekspozicioj 4 Elektitaj skulptaĵoj 5 Elektitaj disĉiploj 6 Fontoj 7 Referencoj Biografio | Erzsébet Schaár studis en Industriarta Lernejo, poste en Reĝa Belarta Altlernejo (1924-1926). Ŝia ĉefinstruisto estis Zsig...
                    Read more