Keras Loss Function for Multidimensional Regression Problem
$begingroup$
I am new to DL and Keras. I am trying to solve a regression problem with multivariate outputs (y shape (?, 2)) using Keras (tensorflow backend). I am having my confusion about how the loss is calculated. I use mean absolute error as the loss function. However, since my target data has 2 dimensions, is the loss value calculated as the reduced mean on all dimensions (a scalar as the result)? I checked the Keras source code, it uses K.mean(..., axis=-1) for MAE calculation. If K.mean is the same to numpy.mean, "axis=-1" should do the column mean (for my case, it should return a tensor with shape (?,2) but not a scalar). If this is the case, how could the loss value be a single number (as outputed in the training process log)?
If the MAE return is indeed a scalar (reduced mean), this gives me another problem. The data from each dimension of my target is not in a same range. A reduced mean would be biased towards the high value dimension. Shall I change my model to a multi-task learning model then?
Thanks a lot for your help on this.
L.
keras tensorflow regression
$endgroup$
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 1 min ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am new to DL and Keras. I am trying to solve a regression problem with multivariate outputs (y shape (?, 2)) using Keras (tensorflow backend). I am having my confusion about how the loss is calculated. I use mean absolute error as the loss function. However, since my target data has 2 dimensions, is the loss value calculated as the reduced mean on all dimensions (a scalar as the result)? I checked the Keras source code, it uses K.mean(..., axis=-1) for MAE calculation. If K.mean is the same to numpy.mean, "axis=-1" should do the column mean (for my case, it should return a tensor with shape (?,2) but not a scalar). If this is the case, how could the loss value be a single number (as outputed in the training process log)?
If the MAE return is indeed a scalar (reduced mean), this gives me another problem. The data from each dimension of my target is not in a same range. A reduced mean would be biased towards the high value dimension. Shall I change my model to a multi-task learning model then?
Thanks a lot for your help on this.
L.
keras tensorflow regression
$endgroup$
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 1 min ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am new to DL and Keras. I am trying to solve a regression problem with multivariate outputs (y shape (?, 2)) using Keras (tensorflow backend). I am having my confusion about how the loss is calculated. I use mean absolute error as the loss function. However, since my target data has 2 dimensions, is the loss value calculated as the reduced mean on all dimensions (a scalar as the result)? I checked the Keras source code, it uses K.mean(..., axis=-1) for MAE calculation. If K.mean is the same to numpy.mean, "axis=-1" should do the column mean (for my case, it should return a tensor with shape (?,2) but not a scalar). If this is the case, how could the loss value be a single number (as outputed in the training process log)?
If the MAE return is indeed a scalar (reduced mean), this gives me another problem. The data from each dimension of my target is not in a same range. A reduced mean would be biased towards the high value dimension. Shall I change my model to a multi-task learning model then?
Thanks a lot for your help on this.
L.
keras tensorflow regression
$endgroup$
I am new to DL and Keras. I am trying to solve a regression problem with multivariate outputs (y shape (?, 2)) using Keras (tensorflow backend). I am having my confusion about how the loss is calculated. I use mean absolute error as the loss function. However, since my target data has 2 dimensions, is the loss value calculated as the reduced mean on all dimensions (a scalar as the result)? I checked the Keras source code, it uses K.mean(..., axis=-1) for MAE calculation. If K.mean is the same to numpy.mean, "axis=-1" should do the column mean (for my case, it should return a tensor with shape (?,2) but not a scalar). If this is the case, how could the loss value be a single number (as outputed in the training process log)?
If the MAE return is indeed a scalar (reduced mean), this gives me another problem. The data from each dimension of my target is not in a same range. A reduced mean would be biased towards the high value dimension. Shall I change my model to a multi-task learning model then?
Thanks a lot for your help on this.
L.
keras tensorflow regression
keras tensorflow regression
asked Apr 19 '18 at 19:37
Li GuoLi Guo
261
261
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 1 min ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 1 min ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I fall on same issue with RMSE which by the way may be a good complementary choice of MAE. Thus in order to measure error prediction on multidimentional output the way i implemented was as follow. Measure the index score per dimension then do the average on all dimensions which gives a single scalar value.
If your data isn t on same scale, apply a standardization on it. And in order to have same order of magnitude on all your output dimensions you also can divide each column by their corresponding test set standard deviation before applying the mean reduce.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "557"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f30537%2fkeras-loss-function-for-multidimensional-regression-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I fall on same issue with RMSE which by the way may be a good complementary choice of MAE. Thus in order to measure error prediction on multidimentional output the way i implemented was as follow. Measure the index score per dimension then do the average on all dimensions which gives a single scalar value.
If your data isn t on same scale, apply a standardization on it. And in order to have same order of magnitude on all your output dimensions you also can divide each column by their corresponding test set standard deviation before applying the mean reduce.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I fall on same issue with RMSE which by the way may be a good complementary choice of MAE. Thus in order to measure error prediction on multidimentional output the way i implemented was as follow. Measure the index score per dimension then do the average on all dimensions which gives a single scalar value.
If your data isn t on same scale, apply a standardization on it. And in order to have same order of magnitude on all your output dimensions you also can divide each column by their corresponding test set standard deviation before applying the mean reduce.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I fall on same issue with RMSE which by the way may be a good complementary choice of MAE. Thus in order to measure error prediction on multidimentional output the way i implemented was as follow. Measure the index score per dimension then do the average on all dimensions which gives a single scalar value.
If your data isn t on same scale, apply a standardization on it. And in order to have same order of magnitude on all your output dimensions you also can divide each column by their corresponding test set standard deviation before applying the mean reduce.
$endgroup$
I fall on same issue with RMSE which by the way may be a good complementary choice of MAE. Thus in order to measure error prediction on multidimentional output the way i implemented was as follow. Measure the index score per dimension then do the average on all dimensions which gives a single scalar value.
If your data isn t on same scale, apply a standardization on it. And in order to have same order of magnitude on all your output dimensions you also can divide each column by their corresponding test set standard deviation before applying the mean reduce.
edited Apr 21 '18 at 5:59
answered Apr 21 '18 at 5:53
KyBeKyBe
260212
260212
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f30537%2fkeras-loss-function-for-multidimensional-regression-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown