What advantage does Guassian kernel have than any other kernels, such as linear kernel, polynomial kernel and...
$begingroup$
Guassian kernel is so important in SVM as we know. The parameter gamma
is designed for this kind of kernel. My question is what makes Guassian kernel so unique? What advantage does it have over other kernels?
machine-learning svm kernel
$endgroup$
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 4 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Guassian kernel is so important in SVM as we know. The parameter gamma
is designed for this kind of kernel. My question is what makes Guassian kernel so unique? What advantage does it have over other kernels?
machine-learning svm kernel
$endgroup$
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 4 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Guassian kernel is so important in SVM as we know. The parameter gamma
is designed for this kind of kernel. My question is what makes Guassian kernel so unique? What advantage does it have over other kernels?
machine-learning svm kernel
$endgroup$
Guassian kernel is so important in SVM as we know. The parameter gamma
is designed for this kind of kernel. My question is what makes Guassian kernel so unique? What advantage does it have over other kernels?
machine-learning svm kernel
machine-learning svm kernel
asked Oct 31 '18 at 14:37
Jason ShuJason Shu
1
1
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 4 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 4 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The advantange is that it is related to euclidean distance, and if your problem benefits from this type of feature, e.g. you have a highly non-linear problem where values nearby some vector point tend to be of a different class, it will be able to find relationships that other kernels would not, and create highly complex decision boundaries.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Mathematically speaking, one can show that an RBF is simply a low-band pass filter. To put it simply, RBF induces a smooth solution. Sometimes that is an important characteristic that matters. However, it isn't always important or useful. For example, it's somewhat well known that a smoothing prior does not outperform a linear/polynomial kernel for problems like Text Classification.
There's also other reasons though why people tend to stick with an RBF kernel instead of trying to design their own or use a polynomial. One main one is that an RBF is non-parametric -- meaning that it's complexity grows with data. While if one uses a polynomial kernel, then you have a parametric model which has a finite and fix size. There essentially comes a point when your polynomial kernel becomes saturated no matter how much data you throw at it. Hence, it's generally seen as a good benchmark to start with an RBF unless you have reason to believe otherwise.
There's other properties that make it mathematically useful, like it's invariant, stationary contain less parameters than polynomial kernels.
TL;DR generally works well.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "557"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f40512%2fwhat-advantage-does-guassian-kernel-have-than-any-other-kernels-such-as-linear%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The advantange is that it is related to euclidean distance, and if your problem benefits from this type of feature, e.g. you have a highly non-linear problem where values nearby some vector point tend to be of a different class, it will be able to find relationships that other kernels would not, and create highly complex decision boundaries.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The advantange is that it is related to euclidean distance, and if your problem benefits from this type of feature, e.g. you have a highly non-linear problem where values nearby some vector point tend to be of a different class, it will be able to find relationships that other kernels would not, and create highly complex decision boundaries.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The advantange is that it is related to euclidean distance, and if your problem benefits from this type of feature, e.g. you have a highly non-linear problem where values nearby some vector point tend to be of a different class, it will be able to find relationships that other kernels would not, and create highly complex decision boundaries.
$endgroup$
The advantange is that it is related to euclidean distance, and if your problem benefits from this type of feature, e.g. you have a highly non-linear problem where values nearby some vector point tend to be of a different class, it will be able to find relationships that other kernels would not, and create highly complex decision boundaries.
answered Oct 31 '18 at 17:25
anymous.askeranymous.asker
55118
55118
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Mathematically speaking, one can show that an RBF is simply a low-band pass filter. To put it simply, RBF induces a smooth solution. Sometimes that is an important characteristic that matters. However, it isn't always important or useful. For example, it's somewhat well known that a smoothing prior does not outperform a linear/polynomial kernel for problems like Text Classification.
There's also other reasons though why people tend to stick with an RBF kernel instead of trying to design their own or use a polynomial. One main one is that an RBF is non-parametric -- meaning that it's complexity grows with data. While if one uses a polynomial kernel, then you have a parametric model which has a finite and fix size. There essentially comes a point when your polynomial kernel becomes saturated no matter how much data you throw at it. Hence, it's generally seen as a good benchmark to start with an RBF unless you have reason to believe otherwise.
There's other properties that make it mathematically useful, like it's invariant, stationary contain less parameters than polynomial kernels.
TL;DR generally works well.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Mathematically speaking, one can show that an RBF is simply a low-band pass filter. To put it simply, RBF induces a smooth solution. Sometimes that is an important characteristic that matters. However, it isn't always important or useful. For example, it's somewhat well known that a smoothing prior does not outperform a linear/polynomial kernel for problems like Text Classification.
There's also other reasons though why people tend to stick with an RBF kernel instead of trying to design their own or use a polynomial. One main one is that an RBF is non-parametric -- meaning that it's complexity grows with data. While if one uses a polynomial kernel, then you have a parametric model which has a finite and fix size. There essentially comes a point when your polynomial kernel becomes saturated no matter how much data you throw at it. Hence, it's generally seen as a good benchmark to start with an RBF unless you have reason to believe otherwise.
There's other properties that make it mathematically useful, like it's invariant, stationary contain less parameters than polynomial kernels.
TL;DR generally works well.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Mathematically speaking, one can show that an RBF is simply a low-band pass filter. To put it simply, RBF induces a smooth solution. Sometimes that is an important characteristic that matters. However, it isn't always important or useful. For example, it's somewhat well known that a smoothing prior does not outperform a linear/polynomial kernel for problems like Text Classification.
There's also other reasons though why people tend to stick with an RBF kernel instead of trying to design their own or use a polynomial. One main one is that an RBF is non-parametric -- meaning that it's complexity grows with data. While if one uses a polynomial kernel, then you have a parametric model which has a finite and fix size. There essentially comes a point when your polynomial kernel becomes saturated no matter how much data you throw at it. Hence, it's generally seen as a good benchmark to start with an RBF unless you have reason to believe otherwise.
There's other properties that make it mathematically useful, like it's invariant, stationary contain less parameters than polynomial kernels.
TL;DR generally works well.
$endgroup$
Mathematically speaking, one can show that an RBF is simply a low-band pass filter. To put it simply, RBF induces a smooth solution. Sometimes that is an important characteristic that matters. However, it isn't always important or useful. For example, it's somewhat well known that a smoothing prior does not outperform a linear/polynomial kernel for problems like Text Classification.
There's also other reasons though why people tend to stick with an RBF kernel instead of trying to design their own or use a polynomial. One main one is that an RBF is non-parametric -- meaning that it's complexity grows with data. While if one uses a polynomial kernel, then you have a parametric model which has a finite and fix size. There essentially comes a point when your polynomial kernel becomes saturated no matter how much data you throw at it. Hence, it's generally seen as a good benchmark to start with an RBF unless you have reason to believe otherwise.
There's other properties that make it mathematically useful, like it's invariant, stationary contain less parameters than polynomial kernels.
TL;DR generally works well.
answered Jan 1 at 2:50
TophatTophat
1,332212
1,332212
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f40512%2fwhat-advantage-does-guassian-kernel-have-than-any-other-kernels-such-as-linear%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown