Why do TACANs not have a symbol for compulsory reporting on IFR Enroute Low Altitude charts?
$begingroup$
I am studying the IFR Enroute Low Altitude legend, and I noticed that all NAV Aids other than TACAN have a compulsory reporting point icon.
Edit: Plot twist:
They do appear on the STAR/DP legend.
Why do TACANs not have a compulsory reporting point icon on the STAR/DP, but not IFR Enroute Low Altitude?
aeronautical-charts ifr-navigation
asked 8 hours ago
Ryan MortensenRyan Mortensen
3,515840
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am studying the IFR Enroute Low Altitude legend, and I noticed that all NAV Aids other than TACAN have a compulsory reporting point icon.
Edit: Plot twist:
They do appear on the STAR/DP legend.
Why do TACANs not have a compulsory reporting point icon on the STAR/DP, but not IFR Enroute Low Altitude?
aeronautical-charts ifr-navigation
asked 8 hours ago
Ryan MortensenRyan Mortensen
3,515840
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am studying the IFR Enroute Low Altitude legend, and I noticed that all NAV Aids other than TACAN have a compulsory reporting point icon.
Edit: Plot twist:
They do appear on the STAR/DP legend.
Why do TACANs not have a compulsory reporting point icon on the STAR/DP, but not IFR Enroute Low Altitude?
aeronautical-charts ifr-navigation
asked 8 hours ago
Ryan MortensenRyan Mortensen
3,515840
$endgroup$
I am studying the IFR Enroute Low Altitude legend, and I noticed that all NAV Aids other than TACAN have a compulsory reporting point icon.
Edit: Plot twist:
They do appear on the STAR/DP legend.
Why do TACANs not have a compulsory reporting point icon on the STAR/DP, but not IFR Enroute Low Altitude?
aeronautical-charts ifr-navigation
aeronautical-charts ifr-navigation
asked 8 hours ago
Ryan MortensenRyan Mortensen
3,515840
asked 8 hours ago
Ryan MortensenRyan Mortensen
3,515840
edited 26 mins ago
Ryan Mortensen
asked 8 hours ago
Ryan MortensenRyan Mortensen
3,515840
asked 8 hours ago
Ryan MortensenRyan Mortensen
3,515840
asked 8 hours ago
Ryan MortensenRyan Mortensen
3,515840
3,515840
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
TACANs are for military use. VOR or VORTAC are the civilian equivalent. Civilians can't generally tune in TACAN.
This wikipedia article has more details. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tactical_air_navigation_system
answered 6 hours ago
CrossRoadsCrossRoads
5,1421919
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Don't the FAA enroute charts serve both civil and military users?
$endgroup$
– pericynthion
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "528"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f63801%2fwhy-do-tacans-not-have-a-symbol-for-compulsory-reporting-on-ifr-enroute-low-alti%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
TACANs are for military use. VOR or VORTAC are the civilian equivalent. Civilians can't generally tune in TACAN.
This wikipedia article has more details. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tactical_air_navigation_system
answered 6 hours ago
CrossRoadsCrossRoads
5,1421919
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Don't the FAA enroute charts serve both civil and military users?
$endgroup$
– pericynthion
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
TACANs are for military use. VOR or VORTAC are the civilian equivalent. Civilians can't generally tune in TACAN.
This wikipedia article has more details. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tactical_air_navigation_system
answered 6 hours ago
CrossRoadsCrossRoads
5,1421919
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Don't the FAA enroute charts serve both civil and military users?
$endgroup$
– pericynthion
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
TACANs are for military use. VOR or VORTAC are the civilian equivalent. Civilians can't generally tune in TACAN.
This wikipedia article has more details. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tactical_air_navigation_system
answered 6 hours ago
CrossRoadsCrossRoads
5,1421919
$endgroup$
TACANs are for military use. VOR or VORTAC are the civilian equivalent. Civilians can't generally tune in TACAN.
This wikipedia article has more details. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tactical_air_navigation_system
answered 6 hours ago
CrossRoadsCrossRoads
5,1421919
answered 6 hours ago
CrossRoadsCrossRoads
5,1421919
answered 6 hours ago
CrossRoadsCrossRoads
5,1421919
answered 6 hours ago
CrossRoadsCrossRoads
5,1421919
5,1421919
$begingroup$
Don't the FAA enroute charts serve both civil and military users?
$endgroup$
– pericynthion
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Don't the FAA enroute charts serve both civil and military users?
$endgroup$
– pericynthion
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Don't the FAA enroute charts serve both civil and military users?
$endgroup$
– pericynthion
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Don't the FAA enroute charts serve both civil and military users?
$endgroup$
– pericynthion
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f63801%2fwhy-do-tacans-not-have-a-symbol-for-compulsory-reporting-on-ifr-enroute-low-alti%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
