Is it a red flag that increasing the number of parameters makes the model less able to overfit small amounts...












3












$begingroup$


I'm training a deep network (CNN-LSTM-CRF) for Named Entity Recognition. Is there a reason that increasing the number of parameters would make the network less able to overfit a small training set (~20 sentences), or does this indicate a serious bug in the code?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




bumped to the homepage by Community 3 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.











  • 3




    $begingroup$
    No, it means you have to train it more.
    $endgroup$
    – Vaalizaadeh
    Jul 9 '18 at 1:36






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "less able to overfit" -- explain how it is that you are measuring this, and we can help more.
    $endgroup$
    – Scott
    Jul 9 '18 at 4:11
















3












$begingroup$


I'm training a deep network (CNN-LSTM-CRF) for Named Entity Recognition. Is there a reason that increasing the number of parameters would make the network less able to overfit a small training set (~20 sentences), or does this indicate a serious bug in the code?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




bumped to the homepage by Community 3 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.











  • 3




    $begingroup$
    No, it means you have to train it more.
    $endgroup$
    – Vaalizaadeh
    Jul 9 '18 at 1:36






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "less able to overfit" -- explain how it is that you are measuring this, and we can help more.
    $endgroup$
    – Scott
    Jul 9 '18 at 4:11














3












3








3





$begingroup$


I'm training a deep network (CNN-LSTM-CRF) for Named Entity Recognition. Is there a reason that increasing the number of parameters would make the network less able to overfit a small training set (~20 sentences), or does this indicate a serious bug in the code?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




I'm training a deep network (CNN-LSTM-CRF) for Named Entity Recognition. Is there a reason that increasing the number of parameters would make the network less able to overfit a small training set (~20 sentences), or does this indicate a serious bug in the code?







deep-learning nlp lstm cnn named-entity-recognition






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Jul 9 '18 at 1:24









SolveItSolveIt

1162




1162





bumped to the homepage by Community 3 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







bumped to the homepage by Community 3 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.










  • 3




    $begingroup$
    No, it means you have to train it more.
    $endgroup$
    – Vaalizaadeh
    Jul 9 '18 at 1:36






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "less able to overfit" -- explain how it is that you are measuring this, and we can help more.
    $endgroup$
    – Scott
    Jul 9 '18 at 4:11














  • 3




    $begingroup$
    No, it means you have to train it more.
    $endgroup$
    – Vaalizaadeh
    Jul 9 '18 at 1:36






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "less able to overfit" -- explain how it is that you are measuring this, and we can help more.
    $endgroup$
    – Scott
    Jul 9 '18 at 4:11








3




3




$begingroup$
No, it means you have to train it more.
$endgroup$
– Vaalizaadeh
Jul 9 '18 at 1:36




$begingroup$
No, it means you have to train it more.
$endgroup$
– Vaalizaadeh
Jul 9 '18 at 1:36




1




1




$begingroup$
"less able to overfit" -- explain how it is that you are measuring this, and we can help more.
$endgroup$
– Scott
Jul 9 '18 at 4:11




$begingroup$
"less able to overfit" -- explain how it is that you are measuring this, and we can help more.
$endgroup$
– Scott
Jul 9 '18 at 4:11










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

It is not necessarily a red flag. Of course, without seeing the code, it is impossible to say that for sure.



What is likely happening here is that adding parameters to your model, it makes it harder for it to converge to some minimum. More parameters roughly mean that your model is able to explain "more complex stuff". And since you have a small amount of data, the explanation should remain rather simple. Therefore, your model is trying to explain something simple in a complicated way, and it might not be easy to do so.



Also, are you using dropout or regularization? If yes, this might also be an issue as these are explicitly use to avoid overfitting.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "557"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f34174%2fis-it-a-red-flag-that-increasing-the-number-of-parameters-makes-the-model-less-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    It is not necessarily a red flag. Of course, without seeing the code, it is impossible to say that for sure.



    What is likely happening here is that adding parameters to your model, it makes it harder for it to converge to some minimum. More parameters roughly mean that your model is able to explain "more complex stuff". And since you have a small amount of data, the explanation should remain rather simple. Therefore, your model is trying to explain something simple in a complicated way, and it might not be easy to do so.



    Also, are you using dropout or regularization? If yes, this might also be an issue as these are explicitly use to avoid overfitting.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      It is not necessarily a red flag. Of course, without seeing the code, it is impossible to say that for sure.



      What is likely happening here is that adding parameters to your model, it makes it harder for it to converge to some minimum. More parameters roughly mean that your model is able to explain "more complex stuff". And since you have a small amount of data, the explanation should remain rather simple. Therefore, your model is trying to explain something simple in a complicated way, and it might not be easy to do so.



      Also, are you using dropout or regularization? If yes, this might also be an issue as these are explicitly use to avoid overfitting.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        It is not necessarily a red flag. Of course, without seeing the code, it is impossible to say that for sure.



        What is likely happening here is that adding parameters to your model, it makes it harder for it to converge to some minimum. More parameters roughly mean that your model is able to explain "more complex stuff". And since you have a small amount of data, the explanation should remain rather simple. Therefore, your model is trying to explain something simple in a complicated way, and it might not be easy to do so.



        Also, are you using dropout or regularization? If yes, this might also be an issue as these are explicitly use to avoid overfitting.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        It is not necessarily a red flag. Of course, without seeing the code, it is impossible to say that for sure.



        What is likely happening here is that adding parameters to your model, it makes it harder for it to converge to some minimum. More parameters roughly mean that your model is able to explain "more complex stuff". And since you have a small amount of data, the explanation should remain rather simple. Therefore, your model is trying to explain something simple in a complicated way, and it might not be easy to do so.



        Also, are you using dropout or regularization? If yes, this might also be an issue as these are explicitly use to avoid overfitting.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Jul 10 '18 at 12:52









        Valentin CalommeValentin Calomme

        1,295423




        1,295423






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f34174%2fis-it-a-red-flag-that-increasing-the-number-of-parameters-makes-the-model-less-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Ponta tanko

            Tantalo (mitologio)

            Erzsébet Schaár