Do fevers caused by infection not exceed 105 °F (40.6 °C)?












10















This question is prompted by but distinct from Is fever (temperature) below 106° F harmful? That question asks about whether fevers below that temperature can cause harm. This question is asking whether there is any appreciable risk of fevers below that temperature progressing to higher temperatures when the underlying cause of fever is a bacterial or viral infection.



That question quotes a source that says in a very definitive tone that fevers caused by viral or bacterial infections do not go above 105 °F:




The common cold and influenza are the most common sources of elevated
temperatures.. they can generate fevers that range all the way up to
105 degrees, but [...] Untreated fevers caused by viral and bacterial infections do not rise inexorably and will not exceed 105 degrees [...]



Only in the case of heatstroke, poisoning, or other externally caused
fevers is this bodily mechanism over-whelmed and inoperative. It is in
those cases that temperatures reach and exceed 106 degrees




(How to Raise a Healthy Child in Spite of Your Doctor, Robert S. Mendelsohn, as quoted in alpha1's question)



Is it true that infections are a negligible cause of elevated body temperature above 105 °F?










share|improve this question





























    10















    This question is prompted by but distinct from Is fever (temperature) below 106° F harmful? That question asks about whether fevers below that temperature can cause harm. This question is asking whether there is any appreciable risk of fevers below that temperature progressing to higher temperatures when the underlying cause of fever is a bacterial or viral infection.



    That question quotes a source that says in a very definitive tone that fevers caused by viral or bacterial infections do not go above 105 °F:




    The common cold and influenza are the most common sources of elevated
    temperatures.. they can generate fevers that range all the way up to
    105 degrees, but [...] Untreated fevers caused by viral and bacterial infections do not rise inexorably and will not exceed 105 degrees [...]



    Only in the case of heatstroke, poisoning, or other externally caused
    fevers is this bodily mechanism over-whelmed and inoperative. It is in
    those cases that temperatures reach and exceed 106 degrees




    (How to Raise a Healthy Child in Spite of Your Doctor, Robert S. Mendelsohn, as quoted in alpha1's question)



    Is it true that infections are a negligible cause of elevated body temperature above 105 °F?










    share|improve this question



























      10












      10








      10








      This question is prompted by but distinct from Is fever (temperature) below 106° F harmful? That question asks about whether fevers below that temperature can cause harm. This question is asking whether there is any appreciable risk of fevers below that temperature progressing to higher temperatures when the underlying cause of fever is a bacterial or viral infection.



      That question quotes a source that says in a very definitive tone that fevers caused by viral or bacterial infections do not go above 105 °F:




      The common cold and influenza are the most common sources of elevated
      temperatures.. they can generate fevers that range all the way up to
      105 degrees, but [...] Untreated fevers caused by viral and bacterial infections do not rise inexorably and will not exceed 105 degrees [...]



      Only in the case of heatstroke, poisoning, or other externally caused
      fevers is this bodily mechanism over-whelmed and inoperative. It is in
      those cases that temperatures reach and exceed 106 degrees




      (How to Raise a Healthy Child in Spite of Your Doctor, Robert S. Mendelsohn, as quoted in alpha1's question)



      Is it true that infections are a negligible cause of elevated body temperature above 105 °F?










      share|improve this question
















      This question is prompted by but distinct from Is fever (temperature) below 106° F harmful? That question asks about whether fevers below that temperature can cause harm. This question is asking whether there is any appreciable risk of fevers below that temperature progressing to higher temperatures when the underlying cause of fever is a bacterial or viral infection.



      That question quotes a source that says in a very definitive tone that fevers caused by viral or bacterial infections do not go above 105 °F:




      The common cold and influenza are the most common sources of elevated
      temperatures.. they can generate fevers that range all the way up to
      105 degrees, but [...] Untreated fevers caused by viral and bacterial infections do not rise inexorably and will not exceed 105 degrees [...]



      Only in the case of heatstroke, poisoning, or other externally caused
      fevers is this bodily mechanism over-whelmed and inoperative. It is in
      those cases that temperatures reach and exceed 106 degrees




      (How to Raise a Healthy Child in Spite of Your Doctor, Robert S. Mendelsohn, as quoted in alpha1's question)



      Is it true that infections are a negligible cause of elevated body temperature above 105 °F?







      medical-science disease infection






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 6 mins ago









      Jonas Stein

      3671411




      3671411










      asked 4 hours ago









      sumelicsumelic

      4901715




      4901715






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          11














          The claim is false, as evidenced by Prospective Evaluation of the Risk of Serious Bacterial Infection in Children Who Present to the Emergency Department With Hyperpyrexia (Temperature of 106°F or Higher) Pediatrics, July 2006; 118(1): 34–40.




          Data were collected prospectively on all children <18 years of age presenting to a pediatric emergency department during a 2-year period with rectal temperatures of ≥106°F




          ...




          Of 130 828 visits, 103 children had hyperpyrexia (1 per 1270 patient visits). Of the 103 subjects, 20 had serious bacterial infection, and 22 had laboratory-proven viral illness (including 1 subject with bacterial/viral coinfection)




          ...




          Common causes of hyperpyrexia in children include bacterial infections, viral infections...




          ...




          One subject, a 4-year-old boy with muscular dystrophy, presented with both neuroleptic malignant syndrome and apparent septic shock. His temperature reached 108.9°F, and he expired during subsequent hospitalization despite aggressive management. A tracheal aspirate collected in the ED grew Pseudomonas. Because the same organism was recovered from autopsy blood cultures, the Pseudomonas was regarded as the cause of sepsis.




          ...




          no child arrived in the ED with hyperpyrexia secondary to heat-related illness







          share|improve this answer


























          • Thanks. I'd appreciate if you could add some more info about how to distinguish correlation from causation in this area, if possible. Does "cause of sepsis" in that last quote imply "cause of fever"? I looked up "neuroleptic malignant syndrome" and it seems to be a drug reaction that can cause dangerously high fever.

            – sumelic
            2 hours ago













          • The authors seem to be a bit vague in most places about causality, as the abstract talks about "the risk of serious bacterial infection in children with hyperpyrexia" (rather than e.g. "the risk of hyperpyrexia in children with serious bacterial infection") and they say both that "Common causes of hyperpyrexia in children include bacterial infections, viral infections, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, intoxication, and heat stroke" and "whether or not hyperpyrexia itself confers a high risk for serious bacterial infection (SBI) is a controversial issue".

            – sumelic
            2 hours ago













          • @sumelic "incidence of SBI in children without underlying illness was 13" and "We suspect that viruses may have been responsible for many of the nonspecific febrile illnesses"

            – DavePhD
            2 hours ago











          • Did you understand which kinds of underlying illnesses they were talking about? I didn't see a section where they mentioned that, and I was curious about which kinds of chronic conditions would cause a predisposition to hyperpyrexia. (Unrelatedly: Even after your edits, I'm still unsure about how the quote about the 4-year-old with muscular dystrophy, neuroleptic malignant syndrome and septic shock is related to my question. Does it actually support the idea that infections can cause high fevers? I have upvoted the post because I think the article as a whole provides support for that point.)

            – sumelic
            1 hour ago













          • @sumelic "Any chronic condition resulting in impaired function of any organ system was classified as an underlying condition, with the exception of reactive airways disease. The presence of foreign bodies, such as central intravascular catheters, ventriculoperitoneal shunts, and renal stents, was also classified as an underlying condition, as was a previous history of UTI, because the history of UTI could be a marker for renal structural abnormality."

            – DavePhD
            1 hour ago



















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          11














          The claim is false, as evidenced by Prospective Evaluation of the Risk of Serious Bacterial Infection in Children Who Present to the Emergency Department With Hyperpyrexia (Temperature of 106°F or Higher) Pediatrics, July 2006; 118(1): 34–40.




          Data were collected prospectively on all children <18 years of age presenting to a pediatric emergency department during a 2-year period with rectal temperatures of ≥106°F




          ...




          Of 130 828 visits, 103 children had hyperpyrexia (1 per 1270 patient visits). Of the 103 subjects, 20 had serious bacterial infection, and 22 had laboratory-proven viral illness (including 1 subject with bacterial/viral coinfection)




          ...




          Common causes of hyperpyrexia in children include bacterial infections, viral infections...




          ...




          One subject, a 4-year-old boy with muscular dystrophy, presented with both neuroleptic malignant syndrome and apparent septic shock. His temperature reached 108.9°F, and he expired during subsequent hospitalization despite aggressive management. A tracheal aspirate collected in the ED grew Pseudomonas. Because the same organism was recovered from autopsy blood cultures, the Pseudomonas was regarded as the cause of sepsis.




          ...




          no child arrived in the ED with hyperpyrexia secondary to heat-related illness







          share|improve this answer


























          • Thanks. I'd appreciate if you could add some more info about how to distinguish correlation from causation in this area, if possible. Does "cause of sepsis" in that last quote imply "cause of fever"? I looked up "neuroleptic malignant syndrome" and it seems to be a drug reaction that can cause dangerously high fever.

            – sumelic
            2 hours ago













          • The authors seem to be a bit vague in most places about causality, as the abstract talks about "the risk of serious bacterial infection in children with hyperpyrexia" (rather than e.g. "the risk of hyperpyrexia in children with serious bacterial infection") and they say both that "Common causes of hyperpyrexia in children include bacterial infections, viral infections, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, intoxication, and heat stroke" and "whether or not hyperpyrexia itself confers a high risk for serious bacterial infection (SBI) is a controversial issue".

            – sumelic
            2 hours ago













          • @sumelic "incidence of SBI in children without underlying illness was 13" and "We suspect that viruses may have been responsible for many of the nonspecific febrile illnesses"

            – DavePhD
            2 hours ago











          • Did you understand which kinds of underlying illnesses they were talking about? I didn't see a section where they mentioned that, and I was curious about which kinds of chronic conditions would cause a predisposition to hyperpyrexia. (Unrelatedly: Even after your edits, I'm still unsure about how the quote about the 4-year-old with muscular dystrophy, neuroleptic malignant syndrome and septic shock is related to my question. Does it actually support the idea that infections can cause high fevers? I have upvoted the post because I think the article as a whole provides support for that point.)

            – sumelic
            1 hour ago













          • @sumelic "Any chronic condition resulting in impaired function of any organ system was classified as an underlying condition, with the exception of reactive airways disease. The presence of foreign bodies, such as central intravascular catheters, ventriculoperitoneal shunts, and renal stents, was also classified as an underlying condition, as was a previous history of UTI, because the history of UTI could be a marker for renal structural abnormality."

            – DavePhD
            1 hour ago
















          11














          The claim is false, as evidenced by Prospective Evaluation of the Risk of Serious Bacterial Infection in Children Who Present to the Emergency Department With Hyperpyrexia (Temperature of 106°F or Higher) Pediatrics, July 2006; 118(1): 34–40.




          Data were collected prospectively on all children <18 years of age presenting to a pediatric emergency department during a 2-year period with rectal temperatures of ≥106°F




          ...




          Of 130 828 visits, 103 children had hyperpyrexia (1 per 1270 patient visits). Of the 103 subjects, 20 had serious bacterial infection, and 22 had laboratory-proven viral illness (including 1 subject with bacterial/viral coinfection)




          ...




          Common causes of hyperpyrexia in children include bacterial infections, viral infections...




          ...




          One subject, a 4-year-old boy with muscular dystrophy, presented with both neuroleptic malignant syndrome and apparent septic shock. His temperature reached 108.9°F, and he expired during subsequent hospitalization despite aggressive management. A tracheal aspirate collected in the ED grew Pseudomonas. Because the same organism was recovered from autopsy blood cultures, the Pseudomonas was regarded as the cause of sepsis.




          ...




          no child arrived in the ED with hyperpyrexia secondary to heat-related illness







          share|improve this answer


























          • Thanks. I'd appreciate if you could add some more info about how to distinguish correlation from causation in this area, if possible. Does "cause of sepsis" in that last quote imply "cause of fever"? I looked up "neuroleptic malignant syndrome" and it seems to be a drug reaction that can cause dangerously high fever.

            – sumelic
            2 hours ago













          • The authors seem to be a bit vague in most places about causality, as the abstract talks about "the risk of serious bacterial infection in children with hyperpyrexia" (rather than e.g. "the risk of hyperpyrexia in children with serious bacterial infection") and they say both that "Common causes of hyperpyrexia in children include bacterial infections, viral infections, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, intoxication, and heat stroke" and "whether or not hyperpyrexia itself confers a high risk for serious bacterial infection (SBI) is a controversial issue".

            – sumelic
            2 hours ago













          • @sumelic "incidence of SBI in children without underlying illness was 13" and "We suspect that viruses may have been responsible for many of the nonspecific febrile illnesses"

            – DavePhD
            2 hours ago











          • Did you understand which kinds of underlying illnesses they were talking about? I didn't see a section where they mentioned that, and I was curious about which kinds of chronic conditions would cause a predisposition to hyperpyrexia. (Unrelatedly: Even after your edits, I'm still unsure about how the quote about the 4-year-old with muscular dystrophy, neuroleptic malignant syndrome and septic shock is related to my question. Does it actually support the idea that infections can cause high fevers? I have upvoted the post because I think the article as a whole provides support for that point.)

            – sumelic
            1 hour ago













          • @sumelic "Any chronic condition resulting in impaired function of any organ system was classified as an underlying condition, with the exception of reactive airways disease. The presence of foreign bodies, such as central intravascular catheters, ventriculoperitoneal shunts, and renal stents, was also classified as an underlying condition, as was a previous history of UTI, because the history of UTI could be a marker for renal structural abnormality."

            – DavePhD
            1 hour ago














          11












          11








          11







          The claim is false, as evidenced by Prospective Evaluation of the Risk of Serious Bacterial Infection in Children Who Present to the Emergency Department With Hyperpyrexia (Temperature of 106°F or Higher) Pediatrics, July 2006; 118(1): 34–40.




          Data were collected prospectively on all children <18 years of age presenting to a pediatric emergency department during a 2-year period with rectal temperatures of ≥106°F




          ...




          Of 130 828 visits, 103 children had hyperpyrexia (1 per 1270 patient visits). Of the 103 subjects, 20 had serious bacterial infection, and 22 had laboratory-proven viral illness (including 1 subject with bacterial/viral coinfection)




          ...




          Common causes of hyperpyrexia in children include bacterial infections, viral infections...




          ...




          One subject, a 4-year-old boy with muscular dystrophy, presented with both neuroleptic malignant syndrome and apparent septic shock. His temperature reached 108.9°F, and he expired during subsequent hospitalization despite aggressive management. A tracheal aspirate collected in the ED grew Pseudomonas. Because the same organism was recovered from autopsy blood cultures, the Pseudomonas was regarded as the cause of sepsis.




          ...




          no child arrived in the ED with hyperpyrexia secondary to heat-related illness







          share|improve this answer















          The claim is false, as evidenced by Prospective Evaluation of the Risk of Serious Bacterial Infection in Children Who Present to the Emergency Department With Hyperpyrexia (Temperature of 106°F or Higher) Pediatrics, July 2006; 118(1): 34–40.




          Data were collected prospectively on all children <18 years of age presenting to a pediatric emergency department during a 2-year period with rectal temperatures of ≥106°F




          ...




          Of 130 828 visits, 103 children had hyperpyrexia (1 per 1270 patient visits). Of the 103 subjects, 20 had serious bacterial infection, and 22 had laboratory-proven viral illness (including 1 subject with bacterial/viral coinfection)




          ...




          Common causes of hyperpyrexia in children include bacterial infections, viral infections...




          ...




          One subject, a 4-year-old boy with muscular dystrophy, presented with both neuroleptic malignant syndrome and apparent septic shock. His temperature reached 108.9°F, and he expired during subsequent hospitalization despite aggressive management. A tracheal aspirate collected in the ED grew Pseudomonas. Because the same organism was recovered from autopsy blood cultures, the Pseudomonas was regarded as the cause of sepsis.




          ...




          no child arrived in the ED with hyperpyrexia secondary to heat-related illness








          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 2 hours ago

























          answered 2 hours ago









          DavePhDDavePhD

          76.4k19325351




          76.4k19325351













          • Thanks. I'd appreciate if you could add some more info about how to distinguish correlation from causation in this area, if possible. Does "cause of sepsis" in that last quote imply "cause of fever"? I looked up "neuroleptic malignant syndrome" and it seems to be a drug reaction that can cause dangerously high fever.

            – sumelic
            2 hours ago













          • The authors seem to be a bit vague in most places about causality, as the abstract talks about "the risk of serious bacterial infection in children with hyperpyrexia" (rather than e.g. "the risk of hyperpyrexia in children with serious bacterial infection") and they say both that "Common causes of hyperpyrexia in children include bacterial infections, viral infections, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, intoxication, and heat stroke" and "whether or not hyperpyrexia itself confers a high risk for serious bacterial infection (SBI) is a controversial issue".

            – sumelic
            2 hours ago













          • @sumelic "incidence of SBI in children without underlying illness was 13" and "We suspect that viruses may have been responsible for many of the nonspecific febrile illnesses"

            – DavePhD
            2 hours ago











          • Did you understand which kinds of underlying illnesses they were talking about? I didn't see a section where they mentioned that, and I was curious about which kinds of chronic conditions would cause a predisposition to hyperpyrexia. (Unrelatedly: Even after your edits, I'm still unsure about how the quote about the 4-year-old with muscular dystrophy, neuroleptic malignant syndrome and septic shock is related to my question. Does it actually support the idea that infections can cause high fevers? I have upvoted the post because I think the article as a whole provides support for that point.)

            – sumelic
            1 hour ago













          • @sumelic "Any chronic condition resulting in impaired function of any organ system was classified as an underlying condition, with the exception of reactive airways disease. The presence of foreign bodies, such as central intravascular catheters, ventriculoperitoneal shunts, and renal stents, was also classified as an underlying condition, as was a previous history of UTI, because the history of UTI could be a marker for renal structural abnormality."

            – DavePhD
            1 hour ago



















          • Thanks. I'd appreciate if you could add some more info about how to distinguish correlation from causation in this area, if possible. Does "cause of sepsis" in that last quote imply "cause of fever"? I looked up "neuroleptic malignant syndrome" and it seems to be a drug reaction that can cause dangerously high fever.

            – sumelic
            2 hours ago













          • The authors seem to be a bit vague in most places about causality, as the abstract talks about "the risk of serious bacterial infection in children with hyperpyrexia" (rather than e.g. "the risk of hyperpyrexia in children with serious bacterial infection") and they say both that "Common causes of hyperpyrexia in children include bacterial infections, viral infections, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, intoxication, and heat stroke" and "whether or not hyperpyrexia itself confers a high risk for serious bacterial infection (SBI) is a controversial issue".

            – sumelic
            2 hours ago













          • @sumelic "incidence of SBI in children without underlying illness was 13" and "We suspect that viruses may have been responsible for many of the nonspecific febrile illnesses"

            – DavePhD
            2 hours ago











          • Did you understand which kinds of underlying illnesses they were talking about? I didn't see a section where they mentioned that, and I was curious about which kinds of chronic conditions would cause a predisposition to hyperpyrexia. (Unrelatedly: Even after your edits, I'm still unsure about how the quote about the 4-year-old with muscular dystrophy, neuroleptic malignant syndrome and septic shock is related to my question. Does it actually support the idea that infections can cause high fevers? I have upvoted the post because I think the article as a whole provides support for that point.)

            – sumelic
            1 hour ago













          • @sumelic "Any chronic condition resulting in impaired function of any organ system was classified as an underlying condition, with the exception of reactive airways disease. The presence of foreign bodies, such as central intravascular catheters, ventriculoperitoneal shunts, and renal stents, was also classified as an underlying condition, as was a previous history of UTI, because the history of UTI could be a marker for renal structural abnormality."

            – DavePhD
            1 hour ago

















          Thanks. I'd appreciate if you could add some more info about how to distinguish correlation from causation in this area, if possible. Does "cause of sepsis" in that last quote imply "cause of fever"? I looked up "neuroleptic malignant syndrome" and it seems to be a drug reaction that can cause dangerously high fever.

          – sumelic
          2 hours ago







          Thanks. I'd appreciate if you could add some more info about how to distinguish correlation from causation in this area, if possible. Does "cause of sepsis" in that last quote imply "cause of fever"? I looked up "neuroleptic malignant syndrome" and it seems to be a drug reaction that can cause dangerously high fever.

          – sumelic
          2 hours ago















          The authors seem to be a bit vague in most places about causality, as the abstract talks about "the risk of serious bacterial infection in children with hyperpyrexia" (rather than e.g. "the risk of hyperpyrexia in children with serious bacterial infection") and they say both that "Common causes of hyperpyrexia in children include bacterial infections, viral infections, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, intoxication, and heat stroke" and "whether or not hyperpyrexia itself confers a high risk for serious bacterial infection (SBI) is a controversial issue".

          – sumelic
          2 hours ago







          The authors seem to be a bit vague in most places about causality, as the abstract talks about "the risk of serious bacterial infection in children with hyperpyrexia" (rather than e.g. "the risk of hyperpyrexia in children with serious bacterial infection") and they say both that "Common causes of hyperpyrexia in children include bacterial infections, viral infections, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, intoxication, and heat stroke" and "whether or not hyperpyrexia itself confers a high risk for serious bacterial infection (SBI) is a controversial issue".

          – sumelic
          2 hours ago















          @sumelic "incidence of SBI in children without underlying illness was 13" and "We suspect that viruses may have been responsible for many of the nonspecific febrile illnesses"

          – DavePhD
          2 hours ago





          @sumelic "incidence of SBI in children without underlying illness was 13" and "We suspect that viruses may have been responsible for many of the nonspecific febrile illnesses"

          – DavePhD
          2 hours ago













          Did you understand which kinds of underlying illnesses they were talking about? I didn't see a section where they mentioned that, and I was curious about which kinds of chronic conditions would cause a predisposition to hyperpyrexia. (Unrelatedly: Even after your edits, I'm still unsure about how the quote about the 4-year-old with muscular dystrophy, neuroleptic malignant syndrome and septic shock is related to my question. Does it actually support the idea that infections can cause high fevers? I have upvoted the post because I think the article as a whole provides support for that point.)

          – sumelic
          1 hour ago







          Did you understand which kinds of underlying illnesses they were talking about? I didn't see a section where they mentioned that, and I was curious about which kinds of chronic conditions would cause a predisposition to hyperpyrexia. (Unrelatedly: Even after your edits, I'm still unsure about how the quote about the 4-year-old with muscular dystrophy, neuroleptic malignant syndrome and septic shock is related to my question. Does it actually support the idea that infections can cause high fevers? I have upvoted the post because I think the article as a whole provides support for that point.)

          – sumelic
          1 hour ago















          @sumelic "Any chronic condition resulting in impaired function of any organ system was classified as an underlying condition, with the exception of reactive airways disease. The presence of foreign bodies, such as central intravascular catheters, ventriculoperitoneal shunts, and renal stents, was also classified as an underlying condition, as was a previous history of UTI, because the history of UTI could be a marker for renal structural abnormality."

          – DavePhD
          1 hour ago





          @sumelic "Any chronic condition resulting in impaired function of any organ system was classified as an underlying condition, with the exception of reactive airways disease. The presence of foreign bodies, such as central intravascular catheters, ventriculoperitoneal shunts, and renal stents, was also classified as an underlying condition, as was a previous history of UTI, because the history of UTI could be a marker for renal structural abnormality."

          – DavePhD
          1 hour ago



          Popular posts from this blog

          Ponta tanko

          Tantalo (mitologio)

          Erzsébet Schaár