Modification to Chariots for Heavy Cavalry Analogue for 4-armed race












4












$begingroup$


I have a 4-armed race in my world that is the predominant species of a country. [ Country A] This race is also too heavy to ride horses as cavalry. A major enemy of this country is a human race that is able to use heavy cavalry. [Country B] To help alleviate this issue, Country A uses chariots to use as their analogue to heavy cavalry.



Now I am aware that historically, chariots were not generally used in the way a cavalry charge was, instead being used more as mobile platforms for missiles.



Question: Using medievalesque (akin to mid-late middle ages) technology, how could this 4-armed race modify or use the chariot so that it would be reasonably effective for use as an analogue to the heavy cavalry charge.



For information about the equipment of these armies.



Country B (the humans with heavy cavalry)




  • Main infantry: Shield, spear, sword backup. Chainmail. (Used in shieldwalls)

  • Crossbows

  • Ballista arbalests

  • Light cavalry

  • Heavy cavalry.


Country A (the 4-arms)




  • Spearmen: Spear, side-arm, shield, scale armor

  • Falxmen: Falx, side-arm, scale armor

  • Crossbows

  • Chariots


  • small number of human light cavalry (there are in-world reasons this number cannot be increased to be a large enough force for their needs.)


For an example battle that these chariots might be used in, assume relatively flat terrain and well-disciplined troops on both sides.



Country A (4-arms)




  • 1000 spearmen

  • 200 falxmen

  • 200 crossbows

  • 20 light [human] cavalry

  • 300 chariots


Country B (humans)




  • 900 spearmen

  • 300 crossbows

  • 50 ballista arbalests

  • 120 light cavalry

  • 360 heavy cavalry










share|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    What's wrong with Hussite Wagenburgs? They work as mobile fortifications, cannot be taken by heavy cavalry, and provide a convenient platform for the much stronger quadrumanous spearmen and crossbowmen to strike at their enemies. Plus they are honest for-real late medieval technology.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    8 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Not an answer but if they are too heavy for horses they do not actually need heavy cavalry. A charge from their pikemen would be just as good because it is mass and size that makes cavalry charges lethal. Lower speed and mobility but also lower cost and maintenance. In some ways it would even be better since they could better charge in difficult terrain or against formations where horses are too smart to go. (Because horse break their legs easily if they are not careful and a horse with broken legs is usually a dead horse.)
    $endgroup$
    – Ville Niemi
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @VilleNiemi - they are very heavy. Quite obese. They are not going to be doing any charging, these folks. Their chariots are more chairiots.
    $endgroup$
    – Willk
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Willk Really love the "chairiot" :) If they are mobile enough to do infantry, they can charge well enough. The difficulty they have moving is the exact same difficulty the other guy has stopping them. Would you try to stop large and obese guy coming at you when you are in a formation so you cannot step out of the way? Not to mention these guys have a spear, shield, armor, four arms, an additional side arm... Lots of mass with metal surfaces and pointy bits.
    $endgroup$
    – Ville Niemi
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Kilisi Where did they get their horses from? Well when a 4-arm and a centaur love each other very very much... ;-) They get their horses from where they live. And it's not me that mentioned them being obese, that was said by Wilk (not the OP) to make a bad bad bad pun.
    $endgroup$
    – mVitus
    7 hours ago
















4












$begingroup$


I have a 4-armed race in my world that is the predominant species of a country. [ Country A] This race is also too heavy to ride horses as cavalry. A major enemy of this country is a human race that is able to use heavy cavalry. [Country B] To help alleviate this issue, Country A uses chariots to use as their analogue to heavy cavalry.



Now I am aware that historically, chariots were not generally used in the way a cavalry charge was, instead being used more as mobile platforms for missiles.



Question: Using medievalesque (akin to mid-late middle ages) technology, how could this 4-armed race modify or use the chariot so that it would be reasonably effective for use as an analogue to the heavy cavalry charge.



For information about the equipment of these armies.



Country B (the humans with heavy cavalry)




  • Main infantry: Shield, spear, sword backup. Chainmail. (Used in shieldwalls)

  • Crossbows

  • Ballista arbalests

  • Light cavalry

  • Heavy cavalry.


Country A (the 4-arms)




  • Spearmen: Spear, side-arm, shield, scale armor

  • Falxmen: Falx, side-arm, scale armor

  • Crossbows

  • Chariots


  • small number of human light cavalry (there are in-world reasons this number cannot be increased to be a large enough force for their needs.)


For an example battle that these chariots might be used in, assume relatively flat terrain and well-disciplined troops on both sides.



Country A (4-arms)




  • 1000 spearmen

  • 200 falxmen

  • 200 crossbows

  • 20 light [human] cavalry

  • 300 chariots


Country B (humans)




  • 900 spearmen

  • 300 crossbows

  • 50 ballista arbalests

  • 120 light cavalry

  • 360 heavy cavalry










share|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    What's wrong with Hussite Wagenburgs? They work as mobile fortifications, cannot be taken by heavy cavalry, and provide a convenient platform for the much stronger quadrumanous spearmen and crossbowmen to strike at their enemies. Plus they are honest for-real late medieval technology.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    8 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Not an answer but if they are too heavy for horses they do not actually need heavy cavalry. A charge from their pikemen would be just as good because it is mass and size that makes cavalry charges lethal. Lower speed and mobility but also lower cost and maintenance. In some ways it would even be better since they could better charge in difficult terrain or against formations where horses are too smart to go. (Because horse break their legs easily if they are not careful and a horse with broken legs is usually a dead horse.)
    $endgroup$
    – Ville Niemi
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @VilleNiemi - they are very heavy. Quite obese. They are not going to be doing any charging, these folks. Their chariots are more chairiots.
    $endgroup$
    – Willk
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Willk Really love the "chairiot" :) If they are mobile enough to do infantry, they can charge well enough. The difficulty they have moving is the exact same difficulty the other guy has stopping them. Would you try to stop large and obese guy coming at you when you are in a formation so you cannot step out of the way? Not to mention these guys have a spear, shield, armor, four arms, an additional side arm... Lots of mass with metal surfaces and pointy bits.
    $endgroup$
    – Ville Niemi
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Kilisi Where did they get their horses from? Well when a 4-arm and a centaur love each other very very much... ;-) They get their horses from where they live. And it's not me that mentioned them being obese, that was said by Wilk (not the OP) to make a bad bad bad pun.
    $endgroup$
    – mVitus
    7 hours ago














4












4








4





$begingroup$


I have a 4-armed race in my world that is the predominant species of a country. [ Country A] This race is also too heavy to ride horses as cavalry. A major enemy of this country is a human race that is able to use heavy cavalry. [Country B] To help alleviate this issue, Country A uses chariots to use as their analogue to heavy cavalry.



Now I am aware that historically, chariots were not generally used in the way a cavalry charge was, instead being used more as mobile platforms for missiles.



Question: Using medievalesque (akin to mid-late middle ages) technology, how could this 4-armed race modify or use the chariot so that it would be reasonably effective for use as an analogue to the heavy cavalry charge.



For information about the equipment of these armies.



Country B (the humans with heavy cavalry)




  • Main infantry: Shield, spear, sword backup. Chainmail. (Used in shieldwalls)

  • Crossbows

  • Ballista arbalests

  • Light cavalry

  • Heavy cavalry.


Country A (the 4-arms)




  • Spearmen: Spear, side-arm, shield, scale armor

  • Falxmen: Falx, side-arm, scale armor

  • Crossbows

  • Chariots


  • small number of human light cavalry (there are in-world reasons this number cannot be increased to be a large enough force for their needs.)


For an example battle that these chariots might be used in, assume relatively flat terrain and well-disciplined troops on both sides.



Country A (4-arms)




  • 1000 spearmen

  • 200 falxmen

  • 200 crossbows

  • 20 light [human] cavalry

  • 300 chariots


Country B (humans)




  • 900 spearmen

  • 300 crossbows

  • 50 ballista arbalests

  • 120 light cavalry

  • 360 heavy cavalry










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




I have a 4-armed race in my world that is the predominant species of a country. [ Country A] This race is also too heavy to ride horses as cavalry. A major enemy of this country is a human race that is able to use heavy cavalry. [Country B] To help alleviate this issue, Country A uses chariots to use as their analogue to heavy cavalry.



Now I am aware that historically, chariots were not generally used in the way a cavalry charge was, instead being used more as mobile platforms for missiles.



Question: Using medievalesque (akin to mid-late middle ages) technology, how could this 4-armed race modify or use the chariot so that it would be reasonably effective for use as an analogue to the heavy cavalry charge.



For information about the equipment of these armies.



Country B (the humans with heavy cavalry)




  • Main infantry: Shield, spear, sword backup. Chainmail. (Used in shieldwalls)

  • Crossbows

  • Ballista arbalests

  • Light cavalry

  • Heavy cavalry.


Country A (the 4-arms)




  • Spearmen: Spear, side-arm, shield, scale armor

  • Falxmen: Falx, side-arm, scale armor

  • Crossbows

  • Chariots


  • small number of human light cavalry (there are in-world reasons this number cannot be increased to be a large enough force for their needs.)


For an example battle that these chariots might be used in, assume relatively flat terrain and well-disciplined troops on both sides.



Country A (4-arms)




  • 1000 spearmen

  • 200 falxmen

  • 200 crossbows

  • 20 light [human] cavalry

  • 300 chariots


Country B (humans)




  • 900 spearmen

  • 300 crossbows

  • 50 ballista arbalests

  • 120 light cavalry

  • 360 heavy cavalry







technology warfare






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 9 hours ago









mVitusmVitus

410214




410214








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    What's wrong with Hussite Wagenburgs? They work as mobile fortifications, cannot be taken by heavy cavalry, and provide a convenient platform for the much stronger quadrumanous spearmen and crossbowmen to strike at their enemies. Plus they are honest for-real late medieval technology.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    8 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Not an answer but if they are too heavy for horses they do not actually need heavy cavalry. A charge from their pikemen would be just as good because it is mass and size that makes cavalry charges lethal. Lower speed and mobility but also lower cost and maintenance. In some ways it would even be better since they could better charge in difficult terrain or against formations where horses are too smart to go. (Because horse break their legs easily if they are not careful and a horse with broken legs is usually a dead horse.)
    $endgroup$
    – Ville Niemi
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @VilleNiemi - they are very heavy. Quite obese. They are not going to be doing any charging, these folks. Their chariots are more chairiots.
    $endgroup$
    – Willk
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Willk Really love the "chairiot" :) If they are mobile enough to do infantry, they can charge well enough. The difficulty they have moving is the exact same difficulty the other guy has stopping them. Would you try to stop large and obese guy coming at you when you are in a formation so you cannot step out of the way? Not to mention these guys have a spear, shield, armor, four arms, an additional side arm... Lots of mass with metal surfaces and pointy bits.
    $endgroup$
    – Ville Niemi
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Kilisi Where did they get their horses from? Well when a 4-arm and a centaur love each other very very much... ;-) They get their horses from where they live. And it's not me that mentioned them being obese, that was said by Wilk (not the OP) to make a bad bad bad pun.
    $endgroup$
    – mVitus
    7 hours ago














  • 3




    $begingroup$
    What's wrong with Hussite Wagenburgs? They work as mobile fortifications, cannot be taken by heavy cavalry, and provide a convenient platform for the much stronger quadrumanous spearmen and crossbowmen to strike at their enemies. Plus they are honest for-real late medieval technology.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    8 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Not an answer but if they are too heavy for horses they do not actually need heavy cavalry. A charge from their pikemen would be just as good because it is mass and size that makes cavalry charges lethal. Lower speed and mobility but also lower cost and maintenance. In some ways it would even be better since they could better charge in difficult terrain or against formations where horses are too smart to go. (Because horse break their legs easily if they are not careful and a horse with broken legs is usually a dead horse.)
    $endgroup$
    – Ville Niemi
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @VilleNiemi - they are very heavy. Quite obese. They are not going to be doing any charging, these folks. Their chariots are more chairiots.
    $endgroup$
    – Willk
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Willk Really love the "chairiot" :) If they are mobile enough to do infantry, they can charge well enough. The difficulty they have moving is the exact same difficulty the other guy has stopping them. Would you try to stop large and obese guy coming at you when you are in a formation so you cannot step out of the way? Not to mention these guys have a spear, shield, armor, four arms, an additional side arm... Lots of mass with metal surfaces and pointy bits.
    $endgroup$
    – Ville Niemi
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Kilisi Where did they get their horses from? Well when a 4-arm and a centaur love each other very very much... ;-) They get their horses from where they live. And it's not me that mentioned them being obese, that was said by Wilk (not the OP) to make a bad bad bad pun.
    $endgroup$
    – mVitus
    7 hours ago








3




3




$begingroup$
What's wrong with Hussite Wagenburgs? They work as mobile fortifications, cannot be taken by heavy cavalry, and provide a convenient platform for the much stronger quadrumanous spearmen and crossbowmen to strike at their enemies. Plus they are honest for-real late medieval technology.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago






$begingroup$
What's wrong with Hussite Wagenburgs? They work as mobile fortifications, cannot be taken by heavy cavalry, and provide a convenient platform for the much stronger quadrumanous spearmen and crossbowmen to strike at their enemies. Plus they are honest for-real late medieval technology.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago






1




1




$begingroup$
Not an answer but if they are too heavy for horses they do not actually need heavy cavalry. A charge from their pikemen would be just as good because it is mass and size that makes cavalry charges lethal. Lower speed and mobility but also lower cost and maintenance. In some ways it would even be better since they could better charge in difficult terrain or against formations where horses are too smart to go. (Because horse break their legs easily if they are not careful and a horse with broken legs is usually a dead horse.)
$endgroup$
– Ville Niemi
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
Not an answer but if they are too heavy for horses they do not actually need heavy cavalry. A charge from their pikemen would be just as good because it is mass and size that makes cavalry charges lethal. Lower speed and mobility but also lower cost and maintenance. In some ways it would even be better since they could better charge in difficult terrain or against formations where horses are too smart to go. (Because horse break their legs easily if they are not careful and a horse with broken legs is usually a dead horse.)
$endgroup$
– Ville Niemi
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
@VilleNiemi - they are very heavy. Quite obese. They are not going to be doing any charging, these folks. Their chariots are more chairiots.
$endgroup$
– Willk
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
@VilleNiemi - they are very heavy. Quite obese. They are not going to be doing any charging, these folks. Their chariots are more chairiots.
$endgroup$
– Willk
7 hours ago












$begingroup$
@Willk Really love the "chairiot" :) If they are mobile enough to do infantry, they can charge well enough. The difficulty they have moving is the exact same difficulty the other guy has stopping them. Would you try to stop large and obese guy coming at you when you are in a formation so you cannot step out of the way? Not to mention these guys have a spear, shield, armor, four arms, an additional side arm... Lots of mass with metal surfaces and pointy bits.
$endgroup$
– Ville Niemi
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
@Willk Really love the "chairiot" :) If they are mobile enough to do infantry, they can charge well enough. The difficulty they have moving is the exact same difficulty the other guy has stopping them. Would you try to stop large and obese guy coming at you when you are in a formation so you cannot step out of the way? Not to mention these guys have a spear, shield, armor, four arms, an additional side arm... Lots of mass with metal surfaces and pointy bits.
$endgroup$
– Ville Niemi
7 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@Kilisi Where did they get their horses from? Well when a 4-arm and a centaur love each other very very much... ;-) They get their horses from where they live. And it's not me that mentioned them being obese, that was said by Wilk (not the OP) to make a bad bad bad pun.
$endgroup$
– mVitus
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
@Kilisi Where did they get their horses from? Well when a 4-arm and a centaur love each other very very much... ;-) They get their horses from where they live. And it's not me that mentioned them being obese, that was said by Wilk (not the OP) to make a bad bad bad pun.
$endgroup$
– mVitus
7 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Put the cart before the horse.



cart before the horse ad
https://www.adsoftheworld.com/media/outdoor/porsche_rear_horsepower_4



This would work great for your big folks. The chariot in the ad is pretty cool and would scale up to additional horses without much problem. With this setup, the big boss is in front, and so it is less scary for the horse - all it sees is the back of the boss. That is reassuring for a horse because it means the badass up front will hit the trouble first. Up front your big guy can do things that would not be possible in a regular chariot or for mounted cavalry. He can have a lance, sure. Or he can have a claymore sword or an axe and mow down whatever is in front and around him. With conventional chariots or cavalry the horses head is in the way of maneuvers like that. With the front-mounted chariot, the horses don't engage the infantry except to stomp on the fallen, which is what they like to do anyway.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    You're going to want a lance to get the most out of your momentum for a first strike, but after that, an axe is a reasonable choice.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Do you have any sources that talk about rear-powered horse carriages? I did a quick search and all I could really find where things of the same picture. Being able to do some research would be beneficial. ( I will say that my initial reaction to this answer was: That looks so incredibly derpy. Like the kind of thing a bunch of drunk people would try doing. And yet it sounds so brilliant and amazing. So now you have me being really intrigued while simultaneously non-stop laughing. )
    $endgroup$
    – mVitus
    38 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    And then I try more searching and the phrase "Don't put the cart before the horse" becomes helpful to my late-night-addled mind. And so the thought of "There has to be some reason this wouldn't work well or humans would've done it somewhere already." gets answered. Still has me laughing though.
    $endgroup$
    – mVitus
    31 mins ago



















1












$begingroup$

maybe make it more heavier or bigger to support more crossbow army and its up to you to give four wheel like sumerian warchariot or not, but not doing so probably make it unwieldy, and use tactic or formation as mobile fence or barricade while spearman support from behind or the gap of the charriot like how chinese deal with cavalry using wagon fort. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wagon_fort



unless the 4arm cant play defensively and require them to go somewhere quickly.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Li Jun is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$

    You can't.



    Heavy cavalry uses the combined momentum of the horse and rider to smash through enemy lines, breaking up their cohesion (or for less-trained soldiers, scare them into running away). With heavy cavalry, the rider is (hopefully) solidly attached to the horse, so the two move as a single unit, and their combined momentum helps carry them through the lines, where they can turn around for a second pass.



    Chariots can't do this. There isn't a rigid coupling between the chariot and the horses -- there can't be, if you want a usable turning radius. What's likely going to happen if you try to charge an infantry line is that the horses will slow down on impact, the chariot won't, and you'll wind up with a pile of wreckage along the front of the battle line. Yes, you'll have done a fair bit of damage, but you've lost your cavalry in the process.



    Don't try to do fight in a way that emphasizes your weaknesses. You describe your 4-arms as big, slow, and presumably quite strong. Don't try to imitate human fighting styles. Instead, fight in a way that plays up your strengths. For example, give your charioteers longbows or heavy crossbows, combining the power and range of heavy archers with the mobility of light cavalry. Similarly, your infantry should be pikemen, not spearmen, wielding pointy objects far longer than any knight's lance.



    Basic tactics here would be for the infantry to form the center of your line to receive the enemy's cavalry charge while the chariots wait on the outside to prevent flanking attacks. Once the cavalry get stopped by the pikes, the chariots swarm out to turn them into pincushions, then continue on to do the same to the enemy infantry.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      0












      $begingroup$

      While mounted horses make a better choice for riding straight in to enemy lines, before larger horses, stirrups, proper saddles, etc., chariots were used to charge into enemy lines. It's the whole reason scythed chariots were a thing.



      But they were limited in the terrain they could be used on and generally less manoeuvrable and more fragile than mounted cavalry. But on flat ground they can and were used to charge enemy ranks.



      Because of their lack of manoeuvrability a common tactic used against chariot charge was just to open ranks, let them pass and attack them from behind as they couldn't turn quickly to face the enemy before they closed ranks again.



      So going back to the scythed chariots, one of their main uses was to break enemy ranks for light cavalry to fill and kill enemy ranks in disarray. In your world you could use larger chariots to carry troops close to the enemy lines quickly but lead these with smaller chariots to break enemy ranks for the newly arrived 4 armed warriors to fill that gap in the shield wall.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$














        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "579"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143442%2fmodification-to-chariots-for-heavy-cavalry-analogue-for-4-armed-race%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        2












        $begingroup$

        Put the cart before the horse.



        cart before the horse ad
        https://www.adsoftheworld.com/media/outdoor/porsche_rear_horsepower_4



        This would work great for your big folks. The chariot in the ad is pretty cool and would scale up to additional horses without much problem. With this setup, the big boss is in front, and so it is less scary for the horse - all it sees is the back of the boss. That is reassuring for a horse because it means the badass up front will hit the trouble first. Up front your big guy can do things that would not be possible in a regular chariot or for mounted cavalry. He can have a lance, sure. Or he can have a claymore sword or an axe and mow down whatever is in front and around him. With conventional chariots or cavalry the horses head is in the way of maneuvers like that. With the front-mounted chariot, the horses don't engage the infantry except to stomp on the fallen, which is what they like to do anyway.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$













        • $begingroup$
          You're going to want a lance to get the most out of your momentum for a first strike, but after that, an axe is a reasonable choice.
          $endgroup$
          – Mark
          1 hour ago










        • $begingroup$
          Do you have any sources that talk about rear-powered horse carriages? I did a quick search and all I could really find where things of the same picture. Being able to do some research would be beneficial. ( I will say that my initial reaction to this answer was: That looks so incredibly derpy. Like the kind of thing a bunch of drunk people would try doing. And yet it sounds so brilliant and amazing. So now you have me being really intrigued while simultaneously non-stop laughing. )
          $endgroup$
          – mVitus
          38 mins ago










        • $begingroup$
          And then I try more searching and the phrase "Don't put the cart before the horse" becomes helpful to my late-night-addled mind. And so the thought of "There has to be some reason this wouldn't work well or humans would've done it somewhere already." gets answered. Still has me laughing though.
          $endgroup$
          – mVitus
          31 mins ago
















        2












        $begingroup$

        Put the cart before the horse.



        cart before the horse ad
        https://www.adsoftheworld.com/media/outdoor/porsche_rear_horsepower_4



        This would work great for your big folks. The chariot in the ad is pretty cool and would scale up to additional horses without much problem. With this setup, the big boss is in front, and so it is less scary for the horse - all it sees is the back of the boss. That is reassuring for a horse because it means the badass up front will hit the trouble first. Up front your big guy can do things that would not be possible in a regular chariot or for mounted cavalry. He can have a lance, sure. Or he can have a claymore sword or an axe and mow down whatever is in front and around him. With conventional chariots or cavalry the horses head is in the way of maneuvers like that. With the front-mounted chariot, the horses don't engage the infantry except to stomp on the fallen, which is what they like to do anyway.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$













        • $begingroup$
          You're going to want a lance to get the most out of your momentum for a first strike, but after that, an axe is a reasonable choice.
          $endgroup$
          – Mark
          1 hour ago










        • $begingroup$
          Do you have any sources that talk about rear-powered horse carriages? I did a quick search and all I could really find where things of the same picture. Being able to do some research would be beneficial. ( I will say that my initial reaction to this answer was: That looks so incredibly derpy. Like the kind of thing a bunch of drunk people would try doing. And yet it sounds so brilliant and amazing. So now you have me being really intrigued while simultaneously non-stop laughing. )
          $endgroup$
          – mVitus
          38 mins ago










        • $begingroup$
          And then I try more searching and the phrase "Don't put the cart before the horse" becomes helpful to my late-night-addled mind. And so the thought of "There has to be some reason this wouldn't work well or humans would've done it somewhere already." gets answered. Still has me laughing though.
          $endgroup$
          – mVitus
          31 mins ago














        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        Put the cart before the horse.



        cart before the horse ad
        https://www.adsoftheworld.com/media/outdoor/porsche_rear_horsepower_4



        This would work great for your big folks. The chariot in the ad is pretty cool and would scale up to additional horses without much problem. With this setup, the big boss is in front, and so it is less scary for the horse - all it sees is the back of the boss. That is reassuring for a horse because it means the badass up front will hit the trouble first. Up front your big guy can do things that would not be possible in a regular chariot or for mounted cavalry. He can have a lance, sure. Or he can have a claymore sword or an axe and mow down whatever is in front and around him. With conventional chariots or cavalry the horses head is in the way of maneuvers like that. With the front-mounted chariot, the horses don't engage the infantry except to stomp on the fallen, which is what they like to do anyway.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Put the cart before the horse.



        cart before the horse ad
        https://www.adsoftheworld.com/media/outdoor/porsche_rear_horsepower_4



        This would work great for your big folks. The chariot in the ad is pretty cool and would scale up to additional horses without much problem. With this setup, the big boss is in front, and so it is less scary for the horse - all it sees is the back of the boss. That is reassuring for a horse because it means the badass up front will hit the trouble first. Up front your big guy can do things that would not be possible in a regular chariot or for mounted cavalry. He can have a lance, sure. Or he can have a claymore sword or an axe and mow down whatever is in front and around him. With conventional chariots or cavalry the horses head is in the way of maneuvers like that. With the front-mounted chariot, the horses don't engage the infantry except to stomp on the fallen, which is what they like to do anyway.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 1 hour ago









        WillkWillk

        116k27219487




        116k27219487












        • $begingroup$
          You're going to want a lance to get the most out of your momentum for a first strike, but after that, an axe is a reasonable choice.
          $endgroup$
          – Mark
          1 hour ago










        • $begingroup$
          Do you have any sources that talk about rear-powered horse carriages? I did a quick search and all I could really find where things of the same picture. Being able to do some research would be beneficial. ( I will say that my initial reaction to this answer was: That looks so incredibly derpy. Like the kind of thing a bunch of drunk people would try doing. And yet it sounds so brilliant and amazing. So now you have me being really intrigued while simultaneously non-stop laughing. )
          $endgroup$
          – mVitus
          38 mins ago










        • $begingroup$
          And then I try more searching and the phrase "Don't put the cart before the horse" becomes helpful to my late-night-addled mind. And so the thought of "There has to be some reason this wouldn't work well or humans would've done it somewhere already." gets answered. Still has me laughing though.
          $endgroup$
          – mVitus
          31 mins ago


















        • $begingroup$
          You're going to want a lance to get the most out of your momentum for a first strike, but after that, an axe is a reasonable choice.
          $endgroup$
          – Mark
          1 hour ago










        • $begingroup$
          Do you have any sources that talk about rear-powered horse carriages? I did a quick search and all I could really find where things of the same picture. Being able to do some research would be beneficial. ( I will say that my initial reaction to this answer was: That looks so incredibly derpy. Like the kind of thing a bunch of drunk people would try doing. And yet it sounds so brilliant and amazing. So now you have me being really intrigued while simultaneously non-stop laughing. )
          $endgroup$
          – mVitus
          38 mins ago










        • $begingroup$
          And then I try more searching and the phrase "Don't put the cart before the horse" becomes helpful to my late-night-addled mind. And so the thought of "There has to be some reason this wouldn't work well or humans would've done it somewhere already." gets answered. Still has me laughing though.
          $endgroup$
          – mVitus
          31 mins ago
















        $begingroup$
        You're going to want a lance to get the most out of your momentum for a first strike, but after that, an axe is a reasonable choice.
        $endgroup$
        – Mark
        1 hour ago




        $begingroup$
        You're going to want a lance to get the most out of your momentum for a first strike, but after that, an axe is a reasonable choice.
        $endgroup$
        – Mark
        1 hour ago












        $begingroup$
        Do you have any sources that talk about rear-powered horse carriages? I did a quick search and all I could really find where things of the same picture. Being able to do some research would be beneficial. ( I will say that my initial reaction to this answer was: That looks so incredibly derpy. Like the kind of thing a bunch of drunk people would try doing. And yet it sounds so brilliant and amazing. So now you have me being really intrigued while simultaneously non-stop laughing. )
        $endgroup$
        – mVitus
        38 mins ago




        $begingroup$
        Do you have any sources that talk about rear-powered horse carriages? I did a quick search and all I could really find where things of the same picture. Being able to do some research would be beneficial. ( I will say that my initial reaction to this answer was: That looks so incredibly derpy. Like the kind of thing a bunch of drunk people would try doing. And yet it sounds so brilliant and amazing. So now you have me being really intrigued while simultaneously non-stop laughing. )
        $endgroup$
        – mVitus
        38 mins ago












        $begingroup$
        And then I try more searching and the phrase "Don't put the cart before the horse" becomes helpful to my late-night-addled mind. And so the thought of "There has to be some reason this wouldn't work well or humans would've done it somewhere already." gets answered. Still has me laughing though.
        $endgroup$
        – mVitus
        31 mins ago




        $begingroup$
        And then I try more searching and the phrase "Don't put the cart before the horse" becomes helpful to my late-night-addled mind. And so the thought of "There has to be some reason this wouldn't work well or humans would've done it somewhere already." gets answered. Still has me laughing though.
        $endgroup$
        – mVitus
        31 mins ago











        1












        $begingroup$

        maybe make it more heavier or bigger to support more crossbow army and its up to you to give four wheel like sumerian warchariot or not, but not doing so probably make it unwieldy, and use tactic or formation as mobile fence or barricade while spearman support from behind or the gap of the charriot like how chinese deal with cavalry using wagon fort. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wagon_fort



        unless the 4arm cant play defensively and require them to go somewhere quickly.






        share|improve this answer










        New contributor




        Li Jun is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        $endgroup$


















          1












          $begingroup$

          maybe make it more heavier or bigger to support more crossbow army and its up to you to give four wheel like sumerian warchariot or not, but not doing so probably make it unwieldy, and use tactic or formation as mobile fence or barricade while spearman support from behind or the gap of the charriot like how chinese deal with cavalry using wagon fort. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wagon_fort



          unless the 4arm cant play defensively and require them to go somewhere quickly.






          share|improve this answer










          New contributor




          Li Jun is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$
















            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            maybe make it more heavier or bigger to support more crossbow army and its up to you to give four wheel like sumerian warchariot or not, but not doing so probably make it unwieldy, and use tactic or formation as mobile fence or barricade while spearman support from behind or the gap of the charriot like how chinese deal with cavalry using wagon fort. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wagon_fort



            unless the 4arm cant play defensively and require them to go somewhere quickly.






            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Li Jun is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            $endgroup$



            maybe make it more heavier or bigger to support more crossbow army and its up to you to give four wheel like sumerian warchariot or not, but not doing so probably make it unwieldy, and use tactic or formation as mobile fence or barricade while spearman support from behind or the gap of the charriot like how chinese deal with cavalry using wagon fort. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wagon_fort



            unless the 4arm cant play defensively and require them to go somewhere quickly.







            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Li Jun is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 8 hours ago





















            New contributor




            Li Jun is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            answered 8 hours ago









            Li JunLi Jun

            17010




            17010




            New contributor




            Li Jun is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





            New contributor





            Li Jun is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            Li Jun is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.























                1












                $begingroup$

                You can't.



                Heavy cavalry uses the combined momentum of the horse and rider to smash through enemy lines, breaking up their cohesion (or for less-trained soldiers, scare them into running away). With heavy cavalry, the rider is (hopefully) solidly attached to the horse, so the two move as a single unit, and their combined momentum helps carry them through the lines, where they can turn around for a second pass.



                Chariots can't do this. There isn't a rigid coupling between the chariot and the horses -- there can't be, if you want a usable turning radius. What's likely going to happen if you try to charge an infantry line is that the horses will slow down on impact, the chariot won't, and you'll wind up with a pile of wreckage along the front of the battle line. Yes, you'll have done a fair bit of damage, but you've lost your cavalry in the process.



                Don't try to do fight in a way that emphasizes your weaknesses. You describe your 4-arms as big, slow, and presumably quite strong. Don't try to imitate human fighting styles. Instead, fight in a way that plays up your strengths. For example, give your charioteers longbows or heavy crossbows, combining the power and range of heavy archers with the mobility of light cavalry. Similarly, your infantry should be pikemen, not spearmen, wielding pointy objects far longer than any knight's lance.



                Basic tactics here would be for the infantry to form the center of your line to receive the enemy's cavalry charge while the chariots wait on the outside to prevent flanking attacks. Once the cavalry get stopped by the pikes, the chariots swarm out to turn them into pincushions, then continue on to do the same to the enemy infantry.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$


















                  1












                  $begingroup$

                  You can't.



                  Heavy cavalry uses the combined momentum of the horse and rider to smash through enemy lines, breaking up their cohesion (or for less-trained soldiers, scare them into running away). With heavy cavalry, the rider is (hopefully) solidly attached to the horse, so the two move as a single unit, and their combined momentum helps carry them through the lines, where they can turn around for a second pass.



                  Chariots can't do this. There isn't a rigid coupling between the chariot and the horses -- there can't be, if you want a usable turning radius. What's likely going to happen if you try to charge an infantry line is that the horses will slow down on impact, the chariot won't, and you'll wind up with a pile of wreckage along the front of the battle line. Yes, you'll have done a fair bit of damage, but you've lost your cavalry in the process.



                  Don't try to do fight in a way that emphasizes your weaknesses. You describe your 4-arms as big, slow, and presumably quite strong. Don't try to imitate human fighting styles. Instead, fight in a way that plays up your strengths. For example, give your charioteers longbows or heavy crossbows, combining the power and range of heavy archers with the mobility of light cavalry. Similarly, your infantry should be pikemen, not spearmen, wielding pointy objects far longer than any knight's lance.



                  Basic tactics here would be for the infantry to form the center of your line to receive the enemy's cavalry charge while the chariots wait on the outside to prevent flanking attacks. Once the cavalry get stopped by the pikes, the chariots swarm out to turn them into pincushions, then continue on to do the same to the enemy infantry.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$
















                    1












                    1








                    1





                    $begingroup$

                    You can't.



                    Heavy cavalry uses the combined momentum of the horse and rider to smash through enemy lines, breaking up their cohesion (or for less-trained soldiers, scare them into running away). With heavy cavalry, the rider is (hopefully) solidly attached to the horse, so the two move as a single unit, and their combined momentum helps carry them through the lines, where they can turn around for a second pass.



                    Chariots can't do this. There isn't a rigid coupling between the chariot and the horses -- there can't be, if you want a usable turning radius. What's likely going to happen if you try to charge an infantry line is that the horses will slow down on impact, the chariot won't, and you'll wind up with a pile of wreckage along the front of the battle line. Yes, you'll have done a fair bit of damage, but you've lost your cavalry in the process.



                    Don't try to do fight in a way that emphasizes your weaknesses. You describe your 4-arms as big, slow, and presumably quite strong. Don't try to imitate human fighting styles. Instead, fight in a way that plays up your strengths. For example, give your charioteers longbows or heavy crossbows, combining the power and range of heavy archers with the mobility of light cavalry. Similarly, your infantry should be pikemen, not spearmen, wielding pointy objects far longer than any knight's lance.



                    Basic tactics here would be for the infantry to form the center of your line to receive the enemy's cavalry charge while the chariots wait on the outside to prevent flanking attacks. Once the cavalry get stopped by the pikes, the chariots swarm out to turn them into pincushions, then continue on to do the same to the enemy infantry.






                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    You can't.



                    Heavy cavalry uses the combined momentum of the horse and rider to smash through enemy lines, breaking up their cohesion (or for less-trained soldiers, scare them into running away). With heavy cavalry, the rider is (hopefully) solidly attached to the horse, so the two move as a single unit, and their combined momentum helps carry them through the lines, where they can turn around for a second pass.



                    Chariots can't do this. There isn't a rigid coupling between the chariot and the horses -- there can't be, if you want a usable turning radius. What's likely going to happen if you try to charge an infantry line is that the horses will slow down on impact, the chariot won't, and you'll wind up with a pile of wreckage along the front of the battle line. Yes, you'll have done a fair bit of damage, but you've lost your cavalry in the process.



                    Don't try to do fight in a way that emphasizes your weaknesses. You describe your 4-arms as big, slow, and presumably quite strong. Don't try to imitate human fighting styles. Instead, fight in a way that plays up your strengths. For example, give your charioteers longbows or heavy crossbows, combining the power and range of heavy archers with the mobility of light cavalry. Similarly, your infantry should be pikemen, not spearmen, wielding pointy objects far longer than any knight's lance.



                    Basic tactics here would be for the infantry to form the center of your line to receive the enemy's cavalry charge while the chariots wait on the outside to prevent flanking attacks. Once the cavalry get stopped by the pikes, the chariots swarm out to turn them into pincushions, then continue on to do the same to the enemy infantry.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered 2 hours ago









                    MarkMark

                    13.4k3265




                    13.4k3265























                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        While mounted horses make a better choice for riding straight in to enemy lines, before larger horses, stirrups, proper saddles, etc., chariots were used to charge into enemy lines. It's the whole reason scythed chariots were a thing.



                        But they were limited in the terrain they could be used on and generally less manoeuvrable and more fragile than mounted cavalry. But on flat ground they can and were used to charge enemy ranks.



                        Because of their lack of manoeuvrability a common tactic used against chariot charge was just to open ranks, let them pass and attack them from behind as they couldn't turn quickly to face the enemy before they closed ranks again.



                        So going back to the scythed chariots, one of their main uses was to break enemy ranks for light cavalry to fill and kill enemy ranks in disarray. In your world you could use larger chariots to carry troops close to the enemy lines quickly but lead these with smaller chariots to break enemy ranks for the newly arrived 4 armed warriors to fill that gap in the shield wall.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$


















                          0












                          $begingroup$

                          While mounted horses make a better choice for riding straight in to enemy lines, before larger horses, stirrups, proper saddles, etc., chariots were used to charge into enemy lines. It's the whole reason scythed chariots were a thing.



                          But they were limited in the terrain they could be used on and generally less manoeuvrable and more fragile than mounted cavalry. But on flat ground they can and were used to charge enemy ranks.



                          Because of their lack of manoeuvrability a common tactic used against chariot charge was just to open ranks, let them pass and attack them from behind as they couldn't turn quickly to face the enemy before they closed ranks again.



                          So going back to the scythed chariots, one of their main uses was to break enemy ranks for light cavalry to fill and kill enemy ranks in disarray. In your world you could use larger chariots to carry troops close to the enemy lines quickly but lead these with smaller chariots to break enemy ranks for the newly arrived 4 armed warriors to fill that gap in the shield wall.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$
















                            0












                            0








                            0





                            $begingroup$

                            While mounted horses make a better choice for riding straight in to enemy lines, before larger horses, stirrups, proper saddles, etc., chariots were used to charge into enemy lines. It's the whole reason scythed chariots were a thing.



                            But they were limited in the terrain they could be used on and generally less manoeuvrable and more fragile than mounted cavalry. But on flat ground they can and were used to charge enemy ranks.



                            Because of their lack of manoeuvrability a common tactic used against chariot charge was just to open ranks, let them pass and attack them from behind as they couldn't turn quickly to face the enemy before they closed ranks again.



                            So going back to the scythed chariots, one of their main uses was to break enemy ranks for light cavalry to fill and kill enemy ranks in disarray. In your world you could use larger chariots to carry troops close to the enemy lines quickly but lead these with smaller chariots to break enemy ranks for the newly arrived 4 armed warriors to fill that gap in the shield wall.






                            share|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            While mounted horses make a better choice for riding straight in to enemy lines, before larger horses, stirrups, proper saddles, etc., chariots were used to charge into enemy lines. It's the whole reason scythed chariots were a thing.



                            But they were limited in the terrain they could be used on and generally less manoeuvrable and more fragile than mounted cavalry. But on flat ground they can and were used to charge enemy ranks.



                            Because of their lack of manoeuvrability a common tactic used against chariot charge was just to open ranks, let them pass and attack them from behind as they couldn't turn quickly to face the enemy before they closed ranks again.



                            So going back to the scythed chariots, one of their main uses was to break enemy ranks for light cavalry to fill and kill enemy ranks in disarray. In your world you could use larger chariots to carry troops close to the enemy lines quickly but lead these with smaller chariots to break enemy ranks for the newly arrived 4 armed warriors to fill that gap in the shield wall.







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered 8 hours ago









                            K MoK Mo

                            2,404514




                            2,404514






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143442%2fmodification-to-chariots-for-heavy-cavalry-analogue-for-4-armed-race%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Ponta tanko

                                Tantalo (mitologio)

                                Erzsébet Schaár