Am I not good enough for you?
$begingroup$
Background:
The current Perfect Numbers challenge is rather flawed and complicated, since it asks you to output in a complex format involving the factors of the number. This is a purely decision-problem repost of the challenge.
Challenge
Given a positive integer through any standard input format, output whether it is not perfect.
A perfect number is a number that is equal to the sum of all its proper divisors (its positive divisors less than itself). For example, $6$ is a perfect number, since its divisors are $1,2,3$, which sum up to $6$, while $12$ is not a perfect number since its divisors ( $1,2,3,4,6$ ) sum up to $16$, not $12$.
Test Cases:
Imperfect:
1,12,13,18,20,1000,33550335
Perfect:
6,28,496,8128,33550336,8589869056
Rules
- Your program doesn't have to complete the larger test cases, if there's memory or time constraints, but it should be theoretically able to if it were given more memory/time.
- Output can be two distinct and consistent values through any allowed output format. If it isn't immediately obvious what represents Truthy/Falsey, please make sure to specify in your answer.
- This means your values don't have to be literally Truthy/Falsey. Your Truthy output may evaluate to false in your language and vice-versa.
code-golf number decision-problem number-theory factoring
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Background:
The current Perfect Numbers challenge is rather flawed and complicated, since it asks you to output in a complex format involving the factors of the number. This is a purely decision-problem repost of the challenge.
Challenge
Given a positive integer through any standard input format, output whether it is not perfect.
A perfect number is a number that is equal to the sum of all its proper divisors (its positive divisors less than itself). For example, $6$ is a perfect number, since its divisors are $1,2,3$, which sum up to $6$, while $12$ is not a perfect number since its divisors ( $1,2,3,4,6$ ) sum up to $16$, not $12$.
Test Cases:
Imperfect:
1,12,13,18,20,1000,33550335
Perfect:
6,28,496,8128,33550336,8589869056
Rules
- Your program doesn't have to complete the larger test cases, if there's memory or time constraints, but it should be theoretically able to if it were given more memory/time.
- Output can be two distinct and consistent values through any allowed output format. If it isn't immediately obvious what represents Truthy/Falsey, please make sure to specify in your answer.
- This means your values don't have to be literally Truthy/Falsey. Your Truthy output may evaluate to false in your language and vice-versa.
code-golf number decision-problem number-theory factoring
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Wait, so truthy is for values that aren't perfect, and falsey is for values that are?
$endgroup$
– Esolanging Fruit
28 mins ago
$begingroup$
@EsolangingFruit Yes, though the actual output values don't really matter, so you can output true for perfect numbers if you wish
$endgroup$
– Jo King
26 mins ago
$begingroup$
Fair enough, but wording the challenge as "output whether it is not perfect" makes the test cases slightly confusing if you interpret "truthy" as meaning "values corresponding to true".
$endgroup$
– Esolanging Fruit
24 mins ago
$begingroup$
@EsolangingFruit Good point. I've renamed the test cases toImperfect
/Perfect
to make it clearer
$endgroup$
– Jo King
23 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Background:
The current Perfect Numbers challenge is rather flawed and complicated, since it asks you to output in a complex format involving the factors of the number. This is a purely decision-problem repost of the challenge.
Challenge
Given a positive integer through any standard input format, output whether it is not perfect.
A perfect number is a number that is equal to the sum of all its proper divisors (its positive divisors less than itself). For example, $6$ is a perfect number, since its divisors are $1,2,3$, which sum up to $6$, while $12$ is not a perfect number since its divisors ( $1,2,3,4,6$ ) sum up to $16$, not $12$.
Test Cases:
Imperfect:
1,12,13,18,20,1000,33550335
Perfect:
6,28,496,8128,33550336,8589869056
Rules
- Your program doesn't have to complete the larger test cases, if there's memory or time constraints, but it should be theoretically able to if it were given more memory/time.
- Output can be two distinct and consistent values through any allowed output format. If it isn't immediately obvious what represents Truthy/Falsey, please make sure to specify in your answer.
- This means your values don't have to be literally Truthy/Falsey. Your Truthy output may evaluate to false in your language and vice-versa.
code-golf number decision-problem number-theory factoring
$endgroup$
Background:
The current Perfect Numbers challenge is rather flawed and complicated, since it asks you to output in a complex format involving the factors of the number. This is a purely decision-problem repost of the challenge.
Challenge
Given a positive integer through any standard input format, output whether it is not perfect.
A perfect number is a number that is equal to the sum of all its proper divisors (its positive divisors less than itself). For example, $6$ is a perfect number, since its divisors are $1,2,3$, which sum up to $6$, while $12$ is not a perfect number since its divisors ( $1,2,3,4,6$ ) sum up to $16$, not $12$.
Test Cases:
Imperfect:
1,12,13,18,20,1000,33550335
Perfect:
6,28,496,8128,33550336,8589869056
Rules
- Your program doesn't have to complete the larger test cases, if there's memory or time constraints, but it should be theoretically able to if it were given more memory/time.
- Output can be two distinct and consistent values through any allowed output format. If it isn't immediately obvious what represents Truthy/Falsey, please make sure to specify in your answer.
- This means your values don't have to be literally Truthy/Falsey. Your Truthy output may evaluate to false in your language and vice-versa.
code-golf number decision-problem number-theory factoring
code-golf number decision-problem number-theory factoring
edited 23 mins ago
Jo King
asked 43 mins ago
Jo KingJo King
24.6k357126
24.6k357126
$begingroup$
Wait, so truthy is for values that aren't perfect, and falsey is for values that are?
$endgroup$
– Esolanging Fruit
28 mins ago
$begingroup$
@EsolangingFruit Yes, though the actual output values don't really matter, so you can output true for perfect numbers if you wish
$endgroup$
– Jo King
26 mins ago
$begingroup$
Fair enough, but wording the challenge as "output whether it is not perfect" makes the test cases slightly confusing if you interpret "truthy" as meaning "values corresponding to true".
$endgroup$
– Esolanging Fruit
24 mins ago
$begingroup$
@EsolangingFruit Good point. I've renamed the test cases toImperfect
/Perfect
to make it clearer
$endgroup$
– Jo King
23 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Wait, so truthy is for values that aren't perfect, and falsey is for values that are?
$endgroup$
– Esolanging Fruit
28 mins ago
$begingroup$
@EsolangingFruit Yes, though the actual output values don't really matter, so you can output true for perfect numbers if you wish
$endgroup$
– Jo King
26 mins ago
$begingroup$
Fair enough, but wording the challenge as "output whether it is not perfect" makes the test cases slightly confusing if you interpret "truthy" as meaning "values corresponding to true".
$endgroup$
– Esolanging Fruit
24 mins ago
$begingroup$
@EsolangingFruit Good point. I've renamed the test cases toImperfect
/Perfect
to make it clearer
$endgroup$
– Jo King
23 mins ago
$begingroup$
Wait, so truthy is for values that aren't perfect, and falsey is for values that are?
$endgroup$
– Esolanging Fruit
28 mins ago
$begingroup$
Wait, so truthy is for values that aren't perfect, and falsey is for values that are?
$endgroup$
– Esolanging Fruit
28 mins ago
$begingroup$
@EsolangingFruit Yes, though the actual output values don't really matter, so you can output true for perfect numbers if you wish
$endgroup$
– Jo King
26 mins ago
$begingroup$
@EsolangingFruit Yes, though the actual output values don't really matter, so you can output true for perfect numbers if you wish
$endgroup$
– Jo King
26 mins ago
$begingroup$
Fair enough, but wording the challenge as "output whether it is not perfect" makes the test cases slightly confusing if you interpret "truthy" as meaning "values corresponding to true".
$endgroup$
– Esolanging Fruit
24 mins ago
$begingroup$
Fair enough, but wording the challenge as "output whether it is not perfect" makes the test cases slightly confusing if you interpret "truthy" as meaning "values corresponding to true".
$endgroup$
– Esolanging Fruit
24 mins ago
$begingroup$
@EsolangingFruit Good point. I've renamed the test cases to
Imperfect
/Perfect
to make it clearer$endgroup$
– Jo King
23 mins ago
$begingroup$
@EsolangingFruit Good point. I've renamed the test cases to
Imperfect
/Perfect
to make it clearer$endgroup$
– Jo King
23 mins ago
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Japt -!
, 4 bytes
¥â¬x
For some reason ¦
doesnt work on tio so I need to use the -!
flag and ¥
instead
Try it online!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
R, 33 bytes
!2*(n=scan())-sum(which(!n%%1:n))
Try it online!
Returns TRUE
for perfect numbers ans FALSE
for imperfect ones.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What do the 2 !s in a row get you?
$endgroup$
– CT Hall
8 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
CJam, 17 bytes
ri_,(;{1$%!},:+=
Try it online!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Javascript, 62
n=>n==[...Array(n).keys()].filter(a=>n%a<1).reduce((a,b)=>a+b)
Explanation (although it's pretty simple)
n=> //return function that takes n
n== //and returns if n is equal to
[...Array(n).keys()] //an array [0..(n-1)]...
.filter(a=>n%a<1) //where all of the elements that are not divisors of n are taken out...
.reduce((a,b)=>a+b) //summed up
Thanks to Jo King for the improvement!
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
thanks! Added that in
$endgroup$
– zevee
21 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "200"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodegolf.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f181350%2fam-i-not-good-enough-for-you%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Japt -!
, 4 bytes
¥â¬x
For some reason ¦
doesnt work on tio so I need to use the -!
flag and ¥
instead
Try it online!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Japt -!
, 4 bytes
¥â¬x
For some reason ¦
doesnt work on tio so I need to use the -!
flag and ¥
instead
Try it online!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Japt -!
, 4 bytes
¥â¬x
For some reason ¦
doesnt work on tio so I need to use the -!
flag and ¥
instead
Try it online!
$endgroup$
Japt -!
, 4 bytes
¥â¬x
For some reason ¦
doesnt work on tio so I need to use the -!
flag and ¥
instead
Try it online!
edited 25 mins ago
answered 31 mins ago
Luis felipe De jesus MunozLuis felipe De jesus Munoz
5,59821670
5,59821670
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
R, 33 bytes
!2*(n=scan())-sum(which(!n%%1:n))
Try it online!
Returns TRUE
for perfect numbers ans FALSE
for imperfect ones.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What do the 2 !s in a row get you?
$endgroup$
– CT Hall
8 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
R, 33 bytes
!2*(n=scan())-sum(which(!n%%1:n))
Try it online!
Returns TRUE
for perfect numbers ans FALSE
for imperfect ones.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What do the 2 !s in a row get you?
$endgroup$
– CT Hall
8 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
R, 33 bytes
!2*(n=scan())-sum(which(!n%%1:n))
Try it online!
Returns TRUE
for perfect numbers ans FALSE
for imperfect ones.
$endgroup$
R, 33 bytes
!2*(n=scan())-sum(which(!n%%1:n))
Try it online!
Returns TRUE
for perfect numbers ans FALSE
for imperfect ones.
answered 11 mins ago
GiuseppeGiuseppe
16.8k31052
16.8k31052
$begingroup$
What do the 2 !s in a row get you?
$endgroup$
– CT Hall
8 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What do the 2 !s in a row get you?
$endgroup$
– CT Hall
8 mins ago
$begingroup$
What do the 2 !s in a row get you?
$endgroup$
– CT Hall
8 mins ago
$begingroup$
What do the 2 !s in a row get you?
$endgroup$
– CT Hall
8 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
CJam, 17 bytes
ri_,(;{1$%!},:+=
Try it online!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
CJam, 17 bytes
ri_,(;{1$%!},:+=
Try it online!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
CJam, 17 bytes
ri_,(;{1$%!},:+=
Try it online!
$endgroup$
CJam, 17 bytes
ri_,(;{1$%!},:+=
Try it online!
answered 26 mins ago
Esolanging FruitEsolanging Fruit
8,50932674
8,50932674
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Javascript, 62
n=>n==[...Array(n).keys()].filter(a=>n%a<1).reduce((a,b)=>a+b)
Explanation (although it's pretty simple)
n=> //return function that takes n
n== //and returns if n is equal to
[...Array(n).keys()] //an array [0..(n-1)]...
.filter(a=>n%a<1) //where all of the elements that are not divisors of n are taken out...
.reduce((a,b)=>a+b) //summed up
Thanks to Jo King for the improvement!
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
thanks! Added that in
$endgroup$
– zevee
21 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Javascript, 62
n=>n==[...Array(n).keys()].filter(a=>n%a<1).reduce((a,b)=>a+b)
Explanation (although it's pretty simple)
n=> //return function that takes n
n== //and returns if n is equal to
[...Array(n).keys()] //an array [0..(n-1)]...
.filter(a=>n%a<1) //where all of the elements that are not divisors of n are taken out...
.reduce((a,b)=>a+b) //summed up
Thanks to Jo King for the improvement!
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
thanks! Added that in
$endgroup$
– zevee
21 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Javascript, 62
n=>n==[...Array(n).keys()].filter(a=>n%a<1).reduce((a,b)=>a+b)
Explanation (although it's pretty simple)
n=> //return function that takes n
n== //and returns if n is equal to
[...Array(n).keys()] //an array [0..(n-1)]...
.filter(a=>n%a<1) //where all of the elements that are not divisors of n are taken out...
.reduce((a,b)=>a+b) //summed up
Thanks to Jo King for the improvement!
$endgroup$
Javascript, 62
n=>n==[...Array(n).keys()].filter(a=>n%a<1).reduce((a,b)=>a+b)
Explanation (although it's pretty simple)
n=> //return function that takes n
n== //and returns if n is equal to
[...Array(n).keys()] //an array [0..(n-1)]...
.filter(a=>n%a<1) //where all of the elements that are not divisors of n are taken out...
.reduce((a,b)=>a+b) //summed up
Thanks to Jo King for the improvement!
edited 21 mins ago
answered 30 mins ago
zeveezevee
22016
22016
$begingroup$
thanks! Added that in
$endgroup$
– zevee
21 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
thanks! Added that in
$endgroup$
– zevee
21 mins ago
$begingroup$
thanks! Added that in
$endgroup$
– zevee
21 mins ago
$begingroup$
thanks! Added that in
$endgroup$
– zevee
21 mins ago
add a comment |
If this is an answer to a challenge…
…Be sure to follow the challenge specification. However, please refrain from exploiting obvious loopholes. Answers abusing any of the standard loopholes are considered invalid. If you think a specification is unclear or underspecified, comment on the question instead.
…Try to optimize your score. For instance, answers to code-golf challenges should attempt to be as short as possible. You can always include a readable version of the code in addition to the competitive one.
Explanations of your answer make it more interesting to read and are very much encouraged.…Include a short header which indicates the language(s) of your code and its score, as defined by the challenge.
More generally…
…Please make sure to answer the question and provide sufficient detail.
…Avoid asking for help, clarification or responding to other answers (use comments instead).
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodegolf.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f181350%2fam-i-not-good-enough-for-you%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Wait, so truthy is for values that aren't perfect, and falsey is for values that are?
$endgroup$
– Esolanging Fruit
28 mins ago
$begingroup$
@EsolangingFruit Yes, though the actual output values don't really matter, so you can output true for perfect numbers if you wish
$endgroup$
– Jo King
26 mins ago
$begingroup$
Fair enough, but wording the challenge as "output whether it is not perfect" makes the test cases slightly confusing if you interpret "truthy" as meaning "values corresponding to true".
$endgroup$
– Esolanging Fruit
24 mins ago
$begingroup$
@EsolangingFruit Good point. I've renamed the test cases to
Imperfect
/Perfect
to make it clearer$endgroup$
– Jo King
23 mins ago