Training a classifier when some of the features are unknown
$begingroup$
I am training a classifier in Matlab with a dataset that I created.
Unfortunately some of the features in the dataset were not recorded.
I currently have the unknown features set as -99999.
So, for example my dataset looks something like this:
class1: 10 1 12 -99999 6 8
class2: 5 -99999 4 3 2 -99999
class3: 18 2 11 22 7 5
...
and so on, where the -99999 are the places where the features werent able to be measured. In this case, each class has 6 features.
I don't want to bias my classifier with the unknown features so I thought it would be a good idea to set the unknowns to -99999 so it would be way out of the range of normal features.
I tested the classifier with the -99999's and it was 78% accurate.
Then I changed the -99999 to 0's and tested the classifier again, this time it was 91% accurate.
So my question is, what is a general rule for training a classifier when some of the features were not recorded? Was I right to assume setting the unknowns to a very high negative value? But why was it more accurate when I set the unknowns to 0s?
Thanks for reading!
machine-learning classification dataset matlab
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am training a classifier in Matlab with a dataset that I created.
Unfortunately some of the features in the dataset were not recorded.
I currently have the unknown features set as -99999.
So, for example my dataset looks something like this:
class1: 10 1 12 -99999 6 8
class2: 5 -99999 4 3 2 -99999
class3: 18 2 11 22 7 5
...
and so on, where the -99999 are the places where the features werent able to be measured. In this case, each class has 6 features.
I don't want to bias my classifier with the unknown features so I thought it would be a good idea to set the unknowns to -99999 so it would be way out of the range of normal features.
I tested the classifier with the -99999's and it was 78% accurate.
Then I changed the -99999 to 0's and tested the classifier again, this time it was 91% accurate.
So my question is, what is a general rule for training a classifier when some of the features were not recorded? Was I right to assume setting the unknowns to a very high negative value? But why was it more accurate when I set the unknowns to 0s?
Thanks for reading!
machine-learning classification dataset matlab
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am training a classifier in Matlab with a dataset that I created.
Unfortunately some of the features in the dataset were not recorded.
I currently have the unknown features set as -99999.
So, for example my dataset looks something like this:
class1: 10 1 12 -99999 6 8
class2: 5 -99999 4 3 2 -99999
class3: 18 2 11 22 7 5
...
and so on, where the -99999 are the places where the features werent able to be measured. In this case, each class has 6 features.
I don't want to bias my classifier with the unknown features so I thought it would be a good idea to set the unknowns to -99999 so it would be way out of the range of normal features.
I tested the classifier with the -99999's and it was 78% accurate.
Then I changed the -99999 to 0's and tested the classifier again, this time it was 91% accurate.
So my question is, what is a general rule for training a classifier when some of the features were not recorded? Was I right to assume setting the unknowns to a very high negative value? But why was it more accurate when I set the unknowns to 0s?
Thanks for reading!
machine-learning classification dataset matlab
New contributor
$endgroup$
I am training a classifier in Matlab with a dataset that I created.
Unfortunately some of the features in the dataset were not recorded.
I currently have the unknown features set as -99999.
So, for example my dataset looks something like this:
class1: 10 1 12 -99999 6 8
class2: 5 -99999 4 3 2 -99999
class3: 18 2 11 22 7 5
...
and so on, where the -99999 are the places where the features werent able to be measured. In this case, each class has 6 features.
I don't want to bias my classifier with the unknown features so I thought it would be a good idea to set the unknowns to -99999 so it would be way out of the range of normal features.
I tested the classifier with the -99999's and it was 78% accurate.
Then I changed the -99999 to 0's and tested the classifier again, this time it was 91% accurate.
So my question is, what is a general rule for training a classifier when some of the features were not recorded? Was I right to assume setting the unknowns to a very high negative value? But why was it more accurate when I set the unknowns to 0s?
Thanks for reading!
machine-learning classification dataset matlab
machine-learning classification dataset matlab
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 3 mins ago
Darklink9110Darklink9110
11
11
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "557"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Darklink9110 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f49298%2ftraining-a-classifier-when-some-of-the-features-are-unknown%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Darklink9110 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Darklink9110 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Darklink9110 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Darklink9110 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f49298%2ftraining-a-classifier-when-some-of-the-features-are-unknown%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown