How to improve the time series predictions using Random Forest?












0












$begingroup$


We are running RandomForest model on a time-series data. The model is run in real time and is refit every time a new row is added. Since it is a timeseries data, we set shuffle to false while splitting into train and test dataset.



We observed that there is a drastic change in scores when shuffle is True and when shuffle is false



The code being used is as follows



# Set shuffle = 'True' or 'False'
df = pandas.read_csv('data.csv', index_col=0)
X = df.drop(columns=['label'])
y = df['label']
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.05, shuffle=True)

count = 0
predictions =

for idx in X_test.index.values:
# Train the model on training data
# print(count, X_train.shape, y_train.shape)
rf = RandomForestRegressor(n_estimators = 600, max_depth = 7, random_state = 12345)
rf.fit(X_train, y_train)

predictions.append(rf.predict(X_test.loc[X_test.index == idx]))
# print(len(predictions))

X_train.loc[len(X_train)] = X_test.loc[idx]
y_train.loc[len(y_train)] = y_test.loc[idx]
count+=1


Initially, we thought the difference is due to covariance shift in the data. But that shouldn't affect this much for continuous fit



Here are screenshots for the prediction plot



With shuffle = False
enter image description here



With shuffle = True
enter image description here









share







New contributor




Sumesh Surendran is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    We are running RandomForest model on a time-series data. The model is run in real time and is refit every time a new row is added. Since it is a timeseries data, we set shuffle to false while splitting into train and test dataset.



    We observed that there is a drastic change in scores when shuffle is True and when shuffle is false



    The code being used is as follows



    # Set shuffle = 'True' or 'False'
    df = pandas.read_csv('data.csv', index_col=0)
    X = df.drop(columns=['label'])
    y = df['label']
    X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.05, shuffle=True)

    count = 0
    predictions =

    for idx in X_test.index.values:
    # Train the model on training data
    # print(count, X_train.shape, y_train.shape)
    rf = RandomForestRegressor(n_estimators = 600, max_depth = 7, random_state = 12345)
    rf.fit(X_train, y_train)

    predictions.append(rf.predict(X_test.loc[X_test.index == idx]))
    # print(len(predictions))

    X_train.loc[len(X_train)] = X_test.loc[idx]
    y_train.loc[len(y_train)] = y_test.loc[idx]
    count+=1


    Initially, we thought the difference is due to covariance shift in the data. But that shouldn't affect this much for continuous fit



    Here are screenshots for the prediction plot



    With shuffle = False
    enter image description here



    With shuffle = True
    enter image description here









    share







    New contributor




    Sumesh Surendran is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      We are running RandomForest model on a time-series data. The model is run in real time and is refit every time a new row is added. Since it is a timeseries data, we set shuffle to false while splitting into train and test dataset.



      We observed that there is a drastic change in scores when shuffle is True and when shuffle is false



      The code being used is as follows



      # Set shuffle = 'True' or 'False'
      df = pandas.read_csv('data.csv', index_col=0)
      X = df.drop(columns=['label'])
      y = df['label']
      X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.05, shuffle=True)

      count = 0
      predictions =

      for idx in X_test.index.values:
      # Train the model on training data
      # print(count, X_train.shape, y_train.shape)
      rf = RandomForestRegressor(n_estimators = 600, max_depth = 7, random_state = 12345)
      rf.fit(X_train, y_train)

      predictions.append(rf.predict(X_test.loc[X_test.index == idx]))
      # print(len(predictions))

      X_train.loc[len(X_train)] = X_test.loc[idx]
      y_train.loc[len(y_train)] = y_test.loc[idx]
      count+=1


      Initially, we thought the difference is due to covariance shift in the data. But that shouldn't affect this much for continuous fit



      Here are screenshots for the prediction plot



      With shuffle = False
      enter image description here



      With shuffle = True
      enter image description here









      share







      New contributor




      Sumesh Surendran is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      We are running RandomForest model on a time-series data. The model is run in real time and is refit every time a new row is added. Since it is a timeseries data, we set shuffle to false while splitting into train and test dataset.



      We observed that there is a drastic change in scores when shuffle is True and when shuffle is false



      The code being used is as follows



      # Set shuffle = 'True' or 'False'
      df = pandas.read_csv('data.csv', index_col=0)
      X = df.drop(columns=['label'])
      y = df['label']
      X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.05, shuffle=True)

      count = 0
      predictions =

      for idx in X_test.index.values:
      # Train the model on training data
      # print(count, X_train.shape, y_train.shape)
      rf = RandomForestRegressor(n_estimators = 600, max_depth = 7, random_state = 12345)
      rf.fit(X_train, y_train)

      predictions.append(rf.predict(X_test.loc[X_test.index == idx]))
      # print(len(predictions))

      X_train.loc[len(X_train)] = X_test.loc[idx]
      y_train.loc[len(y_train)] = y_test.loc[idx]
      count+=1


      Initially, we thought the difference is due to covariance shift in the data. But that shouldn't affect this much for continuous fit



      Here are screenshots for the prediction plot



      With shuffle = False
      enter image description here



      With shuffle = True
      enter image description here







      time-series predictive-modeling random-forest training transfer-learning





      share







      New contributor




      Sumesh Surendran is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.










      share







      New contributor




      Sumesh Surendran is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      share



      share






      New contributor




      Sumesh Surendran is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 7 mins ago









      Sumesh SurendranSumesh Surendran

      1




      1




      New contributor




      Sumesh Surendran is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Sumesh Surendran is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Sumesh Surendran is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "557"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          Sumesh Surendran is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f45672%2fhow-to-improve-the-time-series-predictions-using-random-forest%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          Sumesh Surendran is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          Sumesh Surendran is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          Sumesh Surendran is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          Sumesh Surendran is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















          Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f45672%2fhow-to-improve-the-time-series-predictions-using-random-forest%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Ponta tanko

          Tantalo (mitologio)

          Erzsébet Schaár