Isolation Forest Score Function Theory












0












$begingroup$


I am currently reading this paper on isolation forests. In the section about the score function, they mention the following. For context, $h(x)$ is definded as the path length of a data point traversing an iTree, and $n$ is the sample size used to grow the iTree.




The difficulty in deriving such a score from $h(x)$
is that while the maximum possible height of iTree grows
in the order of $n$, the average height grows in the order of
$log(n)$. Normalization of $h(x)$ by any of the above terms
is either not bounded or cannot be directly compared.




So herein lies my first question. What do they mean that the normalization of $h(x)$ by any of the above terms is either not bounded or cannot be directly compared? The final score function in this paper is given by



$$s(x,n)=2^{-frac{E(h(x))}{c(n)}}$$



where



$$c(n)=2H_{n-1}-2(n-1)/n$$



is the average path length of an unsuccessful search from BST Theory. Note how they are taking the expectation of the path. So in that case we are averaging all the values anyway, so why can we not use the growth of the average height of the tree? Additionally they don't even mention the analytical form of average height here, which from what I gather is $2sqrt{pi n}$ reference, though I have not read this reference thoroughly and may be mistaken.



Am I missing something here?









share







New contributor




Samyak Shah is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I am currently reading this paper on isolation forests. In the section about the score function, they mention the following. For context, $h(x)$ is definded as the path length of a data point traversing an iTree, and $n$ is the sample size used to grow the iTree.




    The difficulty in deriving such a score from $h(x)$
    is that while the maximum possible height of iTree grows
    in the order of $n$, the average height grows in the order of
    $log(n)$. Normalization of $h(x)$ by any of the above terms
    is either not bounded or cannot be directly compared.




    So herein lies my first question. What do they mean that the normalization of $h(x)$ by any of the above terms is either not bounded or cannot be directly compared? The final score function in this paper is given by



    $$s(x,n)=2^{-frac{E(h(x))}{c(n)}}$$



    where



    $$c(n)=2H_{n-1}-2(n-1)/n$$



    is the average path length of an unsuccessful search from BST Theory. Note how they are taking the expectation of the path. So in that case we are averaging all the values anyway, so why can we not use the growth of the average height of the tree? Additionally they don't even mention the analytical form of average height here, which from what I gather is $2sqrt{pi n}$ reference, though I have not read this reference thoroughly and may be mistaken.



    Am I missing something here?









    share







    New contributor




    Samyak Shah is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I am currently reading this paper on isolation forests. In the section about the score function, they mention the following. For context, $h(x)$ is definded as the path length of a data point traversing an iTree, and $n$ is the sample size used to grow the iTree.




      The difficulty in deriving such a score from $h(x)$
      is that while the maximum possible height of iTree grows
      in the order of $n$, the average height grows in the order of
      $log(n)$. Normalization of $h(x)$ by any of the above terms
      is either not bounded or cannot be directly compared.




      So herein lies my first question. What do they mean that the normalization of $h(x)$ by any of the above terms is either not bounded or cannot be directly compared? The final score function in this paper is given by



      $$s(x,n)=2^{-frac{E(h(x))}{c(n)}}$$



      where



      $$c(n)=2H_{n-1}-2(n-1)/n$$



      is the average path length of an unsuccessful search from BST Theory. Note how they are taking the expectation of the path. So in that case we are averaging all the values anyway, so why can we not use the growth of the average height of the tree? Additionally they don't even mention the analytical form of average height here, which from what I gather is $2sqrt{pi n}$ reference, though I have not read this reference thoroughly and may be mistaken.



      Am I missing something here?









      share







      New contributor




      Samyak Shah is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      I am currently reading this paper on isolation forests. In the section about the score function, they mention the following. For context, $h(x)$ is definded as the path length of a data point traversing an iTree, and $n$ is the sample size used to grow the iTree.




      The difficulty in deriving such a score from $h(x)$
      is that while the maximum possible height of iTree grows
      in the order of $n$, the average height grows in the order of
      $log(n)$. Normalization of $h(x)$ by any of the above terms
      is either not bounded or cannot be directly compared.




      So herein lies my first question. What do they mean that the normalization of $h(x)$ by any of the above terms is either not bounded or cannot be directly compared? The final score function in this paper is given by



      $$s(x,n)=2^{-frac{E(h(x))}{c(n)}}$$



      where



      $$c(n)=2H_{n-1}-2(n-1)/n$$



      is the average path length of an unsuccessful search from BST Theory. Note how they are taking the expectation of the path. So in that case we are averaging all the values anyway, so why can we not use the growth of the average height of the tree? Additionally they don't even mention the analytical form of average height here, which from what I gather is $2sqrt{pi n}$ reference, though I have not read this reference thoroughly and may be mistaken.



      Am I missing something here?







      random-forest decision-trees anomaly-detection





      share







      New contributor




      Samyak Shah is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.










      share







      New contributor




      Samyak Shah is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      share



      share






      New contributor




      Samyak Shah is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 5 mins ago









      Samyak ShahSamyak Shah

      1




      1




      New contributor




      Samyak Shah is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Samyak Shah is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Samyak Shah is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "557"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          Samyak Shah is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f49362%2fisolation-forest-score-function-theory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          Samyak Shah is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          Samyak Shah is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          Samyak Shah is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          Samyak Shah is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















          Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f49362%2fisolation-forest-score-function-theory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Aikido

          Tivadar Csontváry Kosztka

          Metroo de Marsejlo