Training a classifier when some of the features are unknown












0












$begingroup$


I am training a classifier in Matlab with a dataset that I created.
Unfortunately some of the features in the dataset were not recorded.



I currently have the unknown features set as -99999.



So, for example my dataset looks something like this:



class1: 10 1 12 -99999 6 8
class2: 5 -99999 4 3 2 -99999
class3: 18 2 11 22 7 5
...


and so on, where the -99999 are the places where the features werent able to be measured. In this case, each class has 6 features.



I don't want to bias my classifier with the unknown features so I thought it would be a good idea to set the unknowns to -99999 so it would be way out of the range of normal features.



I tested the classifier with the -99999's and it was 78% accurate.
Then I changed the -99999 to 0's and tested the classifier again, this time it was 91% accurate.



So my question is, what is a general rule for training a classifier when some of the features were not recorded? Was I right to assume setting the unknowns to a very high negative value? But why was it more accurate when I set the unknowns to 0s?



Thanks for reading!









share







New contributor




Darklink9110 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I am training a classifier in Matlab with a dataset that I created.
    Unfortunately some of the features in the dataset were not recorded.



    I currently have the unknown features set as -99999.



    So, for example my dataset looks something like this:



    class1: 10 1 12 -99999 6 8
    class2: 5 -99999 4 3 2 -99999
    class3: 18 2 11 22 7 5
    ...


    and so on, where the -99999 are the places where the features werent able to be measured. In this case, each class has 6 features.



    I don't want to bias my classifier with the unknown features so I thought it would be a good idea to set the unknowns to -99999 so it would be way out of the range of normal features.



    I tested the classifier with the -99999's and it was 78% accurate.
    Then I changed the -99999 to 0's and tested the classifier again, this time it was 91% accurate.



    So my question is, what is a general rule for training a classifier when some of the features were not recorded? Was I right to assume setting the unknowns to a very high negative value? But why was it more accurate when I set the unknowns to 0s?



    Thanks for reading!









    share







    New contributor




    Darklink9110 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I am training a classifier in Matlab with a dataset that I created.
      Unfortunately some of the features in the dataset were not recorded.



      I currently have the unknown features set as -99999.



      So, for example my dataset looks something like this:



      class1: 10 1 12 -99999 6 8
      class2: 5 -99999 4 3 2 -99999
      class3: 18 2 11 22 7 5
      ...


      and so on, where the -99999 are the places where the features werent able to be measured. In this case, each class has 6 features.



      I don't want to bias my classifier with the unknown features so I thought it would be a good idea to set the unknowns to -99999 so it would be way out of the range of normal features.



      I tested the classifier with the -99999's and it was 78% accurate.
      Then I changed the -99999 to 0's and tested the classifier again, this time it was 91% accurate.



      So my question is, what is a general rule for training a classifier when some of the features were not recorded? Was I right to assume setting the unknowns to a very high negative value? But why was it more accurate when I set the unknowns to 0s?



      Thanks for reading!









      share







      New contributor




      Darklink9110 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      I am training a classifier in Matlab with a dataset that I created.
      Unfortunately some of the features in the dataset were not recorded.



      I currently have the unknown features set as -99999.



      So, for example my dataset looks something like this:



      class1: 10 1 12 -99999 6 8
      class2: 5 -99999 4 3 2 -99999
      class3: 18 2 11 22 7 5
      ...


      and so on, where the -99999 are the places where the features werent able to be measured. In this case, each class has 6 features.



      I don't want to bias my classifier with the unknown features so I thought it would be a good idea to set the unknowns to -99999 so it would be way out of the range of normal features.



      I tested the classifier with the -99999's and it was 78% accurate.
      Then I changed the -99999 to 0's and tested the classifier again, this time it was 91% accurate.



      So my question is, what is a general rule for training a classifier when some of the features were not recorded? Was I right to assume setting the unknowns to a very high negative value? But why was it more accurate when I set the unknowns to 0s?



      Thanks for reading!







      machine-learning classification dataset matlab





      share







      New contributor




      Darklink9110 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.










      share







      New contributor




      Darklink9110 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      share



      share






      New contributor




      Darklink9110 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 3 mins ago









      Darklink9110Darklink9110

      11




      11




      New contributor




      Darklink9110 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Darklink9110 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Darklink9110 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "557"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          Darklink9110 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f49298%2ftraining-a-classifier-when-some-of-the-features-are-unknown%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          Darklink9110 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          Darklink9110 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          Darklink9110 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          Darklink9110 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















          Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f49298%2ftraining-a-classifier-when-some-of-the-features-are-unknown%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Ponta tanko

          Tantalo (mitologio)

          Erzsébet Schaár