Refactoring subquery to JOIN and CROSS APPLY, get only row for each record in parent table












2















Given the following query:



SELECT
p.ProductName,
CASE
WHEN EXISTS(SELECT 1 FROM Product WHERE ProductSuperID = p.ProductSuperID AND HasImage = 1)
THEN
1
ELSE
0
END
AS HasImage,
(SELECT Sum(StockBalance) FROM Product WHERE ProductSuperID = p.ProductSuperID) AS StockBalance,
CASE
WHEN EXISTS(SELECT 1 FROM Product WHERE ProductSuperID = p.ProductSuperID AND Price IS NULL)
AND EXISTS(SELECT 1 FROM Product WHERE ProductSuperID = p.ProductSuperID AND DiscountPrice IS NULL)
THEN
0
ELSE
1
END
AS HasPrice
FROM ProductSuper p

-- SCHEMA
CREATE TABLE ProductSuper
(
ProductSuperID int,
ProductName varchar(255)
)
CREATE TABLE Product
(
ProdID int,
ProductSuperID int,
HasImage bit,
StockBalance int,
Price decimal(10,2),
DiscountPrice decimal(10,2)
)
INSERT INTO ProductSuper
(ProductSuperID, ProductName)
VALUES
(1, 'Product 1'),
(2, 'Product 2')
INSERT INTO Product
(ProductSuperID, HasImage, StockBalance, Price, DiscountPrice)
VALUES
(1, 0, 10, 10.00, 9.00),
(1, 0, 0, 10.00, 9.00),
(2, 0, 10, 10.00, 9.00),
(2, 0, 2, 10.00, 9.00),
(2, 1, 5, 10.00, 9.00)




I want to learn how could I best rewrite it to use either JOIN or CROSS APPLY, if anything to avoid some code duplication. I tried writing a JOIN-based version (and one with APPLY) but I'm getting more than one result for each row in the ProductSuper table, whereas I only want one row.



i.e. expected result:



+-------------+-----+-----+-----+
| Product 1 | 0 | 10 | 1 |
+-------------+-----+-----+-----+
| Product 2 | 1 | 17 | 1 |
+-------------+-----+-----+-----+


(I'm aware that for this particular piece of code there is little benefit from rewriting, since the subqueries are fast. But still, this is only an example.)



Thanks.










share|improve this question




















  • 3





    Help me write this query in SQL.

    – Erik Darling
    4 hours ago











  • Is there more than one record per ProdId in the Product table? That's the only way that this code makes sense, or that a simple change to a JOIN would return multiple records. However, I'd like confirmation.

    – Laughing Vergil
    3 hours ago











  • @LaughingVergil, yes. There's only one ProdID in the ProductSuper table, which has a one-to-many relationship with the Product table.

    – Marc.2377
    2 hours ago
















2















Given the following query:



SELECT
p.ProductName,
CASE
WHEN EXISTS(SELECT 1 FROM Product WHERE ProductSuperID = p.ProductSuperID AND HasImage = 1)
THEN
1
ELSE
0
END
AS HasImage,
(SELECT Sum(StockBalance) FROM Product WHERE ProductSuperID = p.ProductSuperID) AS StockBalance,
CASE
WHEN EXISTS(SELECT 1 FROM Product WHERE ProductSuperID = p.ProductSuperID AND Price IS NULL)
AND EXISTS(SELECT 1 FROM Product WHERE ProductSuperID = p.ProductSuperID AND DiscountPrice IS NULL)
THEN
0
ELSE
1
END
AS HasPrice
FROM ProductSuper p

-- SCHEMA
CREATE TABLE ProductSuper
(
ProductSuperID int,
ProductName varchar(255)
)
CREATE TABLE Product
(
ProdID int,
ProductSuperID int,
HasImage bit,
StockBalance int,
Price decimal(10,2),
DiscountPrice decimal(10,2)
)
INSERT INTO ProductSuper
(ProductSuperID, ProductName)
VALUES
(1, 'Product 1'),
(2, 'Product 2')
INSERT INTO Product
(ProductSuperID, HasImage, StockBalance, Price, DiscountPrice)
VALUES
(1, 0, 10, 10.00, 9.00),
(1, 0, 0, 10.00, 9.00),
(2, 0, 10, 10.00, 9.00),
(2, 0, 2, 10.00, 9.00),
(2, 1, 5, 10.00, 9.00)




I want to learn how could I best rewrite it to use either JOIN or CROSS APPLY, if anything to avoid some code duplication. I tried writing a JOIN-based version (and one with APPLY) but I'm getting more than one result for each row in the ProductSuper table, whereas I only want one row.



i.e. expected result:



+-------------+-----+-----+-----+
| Product 1 | 0 | 10 | 1 |
+-------------+-----+-----+-----+
| Product 2 | 1 | 17 | 1 |
+-------------+-----+-----+-----+


(I'm aware that for this particular piece of code there is little benefit from rewriting, since the subqueries are fast. But still, this is only an example.)



Thanks.










share|improve this question




















  • 3





    Help me write this query in SQL.

    – Erik Darling
    4 hours ago











  • Is there more than one record per ProdId in the Product table? That's the only way that this code makes sense, or that a simple change to a JOIN would return multiple records. However, I'd like confirmation.

    – Laughing Vergil
    3 hours ago











  • @LaughingVergil, yes. There's only one ProdID in the ProductSuper table, which has a one-to-many relationship with the Product table.

    – Marc.2377
    2 hours ago














2












2








2








Given the following query:



SELECT
p.ProductName,
CASE
WHEN EXISTS(SELECT 1 FROM Product WHERE ProductSuperID = p.ProductSuperID AND HasImage = 1)
THEN
1
ELSE
0
END
AS HasImage,
(SELECT Sum(StockBalance) FROM Product WHERE ProductSuperID = p.ProductSuperID) AS StockBalance,
CASE
WHEN EXISTS(SELECT 1 FROM Product WHERE ProductSuperID = p.ProductSuperID AND Price IS NULL)
AND EXISTS(SELECT 1 FROM Product WHERE ProductSuperID = p.ProductSuperID AND DiscountPrice IS NULL)
THEN
0
ELSE
1
END
AS HasPrice
FROM ProductSuper p

-- SCHEMA
CREATE TABLE ProductSuper
(
ProductSuperID int,
ProductName varchar(255)
)
CREATE TABLE Product
(
ProdID int,
ProductSuperID int,
HasImage bit,
StockBalance int,
Price decimal(10,2),
DiscountPrice decimal(10,2)
)
INSERT INTO ProductSuper
(ProductSuperID, ProductName)
VALUES
(1, 'Product 1'),
(2, 'Product 2')
INSERT INTO Product
(ProductSuperID, HasImage, StockBalance, Price, DiscountPrice)
VALUES
(1, 0, 10, 10.00, 9.00),
(1, 0, 0, 10.00, 9.00),
(2, 0, 10, 10.00, 9.00),
(2, 0, 2, 10.00, 9.00),
(2, 1, 5, 10.00, 9.00)




I want to learn how could I best rewrite it to use either JOIN or CROSS APPLY, if anything to avoid some code duplication. I tried writing a JOIN-based version (and one with APPLY) but I'm getting more than one result for each row in the ProductSuper table, whereas I only want one row.



i.e. expected result:



+-------------+-----+-----+-----+
| Product 1 | 0 | 10 | 1 |
+-------------+-----+-----+-----+
| Product 2 | 1 | 17 | 1 |
+-------------+-----+-----+-----+


(I'm aware that for this particular piece of code there is little benefit from rewriting, since the subqueries are fast. But still, this is only an example.)



Thanks.










share|improve this question
















Given the following query:



SELECT
p.ProductName,
CASE
WHEN EXISTS(SELECT 1 FROM Product WHERE ProductSuperID = p.ProductSuperID AND HasImage = 1)
THEN
1
ELSE
0
END
AS HasImage,
(SELECT Sum(StockBalance) FROM Product WHERE ProductSuperID = p.ProductSuperID) AS StockBalance,
CASE
WHEN EXISTS(SELECT 1 FROM Product WHERE ProductSuperID = p.ProductSuperID AND Price IS NULL)
AND EXISTS(SELECT 1 FROM Product WHERE ProductSuperID = p.ProductSuperID AND DiscountPrice IS NULL)
THEN
0
ELSE
1
END
AS HasPrice
FROM ProductSuper p

-- SCHEMA
CREATE TABLE ProductSuper
(
ProductSuperID int,
ProductName varchar(255)
)
CREATE TABLE Product
(
ProdID int,
ProductSuperID int,
HasImage bit,
StockBalance int,
Price decimal(10,2),
DiscountPrice decimal(10,2)
)
INSERT INTO ProductSuper
(ProductSuperID, ProductName)
VALUES
(1, 'Product 1'),
(2, 'Product 2')
INSERT INTO Product
(ProductSuperID, HasImage, StockBalance, Price, DiscountPrice)
VALUES
(1, 0, 10, 10.00, 9.00),
(1, 0, 0, 10.00, 9.00),
(2, 0, 10, 10.00, 9.00),
(2, 0, 2, 10.00, 9.00),
(2, 1, 5, 10.00, 9.00)




I want to learn how could I best rewrite it to use either JOIN or CROSS APPLY, if anything to avoid some code duplication. I tried writing a JOIN-based version (and one with APPLY) but I'm getting more than one result for each row in the ProductSuper table, whereas I only want one row.



i.e. expected result:



+-------------+-----+-----+-----+
| Product 1 | 0 | 10 | 1 |
+-------------+-----+-----+-----+
| Product 2 | 1 | 17 | 1 |
+-------------+-----+-----+-----+


(I'm aware that for this particular piece of code there is little benefit from rewriting, since the subqueries are fast. But still, this is only an example.)



Thanks.







sql-server sql-server-2008-r2 sql-server-2014 join cross-apply






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago







Marc.2377

















asked 5 hours ago









Marc.2377Marc.2377

1376




1376








  • 3





    Help me write this query in SQL.

    – Erik Darling
    4 hours ago











  • Is there more than one record per ProdId in the Product table? That's the only way that this code makes sense, or that a simple change to a JOIN would return multiple records. However, I'd like confirmation.

    – Laughing Vergil
    3 hours ago











  • @LaughingVergil, yes. There's only one ProdID in the ProductSuper table, which has a one-to-many relationship with the Product table.

    – Marc.2377
    2 hours ago














  • 3





    Help me write this query in SQL.

    – Erik Darling
    4 hours ago











  • Is there more than one record per ProdId in the Product table? That's the only way that this code makes sense, or that a simple change to a JOIN would return multiple records. However, I'd like confirmation.

    – Laughing Vergil
    3 hours ago











  • @LaughingVergil, yes. There's only one ProdID in the ProductSuper table, which has a one-to-many relationship with the Product table.

    – Marc.2377
    2 hours ago








3




3





Help me write this query in SQL.

– Erik Darling
4 hours ago





Help me write this query in SQL.

– Erik Darling
4 hours ago













Is there more than one record per ProdId in the Product table? That's the only way that this code makes sense, or that a simple change to a JOIN would return multiple records. However, I'd like confirmation.

– Laughing Vergil
3 hours ago





Is there more than one record per ProdId in the Product table? That's the only way that this code makes sense, or that a simple change to a JOIN would return multiple records. However, I'd like confirmation.

– Laughing Vergil
3 hours ago













@LaughingVergil, yes. There's only one ProdID in the ProductSuper table, which has a one-to-many relationship with the Product table.

– Marc.2377
2 hours ago





@LaughingVergil, yes. There's only one ProdID in the ProductSuper table, which has a one-to-many relationship with the Product table.

– Marc.2377
2 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3














I'd probably structure this query as below



WITH ProductDetails
AS (SELECT ProductSuperID,
HasImage = MAX(CASE WHEN HasImage = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END),
StockBalance = Sum(StockBalance),
HasPrice = CASE WHEN COUNT(*) = COUNT(Price) AND COUNT(*) = COUNT(DiscountPrice) THEN 1 ELSE 0 END
FROM Product
GROUP BY ProductSuperID)
SELECT p.ProductName,
HasImage = ISNULL(pd.HasImage,0),
pd.StockBalance,
HasPrice = ISNULL(pd.HasPrice,0)
FROM ProductSuper p
LEFT JOIN ProductDetails pd
ON p.ProductSuperID= pd.ProductSuperID;


As CROSS APPLY it could be written like this



SELECT ps.ProductName,
pd.HasImage,
pd.StockBalance,
pd.HasPrice
FROM ProductSuper ps
CROSS APPLY (SELECT HasImage = MAX(CASE WHEN HasImage = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END),
StockBalance = Sum(StockBalance),
HasPrice = CASE WHEN COUNT(*) = COUNT(Price) AND COUNT(*) = COUNT(DiscountPrice) THEN 1 ELSE 0 END
FROM Product p
WHERE p.ProductSuperID= ps.ProductSuperID) pd





share|improve this answer


























  • Awesome, tyvm. I improved my question while you answered, would you mind if I make a few edits to your answer so that it is on par with my updated question? (of course, you can do it yourself if you prefer to).

    – Marc.2377
    1 hour ago











  • Yep, go for it!

    – Martin Smith
    1 hour ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "182"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f227687%2frefactoring-subquery-to-join-and-cross-apply-get-only-row-for-each-record-in-pa%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3














I'd probably structure this query as below



WITH ProductDetails
AS (SELECT ProductSuperID,
HasImage = MAX(CASE WHEN HasImage = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END),
StockBalance = Sum(StockBalance),
HasPrice = CASE WHEN COUNT(*) = COUNT(Price) AND COUNT(*) = COUNT(DiscountPrice) THEN 1 ELSE 0 END
FROM Product
GROUP BY ProductSuperID)
SELECT p.ProductName,
HasImage = ISNULL(pd.HasImage,0),
pd.StockBalance,
HasPrice = ISNULL(pd.HasPrice,0)
FROM ProductSuper p
LEFT JOIN ProductDetails pd
ON p.ProductSuperID= pd.ProductSuperID;


As CROSS APPLY it could be written like this



SELECT ps.ProductName,
pd.HasImage,
pd.StockBalance,
pd.HasPrice
FROM ProductSuper ps
CROSS APPLY (SELECT HasImage = MAX(CASE WHEN HasImage = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END),
StockBalance = Sum(StockBalance),
HasPrice = CASE WHEN COUNT(*) = COUNT(Price) AND COUNT(*) = COUNT(DiscountPrice) THEN 1 ELSE 0 END
FROM Product p
WHERE p.ProductSuperID= ps.ProductSuperID) pd





share|improve this answer


























  • Awesome, tyvm. I improved my question while you answered, would you mind if I make a few edits to your answer so that it is on par with my updated question? (of course, you can do it yourself if you prefer to).

    – Marc.2377
    1 hour ago











  • Yep, go for it!

    – Martin Smith
    1 hour ago
















3














I'd probably structure this query as below



WITH ProductDetails
AS (SELECT ProductSuperID,
HasImage = MAX(CASE WHEN HasImage = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END),
StockBalance = Sum(StockBalance),
HasPrice = CASE WHEN COUNT(*) = COUNT(Price) AND COUNT(*) = COUNT(DiscountPrice) THEN 1 ELSE 0 END
FROM Product
GROUP BY ProductSuperID)
SELECT p.ProductName,
HasImage = ISNULL(pd.HasImage,0),
pd.StockBalance,
HasPrice = ISNULL(pd.HasPrice,0)
FROM ProductSuper p
LEFT JOIN ProductDetails pd
ON p.ProductSuperID= pd.ProductSuperID;


As CROSS APPLY it could be written like this



SELECT ps.ProductName,
pd.HasImage,
pd.StockBalance,
pd.HasPrice
FROM ProductSuper ps
CROSS APPLY (SELECT HasImage = MAX(CASE WHEN HasImage = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END),
StockBalance = Sum(StockBalance),
HasPrice = CASE WHEN COUNT(*) = COUNT(Price) AND COUNT(*) = COUNT(DiscountPrice) THEN 1 ELSE 0 END
FROM Product p
WHERE p.ProductSuperID= ps.ProductSuperID) pd





share|improve this answer


























  • Awesome, tyvm. I improved my question while you answered, would you mind if I make a few edits to your answer so that it is on par with my updated question? (of course, you can do it yourself if you prefer to).

    – Marc.2377
    1 hour ago











  • Yep, go for it!

    – Martin Smith
    1 hour ago














3












3








3







I'd probably structure this query as below



WITH ProductDetails
AS (SELECT ProductSuperID,
HasImage = MAX(CASE WHEN HasImage = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END),
StockBalance = Sum(StockBalance),
HasPrice = CASE WHEN COUNT(*) = COUNT(Price) AND COUNT(*) = COUNT(DiscountPrice) THEN 1 ELSE 0 END
FROM Product
GROUP BY ProductSuperID)
SELECT p.ProductName,
HasImage = ISNULL(pd.HasImage,0),
pd.StockBalance,
HasPrice = ISNULL(pd.HasPrice,0)
FROM ProductSuper p
LEFT JOIN ProductDetails pd
ON p.ProductSuperID= pd.ProductSuperID;


As CROSS APPLY it could be written like this



SELECT ps.ProductName,
pd.HasImage,
pd.StockBalance,
pd.HasPrice
FROM ProductSuper ps
CROSS APPLY (SELECT HasImage = MAX(CASE WHEN HasImage = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END),
StockBalance = Sum(StockBalance),
HasPrice = CASE WHEN COUNT(*) = COUNT(Price) AND COUNT(*) = COUNT(DiscountPrice) THEN 1 ELSE 0 END
FROM Product p
WHERE p.ProductSuperID= ps.ProductSuperID) pd





share|improve this answer















I'd probably structure this query as below



WITH ProductDetails
AS (SELECT ProductSuperID,
HasImage = MAX(CASE WHEN HasImage = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END),
StockBalance = Sum(StockBalance),
HasPrice = CASE WHEN COUNT(*) = COUNT(Price) AND COUNT(*) = COUNT(DiscountPrice) THEN 1 ELSE 0 END
FROM Product
GROUP BY ProductSuperID)
SELECT p.ProductName,
HasImage = ISNULL(pd.HasImage,0),
pd.StockBalance,
HasPrice = ISNULL(pd.HasPrice,0)
FROM ProductSuper p
LEFT JOIN ProductDetails pd
ON p.ProductSuperID= pd.ProductSuperID;


As CROSS APPLY it could be written like this



SELECT ps.ProductName,
pd.HasImage,
pd.StockBalance,
pd.HasPrice
FROM ProductSuper ps
CROSS APPLY (SELECT HasImage = MAX(CASE WHEN HasImage = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END),
StockBalance = Sum(StockBalance),
HasPrice = CASE WHEN COUNT(*) = COUNT(Price) AND COUNT(*) = COUNT(DiscountPrice) THEN 1 ELSE 0 END
FROM Product p
WHERE p.ProductSuperID= ps.ProductSuperID) pd






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 50 mins ago









Marc.2377

1376




1376










answered 2 hours ago









Martin SmithMartin Smith

62.3k10168250




62.3k10168250













  • Awesome, tyvm. I improved my question while you answered, would you mind if I make a few edits to your answer so that it is on par with my updated question? (of course, you can do it yourself if you prefer to).

    – Marc.2377
    1 hour ago











  • Yep, go for it!

    – Martin Smith
    1 hour ago



















  • Awesome, tyvm. I improved my question while you answered, would you mind if I make a few edits to your answer so that it is on par with my updated question? (of course, you can do it yourself if you prefer to).

    – Marc.2377
    1 hour ago











  • Yep, go for it!

    – Martin Smith
    1 hour ago

















Awesome, tyvm. I improved my question while you answered, would you mind if I make a few edits to your answer so that it is on par with my updated question? (of course, you can do it yourself if you prefer to).

– Marc.2377
1 hour ago





Awesome, tyvm. I improved my question while you answered, would you mind if I make a few edits to your answer so that it is on par with my updated question? (of course, you can do it yourself if you prefer to).

– Marc.2377
1 hour ago













Yep, go for it!

– Martin Smith
1 hour ago





Yep, go for it!

– Martin Smith
1 hour ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f227687%2frefactoring-subquery-to-join-and-cross-apply-get-only-row-for-each-record-in-pa%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Ponta tanko

Tantalo (mitologio)

Erzsébet Schaár