What advantage does Guassian kernel have than any other kernels, such as linear kernel, polynomial kernel and...












0












$begingroup$


Guassian kernel is so important in SVM as we know. The parameter gamma is designed for this kind of kernel. My question is what makes Guassian kernel so unique? What advantage does it have over other kernels?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




bumped to the homepage by Community 4 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.




















    0












    $begingroup$


    Guassian kernel is so important in SVM as we know. The parameter gamma is designed for this kind of kernel. My question is what makes Guassian kernel so unique? What advantage does it have over other kernels?










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$




    bumped to the homepage by Community 4 mins ago


    This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.


















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Guassian kernel is so important in SVM as we know. The parameter gamma is designed for this kind of kernel. My question is what makes Guassian kernel so unique? What advantage does it have over other kernels?










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Guassian kernel is so important in SVM as we know. The parameter gamma is designed for this kind of kernel. My question is what makes Guassian kernel so unique? What advantage does it have over other kernels?







      machine-learning svm kernel






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Oct 31 '18 at 14:37









      Jason ShuJason Shu

      1




      1





      bumped to the homepage by Community 4 mins ago


      This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







      bumped to the homepage by Community 4 mins ago


      This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          The advantange is that it is related to euclidean distance, and if your problem benefits from this type of feature, e.g. you have a highly non-linear problem where values nearby some vector point tend to be of a different class, it will be able to find relationships that other kernels would not, and create highly complex decision boundaries.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            0












            $begingroup$

            Mathematically speaking, one can show that an RBF is simply a low-band pass filter. To put it simply, RBF induces a smooth solution. Sometimes that is an important characteristic that matters. However, it isn't always important or useful. For example, it's somewhat well known that a smoothing prior does not outperform a linear/polynomial kernel for problems like Text Classification.



            There's also other reasons though why people tend to stick with an RBF kernel instead of trying to design their own or use a polynomial. One main one is that an RBF is non-parametric -- meaning that it's complexity grows with data. While if one uses a polynomial kernel, then you have a parametric model which has a finite and fix size. There essentially comes a point when your polynomial kernel becomes saturated no matter how much data you throw at it. Hence, it's generally seen as a good benchmark to start with an RBF unless you have reason to believe otherwise.



            There's other properties that make it mathematically useful, like it's invariant, stationary contain less parameters than polynomial kernels.



            TL;DR generally works well.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "557"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f40512%2fwhat-advantage-does-guassian-kernel-have-than-any-other-kernels-such-as-linear%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              0












              $begingroup$

              The advantange is that it is related to euclidean distance, and if your problem benefits from this type of feature, e.g. you have a highly non-linear problem where values nearby some vector point tend to be of a different class, it will be able to find relationships that other kernels would not, and create highly complex decision boundaries.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$

                The advantange is that it is related to euclidean distance, and if your problem benefits from this type of feature, e.g. you have a highly non-linear problem where values nearby some vector point tend to be of a different class, it will be able to find relationships that other kernels would not, and create highly complex decision boundaries.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  The advantange is that it is related to euclidean distance, and if your problem benefits from this type of feature, e.g. you have a highly non-linear problem where values nearby some vector point tend to be of a different class, it will be able to find relationships that other kernels would not, and create highly complex decision boundaries.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  The advantange is that it is related to euclidean distance, and if your problem benefits from this type of feature, e.g. you have a highly non-linear problem where values nearby some vector point tend to be of a different class, it will be able to find relationships that other kernels would not, and create highly complex decision boundaries.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Oct 31 '18 at 17:25









                  anymous.askeranymous.asker

                  55118




                  55118























                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      Mathematically speaking, one can show that an RBF is simply a low-band pass filter. To put it simply, RBF induces a smooth solution. Sometimes that is an important characteristic that matters. However, it isn't always important or useful. For example, it's somewhat well known that a smoothing prior does not outperform a linear/polynomial kernel for problems like Text Classification.



                      There's also other reasons though why people tend to stick with an RBF kernel instead of trying to design their own or use a polynomial. One main one is that an RBF is non-parametric -- meaning that it's complexity grows with data. While if one uses a polynomial kernel, then you have a parametric model which has a finite and fix size. There essentially comes a point when your polynomial kernel becomes saturated no matter how much data you throw at it. Hence, it's generally seen as a good benchmark to start with an RBF unless you have reason to believe otherwise.



                      There's other properties that make it mathematically useful, like it's invariant, stationary contain less parameters than polynomial kernels.



                      TL;DR generally works well.






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        Mathematically speaking, one can show that an RBF is simply a low-band pass filter. To put it simply, RBF induces a smooth solution. Sometimes that is an important characteristic that matters. However, it isn't always important or useful. For example, it's somewhat well known that a smoothing prior does not outperform a linear/polynomial kernel for problems like Text Classification.



                        There's also other reasons though why people tend to stick with an RBF kernel instead of trying to design their own or use a polynomial. One main one is that an RBF is non-parametric -- meaning that it's complexity grows with data. While if one uses a polynomial kernel, then you have a parametric model which has a finite and fix size. There essentially comes a point when your polynomial kernel becomes saturated no matter how much data you throw at it. Hence, it's generally seen as a good benchmark to start with an RBF unless you have reason to believe otherwise.



                        There's other properties that make it mathematically useful, like it's invariant, stationary contain less parameters than polynomial kernels.



                        TL;DR generally works well.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          0












                          0








                          0





                          $begingroup$

                          Mathematically speaking, one can show that an RBF is simply a low-band pass filter. To put it simply, RBF induces a smooth solution. Sometimes that is an important characteristic that matters. However, it isn't always important or useful. For example, it's somewhat well known that a smoothing prior does not outperform a linear/polynomial kernel for problems like Text Classification.



                          There's also other reasons though why people tend to stick with an RBF kernel instead of trying to design their own or use a polynomial. One main one is that an RBF is non-parametric -- meaning that it's complexity grows with data. While if one uses a polynomial kernel, then you have a parametric model which has a finite and fix size. There essentially comes a point when your polynomial kernel becomes saturated no matter how much data you throw at it. Hence, it's generally seen as a good benchmark to start with an RBF unless you have reason to believe otherwise.



                          There's other properties that make it mathematically useful, like it's invariant, stationary contain less parameters than polynomial kernels.



                          TL;DR generally works well.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          Mathematically speaking, one can show that an RBF is simply a low-band pass filter. To put it simply, RBF induces a smooth solution. Sometimes that is an important characteristic that matters. However, it isn't always important or useful. For example, it's somewhat well known that a smoothing prior does not outperform a linear/polynomial kernel for problems like Text Classification.



                          There's also other reasons though why people tend to stick with an RBF kernel instead of trying to design their own or use a polynomial. One main one is that an RBF is non-parametric -- meaning that it's complexity grows with data. While if one uses a polynomial kernel, then you have a parametric model which has a finite and fix size. There essentially comes a point when your polynomial kernel becomes saturated no matter how much data you throw at it. Hence, it's generally seen as a good benchmark to start with an RBF unless you have reason to believe otherwise.



                          There's other properties that make it mathematically useful, like it's invariant, stationary contain less parameters than polynomial kernels.



                          TL;DR generally works well.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered Jan 1 at 2:50









                          TophatTophat

                          1,332212




                          1,332212






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f40512%2fwhat-advantage-does-guassian-kernel-have-than-any-other-kernels-such-as-linear%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Ponta tanko

                              Tantalo (mitologio)

                              Erzsébet Schaár