When do we add an hyphen (-) to a complex adjective word?












2















When do we add an hyphen (-) to a complex adjective word?



Here's are a few examples:




This is an Xbox-compatible game.



This is a Creation-Kit-compatible 3d asset.



This is a SkyRe-compatible Skyrim mod.




More often than not all these examples are used without a hyphen or hyphens. Is this a case of people making a grammatical mistake or are both forms completely correct and it's just a matter of preference?






hyphens







share|improve this question





























    2















    When do we add an hyphen (-) to a complex adjective word?



    Here's are a few examples:




    This is an Xbox-compatible game.



    This is a Creation-Kit-compatible 3d asset.



    This is a SkyRe-compatible Skyrim mod.




    More often than not all these examples are used without a hyphen or hyphens. Is this a case of people making a grammatical mistake or are both forms completely correct and it's just a matter of preference?






    hyphens







    share|improve this question



























      2












      2








      2








      When do we add an hyphen (-) to a complex adjective word?



      Here's are a few examples:




      This is an Xbox-compatible game.



      This is a Creation-Kit-compatible 3d asset.



      This is a SkyRe-compatible Skyrim mod.




      More often than not all these examples are used without a hyphen or hyphens. Is this a case of people making a grammatical mistake or are both forms completely correct and it's just a matter of preference?






      hyphens







      share|improve this question
















      When do we add an hyphen (-) to a complex adjective word?



      Here's are a few examples:




      This is an Xbox-compatible game.



      This is a Creation-Kit-compatible 3d asset.



      This is a SkyRe-compatible Skyrim mod.




      More often than not all these examples are used without a hyphen or hyphens. Is this a case of people making a grammatical mistake or are both forms completely correct and it's just a matter of preference?






      hyphens




      hyphens






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 15 mins ago









      Jasper

      18.3k43670




      18.3k43670










      asked 1 hour ago









      repomonsterrepomonster

      1,005116




      1,005116






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          This is not a question of grammar, but of style. Writers use hyphens with compound adjectives to avoid ambiguity so that the reader does not have to read and re-read a sentence to garner the meaning from it.



          Consider:




          John was a white bearded man.




          Someone might try to parse this sentence at first to mean he was a white man who had a beard.




          John was a white-bearded man.




          This makes it quite clear that John was a man with a white beard, not a white man with a beard.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 1





            So both can mean the same thing, but the other is more precise in its meaning?

            – repomonster
            1 hour ago






          • 1





            Yes. Consider hyphenating compound adjectives as providing a courtesy to your readers.

            – Robusto
            1 hour ago











          • "John was a white-bearded man" does not rule out the possibility that John was a white man with a white beard.

            – Jasper
            14 mins ago



















          2














          Robusto's answer is correct, I'm just adding another thought.



          You asked:




          Is this a case of people making a grammatical mistake or are both forms completely correct and it's just a matter of preference?




          Robusto didn't quite address that question head on. While there is a lot of flexibility in punctuation, I would say any professional editor worth his or her salt would correct 'white bearded' to 'white-bearded'. Leaving out the hyphen is not optional.



          Yes, in informal contexts, writers very often leave out the hyphens, either because they are unsure how to use them, or they forget. But that's not the same as saying they are optional. They are making a mistake which can lead to misunderstandings, and knowing how and why to use hyphens in compound adjectives places you at an advantage.



          Finally, often with punctuation, we say "well, it doesn't exist in spoken English, so is it really required?"



          But in spoken English there is an audible difference between




          The white, bearded man.




          and




          The white-bearded man.




          It's subtle, but it's there, and it makes all the difference to the interpretation of the sentence.






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "481"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f200601%2fwhen-do-we-add-an-hyphen-to-a-complex-adjective-word%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4














            This is not a question of grammar, but of style. Writers use hyphens with compound adjectives to avoid ambiguity so that the reader does not have to read and re-read a sentence to garner the meaning from it.



            Consider:




            John was a white bearded man.




            Someone might try to parse this sentence at first to mean he was a white man who had a beard.




            John was a white-bearded man.




            This makes it quite clear that John was a man with a white beard, not a white man with a beard.






            share|improve this answer





















            • 1





              So both can mean the same thing, but the other is more precise in its meaning?

              – repomonster
              1 hour ago






            • 1





              Yes. Consider hyphenating compound adjectives as providing a courtesy to your readers.

              – Robusto
              1 hour ago











            • "John was a white-bearded man" does not rule out the possibility that John was a white man with a white beard.

              – Jasper
              14 mins ago
















            4














            This is not a question of grammar, but of style. Writers use hyphens with compound adjectives to avoid ambiguity so that the reader does not have to read and re-read a sentence to garner the meaning from it.



            Consider:




            John was a white bearded man.




            Someone might try to parse this sentence at first to mean he was a white man who had a beard.




            John was a white-bearded man.




            This makes it quite clear that John was a man with a white beard, not a white man with a beard.






            share|improve this answer





















            • 1





              So both can mean the same thing, but the other is more precise in its meaning?

              – repomonster
              1 hour ago






            • 1





              Yes. Consider hyphenating compound adjectives as providing a courtesy to your readers.

              – Robusto
              1 hour ago











            • "John was a white-bearded man" does not rule out the possibility that John was a white man with a white beard.

              – Jasper
              14 mins ago














            4












            4








            4







            This is not a question of grammar, but of style. Writers use hyphens with compound adjectives to avoid ambiguity so that the reader does not have to read and re-read a sentence to garner the meaning from it.



            Consider:




            John was a white bearded man.




            Someone might try to parse this sentence at first to mean he was a white man who had a beard.




            John was a white-bearded man.




            This makes it quite clear that John was a man with a white beard, not a white man with a beard.






            share|improve this answer















            This is not a question of grammar, but of style. Writers use hyphens with compound adjectives to avoid ambiguity so that the reader does not have to read and re-read a sentence to garner the meaning from it.



            Consider:




            John was a white bearded man.




            Someone might try to parse this sentence at first to mean he was a white man who had a beard.




            John was a white-bearded man.




            This makes it quite clear that John was a man with a white beard, not a white man with a beard.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 1 hour ago

























            answered 1 hour ago









            RobustoRobusto

            11.9k22941




            11.9k22941








            • 1





              So both can mean the same thing, but the other is more precise in its meaning?

              – repomonster
              1 hour ago






            • 1





              Yes. Consider hyphenating compound adjectives as providing a courtesy to your readers.

              – Robusto
              1 hour ago











            • "John was a white-bearded man" does not rule out the possibility that John was a white man with a white beard.

              – Jasper
              14 mins ago














            • 1





              So both can mean the same thing, but the other is more precise in its meaning?

              – repomonster
              1 hour ago






            • 1





              Yes. Consider hyphenating compound adjectives as providing a courtesy to your readers.

              – Robusto
              1 hour ago











            • "John was a white-bearded man" does not rule out the possibility that John was a white man with a white beard.

              – Jasper
              14 mins ago








            1




            1





            So both can mean the same thing, but the other is more precise in its meaning?

            – repomonster
            1 hour ago





            So both can mean the same thing, but the other is more precise in its meaning?

            – repomonster
            1 hour ago




            1




            1





            Yes. Consider hyphenating compound adjectives as providing a courtesy to your readers.

            – Robusto
            1 hour ago





            Yes. Consider hyphenating compound adjectives as providing a courtesy to your readers.

            – Robusto
            1 hour ago













            "John was a white-bearded man" does not rule out the possibility that John was a white man with a white beard.

            – Jasper
            14 mins ago





            "John was a white-bearded man" does not rule out the possibility that John was a white man with a white beard.

            – Jasper
            14 mins ago













            2














            Robusto's answer is correct, I'm just adding another thought.



            You asked:




            Is this a case of people making a grammatical mistake or are both forms completely correct and it's just a matter of preference?




            Robusto didn't quite address that question head on. While there is a lot of flexibility in punctuation, I would say any professional editor worth his or her salt would correct 'white bearded' to 'white-bearded'. Leaving out the hyphen is not optional.



            Yes, in informal contexts, writers very often leave out the hyphens, either because they are unsure how to use them, or they forget. But that's not the same as saying they are optional. They are making a mistake which can lead to misunderstandings, and knowing how and why to use hyphens in compound adjectives places you at an advantage.



            Finally, often with punctuation, we say "well, it doesn't exist in spoken English, so is it really required?"



            But in spoken English there is an audible difference between




            The white, bearded man.




            and




            The white-bearded man.




            It's subtle, but it's there, and it makes all the difference to the interpretation of the sentence.






            share|improve this answer




























              2














              Robusto's answer is correct, I'm just adding another thought.



              You asked:




              Is this a case of people making a grammatical mistake or are both forms completely correct and it's just a matter of preference?




              Robusto didn't quite address that question head on. While there is a lot of flexibility in punctuation, I would say any professional editor worth his or her salt would correct 'white bearded' to 'white-bearded'. Leaving out the hyphen is not optional.



              Yes, in informal contexts, writers very often leave out the hyphens, either because they are unsure how to use them, or they forget. But that's not the same as saying they are optional. They are making a mistake which can lead to misunderstandings, and knowing how and why to use hyphens in compound adjectives places you at an advantage.



              Finally, often with punctuation, we say "well, it doesn't exist in spoken English, so is it really required?"



              But in spoken English there is an audible difference between




              The white, bearded man.




              and




              The white-bearded man.




              It's subtle, but it's there, and it makes all the difference to the interpretation of the sentence.






              share|improve this answer


























                2












                2








                2







                Robusto's answer is correct, I'm just adding another thought.



                You asked:




                Is this a case of people making a grammatical mistake or are both forms completely correct and it's just a matter of preference?




                Robusto didn't quite address that question head on. While there is a lot of flexibility in punctuation, I would say any professional editor worth his or her salt would correct 'white bearded' to 'white-bearded'. Leaving out the hyphen is not optional.



                Yes, in informal contexts, writers very often leave out the hyphens, either because they are unsure how to use them, or they forget. But that's not the same as saying they are optional. They are making a mistake which can lead to misunderstandings, and knowing how and why to use hyphens in compound adjectives places you at an advantage.



                Finally, often with punctuation, we say "well, it doesn't exist in spoken English, so is it really required?"



                But in spoken English there is an audible difference between




                The white, bearded man.




                and




                The white-bearded man.




                It's subtle, but it's there, and it makes all the difference to the interpretation of the sentence.






                share|improve this answer













                Robusto's answer is correct, I'm just adding another thought.



                You asked:




                Is this a case of people making a grammatical mistake or are both forms completely correct and it's just a matter of preference?




                Robusto didn't quite address that question head on. While there is a lot of flexibility in punctuation, I would say any professional editor worth his or her salt would correct 'white bearded' to 'white-bearded'. Leaving out the hyphen is not optional.



                Yes, in informal contexts, writers very often leave out the hyphens, either because they are unsure how to use them, or they forget. But that's not the same as saying they are optional. They are making a mistake which can lead to misunderstandings, and knowing how and why to use hyphens in compound adjectives places you at an advantage.



                Finally, often with punctuation, we say "well, it doesn't exist in spoken English, so is it really required?"



                But in spoken English there is an audible difference between




                The white, bearded man.




                and




                The white-bearded man.




                It's subtle, but it's there, and it makes all the difference to the interpretation of the sentence.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 49 mins ago









                fred2fred2

                2,867718




                2,867718






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f200601%2fwhen-do-we-add-an-hyphen-to-a-complex-adjective-word%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    -

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Ponta tanko

                    Image
                    Usona ponta tanko M60A1 Ponta tanko estas, simile kiel kirasita savveturilo, inter specialaj kirasitaj transportiloj. Kiel pontaj tankoj eblas konsideri ĉiujn memmovigaj rimedoj ebligantaj superi obstaklojn ĝis larĝeco 24 metroj rekte en spaco de bataloperacoj. Ties ĉefa tasko estas ebligi al la propraj taĉmentoj daŭrigi en rapida antaŭenirado sen senbezona reteniĝo. El tio pli-malpli rezultas taktikaj-teknikaj postuloj, kiujn ili devas plenumi. Precipe temas pri kapablo operacii komune kun unue-sinsekvaj taĉmentoj kaj transpontigi obstaklojn dum kelke da minutoj. This page is only for reference, If you need detailed information, please check here
                    Read more

                    Tantalo (mitologio)

                    Image
                    Ĉi tiu artikolo temas pri mitologio. Por aliaj signifoj vidu la paĝon Tantalo (apartigilo) . Tantalo , laŭ Gioacchino Assereto. Laŭ la helena mitologio, Tantalo (el la greka Τάνταλος , ŝancelanta aŭ tre malfeliĉa ) estis filo de Zeŭso kaj la oceanidino Pluto, laŭ la plej divastigata versio. Li estis reĝo de Frigio [1] aŭ de la monto Sipilo, en Lidio (Malgrandazio) [2] kaj post sia morto li suferis eternan torturadon ĉe la Tartaro, la plej profunda parto de Hadeso, rezervita por la plej perversaj homoj. Tamen, kelkaj rakontoj asertas ke li estis reĝo de Argo aŭ de Korinto [3] , aŭ ke li migris norden el la monto Sipilo por akiri la tronon de Paflagonio, el kie Ilo forpelis lin pro tio, ke Tantalo forkaptis kaj seksperfortis lian fraton Ganimedon [4] , kaj tiel ofendis la diojn. Verŝajne li ankaŭ regis urbon en okcidenta Anatolio, kiun oni nomis Tantalis [5] pro li, aŭ Sipilo , pro la monto sur kies flanko ankoraŭ staras ĝiaj ruinaĵoj [6] . Laŭ la geografiisto Strabo,...
                    Read more

                    Erzsébet Schaár

                    Image
                    Erzsébet Schaár Memportreto de Erzsébet Schaár en Pécs Personaj informoj Naskiĝo 27-an de julio 1908 ( 1908-07-27 ) en Budafok Morto 29-an de aŭgusto 1975 ( 1975-08-29 ) (67-jara) en Budapeŝto Ŝtataneco Hungario Profesio skulptisto Familianoj Edz(in)o Tibor Vilt v   •   d   •   r Erzsébet Schaár [erĵEbet ŝAr], laŭ hungarlingve kutima sinsekvo Schaár Erzsébet estis hungara skulptisto. Ŝia edzo estis Tibor Vilt. Déryné Széppataki Róza en Miskolc fare de Erzsébet Schaár Erzsébet Schaár [1] naskiĝis la 27-an de julio 1908 en Budafok, ŝi mortis la 29-an de aŭgusto 1975 en Budapeŝto. Enhavo 1 Biografio 2 Elektitaj solaj ekspozicioj 3 Elektitaj kolektivaj ekspozicioj 4 Elektitaj skulptaĵoj 5 Elektitaj disĉiploj 6 Fontoj 7 Referencoj Biografio | Erzsébet Schaár studis en Industriarta Lernejo, poste en Reĝa Belarta Altlernejo (1924-1926). Ŝia ĉefinstruisto estis Zsig...
                    Read more