Should I oversample my validation data to get better F1 score and PRC?
$begingroup$
I am currently working with a dataset that is imbalanced, about 30k rows * 14 features (just for you know), and 99.5% of the data is labeled 0. Since the model is strongly imbalanced I decided to use precision/recall/f1 score to decide the performance of model.
I used SMOTE to oversample my training data (after splitting the validation set out). Now my model is trained with oversampled training data, and I am going to test it with validation set. If I just validate it on original validation data, I get a F1 score around 0.05, and the classification report is followed:
precision recall f1-score support
Class 0 1.00 0.86 0.93 7606
Class 1 0.03 0.75 0.05 36
If I oversample my validation data, I get a F1 score around 0.85:
precision recall f1-score support
Class 0 0.84 0.86 0.85 7606
Class 1 0.86 0.83 0.85 7606
My question is:
Should I use an oversampled validation set? (because the result is much prettier but I think the model is the same anyway)
Why do I have such bad metrics on the original validation data? Is it because the data size is not big enough?
(This is my first time posting so please be gentle if I did or said anything wrong!)
machine-learning classification cross-validation confusion-matrix smote
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am currently working with a dataset that is imbalanced, about 30k rows * 14 features (just for you know), and 99.5% of the data is labeled 0. Since the model is strongly imbalanced I decided to use precision/recall/f1 score to decide the performance of model.
I used SMOTE to oversample my training data (after splitting the validation set out). Now my model is trained with oversampled training data, and I am going to test it with validation set. If I just validate it on original validation data, I get a F1 score around 0.05, and the classification report is followed:
precision recall f1-score support
Class 0 1.00 0.86 0.93 7606
Class 1 0.03 0.75 0.05 36
If I oversample my validation data, I get a F1 score around 0.85:
precision recall f1-score support
Class 0 0.84 0.86 0.85 7606
Class 1 0.86 0.83 0.85 7606
My question is:
Should I use an oversampled validation set? (because the result is much prettier but I think the model is the same anyway)
Why do I have such bad metrics on the original validation data? Is it because the data size is not big enough?
(This is my first time posting so please be gentle if I did or said anything wrong!)
machine-learning classification cross-validation confusion-matrix smote
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am currently working with a dataset that is imbalanced, about 30k rows * 14 features (just for you know), and 99.5% of the data is labeled 0. Since the model is strongly imbalanced I decided to use precision/recall/f1 score to decide the performance of model.
I used SMOTE to oversample my training data (after splitting the validation set out). Now my model is trained with oversampled training data, and I am going to test it with validation set. If I just validate it on original validation data, I get a F1 score around 0.05, and the classification report is followed:
precision recall f1-score support
Class 0 1.00 0.86 0.93 7606
Class 1 0.03 0.75 0.05 36
If I oversample my validation data, I get a F1 score around 0.85:
precision recall f1-score support
Class 0 0.84 0.86 0.85 7606
Class 1 0.86 0.83 0.85 7606
My question is:
Should I use an oversampled validation set? (because the result is much prettier but I think the model is the same anyway)
Why do I have such bad metrics on the original validation data? Is it because the data size is not big enough?
(This is my first time posting so please be gentle if I did or said anything wrong!)
machine-learning classification cross-validation confusion-matrix smote
New contributor
$endgroup$
I am currently working with a dataset that is imbalanced, about 30k rows * 14 features (just for you know), and 99.5% of the data is labeled 0. Since the model is strongly imbalanced I decided to use precision/recall/f1 score to decide the performance of model.
I used SMOTE to oversample my training data (after splitting the validation set out). Now my model is trained with oversampled training data, and I am going to test it with validation set. If I just validate it on original validation data, I get a F1 score around 0.05, and the classification report is followed:
precision recall f1-score support
Class 0 1.00 0.86 0.93 7606
Class 1 0.03 0.75 0.05 36
If I oversample my validation data, I get a F1 score around 0.85:
precision recall f1-score support
Class 0 0.84 0.86 0.85 7606
Class 1 0.86 0.83 0.85 7606
My question is:
Should I use an oversampled validation set? (because the result is much prettier but I think the model is the same anyway)
Why do I have such bad metrics on the original validation data? Is it because the data size is not big enough?
(This is my first time posting so please be gentle if I did or said anything wrong!)
machine-learning classification cross-validation confusion-matrix smote
machine-learning classification cross-validation confusion-matrix smote
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 14 mins ago
Frank XuFrank Xu
11
11
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "557"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Frank Xu is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f46076%2fshould-i-oversample-my-validation-data-to-get-better-f1-score-and-prc%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Frank Xu is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Frank Xu is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Frank Xu is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Frank Xu is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f46076%2fshould-i-oversample-my-validation-data-to-get-better-f1-score-and-prc%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown