Is it wrong to have two voices leap from a perfect fifth to a perfect octave?
I had a teacher once tell me that although not forbidden, it is not advisable to have the same two voices move from a perfect fifth to a perfect octave (specifically referring to a four-part chorale for SATB chorus). I don't see any reason for this and haven't been able to find anything that addresses that issue specifically. Is that true? And if so, why should it be avoided in good voice-leading?
This can be seen between the tenor and bass in beats 2 and 3 of this bar.

theory harmony
add a comment |
I had a teacher once tell me that although not forbidden, it is not advisable to have the same two voices move from a perfect fifth to a perfect octave (specifically referring to a four-part chorale for SATB chorus). I don't see any reason for this and haven't been able to find anything that addresses that issue specifically. Is that true? And if so, why should it be avoided in good voice-leading?
This can be seen between the tenor and bass in beats 2 and 3 of this bar.

theory harmony
I think this question is related to my first question in SE about "prohibition of the parallels of fifth" and is also answered there (especially the answers concerning history, epoch, harmony and style: music.stackexchange.com/questions/78011/…
– Albrecht Hügli
2 hours ago
you should be more precise: do you concern a counterpoint of 2 voices, is it a task in counterpoint study or do is it an arrangement of 3 or 4 voices, or even a piano piece?
– Albrecht Hügli
2 hours ago
1
Thank you, I've edited my question :-)
– Shannon Duncan
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I had a teacher once tell me that although not forbidden, it is not advisable to have the same two voices move from a perfect fifth to a perfect octave (specifically referring to a four-part chorale for SATB chorus). I don't see any reason for this and haven't been able to find anything that addresses that issue specifically. Is that true? And if so, why should it be avoided in good voice-leading?
This can be seen between the tenor and bass in beats 2 and 3 of this bar.

theory harmony
I had a teacher once tell me that although not forbidden, it is not advisable to have the same two voices move from a perfect fifth to a perfect octave (specifically referring to a four-part chorale for SATB chorus). I don't see any reason for this and haven't been able to find anything that addresses that issue specifically. Is that true? And if so, why should it be avoided in good voice-leading?
This can be seen between the tenor and bass in beats 2 and 3 of this bar.

theory harmony
theory harmony
edited 1 hour ago
Shannon Duncan
asked 3 hours ago
Shannon DuncanShannon Duncan
553314
553314
I think this question is related to my first question in SE about "prohibition of the parallels of fifth" and is also answered there (especially the answers concerning history, epoch, harmony and style: music.stackexchange.com/questions/78011/…
– Albrecht Hügli
2 hours ago
you should be more precise: do you concern a counterpoint of 2 voices, is it a task in counterpoint study or do is it an arrangement of 3 or 4 voices, or even a piano piece?
– Albrecht Hügli
2 hours ago
1
Thank you, I've edited my question :-)
– Shannon Duncan
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I think this question is related to my first question in SE about "prohibition of the parallels of fifth" and is also answered there (especially the answers concerning history, epoch, harmony and style: music.stackexchange.com/questions/78011/…
– Albrecht Hügli
2 hours ago
you should be more precise: do you concern a counterpoint of 2 voices, is it a task in counterpoint study or do is it an arrangement of 3 or 4 voices, or even a piano piece?
– Albrecht Hügli
2 hours ago
1
Thank you, I've edited my question :-)
– Shannon Duncan
1 hour ago
I think this question is related to my first question in SE about "prohibition of the parallels of fifth" and is also answered there (especially the answers concerning history, epoch, harmony and style: music.stackexchange.com/questions/78011/…
– Albrecht Hügli
2 hours ago
I think this question is related to my first question in SE about "prohibition of the parallels of fifth" and is also answered there (especially the answers concerning history, epoch, harmony and style: music.stackexchange.com/questions/78011/…
– Albrecht Hügli
2 hours ago
you should be more precise: do you concern a counterpoint of 2 voices, is it a task in counterpoint study or do is it an arrangement of 3 or 4 voices, or even a piano piece?
– Albrecht Hügli
2 hours ago
you should be more precise: do you concern a counterpoint of 2 voices, is it a task in counterpoint study or do is it an arrangement of 3 or 4 voices, or even a piano piece?
– Albrecht Hügli
2 hours ago
1
1
Thank you, I've edited my question :-)
– Shannon Duncan
1 hour ago
Thank you, I've edited my question :-)
– Shannon Duncan
1 hour ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
I have to respectfully disagree with the individual that made this claim. The fact is that it's very common for a perfect fifth to move to an octave; we see it all the time in the V–I progression!

The claim that this is wrong is likely to prevent hidden octaves (also known as "indirect," "covered," "exposed," or "similar" octaves/fifths). In short, these are perfect fifths or octaves that are approached by similar motion between two voices. But there are wildly varying rules for situations in which these fifths/octaves are okay:
- If neither the soprano nor the bass are involved, it's fine.
- If one of the voices moves by semitone, it's fine.
- If the upper voice moves by step, it's fine.
Not knowing the individual that shared this stipulation with you, I can't say which rule s/he prefers.
It's also possible this individual was referring to the fact that two voices "fuse" together when in perfect intervals, and the whole point of counterpoint is for these voices not to fuse together, but rather be independent. Perhaps they felt that two consecutive perfect intervals, even of different sizes, led to this fusing? But that's not a rule that I'm familiar with.
Thank you so much for your incredibly helpful answer! It makes perfect sense.
– Shannon Duncan
1 hour ago
add a comment |
such rules must have been "invented" by purist teachers as chicane for the students
or generalized from a rule of counterpoint of 2 voices.
There is fundamentalism in every subjects - not only in religion.
Where are these quotes from?
– Dekkadeci
1 hour ago
from me! and probably from Diether da la Motte. (Harmonielehre, Kontrapunkt)
– Albrecht Hügli
1 hour ago
add a comment |
In four-part harmony, this rule is not on the "most important" list, but the perfect intervals, sounding so open, can draw attention to themselves when one is followed by another. This can make them stick out in a chorale setting where it contrasts with most of the movement. When the two voices are moving in the same direction, this effect is exaggerated. It can usually be avoided. Often in V-I cadences, if the soprano is on the 2nd scale degree moving down to the tonic, and the bass is in root position moving from V-I, the movement from a P5 to a P8 is in contrary motion, which lessens the effect.
There are many choices that need to be made when part-writing. Sometimes there is no better choice than to move from a P5 to a P8 between two voices, in order to avoid worse movement somewhere else.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "240"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f78955%2fis-it-wrong-to-have-two-voices-leap-from-a-perfect-fifth-to-a-perfect-octave%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I have to respectfully disagree with the individual that made this claim. The fact is that it's very common for a perfect fifth to move to an octave; we see it all the time in the V–I progression!

The claim that this is wrong is likely to prevent hidden octaves (also known as "indirect," "covered," "exposed," or "similar" octaves/fifths). In short, these are perfect fifths or octaves that are approached by similar motion between two voices. But there are wildly varying rules for situations in which these fifths/octaves are okay:
- If neither the soprano nor the bass are involved, it's fine.
- If one of the voices moves by semitone, it's fine.
- If the upper voice moves by step, it's fine.
Not knowing the individual that shared this stipulation with you, I can't say which rule s/he prefers.
It's also possible this individual was referring to the fact that two voices "fuse" together when in perfect intervals, and the whole point of counterpoint is for these voices not to fuse together, but rather be independent. Perhaps they felt that two consecutive perfect intervals, even of different sizes, led to this fusing? But that's not a rule that I'm familiar with.
Thank you so much for your incredibly helpful answer! It makes perfect sense.
– Shannon Duncan
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I have to respectfully disagree with the individual that made this claim. The fact is that it's very common for a perfect fifth to move to an octave; we see it all the time in the V–I progression!

The claim that this is wrong is likely to prevent hidden octaves (also known as "indirect," "covered," "exposed," or "similar" octaves/fifths). In short, these are perfect fifths or octaves that are approached by similar motion between two voices. But there are wildly varying rules for situations in which these fifths/octaves are okay:
- If neither the soprano nor the bass are involved, it's fine.
- If one of the voices moves by semitone, it's fine.
- If the upper voice moves by step, it's fine.
Not knowing the individual that shared this stipulation with you, I can't say which rule s/he prefers.
It's also possible this individual was referring to the fact that two voices "fuse" together when in perfect intervals, and the whole point of counterpoint is for these voices not to fuse together, but rather be independent. Perhaps they felt that two consecutive perfect intervals, even of different sizes, led to this fusing? But that's not a rule that I'm familiar with.
Thank you so much for your incredibly helpful answer! It makes perfect sense.
– Shannon Duncan
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I have to respectfully disagree with the individual that made this claim. The fact is that it's very common for a perfect fifth to move to an octave; we see it all the time in the V–I progression!

The claim that this is wrong is likely to prevent hidden octaves (also known as "indirect," "covered," "exposed," or "similar" octaves/fifths). In short, these are perfect fifths or octaves that are approached by similar motion between two voices. But there are wildly varying rules for situations in which these fifths/octaves are okay:
- If neither the soprano nor the bass are involved, it's fine.
- If one of the voices moves by semitone, it's fine.
- If the upper voice moves by step, it's fine.
Not knowing the individual that shared this stipulation with you, I can't say which rule s/he prefers.
It's also possible this individual was referring to the fact that two voices "fuse" together when in perfect intervals, and the whole point of counterpoint is for these voices not to fuse together, but rather be independent. Perhaps they felt that two consecutive perfect intervals, even of different sizes, led to this fusing? But that's not a rule that I'm familiar with.
I have to respectfully disagree with the individual that made this claim. The fact is that it's very common for a perfect fifth to move to an octave; we see it all the time in the V–I progression!

The claim that this is wrong is likely to prevent hidden octaves (also known as "indirect," "covered," "exposed," or "similar" octaves/fifths). In short, these are perfect fifths or octaves that are approached by similar motion between two voices. But there are wildly varying rules for situations in which these fifths/octaves are okay:
- If neither the soprano nor the bass are involved, it's fine.
- If one of the voices moves by semitone, it's fine.
- If the upper voice moves by step, it's fine.
Not knowing the individual that shared this stipulation with you, I can't say which rule s/he prefers.
It's also possible this individual was referring to the fact that two voices "fuse" together when in perfect intervals, and the whole point of counterpoint is for these voices not to fuse together, but rather be independent. Perhaps they felt that two consecutive perfect intervals, even of different sizes, led to this fusing? But that's not a rule that I'm familiar with.
answered 1 hour ago
RichardRichard
39.9k689172
39.9k689172
Thank you so much for your incredibly helpful answer! It makes perfect sense.
– Shannon Duncan
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Thank you so much for your incredibly helpful answer! It makes perfect sense.
– Shannon Duncan
1 hour ago
Thank you so much for your incredibly helpful answer! It makes perfect sense.
– Shannon Duncan
1 hour ago
Thank you so much for your incredibly helpful answer! It makes perfect sense.
– Shannon Duncan
1 hour ago
add a comment |
such rules must have been "invented" by purist teachers as chicane for the students
or generalized from a rule of counterpoint of 2 voices.
There is fundamentalism in every subjects - not only in religion.
Where are these quotes from?
– Dekkadeci
1 hour ago
from me! and probably from Diether da la Motte. (Harmonielehre, Kontrapunkt)
– Albrecht Hügli
1 hour ago
add a comment |
such rules must have been "invented" by purist teachers as chicane for the students
or generalized from a rule of counterpoint of 2 voices.
There is fundamentalism in every subjects - not only in religion.
Where are these quotes from?
– Dekkadeci
1 hour ago
from me! and probably from Diether da la Motte. (Harmonielehre, Kontrapunkt)
– Albrecht Hügli
1 hour ago
add a comment |
such rules must have been "invented" by purist teachers as chicane for the students
or generalized from a rule of counterpoint of 2 voices.
There is fundamentalism in every subjects - not only in religion.
such rules must have been "invented" by purist teachers as chicane for the students
or generalized from a rule of counterpoint of 2 voices.
There is fundamentalism in every subjects - not only in religion.
edited 1 hour ago
answered 1 hour ago
Albrecht HügliAlbrecht Hügli
47312
47312
Where are these quotes from?
– Dekkadeci
1 hour ago
from me! and probably from Diether da la Motte. (Harmonielehre, Kontrapunkt)
– Albrecht Hügli
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Where are these quotes from?
– Dekkadeci
1 hour ago
from me! and probably from Diether da la Motte. (Harmonielehre, Kontrapunkt)
– Albrecht Hügli
1 hour ago
Where are these quotes from?
– Dekkadeci
1 hour ago
Where are these quotes from?
– Dekkadeci
1 hour ago
from me! and probably from Diether da la Motte. (Harmonielehre, Kontrapunkt)
– Albrecht Hügli
1 hour ago
from me! and probably from Diether da la Motte. (Harmonielehre, Kontrapunkt)
– Albrecht Hügli
1 hour ago
add a comment |
In four-part harmony, this rule is not on the "most important" list, but the perfect intervals, sounding so open, can draw attention to themselves when one is followed by another. This can make them stick out in a chorale setting where it contrasts with most of the movement. When the two voices are moving in the same direction, this effect is exaggerated. It can usually be avoided. Often in V-I cadences, if the soprano is on the 2nd scale degree moving down to the tonic, and the bass is in root position moving from V-I, the movement from a P5 to a P8 is in contrary motion, which lessens the effect.
There are many choices that need to be made when part-writing. Sometimes there is no better choice than to move from a P5 to a P8 between two voices, in order to avoid worse movement somewhere else.
add a comment |
In four-part harmony, this rule is not on the "most important" list, but the perfect intervals, sounding so open, can draw attention to themselves when one is followed by another. This can make them stick out in a chorale setting where it contrasts with most of the movement. When the two voices are moving in the same direction, this effect is exaggerated. It can usually be avoided. Often in V-I cadences, if the soprano is on the 2nd scale degree moving down to the tonic, and the bass is in root position moving from V-I, the movement from a P5 to a P8 is in contrary motion, which lessens the effect.
There are many choices that need to be made when part-writing. Sometimes there is no better choice than to move from a P5 to a P8 between two voices, in order to avoid worse movement somewhere else.
add a comment |
In four-part harmony, this rule is not on the "most important" list, but the perfect intervals, sounding so open, can draw attention to themselves when one is followed by another. This can make them stick out in a chorale setting where it contrasts with most of the movement. When the two voices are moving in the same direction, this effect is exaggerated. It can usually be avoided. Often in V-I cadences, if the soprano is on the 2nd scale degree moving down to the tonic, and the bass is in root position moving from V-I, the movement from a P5 to a P8 is in contrary motion, which lessens the effect.
There are many choices that need to be made when part-writing. Sometimes there is no better choice than to move from a P5 to a P8 between two voices, in order to avoid worse movement somewhere else.
In four-part harmony, this rule is not on the "most important" list, but the perfect intervals, sounding so open, can draw attention to themselves when one is followed by another. This can make them stick out in a chorale setting where it contrasts with most of the movement. When the two voices are moving in the same direction, this effect is exaggerated. It can usually be avoided. Often in V-I cadences, if the soprano is on the 2nd scale degree moving down to the tonic, and the bass is in root position moving from V-I, the movement from a P5 to a P8 is in contrary motion, which lessens the effect.
There are many choices that need to be made when part-writing. Sometimes there is no better choice than to move from a P5 to a P8 between two voices, in order to avoid worse movement somewhere else.
answered 30 mins ago
Heather S.Heather S.
3,6811320
3,6811320
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f78955%2fis-it-wrong-to-have-two-voices-leap-from-a-perfect-fifth-to-a-perfect-octave%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I think this question is related to my first question in SE about "prohibition of the parallels of fifth" and is also answered there (especially the answers concerning history, epoch, harmony and style: music.stackexchange.com/questions/78011/…
– Albrecht Hügli
2 hours ago
you should be more precise: do you concern a counterpoint of 2 voices, is it a task in counterpoint study or do is it an arrangement of 3 or 4 voices, or even a piano piece?
– Albrecht Hügli
2 hours ago
1
Thank you, I've edited my question :-)
– Shannon Duncan
1 hour ago