Having trouble figuring out how loss was calculated for SQuAD task in BERT paper












0












$begingroup$


The BERT Paper



https://arxiv.org/pdf/1810.04805.pdf



Section 4.2 covers the SQuAD training.



So from my understanding, there are two extra parameters trained, they are two vectors with the same dimension as the hidden size, so the same dimensions as the contextualized embeddings in BERT. They are S (for start) and E (for End).



For each, a softmax is taken with S and each of the final contextualized embeddings to get a score for the correct Start position. And the same thing is done for E and the correct end position.



I get up to this part. But I am having trouble figuring out how the did the labeling and final loss calculations, which is described in this paragraph



"and the maximum scoring span is used as the prediction. The training objective is the loglikelihood of the correct start and end positions."



What do they mean by "maximum scoring span is used as the prediction"?



Furthermore, how does that play into "The training objective is the loglikelihood of the correct start and end positions"?



From this Source:



https://ljvmiranda921.github.io/notebook/2017/08/13/softmax-and-the-negative-log-likelihood/



It says the log-likelihood is only applied to the correct classes. So the we are only calculating the softmax for the correct positions only, Not any of the in correct positions.



If this interpretation is correct, then the loss will be



Loss = -Log( Softmax(S*T(predictedStart) / Sum(S*Ti) ) -Log( Softmax(E*T(predictedEnd) / Sum(S*Ti) )









share|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    The BERT Paper



    https://arxiv.org/pdf/1810.04805.pdf



    Section 4.2 covers the SQuAD training.



    So from my understanding, there are two extra parameters trained, they are two vectors with the same dimension as the hidden size, so the same dimensions as the contextualized embeddings in BERT. They are S (for start) and E (for End).



    For each, a softmax is taken with S and each of the final contextualized embeddings to get a score for the correct Start position. And the same thing is done for E and the correct end position.



    I get up to this part. But I am having trouble figuring out how the did the labeling and final loss calculations, which is described in this paragraph



    "and the maximum scoring span is used as the prediction. The training objective is the loglikelihood of the correct start and end positions."



    What do they mean by "maximum scoring span is used as the prediction"?



    Furthermore, how does that play into "The training objective is the loglikelihood of the correct start and end positions"?



    From this Source:



    https://ljvmiranda921.github.io/notebook/2017/08/13/softmax-and-the-negative-log-likelihood/



    It says the log-likelihood is only applied to the correct classes. So the we are only calculating the softmax for the correct positions only, Not any of the in correct positions.



    If this interpretation is correct, then the loss will be



    Loss = -Log( Softmax(S*T(predictedStart) / Sum(S*Ti) ) -Log( Softmax(E*T(predictedEnd) / Sum(S*Ti) )









    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      The BERT Paper



      https://arxiv.org/pdf/1810.04805.pdf



      Section 4.2 covers the SQuAD training.



      So from my understanding, there are two extra parameters trained, they are two vectors with the same dimension as the hidden size, so the same dimensions as the contextualized embeddings in BERT. They are S (for start) and E (for End).



      For each, a softmax is taken with S and each of the final contextualized embeddings to get a score for the correct Start position. And the same thing is done for E and the correct end position.



      I get up to this part. But I am having trouble figuring out how the did the labeling and final loss calculations, which is described in this paragraph



      "and the maximum scoring span is used as the prediction. The training objective is the loglikelihood of the correct start and end positions."



      What do they mean by "maximum scoring span is used as the prediction"?



      Furthermore, how does that play into "The training objective is the loglikelihood of the correct start and end positions"?



      From this Source:



      https://ljvmiranda921.github.io/notebook/2017/08/13/softmax-and-the-negative-log-likelihood/



      It says the log-likelihood is only applied to the correct classes. So the we are only calculating the softmax for the correct positions only, Not any of the in correct positions.



      If this interpretation is correct, then the loss will be



      Loss = -Log( Softmax(S*T(predictedStart) / Sum(S*Ti) ) -Log( Softmax(E*T(predictedEnd) / Sum(S*Ti) )









      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      The BERT Paper



      https://arxiv.org/pdf/1810.04805.pdf



      Section 4.2 covers the SQuAD training.



      So from my understanding, there are two extra parameters trained, they are two vectors with the same dimension as the hidden size, so the same dimensions as the contextualized embeddings in BERT. They are S (for start) and E (for End).



      For each, a softmax is taken with S and each of the final contextualized embeddings to get a score for the correct Start position. And the same thing is done for E and the correct end position.



      I get up to this part. But I am having trouble figuring out how the did the labeling and final loss calculations, which is described in this paragraph



      "and the maximum scoring span is used as the prediction. The training objective is the loglikelihood of the correct start and end positions."



      What do they mean by "maximum scoring span is used as the prediction"?



      Furthermore, how does that play into "The training objective is the loglikelihood of the correct start and end positions"?



      From this Source:



      https://ljvmiranda921.github.io/notebook/2017/08/13/softmax-and-the-negative-log-likelihood/



      It says the log-likelihood is only applied to the correct classes. So the we are only calculating the softmax for the correct positions only, Not any of the in correct positions.



      If this interpretation is correct, then the loss will be



      Loss = -Log( Softmax(S*T(predictedStart) / Sum(S*Ti) ) -Log( Softmax(E*T(predictedEnd) / Sum(S*Ti) )






      machine-learning nlp loss-function






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 11 mins ago









      SantoshGupta7SantoshGupta7

      1134




      1134






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "557"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f49621%2fhaving-trouble-figuring-out-how-loss-was-calculated-for-squad-task-in-bert-paper%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f49621%2fhaving-trouble-figuring-out-how-loss-was-calculated-for-squad-task-in-bert-paper%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Ponta tanko

          Tantalo (mitologio)

          Erzsébet Schaár