Looking for other opinions on approach to classification problem
$begingroup$
I'm looking to implement an "opt-out" filter for my company. The input is short, text-message style messages. A few examples of opt-out messages are:
- "remove me from your list"
- "remove from list"
- "please unsubscribe from list"
- etc.
All other messages are "good", and should not be removed.
My thoughts on approaches:
I was thinking of using a Bayesian classifier here, but not really knowing the solution space (or having much of a background in ML), want to be sure I'm not wasting time on a sub-optimal solution.
I'm fine with not having the most cutting-edge solution, but want to be sure I'm not missing an approach that might be equally as straightforward but more effective.
classification naive-bayes-classifier
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm looking to implement an "opt-out" filter for my company. The input is short, text-message style messages. A few examples of opt-out messages are:
- "remove me from your list"
- "remove from list"
- "please unsubscribe from list"
- etc.
All other messages are "good", and should not be removed.
My thoughts on approaches:
I was thinking of using a Bayesian classifier here, but not really knowing the solution space (or having much of a background in ML), want to be sure I'm not wasting time on a sub-optimal solution.
I'm fine with not having the most cutting-edge solution, but want to be sure I'm not missing an approach that might be equally as straightforward but more effective.
classification naive-bayes-classifier
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm looking to implement an "opt-out" filter for my company. The input is short, text-message style messages. A few examples of opt-out messages are:
- "remove me from your list"
- "remove from list"
- "please unsubscribe from list"
- etc.
All other messages are "good", and should not be removed.
My thoughts on approaches:
I was thinking of using a Bayesian classifier here, but not really knowing the solution space (or having much of a background in ML), want to be sure I'm not wasting time on a sub-optimal solution.
I'm fine with not having the most cutting-edge solution, but want to be sure I'm not missing an approach that might be equally as straightforward but more effective.
classification naive-bayes-classifier
$endgroup$
I'm looking to implement an "opt-out" filter for my company. The input is short, text-message style messages. A few examples of opt-out messages are:
- "remove me from your list"
- "remove from list"
- "please unsubscribe from list"
- etc.
All other messages are "good", and should not be removed.
My thoughts on approaches:
I was thinking of using a Bayesian classifier here, but not really knowing the solution space (or having much of a background in ML), want to be sure I'm not wasting time on a sub-optimal solution.
I'm fine with not having the most cutting-edge solution, but want to be sure I'm not missing an approach that might be equally as straightforward but more effective.
classification naive-bayes-classifier
classification naive-bayes-classifier
asked 9 hours ago
wheresmycookiewheresmycookie
1164
1164
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You should use text classification techniques. The most basic one is multinomial naive Bayes classifier with tf-idf features. for this method, take a look at this:
https://scikit-learn.org/stable/tutorial/text_analytics/working_with_text_data.html
If you don’t get enough accuracy (or maybe precision, recall or f-score), you could test more complex techniques e.g. using deep LSTM networks with word embedding. For this method, take a look at this:
https://machinelearningmastery.com/use-word-embedding-layers-deep-learning-keras/
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "557"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f48886%2flooking-for-other-opinions-on-approach-to-classification-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You should use text classification techniques. The most basic one is multinomial naive Bayes classifier with tf-idf features. for this method, take a look at this:
https://scikit-learn.org/stable/tutorial/text_analytics/working_with_text_data.html
If you don’t get enough accuracy (or maybe precision, recall or f-score), you could test more complex techniques e.g. using deep LSTM networks with word embedding. For this method, take a look at this:
https://machinelearningmastery.com/use-word-embedding-layers-deep-learning-keras/
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You should use text classification techniques. The most basic one is multinomial naive Bayes classifier with tf-idf features. for this method, take a look at this:
https://scikit-learn.org/stable/tutorial/text_analytics/working_with_text_data.html
If you don’t get enough accuracy (or maybe precision, recall or f-score), you could test more complex techniques e.g. using deep LSTM networks with word embedding. For this method, take a look at this:
https://machinelearningmastery.com/use-word-embedding-layers-deep-learning-keras/
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You should use text classification techniques. The most basic one is multinomial naive Bayes classifier with tf-idf features. for this method, take a look at this:
https://scikit-learn.org/stable/tutorial/text_analytics/working_with_text_data.html
If you don’t get enough accuracy (or maybe precision, recall or f-score), you could test more complex techniques e.g. using deep LSTM networks with word embedding. For this method, take a look at this:
https://machinelearningmastery.com/use-word-embedding-layers-deep-learning-keras/
$endgroup$
You should use text classification techniques. The most basic one is multinomial naive Bayes classifier with tf-idf features. for this method, take a look at this:
https://scikit-learn.org/stable/tutorial/text_analytics/working_with_text_data.html
If you don’t get enough accuracy (or maybe precision, recall or f-score), you could test more complex techniques e.g. using deep LSTM networks with word embedding. For this method, take a look at this:
https://machinelearningmastery.com/use-word-embedding-layers-deep-learning-keras/
answered 5 hours ago
pythinkerpythinker
5431211
5431211
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f48886%2flooking-for-other-opinions-on-approach-to-classification-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown