Does cardinality of ratings column affect performance of matrix factorization based collaborative filtering?
$begingroup$
I am using mllib's implicit preference based implementation of collaborative filtering for generating grocery product recommendations in e-commerce, based on this Netflix Prize winning algorithm. I tried two variations (differing in how rating is derived)-
- rating = no. of times user bought an item
- rating = (2x(no. of times user bought an item) + no. of times user viewed an item)/3 (i.e. 2:1 weights between bought and viewed criteria)
Performance (MAP, Recall and Precision) degrades from 1 to 2, which is counter-intuitive as the matrix density increases and 2nd was expected to perform better. One observation is that the cardinality (discrete values) in rating column increases in second approach and hence I want to understand if that could have resulted in the performance hit?
machine-learning recommender-system matrix-factorisation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am using mllib's implicit preference based implementation of collaborative filtering for generating grocery product recommendations in e-commerce, based on this Netflix Prize winning algorithm. I tried two variations (differing in how rating is derived)-
- rating = no. of times user bought an item
- rating = (2x(no. of times user bought an item) + no. of times user viewed an item)/3 (i.e. 2:1 weights between bought and viewed criteria)
Performance (MAP, Recall and Precision) degrades from 1 to 2, which is counter-intuitive as the matrix density increases and 2nd was expected to perform better. One observation is that the cardinality (discrete values) in rating column increases in second approach and hence I want to understand if that could have resulted in the performance hit?
machine-learning recommender-system matrix-factorisation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am using mllib's implicit preference based implementation of collaborative filtering for generating grocery product recommendations in e-commerce, based on this Netflix Prize winning algorithm. I tried two variations (differing in how rating is derived)-
- rating = no. of times user bought an item
- rating = (2x(no. of times user bought an item) + no. of times user viewed an item)/3 (i.e. 2:1 weights between bought and viewed criteria)
Performance (MAP, Recall and Precision) degrades from 1 to 2, which is counter-intuitive as the matrix density increases and 2nd was expected to perform better. One observation is that the cardinality (discrete values) in rating column increases in second approach and hence I want to understand if that could have resulted in the performance hit?
machine-learning recommender-system matrix-factorisation
$endgroup$
I am using mllib's implicit preference based implementation of collaborative filtering for generating grocery product recommendations in e-commerce, based on this Netflix Prize winning algorithm. I tried two variations (differing in how rating is derived)-
- rating = no. of times user bought an item
- rating = (2x(no. of times user bought an item) + no. of times user viewed an item)/3 (i.e. 2:1 weights between bought and viewed criteria)
Performance (MAP, Recall and Precision) degrades from 1 to 2, which is counter-intuitive as the matrix density increases and 2nd was expected to perform better. One observation is that the cardinality (discrete values) in rating column increases in second approach and hence I want to understand if that could have resulted in the performance hit?
machine-learning recommender-system matrix-factorisation
machine-learning recommender-system matrix-factorisation
asked 7 mins ago
chetna bansalchetna bansal
434
434
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "557"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f46688%2fdoes-cardinality-of-ratings-column-affect-performance-of-matrix-factorization-ba%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f46688%2fdoes-cardinality-of-ratings-column-affect-performance-of-matrix-factorization-ba%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown