Last employer continues to pay me












108















This is a very frustrating situation as the last employer continues to pay me despite my multiple calls to their helpline to rectify the situation. I've called the HR and Payroll department multiple times and filed reports.



When they ask for money back, it will cost me a lot of time and effort to resolve this as it has screwed up my taxes and retirement accounts etc. What is the advice on how to deal with this? I'm tired of telling them to stop paying me. This is very large corporation.










share|improve this question







New contributor




ste_kwr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 11





    What did their HR say when you called them to explain that you were no longer working there and still getting paid?

    – Kozaky
    2 days ago






  • 88





    "I'm sure they have records of all the calls." I wouldn't be so sure of that. And even if they do, it's probably a good idea to keep your own records.

    – a CVn
    2 days ago






  • 12





    You may wish to ask the law section of SE... but be sure to include your locale

    – UKMonkey
    2 days ago








  • 6





    It's not just on Law.se that country/state is important as @UKMonkey comments: it's important here too. Please do add a country/state tag to your question.

    – Andrew Leach
    2 days ago






  • 33





    Which company is this? I would like to work there for a few months, also...

    – vikingsteve
    yesterday
















108















This is a very frustrating situation as the last employer continues to pay me despite my multiple calls to their helpline to rectify the situation. I've called the HR and Payroll department multiple times and filed reports.



When they ask for money back, it will cost me a lot of time and effort to resolve this as it has screwed up my taxes and retirement accounts etc. What is the advice on how to deal with this? I'm tired of telling them to stop paying me. This is very large corporation.










share|improve this question







New contributor




ste_kwr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 11





    What did their HR say when you called them to explain that you were no longer working there and still getting paid?

    – Kozaky
    2 days ago






  • 88





    "I'm sure they have records of all the calls." I wouldn't be so sure of that. And even if they do, it's probably a good idea to keep your own records.

    – a CVn
    2 days ago






  • 12





    You may wish to ask the law section of SE... but be sure to include your locale

    – UKMonkey
    2 days ago








  • 6





    It's not just on Law.se that country/state is important as @UKMonkey comments: it's important here too. Please do add a country/state tag to your question.

    – Andrew Leach
    2 days ago






  • 33





    Which company is this? I would like to work there for a few months, also...

    – vikingsteve
    yesterday














108












108








108


11






This is a very frustrating situation as the last employer continues to pay me despite my multiple calls to their helpline to rectify the situation. I've called the HR and Payroll department multiple times and filed reports.



When they ask for money back, it will cost me a lot of time and effort to resolve this as it has screwed up my taxes and retirement accounts etc. What is the advice on how to deal with this? I'm tired of telling them to stop paying me. This is very large corporation.










share|improve this question







New contributor




ste_kwr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












This is a very frustrating situation as the last employer continues to pay me despite my multiple calls to their helpline to rectify the situation. I've called the HR and Payroll department multiple times and filed reports.



When they ask for money back, it will cost me a lot of time and effort to resolve this as it has screwed up my taxes and retirement accounts etc. What is the advice on how to deal with this? I'm tired of telling them to stop paying me. This is very large corporation.







payroll overpayment






share|improve this question







New contributor




ste_kwr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




ste_kwr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




ste_kwr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









ste_kwrste_kwr

601225




601225




New contributor




ste_kwr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





ste_kwr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






ste_kwr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 11





    What did their HR say when you called them to explain that you were no longer working there and still getting paid?

    – Kozaky
    2 days ago






  • 88





    "I'm sure they have records of all the calls." I wouldn't be so sure of that. And even if they do, it's probably a good idea to keep your own records.

    – a CVn
    2 days ago






  • 12





    You may wish to ask the law section of SE... but be sure to include your locale

    – UKMonkey
    2 days ago








  • 6





    It's not just on Law.se that country/state is important as @UKMonkey comments: it's important here too. Please do add a country/state tag to your question.

    – Andrew Leach
    2 days ago






  • 33





    Which company is this? I would like to work there for a few months, also...

    – vikingsteve
    yesterday














  • 11





    What did their HR say when you called them to explain that you were no longer working there and still getting paid?

    – Kozaky
    2 days ago






  • 88





    "I'm sure they have records of all the calls." I wouldn't be so sure of that. And even if they do, it's probably a good idea to keep your own records.

    – a CVn
    2 days ago






  • 12





    You may wish to ask the law section of SE... but be sure to include your locale

    – UKMonkey
    2 days ago








  • 6





    It's not just on Law.se that country/state is important as @UKMonkey comments: it's important here too. Please do add a country/state tag to your question.

    – Andrew Leach
    2 days ago






  • 33





    Which company is this? I would like to work there for a few months, also...

    – vikingsteve
    yesterday








11




11





What did their HR say when you called them to explain that you were no longer working there and still getting paid?

– Kozaky
2 days ago





What did their HR say when you called them to explain that you were no longer working there and still getting paid?

– Kozaky
2 days ago




88




88





"I'm sure they have records of all the calls." I wouldn't be so sure of that. And even if they do, it's probably a good idea to keep your own records.

– a CVn
2 days ago





"I'm sure they have records of all the calls." I wouldn't be so sure of that. And even if they do, it's probably a good idea to keep your own records.

– a CVn
2 days ago




12




12





You may wish to ask the law section of SE... but be sure to include your locale

– UKMonkey
2 days ago







You may wish to ask the law section of SE... but be sure to include your locale

– UKMonkey
2 days ago






6




6





It's not just on Law.se that country/state is important as @UKMonkey comments: it's important here too. Please do add a country/state tag to your question.

– Andrew Leach
2 days ago





It's not just on Law.se that country/state is important as @UKMonkey comments: it's important here too. Please do add a country/state tag to your question.

– Andrew Leach
2 days ago




33




33





Which company is this? I would like to work there for a few months, also...

– vikingsteve
yesterday





Which company is this? I would like to work there for a few months, also...

– vikingsteve
yesterday










11 Answers
11






active

oldest

votes


















152














Don’t spend the money. You should put it aside for when you are asked for the money back.



Inform the company that they are still paying you. A registered letter to their company address will be fine. Don’t offer anything. It’s their mess, they can clean it up.



If they paid for health insurance, pension etc. That’s their problem to get the money back. They will probably also pay taxes on your behalf; again it’s their problem to get that money back.



So if they ask for more than your paycheque your answer is no. If they ask for your paycheque back, you call the tax office and enquire how much they think you earned, and if there are problems you sort that out first.



Let’s say you make $5000 a month, you were paid 3 months when you worked elsewhere, and the tax office thinks you made $75000 instead of 60,000. Any extra cost you have is up to your company. So they sort it, or they can’t have all their money back.






share|improve this answer



















  • 257





    Put it aside in an interest-bearing account. You will be able to keep the interest, even if the pay eventually goes back.

    – Joe Strazzere
    2 days ago






  • 9





    This is an example where an offset mortgage would be really really helpful; as this will give you the highest interest rate on their money.

    – UKMonkey
    2 days ago






  • 9





    As for taxes this calendar year, assuming they sort it out, you will likely have a wash. As for last year you will have to count it as income in 2018, but a loss in 2019. You will want to get an accountant though because at least in the US losses don't count the same as income and when your former employer figures everything out you will want to have had an accountant tell you how much it screwed you so you can ask for compensation.

    – Bill Leeper
    2 days ago






  • 7





    BTW, if they did this via direct deposit, they will pull it back via direct deposit. Make sure the interest bearing account is setup to be drawn on as overdraft on your main account or your main account will get bled dry and you will be overdrawn and have a hug mess on your hands.

    – Bill Leeper
    2 days ago






  • 15





    I think this is a good answer but there needs to be serious emphasis on correcting your standing with your tax authority. Simply giving the employer their money back is a very different outcome from correcting your total income as far as taxes are concerned. You really need to be able to make sure you are paying taxes on only what you were paid and you need to make sure your employer is correctly representing your income on tax-related documentation (ie a W2 in the US).

    – dwizum
    2 days ago



















42














Don't spend the money.



In many jurisdictions, employers have the legal right to ask for any overpaid money to be given back. Keep the money they have paid you to one side.



Do keep trying to contact them. Skip HR and escalate it up the chain if you have to



If you have the contact details for your old manager (assuming they still work there), that would be a good place to start. It should trigger an internal investigation as to why HR or Accounts have screwed up so hard, at the very least.






share|improve this answer





















  • 15





    Yup. Maybe create a second bank account and have any money from "payee x" re-directed there automatically. That way it won't interfere with OPs finances

    – Richard
    2 days ago






  • 1





    Like Joe suggested in another comment, do your due diligence, make sure there's a paper trail of you trying to contact them, and then put the money in a savings account with an online bank (bc higher interest) or maybe a brokerage account that invests mostly in bonds, so you make a little money for your troubles. Then wait a little until they decide to respond to your emails. Hopefully it takes them a while and you make a decent amount of interest off of it. If you "keep trying to contact them" until they get annoyed and finally deal with the problem, you might make less money :)

    – pushkin
    2 days ago













  • @TasosPapastylianou provides an even better way to escalate this. Send them the following letter via certified mail "I am informing that these payments are unsolicited, and administering them costs me time and money. Please be advised that I will be charging an administrative fee for the processing of future payments, at the rate of X". Next time they pay you, send them a bill.

    – WetlabStudent
    23 hours ago



















30














Expect it to be clawed back at any time. Stop using the account.



Whichever account this money is arriving into, stop using it and open another checking account. At the same bank is fine. If you use checks, get new checks. Leave in the account exactly the amount you were overpaid, plus $100.



Let the money sit there, and continue to pile up as they keep paying you. Don't spend it, it is not yours.



At some point they will realize their error, and are likely to attempt a massive withdrawal for the entire overpay amount, or a series of reversals of each paycheck. Make sure these succeed, and the account finishes with nore than $0 in the account (unless you really enjoy bank fees). The bank will not do a merit removal of any bank fees, because they don't want to be involved in the dispute. They will do one courtesy removal if they haven't done any for you lately.



If the reversal of these payments overdraws your account, you will be liable to pay that immediately under pain of ChexSystems blacklisting. The bank is not party to the dispute, and doesn't care. If you think on a cash basis (money in my pocket is mine), that will get you in big big trouble because nobody in the financial industry thinks that way. Effectively you are a trustee of this misdirected money.



I want to keep it, though



Ok. Let's play our cards to make this as likely as possible.



You have a duty to mitigate damages



Since you are a party to a contract (the employment contract) you must actively help them correct their mistake. Nothing counts unless it is provable. So sitting on hold waiting for HR helpdesk is unlikely to help you, especially since in a dispute, the company has every incentive to destroy any call logs or evidence you called.*



"Mitigation" requires that you tell them what is happening. However you do not need to give them canoncal facts (which you may not even know**), you simply need to raise the alarm. And I say, "don't give away the store", don't hand them victories.



No notice counts unless it counts legally. What courts recognize is paper. In a perfect world you have your lawyer serve notice; your lawyer can testify that you did send it. In the real world, a certified letter with the pastel green card (not the bright green e-confirm) is what is called for. Write on top of the green card's instructions noting what the card is for, then get the green card back in the mail and hold onto it for dear life. That is your "get out of jail free" card.



Send two: to your company's regular mailing address and also to their legal address, which you can find on your state's corporations database, which is on the web.



The letter should look like this; the important thing is don't claim any facts and don't give away anything.




Company Inc.
Payroll / HR department



To whom it may concern,



My name is your name here, and worked at company name here until recently. I quit around date-here, I do not remember the exact date.



I continue to receive my normal paychecks from the company. I do not remember the exact terms of my severance and I do not have that paperwork handy, but I did not expect to be receiving these amounts.



Please check to be sure that I am receiving the appropriate amounts. If any money needs to be returned to the company, please contact me as soon as possible so I may prepare***. Please make sure this does not disrupt my healthcare, 401K, spending plans or my taxes.




Your "duty to notify" is now complete.



Now comes the hard part: waiting. With any luck, the company may just say "to heck with it" and let you keep the money. That is our best hope, but it's not bankable for a long time or unless they flat out tell you that's what they will do. Just forget that checking account even exists.



Taxes, 401K, health savings plan, etc.



FICA, the company will need to claw that back from FICA. Not your problem.



With regular taxes, 401k, health savings plan, etc., all those are deposit accounts. Let's suppose they overpaid your 401K by $2000 and your tax withholding by $1000. Both of these options are equivalent as far as the law goes (though the cash flow is different):




  • The old company claws back those payments from the IRS, brokerage, bank, etc. and then you earn new money with your new employer and pay that same amount into those deposit accounts.

  • They do not claw back those payments from IRS, brokerage, bank etc., ask you to reimburse the $3000 to the old company, then you reduce your new employer's contribution to those funds by $2000 and $1000, giving you that much more in net cash.


The second one is not worse except for the cash flow impacts to you, so it isn't an outrageous ask.



Tax withholding is not tax. It is a deposit into an account the IRS holds for you. It doesn't actually pay your taxes until you file your taxes on April 15.



What if it crosses tax years?



Now if this involved money last year, and it doesn't get resolved before you file your taxes... Then eventually, they are going to issue you an amended W-2, at least they better.



At that point, you amend your taxes. Get a blank set of tax forms and do your taxes again with the corrected data. Do the whole 1040 just like you did the first time. Then take your old 1040, the one you already filed, and lay them side by side. They will be the same, except a couple places, and the totals, of course.



IRS doesn't want all that. They want you to summarize the changes, in a form called 1040X, where you write in some numbers off your original 1040, some numbers off the new 1040, and the differences. Then you write a note explaining what changed. File that, and either you can ask them to send you a refund, or carry the credit forward to the next tax year, which means you need less withholding.



It is really achievable to file a 1040X, and I do it almost every year. Mind you I am not an H&R Block guy, I do file my own taxes. Because it is so doable, it's really your call whether to wait before filing your taxes, or just go ahead and file right away, get your refund, and then amend with 1040X later. Regardless, you must use the numbers in the W-2 provided, don't "correct" it to what you think it should be because that will instantly pop an audit. Or the IRS will just amend your taxes for you to the W-2 amount, and that will really make it complicated.



You can amend your taxes for up to 3 years after the due date.



If they never ask for the money back



After 6 months, if it's a significant sum, you may want to talk to a lawyer at this point. You are interested in the Statute of Limitations as your state's law applies it in this sutuation. It is typically 2-6 years. If they haven't asked for it back by the time the Statute has run, it's yours to keep.



The worst case is they successfully demand the money back 3+ years later, too late to amend your taxes. In that case you'll need tax help.







* they would be in big trouble if they were caught deleting your phone logs after they enter a legal fight with you, that would be destroying evidence. However companies work around this by having a "deletion policy" where they delete everything at some interval, e.g. Keeping phone logs only 30 days or something. That is legal.



** for me in one severance, compensation continued to roll in for several months because those were the terms of the severance (it was a layoff that had been planned a year in advance, this was incentive to continue to be loyal, not steal or vandalize on my way out). Don't accidentally tell them you don't want the severance.



*** They will ignore this request, most likely. Be prepared.






share|improve this answer





















  • 3





    very thorough and well thought out answer.

    – Richard U
    yesterday






  • 1





    On what basis "a massive withdrawal for the entire overpay amount, or a series of reversals of each paycheck." can be executed? I don't think you can come in to a bank and say you want to reverse transactions from 3 months ago, for any reason. Can they in US? I think it's only possible, if the actual bank made a mistake. Bank reversing such a transaction would make them part of dispute. I don't think they'd do anything without a legal order. Reversing transactions is not so simple. At least in my locale.

    – luk32
    yesterday













  • @luk32 it must vary by locale, my employer has done it. Here payments can be reversed - in fact much easier than arbitrarily withdrawing a random amount. Who's to say there isn't a court order? Happens all the time where judgments happen after people fail to be served because of one snafu or another. The server faked service, the serv-ee was not at the last known address, or it's a PMB. With electronic deposit, there's not much need for an employee to keep his employer updated as to his street address.

    – Harper
    yesterday













  • This is very interesting. Here employer cannot even deduct the money from future payments if you were still an employee. E.g. pay you double for half of year, and then say that it was a mistake and for the other half it will withhold salary. Australia: fairwork.gov.au/pay/deducting-pay-and-overpayments A court order that you are unaware of is another story. Ofc it could happen, but if bank reversed transactions based on a legal order, and you didn't know it, then you need a lawyer for yesterday. This is hard to imagine if you are at the correct address and contacted 1st.

    – luk32
    20 hours ago











  • Wow ! in What country such payments can be reversed ? (And the only legal basis is "ooops I did a wrong transfer" !). In Europe it is not that easy. Transactions are for real, you can't fake such a payment, or reverse it later.

    – JB.
    7 hours ago



















24














While this may be a pain to do, create a second bank account, transfer all of your funds, minus the errant pay, and keep the first account to hold only the errant transfers so that your funds are not blended.



Contact your local tax office for advice, and continue to pester HR, and CC senior management in the company so that they are made aware.



Truth be told, a friendly call from the taxman may make them move, so please do not skip that step.






share|improve this answer
























  • Is the separate account just to avoid you spending the money? For me at least what you suggest would be a complete pain due to all the payments set up to go from my main account that would also need moving if I wanted to use this account only to receive the errant funds. I would have thought it easier to set up a second account and just move the errant funds in as they arrive. The separation should be obvious enough if anybody looked - one transfer out of the same size as each transfer in...

    – Chris
    2 days ago






  • 9





    @Chris the separate account is to have the OP's money in an account the former employer can't reverse charges from.

    – Monty Harder
    2 days ago











  • @Chris setting up the second account would be to keep the funds separate, and would also make the bank records much more clear. I.E., if the only activity you had was the deposits, it would be very clear to demonstrate the overpayment amount.

    – Richard U
    2 days ago











  • @RichardU: That doesn't seem like its worth the effort to me but I guess your mileage may vary. A copy of the statement with a highlight of the relevant lines seems like it would do the job. And I'm not even sure in what situation the amount overpaid would be disputed anyway - are you thinking that the company might claim they overpaid by more than they actually did?

    – Chris
    2 days ago






  • 5





    @Chris you never know, they might want interest. They may attempt to freeze the account.... keeping the funds separate makes for fewer headaches

    – Richard U
    2 days ago



















20














The simplest way to avoid "having to pay the money back" is never to receive it.



I assume the payments are electronic transfers, since if they were posting you physical cheques all you have to do is not cash them.



Rather than opening a new account with your bank and getting the payments transferred, just request your bank to block them. Eventually the company will notice something is wrong and stop trying to make the payments. If they have paid advance tax on money that you never received and the tax collection system accepted those payments, that is their problem to sort out with the tax office, not yours.



Contacting a large company's general purpose "helpdesk" over a problem like this is a waste of time. The low-grade employees who man the phones won't have any defined procedure to follow, and they usually have little motivation to do a good job anyway. Their productivity target is to get rid of callers as fast as possible, not figure out how to handle questions where they don't have a pre-scripted answer. Making contact with your former manager or HR rep is more likely to achieve something.






share|improve this answer



















  • 12





    Not receiving the money doesn't help if the company is reporting to the tax office that you were paid it. And if you don't receive the money, you have much less chance of making the company pay for any expenses you occur in dealing with them.

    – Dragonel
    2 days ago






  • 2





    Doesn't actually resolve the question as it may very well be the case that even if the money isn't received in a bank account that fact is never recorded in the systems that report income and taxes to the government!

    – davidbak
    2 days ago






  • 2





    might work for a bank account, but for automatic deposits into something like a 401k, FSA, or other benefit accounts I shudder to think...

    – Michael
    2 days ago








  • 4





    I did not see the OP tag his question with US. An in the rest of the world paper cheques have all but disappearered in the last two decades.

    – Hennes
    yesterday



















12














I agree with other answers to not spend it.



As for screwing up your taxes and plans, you should put in your formal claim letter that accounting charges (hiring a professional accountant, transfert fees, ...) will be deduced from the money they sent you before returning it, as it was not your fault.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




inaliahgle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Stop using the phone to sort out things. It never works and there is no document trail. Send letters to HR with copies to CFO, COO, CEO.

    – CyberFonic
    yesterday











  • That's why formal claim letter comes in place!

    – inaliahgle
    21 hours ago



















8














Don't spend it until you consult a lawyer with expertise in local law. It might be preferable to spend it ASAP. "Don't spend it" is probably a nice hunch in good spirit, but this is a legal question with high dependence on jurisdiction. I wouldn't listen to internet people regarding this one.



There are jurisdictions where an erroneously awarded gain is a subject to be returned but only if the recipient is able to so do. I believe that this protects an unaware recipient from bearing consequences of spending the money thinking it was rightfully theirs. Especially since an employer can award bonuses. The collateral is that if you want to keep money it's best to spend it before you're called to return it. Opinions are "that's it's practically close to impossible to force employee to return money even if they are still employed. In practice though, it does happen often based on employees' goodwill."



Not very ethical probably, especially since you are aware of the mistake. On the other hand you can't be taxed for it, and keep it frozen; what if they silently refused to stop paying you =).



Consult a lawyer on your options and pick the one that you will feel the best with. Don't blindly think that making second account to keep tabs or acting in good will protect you and your best interest. You need to be sure what should you do.






share|improve this answer





















  • 16





    I don't see any possible scenario in which "don't spend the money" is bad advice. It's not your money, they will likely ask for it back, in what world would spending it be a good idea ?

    – xyious
    2 days ago






  • 1





    Any world where they can't garnish your wages.

    – Mazura
    2 days ago











  • @xyious I don't know how to be more explicit. There are cases, when you don't have to give it back if you can't. If you don't care about being nice, then it's better to spend it before they call for it. Anyway not speding it is not enough. No-one suggested immediate lawyer contact.

    – luk32
    2 days ago








  • 2





    Well you actually changed it in the answer to something I would find acceptable. "Don't spend it until you consult a lawyer" is good advice. (seems like the first line completely contradicting the 2nd line now, so I would just remove it anyway, but still acceptable)

    – xyious
    2 days ago











  • @xyious To be completely honest this was community edit. I didn't find it contradictory, but perhaps it was too contrived. I've added a sentence with clear statement, that it might be preferable to spend it ASAP. Hope it's fine now, thanks for the thoughts.

    – luk32
    yesterday





















6














I am someone who has experienced a very similar issue. I got overpaid £20,000 at my workplace, and I chased the payroll department for 2 years before I got them to even respond to my calls / letters / emails.



The only email that worked was the one that said "My employment is coming to an end and I am about to leave the country". I then received an incredibly rude letter along the lines of "it has just come to our attention that you owe us money and you need to pay asap or there will be consequences".



In the end I lost money over this affair because I had overpaid taxes in various forms because of this overpayment, and clearly it was nothing to do with my employer, I had to claim that tax back from the HMRC directly, a process which took another couple of years in itself of me going back and forth trying to resolve the issue, while trying to liaise with a (now uninterested) ex-payroll department for a paper trail.



I would treat this seriously and go down a legal route. "You are overpaying me money I don't want and it is causing me trouble. Please cease and desist. I have started a legal procedure."



You might even go down the 'administrative charges' route, i.e. "I would also like to inform you that these payments are unsolicited, and administering them costs me time and money. Please be advised that I will be charging an administrative fee for the processing of future payments, at the rate of £250/h". Next time they pay you, send them a bill. Ask your lawyer for advice, but apparently as long as you can prove the letter was received, then this is legit and legally binding. People have used this tactic against unsolicited TV licencing letters.



As for whether it's worth spending money to ask for legal advice, consider that even with whatever tax I managed to get back, I still lost about £1,000 from this story, not counting time, money, and petrol wasted going back and forth for 5 years to settle this business.






share|improve this answer































    5














    Keep the money unspent for now, you will be asked to reimburse it.



    Send a formal letter to the company with proof of receipt stating the issue and your willingness to pay back the wrongfully transferred money, so that you can prove you didn't actively try to steal money from them.
    Just to be on the safe side, you could also contact your bank telling them to refuse incoming transfer from your old company.






    share|improve this answer































      2














      Only mentioned on the side in comments is a more worrying scenario than simply sitting on a pile of money not yours, and that is that you may end up being taxed over that money in various ways.



      If the company reports the payments to the tax and social security agencies as taxable income you made, those guys are going to demand you pay taxes and social security premiums over it. And when you eventually pay the company back, don't expect the government to give that money back without a fight, if at all.



      Ditto with other things they may still be paying for. A health insurance for example, or accident insurance.



      I've had to deal with a related but different scenario where a company was in serious arrears paying the company health insurance plan, and the insurance company came after me personally to recover the premiums after 2 years. Expect things like that to come your way, because if their administration is as sloppy as it appears to be it's not unlikely that they for example stopped paying insurance premiums for you but forgot to cancel the insurance policies.






      share|improve this answer
























      • The government will just hand over the money when presented with an amended return and justification. If the company is paying insurance for the employee still, that's between the company and the insurance agency, since it's not money the OP even sees.

        – David Thornley
        yesterday



















      0














      Close the account so they can't pay anymore into your name. If there is no proof you received the money, I'd say there is no basis for the tax, which means it would be easier to claim it back even should it be taken.



      Seek an accountant, and get them to work out all the tax you would have overpaid as a result of that money entering your tax records so far.



      Send them this information via email or a letter. Record all calls but try to keep things only in written format where possible.



      Also, why not seek help from your previous superiors? It may be possible to do more from the inside.



      Let the government organisation responsible for the taxes know that this is happening. They may be able to help you more, it doesn't seem like you'd be the only one facing this. If it happened to you it is happening to somebody else.






      share|improve this answer
























      • My only objection to this answer is that it's not safe to assume closing the account means there's no basis for taxation. Taxes are withheld and reported to the government regardless of whether or not a paycheck gets deposited, I see how a failed direct deposit would be any different.

        – barbecue
        yesterday










      protected by Jane S yesterday



      Thank you for your interest in this question.
      Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



      Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














      11 Answers
      11






      active

      oldest

      votes








      11 Answers
      11






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      152














      Don’t spend the money. You should put it aside for when you are asked for the money back.



      Inform the company that they are still paying you. A registered letter to their company address will be fine. Don’t offer anything. It’s their mess, they can clean it up.



      If they paid for health insurance, pension etc. That’s their problem to get the money back. They will probably also pay taxes on your behalf; again it’s their problem to get that money back.



      So if they ask for more than your paycheque your answer is no. If they ask for your paycheque back, you call the tax office and enquire how much they think you earned, and if there are problems you sort that out first.



      Let’s say you make $5000 a month, you were paid 3 months when you worked elsewhere, and the tax office thinks you made $75000 instead of 60,000. Any extra cost you have is up to your company. So they sort it, or they can’t have all their money back.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 257





        Put it aside in an interest-bearing account. You will be able to keep the interest, even if the pay eventually goes back.

        – Joe Strazzere
        2 days ago






      • 9





        This is an example where an offset mortgage would be really really helpful; as this will give you the highest interest rate on their money.

        – UKMonkey
        2 days ago






      • 9





        As for taxes this calendar year, assuming they sort it out, you will likely have a wash. As for last year you will have to count it as income in 2018, but a loss in 2019. You will want to get an accountant though because at least in the US losses don't count the same as income and when your former employer figures everything out you will want to have had an accountant tell you how much it screwed you so you can ask for compensation.

        – Bill Leeper
        2 days ago






      • 7





        BTW, if they did this via direct deposit, they will pull it back via direct deposit. Make sure the interest bearing account is setup to be drawn on as overdraft on your main account or your main account will get bled dry and you will be overdrawn and have a hug mess on your hands.

        – Bill Leeper
        2 days ago






      • 15





        I think this is a good answer but there needs to be serious emphasis on correcting your standing with your tax authority. Simply giving the employer their money back is a very different outcome from correcting your total income as far as taxes are concerned. You really need to be able to make sure you are paying taxes on only what you were paid and you need to make sure your employer is correctly representing your income on tax-related documentation (ie a W2 in the US).

        – dwizum
        2 days ago
















      152














      Don’t spend the money. You should put it aside for when you are asked for the money back.



      Inform the company that they are still paying you. A registered letter to their company address will be fine. Don’t offer anything. It’s their mess, they can clean it up.



      If they paid for health insurance, pension etc. That’s their problem to get the money back. They will probably also pay taxes on your behalf; again it’s their problem to get that money back.



      So if they ask for more than your paycheque your answer is no. If they ask for your paycheque back, you call the tax office and enquire how much they think you earned, and if there are problems you sort that out first.



      Let’s say you make $5000 a month, you were paid 3 months when you worked elsewhere, and the tax office thinks you made $75000 instead of 60,000. Any extra cost you have is up to your company. So they sort it, or they can’t have all their money back.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 257





        Put it aside in an interest-bearing account. You will be able to keep the interest, even if the pay eventually goes back.

        – Joe Strazzere
        2 days ago






      • 9





        This is an example where an offset mortgage would be really really helpful; as this will give you the highest interest rate on their money.

        – UKMonkey
        2 days ago






      • 9





        As for taxes this calendar year, assuming they sort it out, you will likely have a wash. As for last year you will have to count it as income in 2018, but a loss in 2019. You will want to get an accountant though because at least in the US losses don't count the same as income and when your former employer figures everything out you will want to have had an accountant tell you how much it screwed you so you can ask for compensation.

        – Bill Leeper
        2 days ago






      • 7





        BTW, if they did this via direct deposit, they will pull it back via direct deposit. Make sure the interest bearing account is setup to be drawn on as overdraft on your main account or your main account will get bled dry and you will be overdrawn and have a hug mess on your hands.

        – Bill Leeper
        2 days ago






      • 15





        I think this is a good answer but there needs to be serious emphasis on correcting your standing with your tax authority. Simply giving the employer their money back is a very different outcome from correcting your total income as far as taxes are concerned. You really need to be able to make sure you are paying taxes on only what you were paid and you need to make sure your employer is correctly representing your income on tax-related documentation (ie a W2 in the US).

        – dwizum
        2 days ago














      152












      152








      152







      Don’t spend the money. You should put it aside for when you are asked for the money back.



      Inform the company that they are still paying you. A registered letter to their company address will be fine. Don’t offer anything. It’s their mess, they can clean it up.



      If they paid for health insurance, pension etc. That’s their problem to get the money back. They will probably also pay taxes on your behalf; again it’s their problem to get that money back.



      So if they ask for more than your paycheque your answer is no. If they ask for your paycheque back, you call the tax office and enquire how much they think you earned, and if there are problems you sort that out first.



      Let’s say you make $5000 a month, you were paid 3 months when you worked elsewhere, and the tax office thinks you made $75000 instead of 60,000. Any extra cost you have is up to your company. So they sort it, or they can’t have all their money back.






      share|improve this answer













      Don’t spend the money. You should put it aside for when you are asked for the money back.



      Inform the company that they are still paying you. A registered letter to their company address will be fine. Don’t offer anything. It’s their mess, they can clean it up.



      If they paid for health insurance, pension etc. That’s their problem to get the money back. They will probably also pay taxes on your behalf; again it’s their problem to get that money back.



      So if they ask for more than your paycheque your answer is no. If they ask for your paycheque back, you call the tax office and enquire how much they think you earned, and if there are problems you sort that out first.



      Let’s say you make $5000 a month, you were paid 3 months when you worked elsewhere, and the tax office thinks you made $75000 instead of 60,000. Any extra cost you have is up to your company. So they sort it, or they can’t have all their money back.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered 2 days ago









      gnasher729gnasher729

      84.8k39150268




      84.8k39150268








      • 257





        Put it aside in an interest-bearing account. You will be able to keep the interest, even if the pay eventually goes back.

        – Joe Strazzere
        2 days ago






      • 9





        This is an example where an offset mortgage would be really really helpful; as this will give you the highest interest rate on their money.

        – UKMonkey
        2 days ago






      • 9





        As for taxes this calendar year, assuming they sort it out, you will likely have a wash. As for last year you will have to count it as income in 2018, but a loss in 2019. You will want to get an accountant though because at least in the US losses don't count the same as income and when your former employer figures everything out you will want to have had an accountant tell you how much it screwed you so you can ask for compensation.

        – Bill Leeper
        2 days ago






      • 7





        BTW, if they did this via direct deposit, they will pull it back via direct deposit. Make sure the interest bearing account is setup to be drawn on as overdraft on your main account or your main account will get bled dry and you will be overdrawn and have a hug mess on your hands.

        – Bill Leeper
        2 days ago






      • 15





        I think this is a good answer but there needs to be serious emphasis on correcting your standing with your tax authority. Simply giving the employer their money back is a very different outcome from correcting your total income as far as taxes are concerned. You really need to be able to make sure you are paying taxes on only what you were paid and you need to make sure your employer is correctly representing your income on tax-related documentation (ie a W2 in the US).

        – dwizum
        2 days ago














      • 257





        Put it aside in an interest-bearing account. You will be able to keep the interest, even if the pay eventually goes back.

        – Joe Strazzere
        2 days ago






      • 9





        This is an example where an offset mortgage would be really really helpful; as this will give you the highest interest rate on their money.

        – UKMonkey
        2 days ago






      • 9





        As for taxes this calendar year, assuming they sort it out, you will likely have a wash. As for last year you will have to count it as income in 2018, but a loss in 2019. You will want to get an accountant though because at least in the US losses don't count the same as income and when your former employer figures everything out you will want to have had an accountant tell you how much it screwed you so you can ask for compensation.

        – Bill Leeper
        2 days ago






      • 7





        BTW, if they did this via direct deposit, they will pull it back via direct deposit. Make sure the interest bearing account is setup to be drawn on as overdraft on your main account or your main account will get bled dry and you will be overdrawn and have a hug mess on your hands.

        – Bill Leeper
        2 days ago






      • 15





        I think this is a good answer but there needs to be serious emphasis on correcting your standing with your tax authority. Simply giving the employer their money back is a very different outcome from correcting your total income as far as taxes are concerned. You really need to be able to make sure you are paying taxes on only what you were paid and you need to make sure your employer is correctly representing your income on tax-related documentation (ie a W2 in the US).

        – dwizum
        2 days ago








      257




      257





      Put it aside in an interest-bearing account. You will be able to keep the interest, even if the pay eventually goes back.

      – Joe Strazzere
      2 days ago





      Put it aside in an interest-bearing account. You will be able to keep the interest, even if the pay eventually goes back.

      – Joe Strazzere
      2 days ago




      9




      9





      This is an example where an offset mortgage would be really really helpful; as this will give you the highest interest rate on their money.

      – UKMonkey
      2 days ago





      This is an example where an offset mortgage would be really really helpful; as this will give you the highest interest rate on their money.

      – UKMonkey
      2 days ago




      9




      9





      As for taxes this calendar year, assuming they sort it out, you will likely have a wash. As for last year you will have to count it as income in 2018, but a loss in 2019. You will want to get an accountant though because at least in the US losses don't count the same as income and when your former employer figures everything out you will want to have had an accountant tell you how much it screwed you so you can ask for compensation.

      – Bill Leeper
      2 days ago





      As for taxes this calendar year, assuming they sort it out, you will likely have a wash. As for last year you will have to count it as income in 2018, but a loss in 2019. You will want to get an accountant though because at least in the US losses don't count the same as income and when your former employer figures everything out you will want to have had an accountant tell you how much it screwed you so you can ask for compensation.

      – Bill Leeper
      2 days ago




      7




      7





      BTW, if they did this via direct deposit, they will pull it back via direct deposit. Make sure the interest bearing account is setup to be drawn on as overdraft on your main account or your main account will get bled dry and you will be overdrawn and have a hug mess on your hands.

      – Bill Leeper
      2 days ago





      BTW, if they did this via direct deposit, they will pull it back via direct deposit. Make sure the interest bearing account is setup to be drawn on as overdraft on your main account or your main account will get bled dry and you will be overdrawn and have a hug mess on your hands.

      – Bill Leeper
      2 days ago




      15




      15





      I think this is a good answer but there needs to be serious emphasis on correcting your standing with your tax authority. Simply giving the employer their money back is a very different outcome from correcting your total income as far as taxes are concerned. You really need to be able to make sure you are paying taxes on only what you were paid and you need to make sure your employer is correctly representing your income on tax-related documentation (ie a W2 in the US).

      – dwizum
      2 days ago





      I think this is a good answer but there needs to be serious emphasis on correcting your standing with your tax authority. Simply giving the employer their money back is a very different outcome from correcting your total income as far as taxes are concerned. You really need to be able to make sure you are paying taxes on only what you were paid and you need to make sure your employer is correctly representing your income on tax-related documentation (ie a W2 in the US).

      – dwizum
      2 days ago













      42














      Don't spend the money.



      In many jurisdictions, employers have the legal right to ask for any overpaid money to be given back. Keep the money they have paid you to one side.



      Do keep trying to contact them. Skip HR and escalate it up the chain if you have to



      If you have the contact details for your old manager (assuming they still work there), that would be a good place to start. It should trigger an internal investigation as to why HR or Accounts have screwed up so hard, at the very least.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 15





        Yup. Maybe create a second bank account and have any money from "payee x" re-directed there automatically. That way it won't interfere with OPs finances

        – Richard
        2 days ago






      • 1





        Like Joe suggested in another comment, do your due diligence, make sure there's a paper trail of you trying to contact them, and then put the money in a savings account with an online bank (bc higher interest) or maybe a brokerage account that invests mostly in bonds, so you make a little money for your troubles. Then wait a little until they decide to respond to your emails. Hopefully it takes them a while and you make a decent amount of interest off of it. If you "keep trying to contact them" until they get annoyed and finally deal with the problem, you might make less money :)

        – pushkin
        2 days ago













      • @TasosPapastylianou provides an even better way to escalate this. Send them the following letter via certified mail "I am informing that these payments are unsolicited, and administering them costs me time and money. Please be advised that I will be charging an administrative fee for the processing of future payments, at the rate of X". Next time they pay you, send them a bill.

        – WetlabStudent
        23 hours ago
















      42














      Don't spend the money.



      In many jurisdictions, employers have the legal right to ask for any overpaid money to be given back. Keep the money they have paid you to one side.



      Do keep trying to contact them. Skip HR and escalate it up the chain if you have to



      If you have the contact details for your old manager (assuming they still work there), that would be a good place to start. It should trigger an internal investigation as to why HR or Accounts have screwed up so hard, at the very least.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 15





        Yup. Maybe create a second bank account and have any money from "payee x" re-directed there automatically. That way it won't interfere with OPs finances

        – Richard
        2 days ago






      • 1





        Like Joe suggested in another comment, do your due diligence, make sure there's a paper trail of you trying to contact them, and then put the money in a savings account with an online bank (bc higher interest) or maybe a brokerage account that invests mostly in bonds, so you make a little money for your troubles. Then wait a little until they decide to respond to your emails. Hopefully it takes them a while and you make a decent amount of interest off of it. If you "keep trying to contact them" until they get annoyed and finally deal with the problem, you might make less money :)

        – pushkin
        2 days ago













      • @TasosPapastylianou provides an even better way to escalate this. Send them the following letter via certified mail "I am informing that these payments are unsolicited, and administering them costs me time and money. Please be advised that I will be charging an administrative fee for the processing of future payments, at the rate of X". Next time they pay you, send them a bill.

        – WetlabStudent
        23 hours ago














      42












      42








      42







      Don't spend the money.



      In many jurisdictions, employers have the legal right to ask for any overpaid money to be given back. Keep the money they have paid you to one side.



      Do keep trying to contact them. Skip HR and escalate it up the chain if you have to



      If you have the contact details for your old manager (assuming they still work there), that would be a good place to start. It should trigger an internal investigation as to why HR or Accounts have screwed up so hard, at the very least.






      share|improve this answer















      Don't spend the money.



      In many jurisdictions, employers have the legal right to ask for any overpaid money to be given back. Keep the money they have paid you to one side.



      Do keep trying to contact them. Skip HR and escalate it up the chain if you have to



      If you have the contact details for your old manager (assuming they still work there), that would be a good place to start. It should trigger an internal investigation as to why HR or Accounts have screwed up so hard, at the very least.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 2 days ago

























      answered 2 days ago









      520520

      2,014314




      2,014314








      • 15





        Yup. Maybe create a second bank account and have any money from "payee x" re-directed there automatically. That way it won't interfere with OPs finances

        – Richard
        2 days ago






      • 1





        Like Joe suggested in another comment, do your due diligence, make sure there's a paper trail of you trying to contact them, and then put the money in a savings account with an online bank (bc higher interest) or maybe a brokerage account that invests mostly in bonds, so you make a little money for your troubles. Then wait a little until they decide to respond to your emails. Hopefully it takes them a while and you make a decent amount of interest off of it. If you "keep trying to contact them" until they get annoyed and finally deal with the problem, you might make less money :)

        – pushkin
        2 days ago













      • @TasosPapastylianou provides an even better way to escalate this. Send them the following letter via certified mail "I am informing that these payments are unsolicited, and administering them costs me time and money. Please be advised that I will be charging an administrative fee for the processing of future payments, at the rate of X". Next time they pay you, send them a bill.

        – WetlabStudent
        23 hours ago














      • 15





        Yup. Maybe create a second bank account and have any money from "payee x" re-directed there automatically. That way it won't interfere with OPs finances

        – Richard
        2 days ago






      • 1





        Like Joe suggested in another comment, do your due diligence, make sure there's a paper trail of you trying to contact them, and then put the money in a savings account with an online bank (bc higher interest) or maybe a brokerage account that invests mostly in bonds, so you make a little money for your troubles. Then wait a little until they decide to respond to your emails. Hopefully it takes them a while and you make a decent amount of interest off of it. If you "keep trying to contact them" until they get annoyed and finally deal with the problem, you might make less money :)

        – pushkin
        2 days ago













      • @TasosPapastylianou provides an even better way to escalate this. Send them the following letter via certified mail "I am informing that these payments are unsolicited, and administering them costs me time and money. Please be advised that I will be charging an administrative fee for the processing of future payments, at the rate of X". Next time they pay you, send them a bill.

        – WetlabStudent
        23 hours ago








      15




      15





      Yup. Maybe create a second bank account and have any money from "payee x" re-directed there automatically. That way it won't interfere with OPs finances

      – Richard
      2 days ago





      Yup. Maybe create a second bank account and have any money from "payee x" re-directed there automatically. That way it won't interfere with OPs finances

      – Richard
      2 days ago




      1




      1





      Like Joe suggested in another comment, do your due diligence, make sure there's a paper trail of you trying to contact them, and then put the money in a savings account with an online bank (bc higher interest) or maybe a brokerage account that invests mostly in bonds, so you make a little money for your troubles. Then wait a little until they decide to respond to your emails. Hopefully it takes them a while and you make a decent amount of interest off of it. If you "keep trying to contact them" until they get annoyed and finally deal with the problem, you might make less money :)

      – pushkin
      2 days ago







      Like Joe suggested in another comment, do your due diligence, make sure there's a paper trail of you trying to contact them, and then put the money in a savings account with an online bank (bc higher interest) or maybe a brokerage account that invests mostly in bonds, so you make a little money for your troubles. Then wait a little until they decide to respond to your emails. Hopefully it takes them a while and you make a decent amount of interest off of it. If you "keep trying to contact them" until they get annoyed and finally deal with the problem, you might make less money :)

      – pushkin
      2 days ago















      @TasosPapastylianou provides an even better way to escalate this. Send them the following letter via certified mail "I am informing that these payments are unsolicited, and administering them costs me time and money. Please be advised that I will be charging an administrative fee for the processing of future payments, at the rate of X". Next time they pay you, send them a bill.

      – WetlabStudent
      23 hours ago





      @TasosPapastylianou provides an even better way to escalate this. Send them the following letter via certified mail "I am informing that these payments are unsolicited, and administering them costs me time and money. Please be advised that I will be charging an administrative fee for the processing of future payments, at the rate of X". Next time they pay you, send them a bill.

      – WetlabStudent
      23 hours ago











      30














      Expect it to be clawed back at any time. Stop using the account.



      Whichever account this money is arriving into, stop using it and open another checking account. At the same bank is fine. If you use checks, get new checks. Leave in the account exactly the amount you were overpaid, plus $100.



      Let the money sit there, and continue to pile up as they keep paying you. Don't spend it, it is not yours.



      At some point they will realize their error, and are likely to attempt a massive withdrawal for the entire overpay amount, or a series of reversals of each paycheck. Make sure these succeed, and the account finishes with nore than $0 in the account (unless you really enjoy bank fees). The bank will not do a merit removal of any bank fees, because they don't want to be involved in the dispute. They will do one courtesy removal if they haven't done any for you lately.



      If the reversal of these payments overdraws your account, you will be liable to pay that immediately under pain of ChexSystems blacklisting. The bank is not party to the dispute, and doesn't care. If you think on a cash basis (money in my pocket is mine), that will get you in big big trouble because nobody in the financial industry thinks that way. Effectively you are a trustee of this misdirected money.



      I want to keep it, though



      Ok. Let's play our cards to make this as likely as possible.



      You have a duty to mitigate damages



      Since you are a party to a contract (the employment contract) you must actively help them correct their mistake. Nothing counts unless it is provable. So sitting on hold waiting for HR helpdesk is unlikely to help you, especially since in a dispute, the company has every incentive to destroy any call logs or evidence you called.*



      "Mitigation" requires that you tell them what is happening. However you do not need to give them canoncal facts (which you may not even know**), you simply need to raise the alarm. And I say, "don't give away the store", don't hand them victories.



      No notice counts unless it counts legally. What courts recognize is paper. In a perfect world you have your lawyer serve notice; your lawyer can testify that you did send it. In the real world, a certified letter with the pastel green card (not the bright green e-confirm) is what is called for. Write on top of the green card's instructions noting what the card is for, then get the green card back in the mail and hold onto it for dear life. That is your "get out of jail free" card.



      Send two: to your company's regular mailing address and also to their legal address, which you can find on your state's corporations database, which is on the web.



      The letter should look like this; the important thing is don't claim any facts and don't give away anything.




      Company Inc.
      Payroll / HR department



      To whom it may concern,



      My name is your name here, and worked at company name here until recently. I quit around date-here, I do not remember the exact date.



      I continue to receive my normal paychecks from the company. I do not remember the exact terms of my severance and I do not have that paperwork handy, but I did not expect to be receiving these amounts.



      Please check to be sure that I am receiving the appropriate amounts. If any money needs to be returned to the company, please contact me as soon as possible so I may prepare***. Please make sure this does not disrupt my healthcare, 401K, spending plans or my taxes.




      Your "duty to notify" is now complete.



      Now comes the hard part: waiting. With any luck, the company may just say "to heck with it" and let you keep the money. That is our best hope, but it's not bankable for a long time or unless they flat out tell you that's what they will do. Just forget that checking account even exists.



      Taxes, 401K, health savings plan, etc.



      FICA, the company will need to claw that back from FICA. Not your problem.



      With regular taxes, 401k, health savings plan, etc., all those are deposit accounts. Let's suppose they overpaid your 401K by $2000 and your tax withholding by $1000. Both of these options are equivalent as far as the law goes (though the cash flow is different):




      • The old company claws back those payments from the IRS, brokerage, bank, etc. and then you earn new money with your new employer and pay that same amount into those deposit accounts.

      • They do not claw back those payments from IRS, brokerage, bank etc., ask you to reimburse the $3000 to the old company, then you reduce your new employer's contribution to those funds by $2000 and $1000, giving you that much more in net cash.


      The second one is not worse except for the cash flow impacts to you, so it isn't an outrageous ask.



      Tax withholding is not tax. It is a deposit into an account the IRS holds for you. It doesn't actually pay your taxes until you file your taxes on April 15.



      What if it crosses tax years?



      Now if this involved money last year, and it doesn't get resolved before you file your taxes... Then eventually, they are going to issue you an amended W-2, at least they better.



      At that point, you amend your taxes. Get a blank set of tax forms and do your taxes again with the corrected data. Do the whole 1040 just like you did the first time. Then take your old 1040, the one you already filed, and lay them side by side. They will be the same, except a couple places, and the totals, of course.



      IRS doesn't want all that. They want you to summarize the changes, in a form called 1040X, where you write in some numbers off your original 1040, some numbers off the new 1040, and the differences. Then you write a note explaining what changed. File that, and either you can ask them to send you a refund, or carry the credit forward to the next tax year, which means you need less withholding.



      It is really achievable to file a 1040X, and I do it almost every year. Mind you I am not an H&R Block guy, I do file my own taxes. Because it is so doable, it's really your call whether to wait before filing your taxes, or just go ahead and file right away, get your refund, and then amend with 1040X later. Regardless, you must use the numbers in the W-2 provided, don't "correct" it to what you think it should be because that will instantly pop an audit. Or the IRS will just amend your taxes for you to the W-2 amount, and that will really make it complicated.



      You can amend your taxes for up to 3 years after the due date.



      If they never ask for the money back



      After 6 months, if it's a significant sum, you may want to talk to a lawyer at this point. You are interested in the Statute of Limitations as your state's law applies it in this sutuation. It is typically 2-6 years. If they haven't asked for it back by the time the Statute has run, it's yours to keep.



      The worst case is they successfully demand the money back 3+ years later, too late to amend your taxes. In that case you'll need tax help.







      * they would be in big trouble if they were caught deleting your phone logs after they enter a legal fight with you, that would be destroying evidence. However companies work around this by having a "deletion policy" where they delete everything at some interval, e.g. Keeping phone logs only 30 days or something. That is legal.



      ** for me in one severance, compensation continued to roll in for several months because those were the terms of the severance (it was a layoff that had been planned a year in advance, this was incentive to continue to be loyal, not steal or vandalize on my way out). Don't accidentally tell them you don't want the severance.



      *** They will ignore this request, most likely. Be prepared.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 3





        very thorough and well thought out answer.

        – Richard U
        yesterday






      • 1





        On what basis "a massive withdrawal for the entire overpay amount, or a series of reversals of each paycheck." can be executed? I don't think you can come in to a bank and say you want to reverse transactions from 3 months ago, for any reason. Can they in US? I think it's only possible, if the actual bank made a mistake. Bank reversing such a transaction would make them part of dispute. I don't think they'd do anything without a legal order. Reversing transactions is not so simple. At least in my locale.

        – luk32
        yesterday













      • @luk32 it must vary by locale, my employer has done it. Here payments can be reversed - in fact much easier than arbitrarily withdrawing a random amount. Who's to say there isn't a court order? Happens all the time where judgments happen after people fail to be served because of one snafu or another. The server faked service, the serv-ee was not at the last known address, or it's a PMB. With electronic deposit, there's not much need for an employee to keep his employer updated as to his street address.

        – Harper
        yesterday













      • This is very interesting. Here employer cannot even deduct the money from future payments if you were still an employee. E.g. pay you double for half of year, and then say that it was a mistake and for the other half it will withhold salary. Australia: fairwork.gov.au/pay/deducting-pay-and-overpayments A court order that you are unaware of is another story. Ofc it could happen, but if bank reversed transactions based on a legal order, and you didn't know it, then you need a lawyer for yesterday. This is hard to imagine if you are at the correct address and contacted 1st.

        – luk32
        20 hours ago











      • Wow ! in What country such payments can be reversed ? (And the only legal basis is "ooops I did a wrong transfer" !). In Europe it is not that easy. Transactions are for real, you can't fake such a payment, or reverse it later.

        – JB.
        7 hours ago
















      30














      Expect it to be clawed back at any time. Stop using the account.



      Whichever account this money is arriving into, stop using it and open another checking account. At the same bank is fine. If you use checks, get new checks. Leave in the account exactly the amount you were overpaid, plus $100.



      Let the money sit there, and continue to pile up as they keep paying you. Don't spend it, it is not yours.



      At some point they will realize their error, and are likely to attempt a massive withdrawal for the entire overpay amount, or a series of reversals of each paycheck. Make sure these succeed, and the account finishes with nore than $0 in the account (unless you really enjoy bank fees). The bank will not do a merit removal of any bank fees, because they don't want to be involved in the dispute. They will do one courtesy removal if they haven't done any for you lately.



      If the reversal of these payments overdraws your account, you will be liable to pay that immediately under pain of ChexSystems blacklisting. The bank is not party to the dispute, and doesn't care. If you think on a cash basis (money in my pocket is mine), that will get you in big big trouble because nobody in the financial industry thinks that way. Effectively you are a trustee of this misdirected money.



      I want to keep it, though



      Ok. Let's play our cards to make this as likely as possible.



      You have a duty to mitigate damages



      Since you are a party to a contract (the employment contract) you must actively help them correct their mistake. Nothing counts unless it is provable. So sitting on hold waiting for HR helpdesk is unlikely to help you, especially since in a dispute, the company has every incentive to destroy any call logs or evidence you called.*



      "Mitigation" requires that you tell them what is happening. However you do not need to give them canoncal facts (which you may not even know**), you simply need to raise the alarm. And I say, "don't give away the store", don't hand them victories.



      No notice counts unless it counts legally. What courts recognize is paper. In a perfect world you have your lawyer serve notice; your lawyer can testify that you did send it. In the real world, a certified letter with the pastel green card (not the bright green e-confirm) is what is called for. Write on top of the green card's instructions noting what the card is for, then get the green card back in the mail and hold onto it for dear life. That is your "get out of jail free" card.



      Send two: to your company's regular mailing address and also to their legal address, which you can find on your state's corporations database, which is on the web.



      The letter should look like this; the important thing is don't claim any facts and don't give away anything.




      Company Inc.
      Payroll / HR department



      To whom it may concern,



      My name is your name here, and worked at company name here until recently. I quit around date-here, I do not remember the exact date.



      I continue to receive my normal paychecks from the company. I do not remember the exact terms of my severance and I do not have that paperwork handy, but I did not expect to be receiving these amounts.



      Please check to be sure that I am receiving the appropriate amounts. If any money needs to be returned to the company, please contact me as soon as possible so I may prepare***. Please make sure this does not disrupt my healthcare, 401K, spending plans or my taxes.




      Your "duty to notify" is now complete.



      Now comes the hard part: waiting. With any luck, the company may just say "to heck with it" and let you keep the money. That is our best hope, but it's not bankable for a long time or unless they flat out tell you that's what they will do. Just forget that checking account even exists.



      Taxes, 401K, health savings plan, etc.



      FICA, the company will need to claw that back from FICA. Not your problem.



      With regular taxes, 401k, health savings plan, etc., all those are deposit accounts. Let's suppose they overpaid your 401K by $2000 and your tax withholding by $1000. Both of these options are equivalent as far as the law goes (though the cash flow is different):




      • The old company claws back those payments from the IRS, brokerage, bank, etc. and then you earn new money with your new employer and pay that same amount into those deposit accounts.

      • They do not claw back those payments from IRS, brokerage, bank etc., ask you to reimburse the $3000 to the old company, then you reduce your new employer's contribution to those funds by $2000 and $1000, giving you that much more in net cash.


      The second one is not worse except for the cash flow impacts to you, so it isn't an outrageous ask.



      Tax withholding is not tax. It is a deposit into an account the IRS holds for you. It doesn't actually pay your taxes until you file your taxes on April 15.



      What if it crosses tax years?



      Now if this involved money last year, and it doesn't get resolved before you file your taxes... Then eventually, they are going to issue you an amended W-2, at least they better.



      At that point, you amend your taxes. Get a blank set of tax forms and do your taxes again with the corrected data. Do the whole 1040 just like you did the first time. Then take your old 1040, the one you already filed, and lay them side by side. They will be the same, except a couple places, and the totals, of course.



      IRS doesn't want all that. They want you to summarize the changes, in a form called 1040X, where you write in some numbers off your original 1040, some numbers off the new 1040, and the differences. Then you write a note explaining what changed. File that, and either you can ask them to send you a refund, or carry the credit forward to the next tax year, which means you need less withholding.



      It is really achievable to file a 1040X, and I do it almost every year. Mind you I am not an H&R Block guy, I do file my own taxes. Because it is so doable, it's really your call whether to wait before filing your taxes, or just go ahead and file right away, get your refund, and then amend with 1040X later. Regardless, you must use the numbers in the W-2 provided, don't "correct" it to what you think it should be because that will instantly pop an audit. Or the IRS will just amend your taxes for you to the W-2 amount, and that will really make it complicated.



      You can amend your taxes for up to 3 years after the due date.



      If they never ask for the money back



      After 6 months, if it's a significant sum, you may want to talk to a lawyer at this point. You are interested in the Statute of Limitations as your state's law applies it in this sutuation. It is typically 2-6 years. If they haven't asked for it back by the time the Statute has run, it's yours to keep.



      The worst case is they successfully demand the money back 3+ years later, too late to amend your taxes. In that case you'll need tax help.







      * they would be in big trouble if they were caught deleting your phone logs after they enter a legal fight with you, that would be destroying evidence. However companies work around this by having a "deletion policy" where they delete everything at some interval, e.g. Keeping phone logs only 30 days or something. That is legal.



      ** for me in one severance, compensation continued to roll in for several months because those were the terms of the severance (it was a layoff that had been planned a year in advance, this was incentive to continue to be loyal, not steal or vandalize on my way out). Don't accidentally tell them you don't want the severance.



      *** They will ignore this request, most likely. Be prepared.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 3





        very thorough and well thought out answer.

        – Richard U
        yesterday






      • 1





        On what basis "a massive withdrawal for the entire overpay amount, or a series of reversals of each paycheck." can be executed? I don't think you can come in to a bank and say you want to reverse transactions from 3 months ago, for any reason. Can they in US? I think it's only possible, if the actual bank made a mistake. Bank reversing such a transaction would make them part of dispute. I don't think they'd do anything without a legal order. Reversing transactions is not so simple. At least in my locale.

        – luk32
        yesterday













      • @luk32 it must vary by locale, my employer has done it. Here payments can be reversed - in fact much easier than arbitrarily withdrawing a random amount. Who's to say there isn't a court order? Happens all the time where judgments happen after people fail to be served because of one snafu or another. The server faked service, the serv-ee was not at the last known address, or it's a PMB. With electronic deposit, there's not much need for an employee to keep his employer updated as to his street address.

        – Harper
        yesterday













      • This is very interesting. Here employer cannot even deduct the money from future payments if you were still an employee. E.g. pay you double for half of year, and then say that it was a mistake and for the other half it will withhold salary. Australia: fairwork.gov.au/pay/deducting-pay-and-overpayments A court order that you are unaware of is another story. Ofc it could happen, but if bank reversed transactions based on a legal order, and you didn't know it, then you need a lawyer for yesterday. This is hard to imagine if you are at the correct address and contacted 1st.

        – luk32
        20 hours ago











      • Wow ! in What country such payments can be reversed ? (And the only legal basis is "ooops I did a wrong transfer" !). In Europe it is not that easy. Transactions are for real, you can't fake such a payment, or reverse it later.

        – JB.
        7 hours ago














      30












      30








      30







      Expect it to be clawed back at any time. Stop using the account.



      Whichever account this money is arriving into, stop using it and open another checking account. At the same bank is fine. If you use checks, get new checks. Leave in the account exactly the amount you were overpaid, plus $100.



      Let the money sit there, and continue to pile up as they keep paying you. Don't spend it, it is not yours.



      At some point they will realize their error, and are likely to attempt a massive withdrawal for the entire overpay amount, or a series of reversals of each paycheck. Make sure these succeed, and the account finishes with nore than $0 in the account (unless you really enjoy bank fees). The bank will not do a merit removal of any bank fees, because they don't want to be involved in the dispute. They will do one courtesy removal if they haven't done any for you lately.



      If the reversal of these payments overdraws your account, you will be liable to pay that immediately under pain of ChexSystems blacklisting. The bank is not party to the dispute, and doesn't care. If you think on a cash basis (money in my pocket is mine), that will get you in big big trouble because nobody in the financial industry thinks that way. Effectively you are a trustee of this misdirected money.



      I want to keep it, though



      Ok. Let's play our cards to make this as likely as possible.



      You have a duty to mitigate damages



      Since you are a party to a contract (the employment contract) you must actively help them correct their mistake. Nothing counts unless it is provable. So sitting on hold waiting for HR helpdesk is unlikely to help you, especially since in a dispute, the company has every incentive to destroy any call logs or evidence you called.*



      "Mitigation" requires that you tell them what is happening. However you do not need to give them canoncal facts (which you may not even know**), you simply need to raise the alarm. And I say, "don't give away the store", don't hand them victories.



      No notice counts unless it counts legally. What courts recognize is paper. In a perfect world you have your lawyer serve notice; your lawyer can testify that you did send it. In the real world, a certified letter with the pastel green card (not the bright green e-confirm) is what is called for. Write on top of the green card's instructions noting what the card is for, then get the green card back in the mail and hold onto it for dear life. That is your "get out of jail free" card.



      Send two: to your company's regular mailing address and also to their legal address, which you can find on your state's corporations database, which is on the web.



      The letter should look like this; the important thing is don't claim any facts and don't give away anything.




      Company Inc.
      Payroll / HR department



      To whom it may concern,



      My name is your name here, and worked at company name here until recently. I quit around date-here, I do not remember the exact date.



      I continue to receive my normal paychecks from the company. I do not remember the exact terms of my severance and I do not have that paperwork handy, but I did not expect to be receiving these amounts.



      Please check to be sure that I am receiving the appropriate amounts. If any money needs to be returned to the company, please contact me as soon as possible so I may prepare***. Please make sure this does not disrupt my healthcare, 401K, spending plans or my taxes.




      Your "duty to notify" is now complete.



      Now comes the hard part: waiting. With any luck, the company may just say "to heck with it" and let you keep the money. That is our best hope, but it's not bankable for a long time or unless they flat out tell you that's what they will do. Just forget that checking account even exists.



      Taxes, 401K, health savings plan, etc.



      FICA, the company will need to claw that back from FICA. Not your problem.



      With regular taxes, 401k, health savings plan, etc., all those are deposit accounts. Let's suppose they overpaid your 401K by $2000 and your tax withholding by $1000. Both of these options are equivalent as far as the law goes (though the cash flow is different):




      • The old company claws back those payments from the IRS, brokerage, bank, etc. and then you earn new money with your new employer and pay that same amount into those deposit accounts.

      • They do not claw back those payments from IRS, brokerage, bank etc., ask you to reimburse the $3000 to the old company, then you reduce your new employer's contribution to those funds by $2000 and $1000, giving you that much more in net cash.


      The second one is not worse except for the cash flow impacts to you, so it isn't an outrageous ask.



      Tax withholding is not tax. It is a deposit into an account the IRS holds for you. It doesn't actually pay your taxes until you file your taxes on April 15.



      What if it crosses tax years?



      Now if this involved money last year, and it doesn't get resolved before you file your taxes... Then eventually, they are going to issue you an amended W-2, at least they better.



      At that point, you amend your taxes. Get a blank set of tax forms and do your taxes again with the corrected data. Do the whole 1040 just like you did the first time. Then take your old 1040, the one you already filed, and lay them side by side. They will be the same, except a couple places, and the totals, of course.



      IRS doesn't want all that. They want you to summarize the changes, in a form called 1040X, where you write in some numbers off your original 1040, some numbers off the new 1040, and the differences. Then you write a note explaining what changed. File that, and either you can ask them to send you a refund, or carry the credit forward to the next tax year, which means you need less withholding.



      It is really achievable to file a 1040X, and I do it almost every year. Mind you I am not an H&R Block guy, I do file my own taxes. Because it is so doable, it's really your call whether to wait before filing your taxes, or just go ahead and file right away, get your refund, and then amend with 1040X later. Regardless, you must use the numbers in the W-2 provided, don't "correct" it to what you think it should be because that will instantly pop an audit. Or the IRS will just amend your taxes for you to the W-2 amount, and that will really make it complicated.



      You can amend your taxes for up to 3 years after the due date.



      If they never ask for the money back



      After 6 months, if it's a significant sum, you may want to talk to a lawyer at this point. You are interested in the Statute of Limitations as your state's law applies it in this sutuation. It is typically 2-6 years. If they haven't asked for it back by the time the Statute has run, it's yours to keep.



      The worst case is they successfully demand the money back 3+ years later, too late to amend your taxes. In that case you'll need tax help.







      * they would be in big trouble if they were caught deleting your phone logs after they enter a legal fight with you, that would be destroying evidence. However companies work around this by having a "deletion policy" where they delete everything at some interval, e.g. Keeping phone logs only 30 days or something. That is legal.



      ** for me in one severance, compensation continued to roll in for several months because those were the terms of the severance (it was a layoff that had been planned a year in advance, this was incentive to continue to be loyal, not steal or vandalize on my way out). Don't accidentally tell them you don't want the severance.



      *** They will ignore this request, most likely. Be prepared.






      share|improve this answer















      Expect it to be clawed back at any time. Stop using the account.



      Whichever account this money is arriving into, stop using it and open another checking account. At the same bank is fine. If you use checks, get new checks. Leave in the account exactly the amount you were overpaid, plus $100.



      Let the money sit there, and continue to pile up as they keep paying you. Don't spend it, it is not yours.



      At some point they will realize their error, and are likely to attempt a massive withdrawal for the entire overpay amount, or a series of reversals of each paycheck. Make sure these succeed, and the account finishes with nore than $0 in the account (unless you really enjoy bank fees). The bank will not do a merit removal of any bank fees, because they don't want to be involved in the dispute. They will do one courtesy removal if they haven't done any for you lately.



      If the reversal of these payments overdraws your account, you will be liable to pay that immediately under pain of ChexSystems blacklisting. The bank is not party to the dispute, and doesn't care. If you think on a cash basis (money in my pocket is mine), that will get you in big big trouble because nobody in the financial industry thinks that way. Effectively you are a trustee of this misdirected money.



      I want to keep it, though



      Ok. Let's play our cards to make this as likely as possible.



      You have a duty to mitigate damages



      Since you are a party to a contract (the employment contract) you must actively help them correct their mistake. Nothing counts unless it is provable. So sitting on hold waiting for HR helpdesk is unlikely to help you, especially since in a dispute, the company has every incentive to destroy any call logs or evidence you called.*



      "Mitigation" requires that you tell them what is happening. However you do not need to give them canoncal facts (which you may not even know**), you simply need to raise the alarm. And I say, "don't give away the store", don't hand them victories.



      No notice counts unless it counts legally. What courts recognize is paper. In a perfect world you have your lawyer serve notice; your lawyer can testify that you did send it. In the real world, a certified letter with the pastel green card (not the bright green e-confirm) is what is called for. Write on top of the green card's instructions noting what the card is for, then get the green card back in the mail and hold onto it for dear life. That is your "get out of jail free" card.



      Send two: to your company's regular mailing address and also to their legal address, which you can find on your state's corporations database, which is on the web.



      The letter should look like this; the important thing is don't claim any facts and don't give away anything.




      Company Inc.
      Payroll / HR department



      To whom it may concern,



      My name is your name here, and worked at company name here until recently. I quit around date-here, I do not remember the exact date.



      I continue to receive my normal paychecks from the company. I do not remember the exact terms of my severance and I do not have that paperwork handy, but I did not expect to be receiving these amounts.



      Please check to be sure that I am receiving the appropriate amounts. If any money needs to be returned to the company, please contact me as soon as possible so I may prepare***. Please make sure this does not disrupt my healthcare, 401K, spending plans or my taxes.




      Your "duty to notify" is now complete.



      Now comes the hard part: waiting. With any luck, the company may just say "to heck with it" and let you keep the money. That is our best hope, but it's not bankable for a long time or unless they flat out tell you that's what they will do. Just forget that checking account even exists.



      Taxes, 401K, health savings plan, etc.



      FICA, the company will need to claw that back from FICA. Not your problem.



      With regular taxes, 401k, health savings plan, etc., all those are deposit accounts. Let's suppose they overpaid your 401K by $2000 and your tax withholding by $1000. Both of these options are equivalent as far as the law goes (though the cash flow is different):




      • The old company claws back those payments from the IRS, brokerage, bank, etc. and then you earn new money with your new employer and pay that same amount into those deposit accounts.

      • They do not claw back those payments from IRS, brokerage, bank etc., ask you to reimburse the $3000 to the old company, then you reduce your new employer's contribution to those funds by $2000 and $1000, giving you that much more in net cash.


      The second one is not worse except for the cash flow impacts to you, so it isn't an outrageous ask.



      Tax withholding is not tax. It is a deposit into an account the IRS holds for you. It doesn't actually pay your taxes until you file your taxes on April 15.



      What if it crosses tax years?



      Now if this involved money last year, and it doesn't get resolved before you file your taxes... Then eventually, they are going to issue you an amended W-2, at least they better.



      At that point, you amend your taxes. Get a blank set of tax forms and do your taxes again with the corrected data. Do the whole 1040 just like you did the first time. Then take your old 1040, the one you already filed, and lay them side by side. They will be the same, except a couple places, and the totals, of course.



      IRS doesn't want all that. They want you to summarize the changes, in a form called 1040X, where you write in some numbers off your original 1040, some numbers off the new 1040, and the differences. Then you write a note explaining what changed. File that, and either you can ask them to send you a refund, or carry the credit forward to the next tax year, which means you need less withholding.



      It is really achievable to file a 1040X, and I do it almost every year. Mind you I am not an H&R Block guy, I do file my own taxes. Because it is so doable, it's really your call whether to wait before filing your taxes, or just go ahead and file right away, get your refund, and then amend with 1040X later. Regardless, you must use the numbers in the W-2 provided, don't "correct" it to what you think it should be because that will instantly pop an audit. Or the IRS will just amend your taxes for you to the W-2 amount, and that will really make it complicated.



      You can amend your taxes for up to 3 years after the due date.



      If they never ask for the money back



      After 6 months, if it's a significant sum, you may want to talk to a lawyer at this point. You are interested in the Statute of Limitations as your state's law applies it in this sutuation. It is typically 2-6 years. If they haven't asked for it back by the time the Statute has run, it's yours to keep.



      The worst case is they successfully demand the money back 3+ years later, too late to amend your taxes. In that case you'll need tax help.







      * they would be in big trouble if they were caught deleting your phone logs after they enter a legal fight with you, that would be destroying evidence. However companies work around this by having a "deletion policy" where they delete everything at some interval, e.g. Keeping phone logs only 30 days or something. That is legal.



      ** for me in one severance, compensation continued to roll in for several months because those were the terms of the severance (it was a layoff that had been planned a year in advance, this was incentive to continue to be loyal, not steal or vandalize on my way out). Don't accidentally tell them you don't want the severance.



      *** They will ignore this request, most likely. Be prepared.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited yesterday

























      answered 2 days ago









      HarperHarper

      3,5191616




      3,5191616








      • 3





        very thorough and well thought out answer.

        – Richard U
        yesterday






      • 1





        On what basis "a massive withdrawal for the entire overpay amount, or a series of reversals of each paycheck." can be executed? I don't think you can come in to a bank and say you want to reverse transactions from 3 months ago, for any reason. Can they in US? I think it's only possible, if the actual bank made a mistake. Bank reversing such a transaction would make them part of dispute. I don't think they'd do anything without a legal order. Reversing transactions is not so simple. At least in my locale.

        – luk32
        yesterday













      • @luk32 it must vary by locale, my employer has done it. Here payments can be reversed - in fact much easier than arbitrarily withdrawing a random amount. Who's to say there isn't a court order? Happens all the time where judgments happen after people fail to be served because of one snafu or another. The server faked service, the serv-ee was not at the last known address, or it's a PMB. With electronic deposit, there's not much need for an employee to keep his employer updated as to his street address.

        – Harper
        yesterday













      • This is very interesting. Here employer cannot even deduct the money from future payments if you were still an employee. E.g. pay you double for half of year, and then say that it was a mistake and for the other half it will withhold salary. Australia: fairwork.gov.au/pay/deducting-pay-and-overpayments A court order that you are unaware of is another story. Ofc it could happen, but if bank reversed transactions based on a legal order, and you didn't know it, then you need a lawyer for yesterday. This is hard to imagine if you are at the correct address and contacted 1st.

        – luk32
        20 hours ago











      • Wow ! in What country such payments can be reversed ? (And the only legal basis is "ooops I did a wrong transfer" !). In Europe it is not that easy. Transactions are for real, you can't fake such a payment, or reverse it later.

        – JB.
        7 hours ago














      • 3





        very thorough and well thought out answer.

        – Richard U
        yesterday






      • 1





        On what basis "a massive withdrawal for the entire overpay amount, or a series of reversals of each paycheck." can be executed? I don't think you can come in to a bank and say you want to reverse transactions from 3 months ago, for any reason. Can they in US? I think it's only possible, if the actual bank made a mistake. Bank reversing such a transaction would make them part of dispute. I don't think they'd do anything without a legal order. Reversing transactions is not so simple. At least in my locale.

        – luk32
        yesterday













      • @luk32 it must vary by locale, my employer has done it. Here payments can be reversed - in fact much easier than arbitrarily withdrawing a random amount. Who's to say there isn't a court order? Happens all the time where judgments happen after people fail to be served because of one snafu or another. The server faked service, the serv-ee was not at the last known address, or it's a PMB. With electronic deposit, there's not much need for an employee to keep his employer updated as to his street address.

        – Harper
        yesterday













      • This is very interesting. Here employer cannot even deduct the money from future payments if you were still an employee. E.g. pay you double for half of year, and then say that it was a mistake and for the other half it will withhold salary. Australia: fairwork.gov.au/pay/deducting-pay-and-overpayments A court order that you are unaware of is another story. Ofc it could happen, but if bank reversed transactions based on a legal order, and you didn't know it, then you need a lawyer for yesterday. This is hard to imagine if you are at the correct address and contacted 1st.

        – luk32
        20 hours ago











      • Wow ! in What country such payments can be reversed ? (And the only legal basis is "ooops I did a wrong transfer" !). In Europe it is not that easy. Transactions are for real, you can't fake such a payment, or reverse it later.

        – JB.
        7 hours ago








      3




      3





      very thorough and well thought out answer.

      – Richard U
      yesterday





      very thorough and well thought out answer.

      – Richard U
      yesterday




      1




      1





      On what basis "a massive withdrawal for the entire overpay amount, or a series of reversals of each paycheck." can be executed? I don't think you can come in to a bank and say you want to reverse transactions from 3 months ago, for any reason. Can they in US? I think it's only possible, if the actual bank made a mistake. Bank reversing such a transaction would make them part of dispute. I don't think they'd do anything without a legal order. Reversing transactions is not so simple. At least in my locale.

      – luk32
      yesterday







      On what basis "a massive withdrawal for the entire overpay amount, or a series of reversals of each paycheck." can be executed? I don't think you can come in to a bank and say you want to reverse transactions from 3 months ago, for any reason. Can they in US? I think it's only possible, if the actual bank made a mistake. Bank reversing such a transaction would make them part of dispute. I don't think they'd do anything without a legal order. Reversing transactions is not so simple. At least in my locale.

      – luk32
      yesterday















      @luk32 it must vary by locale, my employer has done it. Here payments can be reversed - in fact much easier than arbitrarily withdrawing a random amount. Who's to say there isn't a court order? Happens all the time where judgments happen after people fail to be served because of one snafu or another. The server faked service, the serv-ee was not at the last known address, or it's a PMB. With electronic deposit, there's not much need for an employee to keep his employer updated as to his street address.

      – Harper
      yesterday







      @luk32 it must vary by locale, my employer has done it. Here payments can be reversed - in fact much easier than arbitrarily withdrawing a random amount. Who's to say there isn't a court order? Happens all the time where judgments happen after people fail to be served because of one snafu or another. The server faked service, the serv-ee was not at the last known address, or it's a PMB. With electronic deposit, there's not much need for an employee to keep his employer updated as to his street address.

      – Harper
      yesterday















      This is very interesting. Here employer cannot even deduct the money from future payments if you were still an employee. E.g. pay you double for half of year, and then say that it was a mistake and for the other half it will withhold salary. Australia: fairwork.gov.au/pay/deducting-pay-and-overpayments A court order that you are unaware of is another story. Ofc it could happen, but if bank reversed transactions based on a legal order, and you didn't know it, then you need a lawyer for yesterday. This is hard to imagine if you are at the correct address and contacted 1st.

      – luk32
      20 hours ago





      This is very interesting. Here employer cannot even deduct the money from future payments if you were still an employee. E.g. pay you double for half of year, and then say that it was a mistake and for the other half it will withhold salary. Australia: fairwork.gov.au/pay/deducting-pay-and-overpayments A court order that you are unaware of is another story. Ofc it could happen, but if bank reversed transactions based on a legal order, and you didn't know it, then you need a lawyer for yesterday. This is hard to imagine if you are at the correct address and contacted 1st.

      – luk32
      20 hours ago













      Wow ! in What country such payments can be reversed ? (And the only legal basis is "ooops I did a wrong transfer" !). In Europe it is not that easy. Transactions are for real, you can't fake such a payment, or reverse it later.

      – JB.
      7 hours ago





      Wow ! in What country such payments can be reversed ? (And the only legal basis is "ooops I did a wrong transfer" !). In Europe it is not that easy. Transactions are for real, you can't fake such a payment, or reverse it later.

      – JB.
      7 hours ago











      24














      While this may be a pain to do, create a second bank account, transfer all of your funds, minus the errant pay, and keep the first account to hold only the errant transfers so that your funds are not blended.



      Contact your local tax office for advice, and continue to pester HR, and CC senior management in the company so that they are made aware.



      Truth be told, a friendly call from the taxman may make them move, so please do not skip that step.






      share|improve this answer
























      • Is the separate account just to avoid you spending the money? For me at least what you suggest would be a complete pain due to all the payments set up to go from my main account that would also need moving if I wanted to use this account only to receive the errant funds. I would have thought it easier to set up a second account and just move the errant funds in as they arrive. The separation should be obvious enough if anybody looked - one transfer out of the same size as each transfer in...

        – Chris
        2 days ago






      • 9





        @Chris the separate account is to have the OP's money in an account the former employer can't reverse charges from.

        – Monty Harder
        2 days ago











      • @Chris setting up the second account would be to keep the funds separate, and would also make the bank records much more clear. I.E., if the only activity you had was the deposits, it would be very clear to demonstrate the overpayment amount.

        – Richard U
        2 days ago











      • @RichardU: That doesn't seem like its worth the effort to me but I guess your mileage may vary. A copy of the statement with a highlight of the relevant lines seems like it would do the job. And I'm not even sure in what situation the amount overpaid would be disputed anyway - are you thinking that the company might claim they overpaid by more than they actually did?

        – Chris
        2 days ago






      • 5





        @Chris you never know, they might want interest. They may attempt to freeze the account.... keeping the funds separate makes for fewer headaches

        – Richard U
        2 days ago
















      24














      While this may be a pain to do, create a second bank account, transfer all of your funds, minus the errant pay, and keep the first account to hold only the errant transfers so that your funds are not blended.



      Contact your local tax office for advice, and continue to pester HR, and CC senior management in the company so that they are made aware.



      Truth be told, a friendly call from the taxman may make them move, so please do not skip that step.






      share|improve this answer
























      • Is the separate account just to avoid you spending the money? For me at least what you suggest would be a complete pain due to all the payments set up to go from my main account that would also need moving if I wanted to use this account only to receive the errant funds. I would have thought it easier to set up a second account and just move the errant funds in as they arrive. The separation should be obvious enough if anybody looked - one transfer out of the same size as each transfer in...

        – Chris
        2 days ago






      • 9





        @Chris the separate account is to have the OP's money in an account the former employer can't reverse charges from.

        – Monty Harder
        2 days ago











      • @Chris setting up the second account would be to keep the funds separate, and would also make the bank records much more clear. I.E., if the only activity you had was the deposits, it would be very clear to demonstrate the overpayment amount.

        – Richard U
        2 days ago











      • @RichardU: That doesn't seem like its worth the effort to me but I guess your mileage may vary. A copy of the statement with a highlight of the relevant lines seems like it would do the job. And I'm not even sure in what situation the amount overpaid would be disputed anyway - are you thinking that the company might claim they overpaid by more than they actually did?

        – Chris
        2 days ago






      • 5





        @Chris you never know, they might want interest. They may attempt to freeze the account.... keeping the funds separate makes for fewer headaches

        – Richard U
        2 days ago














      24












      24








      24







      While this may be a pain to do, create a second bank account, transfer all of your funds, minus the errant pay, and keep the first account to hold only the errant transfers so that your funds are not blended.



      Contact your local tax office for advice, and continue to pester HR, and CC senior management in the company so that they are made aware.



      Truth be told, a friendly call from the taxman may make them move, so please do not skip that step.






      share|improve this answer













      While this may be a pain to do, create a second bank account, transfer all of your funds, minus the errant pay, and keep the first account to hold only the errant transfers so that your funds are not blended.



      Contact your local tax office for advice, and continue to pester HR, and CC senior management in the company so that they are made aware.



      Truth be told, a friendly call from the taxman may make them move, so please do not skip that step.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered 2 days ago









      Richard URichard U

      90.3k64232358




      90.3k64232358













      • Is the separate account just to avoid you spending the money? For me at least what you suggest would be a complete pain due to all the payments set up to go from my main account that would also need moving if I wanted to use this account only to receive the errant funds. I would have thought it easier to set up a second account and just move the errant funds in as they arrive. The separation should be obvious enough if anybody looked - one transfer out of the same size as each transfer in...

        – Chris
        2 days ago






      • 9





        @Chris the separate account is to have the OP's money in an account the former employer can't reverse charges from.

        – Monty Harder
        2 days ago











      • @Chris setting up the second account would be to keep the funds separate, and would also make the bank records much more clear. I.E., if the only activity you had was the deposits, it would be very clear to demonstrate the overpayment amount.

        – Richard U
        2 days ago











      • @RichardU: That doesn't seem like its worth the effort to me but I guess your mileage may vary. A copy of the statement with a highlight of the relevant lines seems like it would do the job. And I'm not even sure in what situation the amount overpaid would be disputed anyway - are you thinking that the company might claim they overpaid by more than they actually did?

        – Chris
        2 days ago






      • 5





        @Chris you never know, they might want interest. They may attempt to freeze the account.... keeping the funds separate makes for fewer headaches

        – Richard U
        2 days ago



















      • Is the separate account just to avoid you spending the money? For me at least what you suggest would be a complete pain due to all the payments set up to go from my main account that would also need moving if I wanted to use this account only to receive the errant funds. I would have thought it easier to set up a second account and just move the errant funds in as they arrive. The separation should be obvious enough if anybody looked - one transfer out of the same size as each transfer in...

        – Chris
        2 days ago






      • 9





        @Chris the separate account is to have the OP's money in an account the former employer can't reverse charges from.

        – Monty Harder
        2 days ago











      • @Chris setting up the second account would be to keep the funds separate, and would also make the bank records much more clear. I.E., if the only activity you had was the deposits, it would be very clear to demonstrate the overpayment amount.

        – Richard U
        2 days ago











      • @RichardU: That doesn't seem like its worth the effort to me but I guess your mileage may vary. A copy of the statement with a highlight of the relevant lines seems like it would do the job. And I'm not even sure in what situation the amount overpaid would be disputed anyway - are you thinking that the company might claim they overpaid by more than they actually did?

        – Chris
        2 days ago






      • 5





        @Chris you never know, they might want interest. They may attempt to freeze the account.... keeping the funds separate makes for fewer headaches

        – Richard U
        2 days ago

















      Is the separate account just to avoid you spending the money? For me at least what you suggest would be a complete pain due to all the payments set up to go from my main account that would also need moving if I wanted to use this account only to receive the errant funds. I would have thought it easier to set up a second account and just move the errant funds in as they arrive. The separation should be obvious enough if anybody looked - one transfer out of the same size as each transfer in...

      – Chris
      2 days ago





      Is the separate account just to avoid you spending the money? For me at least what you suggest would be a complete pain due to all the payments set up to go from my main account that would also need moving if I wanted to use this account only to receive the errant funds. I would have thought it easier to set up a second account and just move the errant funds in as they arrive. The separation should be obvious enough if anybody looked - one transfer out of the same size as each transfer in...

      – Chris
      2 days ago




      9




      9





      @Chris the separate account is to have the OP's money in an account the former employer can't reverse charges from.

      – Monty Harder
      2 days ago





      @Chris the separate account is to have the OP's money in an account the former employer can't reverse charges from.

      – Monty Harder
      2 days ago













      @Chris setting up the second account would be to keep the funds separate, and would also make the bank records much more clear. I.E., if the only activity you had was the deposits, it would be very clear to demonstrate the overpayment amount.

      – Richard U
      2 days ago





      @Chris setting up the second account would be to keep the funds separate, and would also make the bank records much more clear. I.E., if the only activity you had was the deposits, it would be very clear to demonstrate the overpayment amount.

      – Richard U
      2 days ago













      @RichardU: That doesn't seem like its worth the effort to me but I guess your mileage may vary. A copy of the statement with a highlight of the relevant lines seems like it would do the job. And I'm not even sure in what situation the amount overpaid would be disputed anyway - are you thinking that the company might claim they overpaid by more than they actually did?

      – Chris
      2 days ago





      @RichardU: That doesn't seem like its worth the effort to me but I guess your mileage may vary. A copy of the statement with a highlight of the relevant lines seems like it would do the job. And I'm not even sure in what situation the amount overpaid would be disputed anyway - are you thinking that the company might claim they overpaid by more than they actually did?

      – Chris
      2 days ago




      5




      5





      @Chris you never know, they might want interest. They may attempt to freeze the account.... keeping the funds separate makes for fewer headaches

      – Richard U
      2 days ago





      @Chris you never know, they might want interest. They may attempt to freeze the account.... keeping the funds separate makes for fewer headaches

      – Richard U
      2 days ago











      20














      The simplest way to avoid "having to pay the money back" is never to receive it.



      I assume the payments are electronic transfers, since if they were posting you physical cheques all you have to do is not cash them.



      Rather than opening a new account with your bank and getting the payments transferred, just request your bank to block them. Eventually the company will notice something is wrong and stop trying to make the payments. If they have paid advance tax on money that you never received and the tax collection system accepted those payments, that is their problem to sort out with the tax office, not yours.



      Contacting a large company's general purpose "helpdesk" over a problem like this is a waste of time. The low-grade employees who man the phones won't have any defined procedure to follow, and they usually have little motivation to do a good job anyway. Their productivity target is to get rid of callers as fast as possible, not figure out how to handle questions where they don't have a pre-scripted answer. Making contact with your former manager or HR rep is more likely to achieve something.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 12





        Not receiving the money doesn't help if the company is reporting to the tax office that you were paid it. And if you don't receive the money, you have much less chance of making the company pay for any expenses you occur in dealing with them.

        – Dragonel
        2 days ago






      • 2





        Doesn't actually resolve the question as it may very well be the case that even if the money isn't received in a bank account that fact is never recorded in the systems that report income and taxes to the government!

        – davidbak
        2 days ago






      • 2





        might work for a bank account, but for automatic deposits into something like a 401k, FSA, or other benefit accounts I shudder to think...

        – Michael
        2 days ago








      • 4





        I did not see the OP tag his question with US. An in the rest of the world paper cheques have all but disappearered in the last two decades.

        – Hennes
        yesterday
















      20














      The simplest way to avoid "having to pay the money back" is never to receive it.



      I assume the payments are electronic transfers, since if they were posting you physical cheques all you have to do is not cash them.



      Rather than opening a new account with your bank and getting the payments transferred, just request your bank to block them. Eventually the company will notice something is wrong and stop trying to make the payments. If they have paid advance tax on money that you never received and the tax collection system accepted those payments, that is their problem to sort out with the tax office, not yours.



      Contacting a large company's general purpose "helpdesk" over a problem like this is a waste of time. The low-grade employees who man the phones won't have any defined procedure to follow, and they usually have little motivation to do a good job anyway. Their productivity target is to get rid of callers as fast as possible, not figure out how to handle questions where they don't have a pre-scripted answer. Making contact with your former manager or HR rep is more likely to achieve something.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 12





        Not receiving the money doesn't help if the company is reporting to the tax office that you were paid it. And if you don't receive the money, you have much less chance of making the company pay for any expenses you occur in dealing with them.

        – Dragonel
        2 days ago






      • 2





        Doesn't actually resolve the question as it may very well be the case that even if the money isn't received in a bank account that fact is never recorded in the systems that report income and taxes to the government!

        – davidbak
        2 days ago






      • 2





        might work for a bank account, but for automatic deposits into something like a 401k, FSA, or other benefit accounts I shudder to think...

        – Michael
        2 days ago








      • 4





        I did not see the OP tag his question with US. An in the rest of the world paper cheques have all but disappearered in the last two decades.

        – Hennes
        yesterday














      20












      20








      20







      The simplest way to avoid "having to pay the money back" is never to receive it.



      I assume the payments are electronic transfers, since if they were posting you physical cheques all you have to do is not cash them.



      Rather than opening a new account with your bank and getting the payments transferred, just request your bank to block them. Eventually the company will notice something is wrong and stop trying to make the payments. If they have paid advance tax on money that you never received and the tax collection system accepted those payments, that is their problem to sort out with the tax office, not yours.



      Contacting a large company's general purpose "helpdesk" over a problem like this is a waste of time. The low-grade employees who man the phones won't have any defined procedure to follow, and they usually have little motivation to do a good job anyway. Their productivity target is to get rid of callers as fast as possible, not figure out how to handle questions where they don't have a pre-scripted answer. Making contact with your former manager or HR rep is more likely to achieve something.






      share|improve this answer













      The simplest way to avoid "having to pay the money back" is never to receive it.



      I assume the payments are electronic transfers, since if they were posting you physical cheques all you have to do is not cash them.



      Rather than opening a new account with your bank and getting the payments transferred, just request your bank to block them. Eventually the company will notice something is wrong and stop trying to make the payments. If they have paid advance tax on money that you never received and the tax collection system accepted those payments, that is their problem to sort out with the tax office, not yours.



      Contacting a large company's general purpose "helpdesk" over a problem like this is a waste of time. The low-grade employees who man the phones won't have any defined procedure to follow, and they usually have little motivation to do a good job anyway. Their productivity target is to get rid of callers as fast as possible, not figure out how to handle questions where they don't have a pre-scripted answer. Making contact with your former manager or HR rep is more likely to achieve something.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered 2 days ago









      alephzeroalephzero

      2,6901715




      2,6901715








      • 12





        Not receiving the money doesn't help if the company is reporting to the tax office that you were paid it. And if you don't receive the money, you have much less chance of making the company pay for any expenses you occur in dealing with them.

        – Dragonel
        2 days ago






      • 2





        Doesn't actually resolve the question as it may very well be the case that even if the money isn't received in a bank account that fact is never recorded in the systems that report income and taxes to the government!

        – davidbak
        2 days ago






      • 2





        might work for a bank account, but for automatic deposits into something like a 401k, FSA, or other benefit accounts I shudder to think...

        – Michael
        2 days ago








      • 4





        I did not see the OP tag his question with US. An in the rest of the world paper cheques have all but disappearered in the last two decades.

        – Hennes
        yesterday














      • 12





        Not receiving the money doesn't help if the company is reporting to the tax office that you were paid it. And if you don't receive the money, you have much less chance of making the company pay for any expenses you occur in dealing with them.

        – Dragonel
        2 days ago






      • 2





        Doesn't actually resolve the question as it may very well be the case that even if the money isn't received in a bank account that fact is never recorded in the systems that report income and taxes to the government!

        – davidbak
        2 days ago






      • 2





        might work for a bank account, but for automatic deposits into something like a 401k, FSA, or other benefit accounts I shudder to think...

        – Michael
        2 days ago








      • 4





        I did not see the OP tag his question with US. An in the rest of the world paper cheques have all but disappearered in the last two decades.

        – Hennes
        yesterday








      12




      12





      Not receiving the money doesn't help if the company is reporting to the tax office that you were paid it. And if you don't receive the money, you have much less chance of making the company pay for any expenses you occur in dealing with them.

      – Dragonel
      2 days ago





      Not receiving the money doesn't help if the company is reporting to the tax office that you were paid it. And if you don't receive the money, you have much less chance of making the company pay for any expenses you occur in dealing with them.

      – Dragonel
      2 days ago




      2




      2





      Doesn't actually resolve the question as it may very well be the case that even if the money isn't received in a bank account that fact is never recorded in the systems that report income and taxes to the government!

      – davidbak
      2 days ago





      Doesn't actually resolve the question as it may very well be the case that even if the money isn't received in a bank account that fact is never recorded in the systems that report income and taxes to the government!

      – davidbak
      2 days ago




      2




      2





      might work for a bank account, but for automatic deposits into something like a 401k, FSA, or other benefit accounts I shudder to think...

      – Michael
      2 days ago







      might work for a bank account, but for automatic deposits into something like a 401k, FSA, or other benefit accounts I shudder to think...

      – Michael
      2 days ago






      4




      4





      I did not see the OP tag his question with US. An in the rest of the world paper cheques have all but disappearered in the last two decades.

      – Hennes
      yesterday





      I did not see the OP tag his question with US. An in the rest of the world paper cheques have all but disappearered in the last two decades.

      – Hennes
      yesterday











      12














      I agree with other answers to not spend it.



      As for screwing up your taxes and plans, you should put in your formal claim letter that accounting charges (hiring a professional accountant, transfert fees, ...) will be deduced from the money they sent you before returning it, as it was not your fault.






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      inaliahgle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





















      • Stop using the phone to sort out things. It never works and there is no document trail. Send letters to HR with copies to CFO, COO, CEO.

        – CyberFonic
        yesterday











      • That's why formal claim letter comes in place!

        – inaliahgle
        21 hours ago
















      12














      I agree with other answers to not spend it.



      As for screwing up your taxes and plans, you should put in your formal claim letter that accounting charges (hiring a professional accountant, transfert fees, ...) will be deduced from the money they sent you before returning it, as it was not your fault.






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      inaliahgle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





















      • Stop using the phone to sort out things. It never works and there is no document trail. Send letters to HR with copies to CFO, COO, CEO.

        – CyberFonic
        yesterday











      • That's why formal claim letter comes in place!

        – inaliahgle
        21 hours ago














      12












      12








      12







      I agree with other answers to not spend it.



      As for screwing up your taxes and plans, you should put in your formal claim letter that accounting charges (hiring a professional accountant, transfert fees, ...) will be deduced from the money they sent you before returning it, as it was not your fault.






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      inaliahgle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.










      I agree with other answers to not spend it.



      As for screwing up your taxes and plans, you should put in your formal claim letter that accounting charges (hiring a professional accountant, transfert fees, ...) will be deduced from the money they sent you before returning it, as it was not your fault.







      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      inaliahgle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 2 days ago





















      New contributor




      inaliahgle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      answered 2 days ago









      inaliahgleinaliahgle

      460311




      460311




      New contributor




      inaliahgle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      inaliahgle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      inaliahgle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.













      • Stop using the phone to sort out things. It never works and there is no document trail. Send letters to HR with copies to CFO, COO, CEO.

        – CyberFonic
        yesterday











      • That's why formal claim letter comes in place!

        – inaliahgle
        21 hours ago



















      • Stop using the phone to sort out things. It never works and there is no document trail. Send letters to HR with copies to CFO, COO, CEO.

        – CyberFonic
        yesterday











      • That's why formal claim letter comes in place!

        – inaliahgle
        21 hours ago

















      Stop using the phone to sort out things. It never works and there is no document trail. Send letters to HR with copies to CFO, COO, CEO.

      – CyberFonic
      yesterday





      Stop using the phone to sort out things. It never works and there is no document trail. Send letters to HR with copies to CFO, COO, CEO.

      – CyberFonic
      yesterday













      That's why formal claim letter comes in place!

      – inaliahgle
      21 hours ago





      That's why formal claim letter comes in place!

      – inaliahgle
      21 hours ago











      8














      Don't spend it until you consult a lawyer with expertise in local law. It might be preferable to spend it ASAP. "Don't spend it" is probably a nice hunch in good spirit, but this is a legal question with high dependence on jurisdiction. I wouldn't listen to internet people regarding this one.



      There are jurisdictions where an erroneously awarded gain is a subject to be returned but only if the recipient is able to so do. I believe that this protects an unaware recipient from bearing consequences of spending the money thinking it was rightfully theirs. Especially since an employer can award bonuses. The collateral is that if you want to keep money it's best to spend it before you're called to return it. Opinions are "that's it's practically close to impossible to force employee to return money even if they are still employed. In practice though, it does happen often based on employees' goodwill."



      Not very ethical probably, especially since you are aware of the mistake. On the other hand you can't be taxed for it, and keep it frozen; what if they silently refused to stop paying you =).



      Consult a lawyer on your options and pick the one that you will feel the best with. Don't blindly think that making second account to keep tabs or acting in good will protect you and your best interest. You need to be sure what should you do.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 16





        I don't see any possible scenario in which "don't spend the money" is bad advice. It's not your money, they will likely ask for it back, in what world would spending it be a good idea ?

        – xyious
        2 days ago






      • 1





        Any world where they can't garnish your wages.

        – Mazura
        2 days ago











      • @xyious I don't know how to be more explicit. There are cases, when you don't have to give it back if you can't. If you don't care about being nice, then it's better to spend it before they call for it. Anyway not speding it is not enough. No-one suggested immediate lawyer contact.

        – luk32
        2 days ago








      • 2





        Well you actually changed it in the answer to something I would find acceptable. "Don't spend it until you consult a lawyer" is good advice. (seems like the first line completely contradicting the 2nd line now, so I would just remove it anyway, but still acceptable)

        – xyious
        2 days ago











      • @xyious To be completely honest this was community edit. I didn't find it contradictory, but perhaps it was too contrived. I've added a sentence with clear statement, that it might be preferable to spend it ASAP. Hope it's fine now, thanks for the thoughts.

        – luk32
        yesterday


















      8














      Don't spend it until you consult a lawyer with expertise in local law. It might be preferable to spend it ASAP. "Don't spend it" is probably a nice hunch in good spirit, but this is a legal question with high dependence on jurisdiction. I wouldn't listen to internet people regarding this one.



      There are jurisdictions where an erroneously awarded gain is a subject to be returned but only if the recipient is able to so do. I believe that this protects an unaware recipient from bearing consequences of spending the money thinking it was rightfully theirs. Especially since an employer can award bonuses. The collateral is that if you want to keep money it's best to spend it before you're called to return it. Opinions are "that's it's practically close to impossible to force employee to return money even if they are still employed. In practice though, it does happen often based on employees' goodwill."



      Not very ethical probably, especially since you are aware of the mistake. On the other hand you can't be taxed for it, and keep it frozen; what if they silently refused to stop paying you =).



      Consult a lawyer on your options and pick the one that you will feel the best with. Don't blindly think that making second account to keep tabs or acting in good will protect you and your best interest. You need to be sure what should you do.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 16





        I don't see any possible scenario in which "don't spend the money" is bad advice. It's not your money, they will likely ask for it back, in what world would spending it be a good idea ?

        – xyious
        2 days ago






      • 1





        Any world where they can't garnish your wages.

        – Mazura
        2 days ago











      • @xyious I don't know how to be more explicit. There are cases, when you don't have to give it back if you can't. If you don't care about being nice, then it's better to spend it before they call for it. Anyway not speding it is not enough. No-one suggested immediate lawyer contact.

        – luk32
        2 days ago








      • 2





        Well you actually changed it in the answer to something I would find acceptable. "Don't spend it until you consult a lawyer" is good advice. (seems like the first line completely contradicting the 2nd line now, so I would just remove it anyway, but still acceptable)

        – xyious
        2 days ago











      • @xyious To be completely honest this was community edit. I didn't find it contradictory, but perhaps it was too contrived. I've added a sentence with clear statement, that it might be preferable to spend it ASAP. Hope it's fine now, thanks for the thoughts.

        – luk32
        yesterday
















      8












      8








      8







      Don't spend it until you consult a lawyer with expertise in local law. It might be preferable to spend it ASAP. "Don't spend it" is probably a nice hunch in good spirit, but this is a legal question with high dependence on jurisdiction. I wouldn't listen to internet people regarding this one.



      There are jurisdictions where an erroneously awarded gain is a subject to be returned but only if the recipient is able to so do. I believe that this protects an unaware recipient from bearing consequences of spending the money thinking it was rightfully theirs. Especially since an employer can award bonuses. The collateral is that if you want to keep money it's best to spend it before you're called to return it. Opinions are "that's it's practically close to impossible to force employee to return money even if they are still employed. In practice though, it does happen often based on employees' goodwill."



      Not very ethical probably, especially since you are aware of the mistake. On the other hand you can't be taxed for it, and keep it frozen; what if they silently refused to stop paying you =).



      Consult a lawyer on your options and pick the one that you will feel the best with. Don't blindly think that making second account to keep tabs or acting in good will protect you and your best interest. You need to be sure what should you do.






      share|improve this answer















      Don't spend it until you consult a lawyer with expertise in local law. It might be preferable to spend it ASAP. "Don't spend it" is probably a nice hunch in good spirit, but this is a legal question with high dependence on jurisdiction. I wouldn't listen to internet people regarding this one.



      There are jurisdictions where an erroneously awarded gain is a subject to be returned but only if the recipient is able to so do. I believe that this protects an unaware recipient from bearing consequences of spending the money thinking it was rightfully theirs. Especially since an employer can award bonuses. The collateral is that if you want to keep money it's best to spend it before you're called to return it. Opinions are "that's it's practically close to impossible to force employee to return money even if they are still employed. In practice though, it does happen often based on employees' goodwill."



      Not very ethical probably, especially since you are aware of the mistake. On the other hand you can't be taxed for it, and keep it frozen; what if they silently refused to stop paying you =).



      Consult a lawyer on your options and pick the one that you will feel the best with. Don't blindly think that making second account to keep tabs or acting in good will protect you and your best interest. You need to be sure what should you do.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited yesterday

























      answered 2 days ago









      luk32luk32

      65849




      65849








      • 16





        I don't see any possible scenario in which "don't spend the money" is bad advice. It's not your money, they will likely ask for it back, in what world would spending it be a good idea ?

        – xyious
        2 days ago






      • 1





        Any world where they can't garnish your wages.

        – Mazura
        2 days ago











      • @xyious I don't know how to be more explicit. There are cases, when you don't have to give it back if you can't. If you don't care about being nice, then it's better to spend it before they call for it. Anyway not speding it is not enough. No-one suggested immediate lawyer contact.

        – luk32
        2 days ago








      • 2





        Well you actually changed it in the answer to something I would find acceptable. "Don't spend it until you consult a lawyer" is good advice. (seems like the first line completely contradicting the 2nd line now, so I would just remove it anyway, but still acceptable)

        – xyious
        2 days ago











      • @xyious To be completely honest this was community edit. I didn't find it contradictory, but perhaps it was too contrived. I've added a sentence with clear statement, that it might be preferable to spend it ASAP. Hope it's fine now, thanks for the thoughts.

        – luk32
        yesterday
















      • 16





        I don't see any possible scenario in which "don't spend the money" is bad advice. It's not your money, they will likely ask for it back, in what world would spending it be a good idea ?

        – xyious
        2 days ago






      • 1





        Any world where they can't garnish your wages.

        – Mazura
        2 days ago











      • @xyious I don't know how to be more explicit. There are cases, when you don't have to give it back if you can't. If you don't care about being nice, then it's better to spend it before they call for it. Anyway not speding it is not enough. No-one suggested immediate lawyer contact.

        – luk32
        2 days ago








      • 2





        Well you actually changed it in the answer to something I would find acceptable. "Don't spend it until you consult a lawyer" is good advice. (seems like the first line completely contradicting the 2nd line now, so I would just remove it anyway, but still acceptable)

        – xyious
        2 days ago











      • @xyious To be completely honest this was community edit. I didn't find it contradictory, but perhaps it was too contrived. I've added a sentence with clear statement, that it might be preferable to spend it ASAP. Hope it's fine now, thanks for the thoughts.

        – luk32
        yesterday










      16




      16





      I don't see any possible scenario in which "don't spend the money" is bad advice. It's not your money, they will likely ask for it back, in what world would spending it be a good idea ?

      – xyious
      2 days ago





      I don't see any possible scenario in which "don't spend the money" is bad advice. It's not your money, they will likely ask for it back, in what world would spending it be a good idea ?

      – xyious
      2 days ago




      1




      1





      Any world where they can't garnish your wages.

      – Mazura
      2 days ago





      Any world where they can't garnish your wages.

      – Mazura
      2 days ago













      @xyious I don't know how to be more explicit. There are cases, when you don't have to give it back if you can't. If you don't care about being nice, then it's better to spend it before they call for it. Anyway not speding it is not enough. No-one suggested immediate lawyer contact.

      – luk32
      2 days ago







      @xyious I don't know how to be more explicit. There are cases, when you don't have to give it back if you can't. If you don't care about being nice, then it's better to spend it before they call for it. Anyway not speding it is not enough. No-one suggested immediate lawyer contact.

      – luk32
      2 days ago






      2




      2





      Well you actually changed it in the answer to something I would find acceptable. "Don't spend it until you consult a lawyer" is good advice. (seems like the first line completely contradicting the 2nd line now, so I would just remove it anyway, but still acceptable)

      – xyious
      2 days ago





      Well you actually changed it in the answer to something I would find acceptable. "Don't spend it until you consult a lawyer" is good advice. (seems like the first line completely contradicting the 2nd line now, so I would just remove it anyway, but still acceptable)

      – xyious
      2 days ago













      @xyious To be completely honest this was community edit. I didn't find it contradictory, but perhaps it was too contrived. I've added a sentence with clear statement, that it might be preferable to spend it ASAP. Hope it's fine now, thanks for the thoughts.

      – luk32
      yesterday







      @xyious To be completely honest this was community edit. I didn't find it contradictory, but perhaps it was too contrived. I've added a sentence with clear statement, that it might be preferable to spend it ASAP. Hope it's fine now, thanks for the thoughts.

      – luk32
      yesterday













      6














      I am someone who has experienced a very similar issue. I got overpaid £20,000 at my workplace, and I chased the payroll department for 2 years before I got them to even respond to my calls / letters / emails.



      The only email that worked was the one that said "My employment is coming to an end and I am about to leave the country". I then received an incredibly rude letter along the lines of "it has just come to our attention that you owe us money and you need to pay asap or there will be consequences".



      In the end I lost money over this affair because I had overpaid taxes in various forms because of this overpayment, and clearly it was nothing to do with my employer, I had to claim that tax back from the HMRC directly, a process which took another couple of years in itself of me going back and forth trying to resolve the issue, while trying to liaise with a (now uninterested) ex-payroll department for a paper trail.



      I would treat this seriously and go down a legal route. "You are overpaying me money I don't want and it is causing me trouble. Please cease and desist. I have started a legal procedure."



      You might even go down the 'administrative charges' route, i.e. "I would also like to inform you that these payments are unsolicited, and administering them costs me time and money. Please be advised that I will be charging an administrative fee for the processing of future payments, at the rate of £250/h". Next time they pay you, send them a bill. Ask your lawyer for advice, but apparently as long as you can prove the letter was received, then this is legit and legally binding. People have used this tactic against unsolicited TV licencing letters.



      As for whether it's worth spending money to ask for legal advice, consider that even with whatever tax I managed to get back, I still lost about £1,000 from this story, not counting time, money, and petrol wasted going back and forth for 5 years to settle this business.






      share|improve this answer




























        6














        I am someone who has experienced a very similar issue. I got overpaid £20,000 at my workplace, and I chased the payroll department for 2 years before I got them to even respond to my calls / letters / emails.



        The only email that worked was the one that said "My employment is coming to an end and I am about to leave the country". I then received an incredibly rude letter along the lines of "it has just come to our attention that you owe us money and you need to pay asap or there will be consequences".



        In the end I lost money over this affair because I had overpaid taxes in various forms because of this overpayment, and clearly it was nothing to do with my employer, I had to claim that tax back from the HMRC directly, a process which took another couple of years in itself of me going back and forth trying to resolve the issue, while trying to liaise with a (now uninterested) ex-payroll department for a paper trail.



        I would treat this seriously and go down a legal route. "You are overpaying me money I don't want and it is causing me trouble. Please cease and desist. I have started a legal procedure."



        You might even go down the 'administrative charges' route, i.e. "I would also like to inform you that these payments are unsolicited, and administering them costs me time and money. Please be advised that I will be charging an administrative fee for the processing of future payments, at the rate of £250/h". Next time they pay you, send them a bill. Ask your lawyer for advice, but apparently as long as you can prove the letter was received, then this is legit and legally binding. People have used this tactic against unsolicited TV licencing letters.



        As for whether it's worth spending money to ask for legal advice, consider that even with whatever tax I managed to get back, I still lost about £1,000 from this story, not counting time, money, and petrol wasted going back and forth for 5 years to settle this business.






        share|improve this answer


























          6












          6








          6







          I am someone who has experienced a very similar issue. I got overpaid £20,000 at my workplace, and I chased the payroll department for 2 years before I got them to even respond to my calls / letters / emails.



          The only email that worked was the one that said "My employment is coming to an end and I am about to leave the country". I then received an incredibly rude letter along the lines of "it has just come to our attention that you owe us money and you need to pay asap or there will be consequences".



          In the end I lost money over this affair because I had overpaid taxes in various forms because of this overpayment, and clearly it was nothing to do with my employer, I had to claim that tax back from the HMRC directly, a process which took another couple of years in itself of me going back and forth trying to resolve the issue, while trying to liaise with a (now uninterested) ex-payroll department for a paper trail.



          I would treat this seriously and go down a legal route. "You are overpaying me money I don't want and it is causing me trouble. Please cease and desist. I have started a legal procedure."



          You might even go down the 'administrative charges' route, i.e. "I would also like to inform you that these payments are unsolicited, and administering them costs me time and money. Please be advised that I will be charging an administrative fee for the processing of future payments, at the rate of £250/h". Next time they pay you, send them a bill. Ask your lawyer for advice, but apparently as long as you can prove the letter was received, then this is legit and legally binding. People have used this tactic against unsolicited TV licencing letters.



          As for whether it's worth spending money to ask for legal advice, consider that even with whatever tax I managed to get back, I still lost about £1,000 from this story, not counting time, money, and petrol wasted going back and forth for 5 years to settle this business.






          share|improve this answer













          I am someone who has experienced a very similar issue. I got overpaid £20,000 at my workplace, and I chased the payroll department for 2 years before I got them to even respond to my calls / letters / emails.



          The only email that worked was the one that said "My employment is coming to an end and I am about to leave the country". I then received an incredibly rude letter along the lines of "it has just come to our attention that you owe us money and you need to pay asap or there will be consequences".



          In the end I lost money over this affair because I had overpaid taxes in various forms because of this overpayment, and clearly it was nothing to do with my employer, I had to claim that tax back from the HMRC directly, a process which took another couple of years in itself of me going back and forth trying to resolve the issue, while trying to liaise with a (now uninterested) ex-payroll department for a paper trail.



          I would treat this seriously and go down a legal route. "You are overpaying me money I don't want and it is causing me trouble. Please cease and desist. I have started a legal procedure."



          You might even go down the 'administrative charges' route, i.e. "I would also like to inform you that these payments are unsolicited, and administering them costs me time and money. Please be advised that I will be charging an administrative fee for the processing of future payments, at the rate of £250/h". Next time they pay you, send them a bill. Ask your lawyer for advice, but apparently as long as you can prove the letter was received, then this is legit and legally binding. People have used this tactic against unsolicited TV licencing letters.



          As for whether it's worth spending money to ask for legal advice, consider that even with whatever tax I managed to get back, I still lost about £1,000 from this story, not counting time, money, and petrol wasted going back and forth for 5 years to settle this business.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered yesterday









          Tasos PapastylianouTasos Papastylianou

          1814




          1814























              5














              Keep the money unspent for now, you will be asked to reimburse it.



              Send a formal letter to the company with proof of receipt stating the issue and your willingness to pay back the wrongfully transferred money, so that you can prove you didn't actively try to steal money from them.
              Just to be on the safe side, you could also contact your bank telling them to refuse incoming transfer from your old company.






              share|improve this answer




























                5














                Keep the money unspent for now, you will be asked to reimburse it.



                Send a formal letter to the company with proof of receipt stating the issue and your willingness to pay back the wrongfully transferred money, so that you can prove you didn't actively try to steal money from them.
                Just to be on the safe side, you could also contact your bank telling them to refuse incoming transfer from your old company.






                share|improve this answer


























                  5












                  5








                  5







                  Keep the money unspent for now, you will be asked to reimburse it.



                  Send a formal letter to the company with proof of receipt stating the issue and your willingness to pay back the wrongfully transferred money, so that you can prove you didn't actively try to steal money from them.
                  Just to be on the safe side, you could also contact your bank telling them to refuse incoming transfer from your old company.






                  share|improve this answer













                  Keep the money unspent for now, you will be asked to reimburse it.



                  Send a formal letter to the company with proof of receipt stating the issue and your willingness to pay back the wrongfully transferred money, so that you can prove you didn't actively try to steal money from them.
                  Just to be on the safe side, you could also contact your bank telling them to refuse incoming transfer from your old company.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 2 days ago









                  BriseFlotsBriseFlots

                  3597




                  3597























                      2














                      Only mentioned on the side in comments is a more worrying scenario than simply sitting on a pile of money not yours, and that is that you may end up being taxed over that money in various ways.



                      If the company reports the payments to the tax and social security agencies as taxable income you made, those guys are going to demand you pay taxes and social security premiums over it. And when you eventually pay the company back, don't expect the government to give that money back without a fight, if at all.



                      Ditto with other things they may still be paying for. A health insurance for example, or accident insurance.



                      I've had to deal with a related but different scenario where a company was in serious arrears paying the company health insurance plan, and the insurance company came after me personally to recover the premiums after 2 years. Expect things like that to come your way, because if their administration is as sloppy as it appears to be it's not unlikely that they for example stopped paying insurance premiums for you but forgot to cancel the insurance policies.






                      share|improve this answer
























                      • The government will just hand over the money when presented with an amended return and justification. If the company is paying insurance for the employee still, that's between the company and the insurance agency, since it's not money the OP even sees.

                        – David Thornley
                        yesterday
















                      2














                      Only mentioned on the side in comments is a more worrying scenario than simply sitting on a pile of money not yours, and that is that you may end up being taxed over that money in various ways.



                      If the company reports the payments to the tax and social security agencies as taxable income you made, those guys are going to demand you pay taxes and social security premiums over it. And when you eventually pay the company back, don't expect the government to give that money back without a fight, if at all.



                      Ditto with other things they may still be paying for. A health insurance for example, or accident insurance.



                      I've had to deal with a related but different scenario where a company was in serious arrears paying the company health insurance plan, and the insurance company came after me personally to recover the premiums after 2 years. Expect things like that to come your way, because if their administration is as sloppy as it appears to be it's not unlikely that they for example stopped paying insurance premiums for you but forgot to cancel the insurance policies.






                      share|improve this answer
























                      • The government will just hand over the money when presented with an amended return and justification. If the company is paying insurance for the employee still, that's between the company and the insurance agency, since it's not money the OP even sees.

                        – David Thornley
                        yesterday














                      2












                      2








                      2







                      Only mentioned on the side in comments is a more worrying scenario than simply sitting on a pile of money not yours, and that is that you may end up being taxed over that money in various ways.



                      If the company reports the payments to the tax and social security agencies as taxable income you made, those guys are going to demand you pay taxes and social security premiums over it. And when you eventually pay the company back, don't expect the government to give that money back without a fight, if at all.



                      Ditto with other things they may still be paying for. A health insurance for example, or accident insurance.



                      I've had to deal with a related but different scenario where a company was in serious arrears paying the company health insurance plan, and the insurance company came after me personally to recover the premiums after 2 years. Expect things like that to come your way, because if their administration is as sloppy as it appears to be it's not unlikely that they for example stopped paying insurance premiums for you but forgot to cancel the insurance policies.






                      share|improve this answer













                      Only mentioned on the side in comments is a more worrying scenario than simply sitting on a pile of money not yours, and that is that you may end up being taxed over that money in various ways.



                      If the company reports the payments to the tax and social security agencies as taxable income you made, those guys are going to demand you pay taxes and social security premiums over it. And when you eventually pay the company back, don't expect the government to give that money back without a fight, if at all.



                      Ditto with other things they may still be paying for. A health insurance for example, or accident insurance.



                      I've had to deal with a related but different scenario where a company was in serious arrears paying the company health insurance plan, and the insurance company came after me personally to recover the premiums after 2 years. Expect things like that to come your way, because if their administration is as sloppy as it appears to be it's not unlikely that they for example stopped paying insurance premiums for you but forgot to cancel the insurance policies.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered 2 days ago









                      jwentingjwenting

                      1,48677




                      1,48677













                      • The government will just hand over the money when presented with an amended return and justification. If the company is paying insurance for the employee still, that's between the company and the insurance agency, since it's not money the OP even sees.

                        – David Thornley
                        yesterday



















                      • The government will just hand over the money when presented with an amended return and justification. If the company is paying insurance for the employee still, that's between the company and the insurance agency, since it's not money the OP even sees.

                        – David Thornley
                        yesterday

















                      The government will just hand over the money when presented with an amended return and justification. If the company is paying insurance for the employee still, that's between the company and the insurance agency, since it's not money the OP even sees.

                      – David Thornley
                      yesterday





                      The government will just hand over the money when presented with an amended return and justification. If the company is paying insurance for the employee still, that's between the company and the insurance agency, since it's not money the OP even sees.

                      – David Thornley
                      yesterday











                      0














                      Close the account so they can't pay anymore into your name. If there is no proof you received the money, I'd say there is no basis for the tax, which means it would be easier to claim it back even should it be taken.



                      Seek an accountant, and get them to work out all the tax you would have overpaid as a result of that money entering your tax records so far.



                      Send them this information via email or a letter. Record all calls but try to keep things only in written format where possible.



                      Also, why not seek help from your previous superiors? It may be possible to do more from the inside.



                      Let the government organisation responsible for the taxes know that this is happening. They may be able to help you more, it doesn't seem like you'd be the only one facing this. If it happened to you it is happening to somebody else.






                      share|improve this answer
























                      • My only objection to this answer is that it's not safe to assume closing the account means there's no basis for taxation. Taxes are withheld and reported to the government regardless of whether or not a paycheck gets deposited, I see how a failed direct deposit would be any different.

                        – barbecue
                        yesterday
















                      0














                      Close the account so they can't pay anymore into your name. If there is no proof you received the money, I'd say there is no basis for the tax, which means it would be easier to claim it back even should it be taken.



                      Seek an accountant, and get them to work out all the tax you would have overpaid as a result of that money entering your tax records so far.



                      Send them this information via email or a letter. Record all calls but try to keep things only in written format where possible.



                      Also, why not seek help from your previous superiors? It may be possible to do more from the inside.



                      Let the government organisation responsible for the taxes know that this is happening. They may be able to help you more, it doesn't seem like you'd be the only one facing this. If it happened to you it is happening to somebody else.






                      share|improve this answer
























                      • My only objection to this answer is that it's not safe to assume closing the account means there's no basis for taxation. Taxes are withheld and reported to the government regardless of whether or not a paycheck gets deposited, I see how a failed direct deposit would be any different.

                        – barbecue
                        yesterday














                      0












                      0








                      0







                      Close the account so they can't pay anymore into your name. If there is no proof you received the money, I'd say there is no basis for the tax, which means it would be easier to claim it back even should it be taken.



                      Seek an accountant, and get them to work out all the tax you would have overpaid as a result of that money entering your tax records so far.



                      Send them this information via email or a letter. Record all calls but try to keep things only in written format where possible.



                      Also, why not seek help from your previous superiors? It may be possible to do more from the inside.



                      Let the government organisation responsible for the taxes know that this is happening. They may be able to help you more, it doesn't seem like you'd be the only one facing this. If it happened to you it is happening to somebody else.






                      share|improve this answer













                      Close the account so they can't pay anymore into your name. If there is no proof you received the money, I'd say there is no basis for the tax, which means it would be easier to claim it back even should it be taken.



                      Seek an accountant, and get them to work out all the tax you would have overpaid as a result of that money entering your tax records so far.



                      Send them this information via email or a letter. Record all calls but try to keep things only in written format where possible.



                      Also, why not seek help from your previous superiors? It may be possible to do more from the inside.



                      Let the government organisation responsible for the taxes know that this is happening. They may be able to help you more, it doesn't seem like you'd be the only one facing this. If it happened to you it is happening to somebody else.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered yesterday









                      LukaliLukali

                      58415




                      58415













                      • My only objection to this answer is that it's not safe to assume closing the account means there's no basis for taxation. Taxes are withheld and reported to the government regardless of whether or not a paycheck gets deposited, I see how a failed direct deposit would be any different.

                        – barbecue
                        yesterday



















                      • My only objection to this answer is that it's not safe to assume closing the account means there's no basis for taxation. Taxes are withheld and reported to the government regardless of whether or not a paycheck gets deposited, I see how a failed direct deposit would be any different.

                        – barbecue
                        yesterday

















                      My only objection to this answer is that it's not safe to assume closing the account means there's no basis for taxation. Taxes are withheld and reported to the government regardless of whether or not a paycheck gets deposited, I see how a failed direct deposit would be any different.

                      – barbecue
                      yesterday





                      My only objection to this answer is that it's not safe to assume closing the account means there's no basis for taxation. Taxes are withheld and reported to the government regardless of whether or not a paycheck gets deposited, I see how a failed direct deposit would be any different.

                      – barbecue
                      yesterday





                      protected by Jane S yesterday



                      Thank you for your interest in this question.
                      Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



                      Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Ponta tanko

                      Tantalo (mitologio)

                      Erzsébet Schaár