Images Score Regression only regresses to the average of the target values












0












$begingroup$


I have 700 3D images, each one having a target value. The target value distribution after standardizing looks as below
enter image description here



After training, my validation set MSE (10% of data) does not go down and R2 score remains below 0.1 and predicted v.s. real values look like as



enter image description here



What I am seeing is that model is only trying to set all values as the mean value, and cannot get the values away from the mean right. I am using MSE loss and have also tried Huber loss. I have tried normalizing my data to [0,1] and also [-1,1] (enforcing the last 1-neuron layer with a sigmoid or tanh activation function to this range as well) but haven't seen any improvement.



FYI, my architecture is 3 times (conv3d, conv3d, maxpool) + 2 times(dense layer) + a one unit dense layer. Adam optimizer, leaky-relu activations, regularizations and drop outs.



FYI, I have done an extensive hyperparameter study as well, but never any improvements.



Any idea why this is happening, maybe a need of changing my data range?









share









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I have 700 3D images, each one having a target value. The target value distribution after standardizing looks as below
    enter image description here



    After training, my validation set MSE (10% of data) does not go down and R2 score remains below 0.1 and predicted v.s. real values look like as



    enter image description here



    What I am seeing is that model is only trying to set all values as the mean value, and cannot get the values away from the mean right. I am using MSE loss and have also tried Huber loss. I have tried normalizing my data to [0,1] and also [-1,1] (enforcing the last 1-neuron layer with a sigmoid or tanh activation function to this range as well) but haven't seen any improvement.



    FYI, my architecture is 3 times (conv3d, conv3d, maxpool) + 2 times(dense layer) + a one unit dense layer. Adam optimizer, leaky-relu activations, regularizations and drop outs.



    FYI, I have done an extensive hyperparameter study as well, but never any improvements.



    Any idea why this is happening, maybe a need of changing my data range?









    share









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I have 700 3D images, each one having a target value. The target value distribution after standardizing looks as below
      enter image description here



      After training, my validation set MSE (10% of data) does not go down and R2 score remains below 0.1 and predicted v.s. real values look like as



      enter image description here



      What I am seeing is that model is only trying to set all values as the mean value, and cannot get the values away from the mean right. I am using MSE loss and have also tried Huber loss. I have tried normalizing my data to [0,1] and also [-1,1] (enforcing the last 1-neuron layer with a sigmoid or tanh activation function to this range as well) but haven't seen any improvement.



      FYI, my architecture is 3 times (conv3d, conv3d, maxpool) + 2 times(dense layer) + a one unit dense layer. Adam optimizer, leaky-relu activations, regularizations and drop outs.



      FYI, I have done an extensive hyperparameter study as well, but never any improvements.



      Any idea why this is happening, maybe a need of changing my data range?









      share









      $endgroup$




      I have 700 3D images, each one having a target value. The target value distribution after standardizing looks as below
      enter image description here



      After training, my validation set MSE (10% of data) does not go down and R2 score remains below 0.1 and predicted v.s. real values look like as



      enter image description here



      What I am seeing is that model is only trying to set all values as the mean value, and cannot get the values away from the mean right. I am using MSE loss and have also tried Huber loss. I have tried normalizing my data to [0,1] and also [-1,1] (enforcing the last 1-neuron layer with a sigmoid or tanh activation function to this range as well) but haven't seen any improvement.



      FYI, my architecture is 3 times (conv3d, conv3d, maxpool) + 2 times(dense layer) + a one unit dense layer. Adam optimizer, leaky-relu activations, regularizations and drop outs.



      FYI, I have done an extensive hyperparameter study as well, but never any improvements.



      Any idea why this is happening, maybe a need of changing my data range?







      regression cnn convolution image-preprocessing





      share












      share










      share



      share










      asked 4 mins ago









      SoyolSoyol

      1112




      1112






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "557"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f44672%2fimages-score-regression-only-regresses-to-the-average-of-the-target-values%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f44672%2fimages-score-regression-only-regresses-to-the-average-of-the-target-values%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Ponta tanko

          Tantalo (mitologio)

          Erzsébet Schaár