What is the best approach to determining clusivity in English texts?
$begingroup$
The problem is fairly simple: linguistically, how can we build a model to infer whether a given use of "we" (first person plural) implies including or excluding the listener/recipient? For example:
"We apologize for the inconvenience"
Versus
"We should apologize for the inconvenience"
The first means "we" on behalf of an organization, the second means "we" to include the recipient. There's a good Wikipedia page on the topic, because it's a well-known feature in other languages, but not most European ones.
I've not built this model, yet, but I can't find anyone else who has either, and yet it's an important factor for some of the analyses that I am working on.
What are the best approaches to this particular problem? Is there any prior work?
classification nlp
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The problem is fairly simple: linguistically, how can we build a model to infer whether a given use of "we" (first person plural) implies including or excluding the listener/recipient? For example:
"We apologize for the inconvenience"
Versus
"We should apologize for the inconvenience"
The first means "we" on behalf of an organization, the second means "we" to include the recipient. There's a good Wikipedia page on the topic, because it's a well-known feature in other languages, but not most European ones.
I've not built this model, yet, but I can't find anyone else who has either, and yet it's an important factor for some of the analyses that I am working on.
What are the best approaches to this particular problem? Is there any prior work?
classification nlp
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The problem is fairly simple: linguistically, how can we build a model to infer whether a given use of "we" (first person plural) implies including or excluding the listener/recipient? For example:
"We apologize for the inconvenience"
Versus
"We should apologize for the inconvenience"
The first means "we" on behalf of an organization, the second means "we" to include the recipient. There's a good Wikipedia page on the topic, because it's a well-known feature in other languages, but not most European ones.
I've not built this model, yet, but I can't find anyone else who has either, and yet it's an important factor for some of the analyses that I am working on.
What are the best approaches to this particular problem? Is there any prior work?
classification nlp
New contributor
$endgroup$
The problem is fairly simple: linguistically, how can we build a model to infer whether a given use of "we" (first person plural) implies including or excluding the listener/recipient? For example:
"We apologize for the inconvenience"
Versus
"We should apologize for the inconvenience"
The first means "we" on behalf of an organization, the second means "we" to include the recipient. There's a good Wikipedia page on the topic, because it's a well-known feature in other languages, but not most European ones.
I've not built this model, yet, but I can't find anyone else who has either, and yet it's an important factor for some of the analyses that I am working on.
What are the best approaches to this particular problem? Is there any prior work?
classification nlp
classification nlp
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 1 hour ago
Stuart WattStuart Watt
1011
1011
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "557"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Stuart Watt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f47118%2fwhat-is-the-best-approach-to-determining-clusivity-in-english-texts%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Stuart Watt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Stuart Watt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Stuart Watt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Stuart Watt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f47118%2fwhat-is-the-best-approach-to-determining-clusivity-in-english-texts%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown