PTIJ: Why do we make a Lulav holder?
The Gemara says:
אין עושין מצות חבילות חבילות
One does not make mitzvot into bundles.
But I've seen lots of people do just that: They put the four species into a bundle.
ואם תומר, and if you'll say:
The issue is making a Mitzva into a bundle, not putting the Mitzvah into a bundle.
You can't say that since the bundle is made from Lulav leaves. So we quite literally made a Mitzvah into a bundle.
Oh, and there are some who only make a bundle out of the Lulav, without even making a basket.
That should definitely be an issue.
This question is Purim Torah and is not intended to be taken completely seriously. See the Purim Torah policy.
purim-torah-in-jest
asked 7 hours ago
LeitzLeitz
903212
|
show 2 more comments
The Gemara says:
אין עושין מצות חבילות חבילות
One does not make mitzvot into bundles.
But I've seen lots of people do just that: They put the four species into a bundle.
ואם תומר, and if you'll say:
The issue is making a Mitzva into a bundle, not putting the Mitzvah into a bundle.
You can't say that since the bundle is made from Lulav leaves. So we quite literally made a Mitzvah into a bundle.
Oh, and there are some who only make a bundle out of the Lulav, without even making a basket.
That should definitely be an issue.
This question is Purim Torah and is not intended to be taken completely seriously. See the Purim Torah policy.
purim-torah-in-jest
asked 7 hours ago
LeitzLeitz
903212
VTC as not Purim Torah
– Double AA♦
6 hours ago
@DoubleAA Ummm... You think that this is a real question?
– Leitz
6 hours ago
2
If I removed the disclaimer, would you be able to tell it wasn't?
– Double AA♦
6 hours ago
Yes because he is making a pun of חבילות חבילות @DoubleAA
– Dr. Shmuel
6 hours ago
1
@DoubleAA From the way that he addresses the serious question, answering it by posing the ridiculous Purim Torah interpretation (turning the lulav into a bundle), it's clear he means it as PTIJ. Consider judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1990, whose guidelines the OP is definitely following.
– DonielF
6 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
The Gemara says:
אין עושין מצות חבילות חבילות
One does not make mitzvot into bundles.
But I've seen lots of people do just that: They put the four species into a bundle.
ואם תומר, and if you'll say:
The issue is making a Mitzva into a bundle, not putting the Mitzvah into a bundle.
You can't say that since the bundle is made from Lulav leaves. So we quite literally made a Mitzvah into a bundle.
Oh, and there are some who only make a bundle out of the Lulav, without even making a basket.
That should definitely be an issue.
This question is Purim Torah and is not intended to be taken completely seriously. See the Purim Torah policy.
purim-torah-in-jest
asked 7 hours ago
LeitzLeitz
903212
The Gemara says:
אין עושין מצות חבילות חבילות
One does not make mitzvot into bundles.
But I've seen lots of people do just that: They put the four species into a bundle.
ואם תומר, and if you'll say:
The issue is making a Mitzva into a bundle, not putting the Mitzvah into a bundle.
You can't say that since the bundle is made from Lulav leaves. So we quite literally made a Mitzvah into a bundle.
Oh, and there are some who only make a bundle out of the Lulav, without even making a basket.
That should definitely be an issue.
This question is Purim Torah and is not intended to be taken completely seriously. See the Purim Torah policy.
purim-torah-in-jest
purim-torah-in-jest
asked 7 hours ago
LeitzLeitz
903212
asked 7 hours ago
LeitzLeitz
903212
asked 7 hours ago
LeitzLeitz
903212
asked 7 hours ago
LeitzLeitz
903212
asked 7 hours ago
LeitzLeitz
903212
903212
VTC as not Purim Torah
– Double AA♦
6 hours ago
@DoubleAA Ummm... You think that this is a real question?
– Leitz
6 hours ago
2
If I removed the disclaimer, would you be able to tell it wasn't?
– Double AA♦
6 hours ago
Yes because he is making a pun of חבילות חבילות @DoubleAA
– Dr. Shmuel
6 hours ago
1
@DoubleAA From the way that he addresses the serious question, answering it by posing the ridiculous Purim Torah interpretation (turning the lulav into a bundle), it's clear he means it as PTIJ. Consider judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1990, whose guidelines the OP is definitely following.
– DonielF
6 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
VTC as not Purim Torah
– Double AA♦
6 hours ago
@DoubleAA Ummm... You think that this is a real question?
– Leitz
6 hours ago
2
If I removed the disclaimer, would you be able to tell it wasn't?
– Double AA♦
6 hours ago
Yes because he is making a pun of חבילות חבילות @DoubleAA
– Dr. Shmuel
6 hours ago
1
@DoubleAA From the way that he addresses the serious question, answering it by posing the ridiculous Purim Torah interpretation (turning the lulav into a bundle), it's clear he means it as PTIJ. Consider judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1990, whose guidelines the OP is definitely following.
– DonielF
6 hours ago
VTC as not Purim Torah
– Double AA♦
6 hours ago
VTC as not Purim Torah
– Double AA♦
6 hours ago
@DoubleAA Ummm... You think that this is a real question?
– Leitz
6 hours ago
@DoubleAA Ummm... You think that this is a real question?
– Leitz
6 hours ago
2
2
If I removed the disclaimer, would you be able to tell it wasn't?
– Double AA♦
6 hours ago
If I removed the disclaimer, would you be able to tell it wasn't?
– Double AA♦
6 hours ago
Yes because he is making a pun of חבילות חבילות @DoubleAA
– Dr. Shmuel
6 hours ago
Yes because he is making a pun of חבילות חבילות @DoubleAA
– Dr. Shmuel
6 hours ago
1
1
@DoubleAA From the way that he addresses the serious question, answering it by posing the ridiculous Purim Torah interpretation (turning the lulav into a bundle), it's clear he means it as PTIJ. Consider judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1990, whose guidelines the OP is definitely following.
– DonielF
6 hours ago
@DoubleAA From the way that he addresses the serious question, answering it by posing the ridiculous Purim Torah interpretation (turning the lulav into a bundle), it's clear he means it as PTIJ. Consider judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1990, whose guidelines the OP is definitely following.
– DonielF
6 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
The proper way to punctuate it is
אין עושין מצוות חבילות - חבילות
One should not make bundles of mitzvos into bundles
So, taking just one mitzvah, like the lulav, and making it into a bundle is perfectly fine. If you were to take your whole lulav-bundle and wrap a lulav with that, using a bundle of mitzvos to bundle, that would be a problem.
answered 48 mins ago
Y e zY e z
45.1k369201
+1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-
– Asher
45 mins ago
add a comment |
In Aramaic the word אין means yes. The PTIJ explanation of this is Yes we make Mitzvas into bundles.
answered 4 hours ago
Gershon GoldGershon Gold
111k8178425
It also means if.
– Dr. Shmuel
4 hours ago
add a comment |
The Gemara didn't need to repeat the word חבילות must be אין מיעוט אחר מיעוט אלא לרבות and the Gemara is teaching you that if you are bundling them many times it is mutar.
So if you don't have a basket you are fine because you bundle it several times and the problem is only if you have one basket.
edited 26 mins ago
Alex
22.3k154129
answered 54 mins ago
AsherAsher
1095
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The proper way to punctuate it is
אין עושין מצוות חבילות - חבילות
One should not make bundles of mitzvos into bundles
So, taking just one mitzvah, like the lulav, and making it into a bundle is perfectly fine. If you were to take your whole lulav-bundle and wrap a lulav with that, using a bundle of mitzvos to bundle, that would be a problem.
answered 48 mins ago
Y e zY e z
45.1k369201
+1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-
– Asher
45 mins ago
add a comment |
The proper way to punctuate it is
אין עושין מצוות חבילות - חבילות
One should not make bundles of mitzvos into bundles
So, taking just one mitzvah, like the lulav, and making it into a bundle is perfectly fine. If you were to take your whole lulav-bundle and wrap a lulav with that, using a bundle of mitzvos to bundle, that would be a problem.
answered 48 mins ago
Y e zY e z
45.1k369201
+1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-
– Asher
45 mins ago
add a comment |
The proper way to punctuate it is
אין עושין מצוות חבילות - חבילות
One should not make bundles of mitzvos into bundles
So, taking just one mitzvah, like the lulav, and making it into a bundle is perfectly fine. If you were to take your whole lulav-bundle and wrap a lulav with that, using a bundle of mitzvos to bundle, that would be a problem.
answered 48 mins ago
Y e zY e z
45.1k369201
The proper way to punctuate it is
אין עושין מצוות חבילות - חבילות
One should not make bundles of mitzvos into bundles
So, taking just one mitzvah, like the lulav, and making it into a bundle is perfectly fine. If you were to take your whole lulav-bundle and wrap a lulav with that, using a bundle of mitzvos to bundle, that would be a problem.
answered 48 mins ago
Y e zY e z
45.1k369201
answered 48 mins ago
Y e zY e z
45.1k369201
answered 48 mins ago
Y e zY e z
45.1k369201
answered 48 mins ago
Y e zY e z
45.1k369201
45.1k369201
+1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-
– Asher
45 mins ago
add a comment |
+1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-
– Asher
45 mins ago
+1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-
– Asher
45 mins ago
+1. in this case you are wrapping a bundle of mitzvos-daled minim- with a mitzvah-lulav leaf-
– Asher
45 mins ago
add a comment |
In Aramaic the word אין means yes. The PTIJ explanation of this is Yes we make Mitzvas into bundles.
answered 4 hours ago
Gershon GoldGershon Gold
111k8178425
It also means if.
– Dr. Shmuel
4 hours ago
add a comment |
In Aramaic the word אין means yes. The PTIJ explanation of this is Yes we make Mitzvas into bundles.
answered 4 hours ago
Gershon GoldGershon Gold
111k8178425
It also means if.
– Dr. Shmuel
4 hours ago
add a comment |
In Aramaic the word אין means yes. The PTIJ explanation of this is Yes we make Mitzvas into bundles.
answered 4 hours ago
Gershon GoldGershon Gold
111k8178425
In Aramaic the word אין means yes. The PTIJ explanation of this is Yes we make Mitzvas into bundles.
answered 4 hours ago
Gershon GoldGershon Gold
111k8178425
answered 4 hours ago
Gershon GoldGershon Gold
111k8178425
answered 4 hours ago
Gershon GoldGershon Gold
111k8178425
answered 4 hours ago
Gershon GoldGershon Gold
111k8178425
111k8178425
It also means if.
– Dr. Shmuel
4 hours ago
add a comment |
It also means if.
– Dr. Shmuel
4 hours ago
It also means if.
– Dr. Shmuel
4 hours ago
It also means if.
– Dr. Shmuel
4 hours ago
add a comment |
The Gemara didn't need to repeat the word חבילות must be אין מיעוט אחר מיעוט אלא לרבות and the Gemara is teaching you that if you are bundling them many times it is mutar.
So if you don't have a basket you are fine because you bundle it several times and the problem is only if you have one basket.
edited 26 mins ago
Alex
22.3k154129
answered 54 mins ago
AsherAsher
1095
add a comment |
The Gemara didn't need to repeat the word חבילות must be אין מיעוט אחר מיעוט אלא לרבות and the Gemara is teaching you that if you are bundling them many times it is mutar.
So if you don't have a basket you are fine because you bundle it several times and the problem is only if you have one basket.
edited 26 mins ago
Alex
22.3k154129
answered 54 mins ago
AsherAsher
1095
add a comment |
The Gemara didn't need to repeat the word חבילות must be אין מיעוט אחר מיעוט אלא לרבות and the Gemara is teaching you that if you are bundling them many times it is mutar.
So if you don't have a basket you are fine because you bundle it several times and the problem is only if you have one basket.
edited 26 mins ago
Alex
22.3k154129
answered 54 mins ago
AsherAsher
1095
The Gemara didn't need to repeat the word חבילות must be אין מיעוט אחר מיעוט אלא לרבות and the Gemara is teaching you that if you are bundling them many times it is mutar.
So if you don't have a basket you are fine because you bundle it several times and the problem is only if you have one basket.
edited 26 mins ago
Alex
22.3k154129
answered 54 mins ago
AsherAsher
1095
edited 26 mins ago
Alex
22.3k154129
edited 26 mins ago
Alex
22.3k154129
edited 26 mins ago
Alex
22.3k154129
22.3k154129
answered 54 mins ago
AsherAsher
1095
answered 54 mins ago
AsherAsher
1095
answered 54 mins ago
AsherAsher
1095
1095
add a comment |
add a comment |
VTC as not Purim Torah
– Double AA♦
6 hours ago
@DoubleAA Ummm... You think that this is a real question?
– Leitz
6 hours ago
2
If I removed the disclaimer, would you be able to tell it wasn't?
– Double AA♦
6 hours ago
Yes because he is making a pun of חבילות חבילות @DoubleAA
– Dr. Shmuel
6 hours ago
1
@DoubleAA From the way that he addresses the serious question, answering it by posing the ridiculous Purim Torah interpretation (turning the lulav into a bundle), it's clear he means it as PTIJ. Consider judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1990, whose guidelines the OP is definitely following.
– DonielF
6 hours ago