Why does the Common Agriculrural Policy exist?
The Common Agricultural Policy is a system of state grants to farmers in the EU.
Why do farms warrant public funding in this way? Isn’t this, in effect a form of protectionism?
european-union
asked 1 hour ago
BenBen
2,216926
add a comment |
The Common Agricultural Policy is a system of state grants to farmers in the EU.
Why do farms warrant public funding in this way? Isn’t this, in effect a form of protectionism?
european-union
asked 1 hour ago
BenBen
2,216926
Yes, it is protectionism. There is the idea that Europe should be self-sufficient in food, and there was a fear that it wouldn't be self-sufficient without subsidies. Among the other reasons for subsidies, i.e. lobbyism.
– o.m.
46 mins ago
Isn’t the intellectual consensus that protectionism actually harms the economy it is designed to protect? If so, why does this persist? Or am I wrong about the consensus?
– Ben
44 mins ago
Depends on what your goals are. The most efficient agricultural industry in a global market or assured local production of all required food? Note some of the more extreme worries in case of a hard Brexit, because the UK isn't self-sufficient in many foods.
– o.m.
9 mins ago
@Ben That is regularly claimed, by free market theorists, but without strong evidence. It certainly can produce a weak industry without an incentive to innovate. On the other hand, failure to protect some industries can result in total loss of the industry to other countries and devastation of the local economy. This is particularly an issue if competing against other countries who do give subsidies.
– Graham
4 mins ago
add a comment |
The Common Agricultural Policy is a system of state grants to farmers in the EU.
Why do farms warrant public funding in this way? Isn’t this, in effect a form of protectionism?
european-union
asked 1 hour ago
BenBen
2,216926
The Common Agricultural Policy is a system of state grants to farmers in the EU.
Why do farms warrant public funding in this way? Isn’t this, in effect a form of protectionism?
european-union
european-union
asked 1 hour ago
BenBen
2,216926
asked 1 hour ago
BenBen
2,216926
asked 1 hour ago
BenBen
2,216926
asked 1 hour ago
BenBen
2,216926
asked 1 hour ago
BenBen
2,216926
2,216926
Yes, it is protectionism. There is the idea that Europe should be self-sufficient in food, and there was a fear that it wouldn't be self-sufficient without subsidies. Among the other reasons for subsidies, i.e. lobbyism.
– o.m.
46 mins ago
Isn’t the intellectual consensus that protectionism actually harms the economy it is designed to protect? If so, why does this persist? Or am I wrong about the consensus?
– Ben
44 mins ago
Depends on what your goals are. The most efficient agricultural industry in a global market or assured local production of all required food? Note some of the more extreme worries in case of a hard Brexit, because the UK isn't self-sufficient in many foods.
– o.m.
9 mins ago
@Ben That is regularly claimed, by free market theorists, but without strong evidence. It certainly can produce a weak industry without an incentive to innovate. On the other hand, failure to protect some industries can result in total loss of the industry to other countries and devastation of the local economy. This is particularly an issue if competing against other countries who do give subsidies.
– Graham
4 mins ago
add a comment |
Yes, it is protectionism. There is the idea that Europe should be self-sufficient in food, and there was a fear that it wouldn't be self-sufficient without subsidies. Among the other reasons for subsidies, i.e. lobbyism.
– o.m.
46 mins ago
Isn’t the intellectual consensus that protectionism actually harms the economy it is designed to protect? If so, why does this persist? Or am I wrong about the consensus?
– Ben
44 mins ago
Depends on what your goals are. The most efficient agricultural industry in a global market or assured local production of all required food? Note some of the more extreme worries in case of a hard Brexit, because the UK isn't self-sufficient in many foods.
– o.m.
9 mins ago
@Ben That is regularly claimed, by free market theorists, but without strong evidence. It certainly can produce a weak industry without an incentive to innovate. On the other hand, failure to protect some industries can result in total loss of the industry to other countries and devastation of the local economy. This is particularly an issue if competing against other countries who do give subsidies.
– Graham
4 mins ago
Yes, it is protectionism. There is the idea that Europe should be self-sufficient in food, and there was a fear that it wouldn't be self-sufficient without subsidies. Among the other reasons for subsidies, i.e. lobbyism.
– o.m.
46 mins ago
Yes, it is protectionism. There is the idea that Europe should be self-sufficient in food, and there was a fear that it wouldn't be self-sufficient without subsidies. Among the other reasons for subsidies, i.e. lobbyism.
– o.m.
46 mins ago
Isn’t the intellectual consensus that protectionism actually harms the economy it is designed to protect? If so, why does this persist? Or am I wrong about the consensus?
– Ben
44 mins ago
Isn’t the intellectual consensus that protectionism actually harms the economy it is designed to protect? If so, why does this persist? Or am I wrong about the consensus?
– Ben
44 mins ago
Depends on what your goals are. The most efficient agricultural industry in a global market or assured local production of all required food? Note some of the more extreme worries in case of a hard Brexit, because the UK isn't self-sufficient in many foods.
– o.m.
9 mins ago
Depends on what your goals are. The most efficient agricultural industry in a global market or assured local production of all required food? Note some of the more extreme worries in case of a hard Brexit, because the UK isn't self-sufficient in many foods.
– o.m.
9 mins ago
@Ben That is regularly claimed, by free market theorists, but without strong evidence. It certainly can produce a weak industry without an incentive to innovate. On the other hand, failure to protect some industries can result in total loss of the industry to other countries and devastation of the local economy. This is particularly an issue if competing against other countries who do give subsidies.
– Graham
4 mins ago
@Ben That is regularly claimed, by free market theorists, but without strong evidence. It certainly can produce a weak industry without an incentive to innovate. On the other hand, failure to protect some industries can result in total loss of the industry to other countries and devastation of the local economy. This is particularly an issue if competing against other countries who do give subsidies.
– Graham
4 mins ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Farmers receive subsidies in many many countries around the world, including EU countries prior to the CAP, the US, or Switzerland. One justification that's commonly offered is that self-sufficiency is a strategic goal that requires state support. The original policy was also devised when Europe was just coming out of food rationing that lasted for a decade after WWII. Nowadays, this productivity objective has partly been replaced with policies designed to safeguard the landscape and ecosystems through specific agricultural practices. And of course other sectors of the economy also receive subsidies and support from states in various ways.
So what's specific to the CAP is not that farmers receive subsidies, it's that they may not receive subsidies from individual states, instead getting them solely through EU programmes. That's why the CAP was such a large part of the EU budget for many decades (less so now). EU federalists hoped that other sectors would follow but that never happened. In other domains (industry, defense, research, education, healthcare, etc.) individual EU member states fund specific policies or directly subsidizes businesses within the bounds set by EU rules (in particular the rules on “state aid”).
answered 32 mins ago
RelaxedRelaxed
16.6k3558
CAP was 39% of the goal EU budget in 2013. That seems vast. Is it?
– Ben
28 mins ago
1
@Ben Yes, that's what I am referring to in the second paragraph. It's not necessarily a lot of money relative to EU GDP or farm subsidies elsewhere but it's large compared to the EU budget because other “traditional” big spending items (including defense, education or subsidies to industry or transportation) are mostly covered through the member states budget, not the EU budget. The EU budget is far from negligible but not that large relative to the total GDP.
– Relaxed
24 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "475"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38207%2fwhy-does-the-common-agriculrural-policy-exist%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Farmers receive subsidies in many many countries around the world, including EU countries prior to the CAP, the US, or Switzerland. One justification that's commonly offered is that self-sufficiency is a strategic goal that requires state support. The original policy was also devised when Europe was just coming out of food rationing that lasted for a decade after WWII. Nowadays, this productivity objective has partly been replaced with policies designed to safeguard the landscape and ecosystems through specific agricultural practices. And of course other sectors of the economy also receive subsidies and support from states in various ways.
So what's specific to the CAP is not that farmers receive subsidies, it's that they may not receive subsidies from individual states, instead getting them solely through EU programmes. That's why the CAP was such a large part of the EU budget for many decades (less so now). EU federalists hoped that other sectors would follow but that never happened. In other domains (industry, defense, research, education, healthcare, etc.) individual EU member states fund specific policies or directly subsidizes businesses within the bounds set by EU rules (in particular the rules on “state aid”).
answered 32 mins ago
RelaxedRelaxed
16.6k3558
CAP was 39% of the goal EU budget in 2013. That seems vast. Is it?
– Ben
28 mins ago
1
@Ben Yes, that's what I am referring to in the second paragraph. It's not necessarily a lot of money relative to EU GDP or farm subsidies elsewhere but it's large compared to the EU budget because other “traditional” big spending items (including defense, education or subsidies to industry or transportation) are mostly covered through the member states budget, not the EU budget. The EU budget is far from negligible but not that large relative to the total GDP.
– Relaxed
24 mins ago
add a comment |
Farmers receive subsidies in many many countries around the world, including EU countries prior to the CAP, the US, or Switzerland. One justification that's commonly offered is that self-sufficiency is a strategic goal that requires state support. The original policy was also devised when Europe was just coming out of food rationing that lasted for a decade after WWII. Nowadays, this productivity objective has partly been replaced with policies designed to safeguard the landscape and ecosystems through specific agricultural practices. And of course other sectors of the economy also receive subsidies and support from states in various ways.
So what's specific to the CAP is not that farmers receive subsidies, it's that they may not receive subsidies from individual states, instead getting them solely through EU programmes. That's why the CAP was such a large part of the EU budget for many decades (less so now). EU federalists hoped that other sectors would follow but that never happened. In other domains (industry, defense, research, education, healthcare, etc.) individual EU member states fund specific policies or directly subsidizes businesses within the bounds set by EU rules (in particular the rules on “state aid”).
answered 32 mins ago
RelaxedRelaxed
16.6k3558
CAP was 39% of the goal EU budget in 2013. That seems vast. Is it?
– Ben
28 mins ago
1
@Ben Yes, that's what I am referring to in the second paragraph. It's not necessarily a lot of money relative to EU GDP or farm subsidies elsewhere but it's large compared to the EU budget because other “traditional” big spending items (including defense, education or subsidies to industry or transportation) are mostly covered through the member states budget, not the EU budget. The EU budget is far from negligible but not that large relative to the total GDP.
– Relaxed
24 mins ago
add a comment |
Farmers receive subsidies in many many countries around the world, including EU countries prior to the CAP, the US, or Switzerland. One justification that's commonly offered is that self-sufficiency is a strategic goal that requires state support. The original policy was also devised when Europe was just coming out of food rationing that lasted for a decade after WWII. Nowadays, this productivity objective has partly been replaced with policies designed to safeguard the landscape and ecosystems through specific agricultural practices. And of course other sectors of the economy also receive subsidies and support from states in various ways.
So what's specific to the CAP is not that farmers receive subsidies, it's that they may not receive subsidies from individual states, instead getting them solely through EU programmes. That's why the CAP was such a large part of the EU budget for many decades (less so now). EU federalists hoped that other sectors would follow but that never happened. In other domains (industry, defense, research, education, healthcare, etc.) individual EU member states fund specific policies or directly subsidizes businesses within the bounds set by EU rules (in particular the rules on “state aid”).
answered 32 mins ago
RelaxedRelaxed
16.6k3558
Farmers receive subsidies in many many countries around the world, including EU countries prior to the CAP, the US, or Switzerland. One justification that's commonly offered is that self-sufficiency is a strategic goal that requires state support. The original policy was also devised when Europe was just coming out of food rationing that lasted for a decade after WWII. Nowadays, this productivity objective has partly been replaced with policies designed to safeguard the landscape and ecosystems through specific agricultural practices. And of course other sectors of the economy also receive subsidies and support from states in various ways.
So what's specific to the CAP is not that farmers receive subsidies, it's that they may not receive subsidies from individual states, instead getting them solely through EU programmes. That's why the CAP was such a large part of the EU budget for many decades (less so now). EU federalists hoped that other sectors would follow but that never happened. In other domains (industry, defense, research, education, healthcare, etc.) individual EU member states fund specific policies or directly subsidizes businesses within the bounds set by EU rules (in particular the rules on “state aid”).
answered 32 mins ago
RelaxedRelaxed
16.6k3558
answered 32 mins ago
RelaxedRelaxed
16.6k3558
answered 32 mins ago
RelaxedRelaxed
16.6k3558
answered 32 mins ago
RelaxedRelaxed
16.6k3558
16.6k3558
CAP was 39% of the goal EU budget in 2013. That seems vast. Is it?
– Ben
28 mins ago
1
@Ben Yes, that's what I am referring to in the second paragraph. It's not necessarily a lot of money relative to EU GDP or farm subsidies elsewhere but it's large compared to the EU budget because other “traditional” big spending items (including defense, education or subsidies to industry or transportation) are mostly covered through the member states budget, not the EU budget. The EU budget is far from negligible but not that large relative to the total GDP.
– Relaxed
24 mins ago
add a comment |
CAP was 39% of the goal EU budget in 2013. That seems vast. Is it?
– Ben
28 mins ago
1
@Ben Yes, that's what I am referring to in the second paragraph. It's not necessarily a lot of money relative to EU GDP or farm subsidies elsewhere but it's large compared to the EU budget because other “traditional” big spending items (including defense, education or subsidies to industry or transportation) are mostly covered through the member states budget, not the EU budget. The EU budget is far from negligible but not that large relative to the total GDP.
– Relaxed
24 mins ago
CAP was 39% of the goal EU budget in 2013. That seems vast. Is it?
– Ben
28 mins ago
CAP was 39% of the goal EU budget in 2013. That seems vast. Is it?
– Ben
28 mins ago
1
1
@Ben Yes, that's what I am referring to in the second paragraph. It's not necessarily a lot of money relative to EU GDP or farm subsidies elsewhere but it's large compared to the EU budget because other “traditional” big spending items (including defense, education or subsidies to industry or transportation) are mostly covered through the member states budget, not the EU budget. The EU budget is far from negligible but not that large relative to the total GDP.
– Relaxed
24 mins ago
@Ben Yes, that's what I am referring to in the second paragraph. It's not necessarily a lot of money relative to EU GDP or farm subsidies elsewhere but it's large compared to the EU budget because other “traditional” big spending items (including defense, education or subsidies to industry or transportation) are mostly covered through the member states budget, not the EU budget. The EU budget is far from negligible but not that large relative to the total GDP.
– Relaxed
24 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Politics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38207%2fwhy-does-the-common-agriculrural-policy-exist%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Yes, it is protectionism. There is the idea that Europe should be self-sufficient in food, and there was a fear that it wouldn't be self-sufficient without subsidies. Among the other reasons for subsidies, i.e. lobbyism.
– o.m.
46 mins ago
Isn’t the intellectual consensus that protectionism actually harms the economy it is designed to protect? If so, why does this persist? Or am I wrong about the consensus?
– Ben
44 mins ago
Depends on what your goals are. The most efficient agricultural industry in a global market or assured local production of all required food? Note some of the more extreme worries in case of a hard Brexit, because the UK isn't self-sufficient in many foods.
– o.m.
9 mins ago
@Ben That is regularly claimed, by free market theorists, but without strong evidence. It certainly can produce a weak industry without an incentive to innovate. On the other hand, failure to protect some industries can result in total loss of the industry to other countries and devastation of the local economy. This is particularly an issue if competing against other countries who do give subsidies.
– Graham
4 mins ago