Roots of 6th chords on the guitar for different inversions/voicings












2















I've played piano for many years and just started learning guitar.



I've been learning the major 6th chords, but I've noticed that many videos and chord charts don't have any regard for the bass note that I would think of as the root on the piano.



The specific example is that they will say that a chord is a 6th, but it just doesn't sound right at all to me since it is really the minor 7th inversion. It does not sound the same to my ear at all, even though I know they are the same notes.



For example, if I play C E G A, where C is the lowest-pitched note, It has a very different feel to me than if I play A G C E, even though they are the same bundle of notes.



Am I missing something basic about how chords are perceived for guitar, or are there just many sloppy guitarists? If the latter, do I just have to muck around on the web until I find the fingerings that have the correct root?



Unlike other posts I've seen here, it doesn't bother me if there are extra notes, and I know different styles are supposed to be "sloppy" to sound right. I also understand that it can really depend on if you are playing with others (e.g. the bass player supplies the root) or if you are trying to focus on other things like the melody. I just want to fill this gap in my understanding and learn how to supply the root if I'm playing solo.










share|improve this question









New contributor




labyrinth is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1





    Can you add at least one specific example? Like one of these chords that doesn't sound right? What is the fingering of that chord? What is it called by the site that seems to call it something different from what it sounds like?

    – Todd Wilcox
    5 hours ago











  • This question seems to have nothing to do with guitar, and everything to do with inversions and chord voicings. I'm not quite sure what the question is. Ambiguous chords need context to resolve ambiguity; what is the problem?

    – David Bowling
    3 hours ago
















2















I've played piano for many years and just started learning guitar.



I've been learning the major 6th chords, but I've noticed that many videos and chord charts don't have any regard for the bass note that I would think of as the root on the piano.



The specific example is that they will say that a chord is a 6th, but it just doesn't sound right at all to me since it is really the minor 7th inversion. It does not sound the same to my ear at all, even though I know they are the same notes.



For example, if I play C E G A, where C is the lowest-pitched note, It has a very different feel to me than if I play A G C E, even though they are the same bundle of notes.



Am I missing something basic about how chords are perceived for guitar, or are there just many sloppy guitarists? If the latter, do I just have to muck around on the web until I find the fingerings that have the correct root?



Unlike other posts I've seen here, it doesn't bother me if there are extra notes, and I know different styles are supposed to be "sloppy" to sound right. I also understand that it can really depend on if you are playing with others (e.g. the bass player supplies the root) or if you are trying to focus on other things like the melody. I just want to fill this gap in my understanding and learn how to supply the root if I'm playing solo.










share|improve this question









New contributor




labyrinth is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1





    Can you add at least one specific example? Like one of these chords that doesn't sound right? What is the fingering of that chord? What is it called by the site that seems to call it something different from what it sounds like?

    – Todd Wilcox
    5 hours ago











  • This question seems to have nothing to do with guitar, and everything to do with inversions and chord voicings. I'm not quite sure what the question is. Ambiguous chords need context to resolve ambiguity; what is the problem?

    – David Bowling
    3 hours ago














2












2








2








I've played piano for many years and just started learning guitar.



I've been learning the major 6th chords, but I've noticed that many videos and chord charts don't have any regard for the bass note that I would think of as the root on the piano.



The specific example is that they will say that a chord is a 6th, but it just doesn't sound right at all to me since it is really the minor 7th inversion. It does not sound the same to my ear at all, even though I know they are the same notes.



For example, if I play C E G A, where C is the lowest-pitched note, It has a very different feel to me than if I play A G C E, even though they are the same bundle of notes.



Am I missing something basic about how chords are perceived for guitar, or are there just many sloppy guitarists? If the latter, do I just have to muck around on the web until I find the fingerings that have the correct root?



Unlike other posts I've seen here, it doesn't bother me if there are extra notes, and I know different styles are supposed to be "sloppy" to sound right. I also understand that it can really depend on if you are playing with others (e.g. the bass player supplies the root) or if you are trying to focus on other things like the melody. I just want to fill this gap in my understanding and learn how to supply the root if I'm playing solo.










share|improve this question









New contributor




labyrinth is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I've played piano for many years and just started learning guitar.



I've been learning the major 6th chords, but I've noticed that many videos and chord charts don't have any regard for the bass note that I would think of as the root on the piano.



The specific example is that they will say that a chord is a 6th, but it just doesn't sound right at all to me since it is really the minor 7th inversion. It does not sound the same to my ear at all, even though I know they are the same notes.



For example, if I play C E G A, where C is the lowest-pitched note, It has a very different feel to me than if I play A G C E, even though they are the same bundle of notes.



Am I missing something basic about how chords are perceived for guitar, or are there just many sloppy guitarists? If the latter, do I just have to muck around on the web until I find the fingerings that have the correct root?



Unlike other posts I've seen here, it doesn't bother me if there are extra notes, and I know different styles are supposed to be "sloppy" to sound right. I also understand that it can really depend on if you are playing with others (e.g. the bass player supplies the root) or if you are trying to focus on other things like the melody. I just want to fill this gap in my understanding and learn how to supply the root if I'm playing solo.







guitar chords chord-inversions






share|improve this question









New contributor




labyrinth is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




labyrinth is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 33 mins ago









user45266

3,3281733




3,3281733






New contributor




labyrinth is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 5 hours ago









labyrinthlabyrinth

1165




1165




New contributor




labyrinth is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





labyrinth is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






labyrinth is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1





    Can you add at least one specific example? Like one of these chords that doesn't sound right? What is the fingering of that chord? What is it called by the site that seems to call it something different from what it sounds like?

    – Todd Wilcox
    5 hours ago











  • This question seems to have nothing to do with guitar, and everything to do with inversions and chord voicings. I'm not quite sure what the question is. Ambiguous chords need context to resolve ambiguity; what is the problem?

    – David Bowling
    3 hours ago














  • 1





    Can you add at least one specific example? Like one of these chords that doesn't sound right? What is the fingering of that chord? What is it called by the site that seems to call it something different from what it sounds like?

    – Todd Wilcox
    5 hours ago











  • This question seems to have nothing to do with guitar, and everything to do with inversions and chord voicings. I'm not quite sure what the question is. Ambiguous chords need context to resolve ambiguity; what is the problem?

    – David Bowling
    3 hours ago








1




1





Can you add at least one specific example? Like one of these chords that doesn't sound right? What is the fingering of that chord? What is it called by the site that seems to call it something different from what it sounds like?

– Todd Wilcox
5 hours ago





Can you add at least one specific example? Like one of these chords that doesn't sound right? What is the fingering of that chord? What is it called by the site that seems to call it something different from what it sounds like?

– Todd Wilcox
5 hours ago













This question seems to have nothing to do with guitar, and everything to do with inversions and chord voicings. I'm not quite sure what the question is. Ambiguous chords need context to resolve ambiguity; what is the problem?

– David Bowling
3 hours ago





This question seems to have nothing to do with guitar, and everything to do with inversions and chord voicings. I'm not quite sure what the question is. Ambiguous chords need context to resolve ambiguity; what is the problem?

– David Bowling
3 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















3














If I follow your description, you are talking about a chord with tones A C E G.



In modern Roman numeral analysis, in C major that would be...



Root position...



enter image description here



First inversion...



enter image description here



You understand chord roots and inversions and so see the second example as an inversion of vi7 or Am7.



Sometimes the chord is labeled C6 or Cadd6 as a plain C major triad with an added sixth.



enter image description here



That label is popular in jazz and pop music. It also has some historic significance when prior to the theory of chord roots and Roman numeral analysis figured bass would have presented this chord as rooted on C with a perfect fifth and major sixth above the bass.



enter image description here



Importantly the different labeling changes the analysis of harmonic function! In the key of C the first case is a vi chord and with the jazz/pop label it's a tonic I chord. The figured bass would be the equivalent of an inverted chord and definitely not a tonic C chord.



In the above I deliberately compared Am7 as vi6/5 and C6 to highlight the ambiguity when swapping between the different labels. But in reality I would say the commonest classical appearance of the inverted chord is ii6/5 a kind of subdominant rather than a vi. In pop style the add6 chord can often be a decorated tonic I chord.




Am I missing something basic about how chords are perceived for guitar, or are there just many sloppy guitarists?




You may encounter some people who are unaware of analysis by chord inversions, keys, functional harmony, etc. Personally, I would have trouble with lessons from someone who didn't know the various labels and theoretical approaches. But it really depends on the exact content of what is presented. Maybe you can translate some pop things in Roman numeral analysis. If it's a hopeless muddle, look for better material. Plenty of rock/pop musicians know theory.






share|improve this answer


























  • I'm familiar (although not fluent) w/ modern roman numeral notation and love it. It didn't make sense to me that playing the guitar would somehow ignore the impact of how an inversion might change the chord so that it no longer sounds like it is the same root. Your answer gives me the theory I need, Hugli's gives me the practical side. I wish I could give you both a checkmark.

    – labyrinth
    3 hours ago



















3















I've noticed that many videos and chord charts don't have any regard for the bass note that I would think of as the root on the piano.




Bass and root are two different things. They can be the same when a chord is played in root position, but a chord played in an inversion is still the same chord.




they will say that a chord is a 6th, but it just doesn't sound right at all to me since it is really the minor 7th inversion




If the sixth is in the bass it's identical to a minor seventh in root position. But ALL major sixths are some inversion of a minor seventh chord. Whether you call it a sixth or a minor seventh depends on the context, and the inversion to be played is a separate decision.



Chords aren't perceived any differently on the guitar than they are on any other instrument. How they're voiced on the guitar depends on the situation. As a guitarist, if I'm in an ensemble that has a bass player my choice of voicing isn't going to determine the inversion being played, because the bassist is almost certainly going to come in below me - so I will tend to grab the voicing that results in the least motion up or down the fretboard. If I'm in a solo situation the voicing decision might depend on realizing a particular bass line. That could mean playing a root position voicing, but it might not.



If you aim to be a competent guitarist you need to learn how to play chords in every inversion, because there will be times you need a specific one. If you only learn chords in root positions you're going to be doing a lot more work than you need to, because you'll be constantly moving up and down the neck, and you probably won't sound that good... long strings of root position chords become boring.




are there just many sloppy guitarists?




Well, yes, there are. But that's not a consequence of the voicings they choose.






share|improve this answer
























  • I want to learn all the inversions/voicings of each chord. But I disagree that they sound the same. I already know that AGCE (m7th) feels very different from CEGA (6th), even though they are the same notes. But from what I see on youtube, most guitarists are either unaware, or apathetic about how inverting the 6th can make it sound more like a minor 7th. I was wondering if that was just considered no big deal on guitar or something else.

    – labyrinth
    4 hours ago











  • @labyrinth -- be careful with "most guitarists...." YouTube is not a good benchmark to start, and I find that there are plenty of un-subtle players on all chording instruments who don't use inversions effectively. Your comment, "...inverting the 6th can make it sound more like a minor 7th" is obvious, but not always true. An inversion will sound different depending on the context, and depending on the details of the chord voicing (i.e. beyond the bass note). AGCE and CEGA are neither m7 or M6 in the absence of context, or assumptions.

    – David Bowling
    3 hours ago











  • @labyrinth - I didn't say all the voicings sound the same. I said they are all the same chord.

    – Tom Serb
    36 mins ago



















2














It is like you say. With a bass guitar that plays the root note all would be less complicated. The guitar has six strings. Some tones are doubled and most of the chords appear in an inversion if you play all strings. It depends which pattern you want to choose. You as a pianist will be able to derive any chord pattern of a guitar chord containing exactly those tones you want to have. So you can continue looking around, may be you find the one chord you're looking for or you develop it yourself. The best way is to know which chord you want to transfer from the piano, notate it draw the pattern yourself and you'll know what strings you have to play or not. Ask what is the root of the chord and derive the sixth or seventh chord.






share|improve this answer
























  • I wish I could give you the check for accepted, too. This is very helpful for how to proceed practically. I'm comfortable pulling the notes from the piano, and notating it on the frets will be good practice for me.

    – labyrinth
    3 hours ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "240"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






labyrinth is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81014%2froots-of-6th-chords-on-the-guitar-for-different-inversions-voicings%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3














If I follow your description, you are talking about a chord with tones A C E G.



In modern Roman numeral analysis, in C major that would be...



Root position...



enter image description here



First inversion...



enter image description here



You understand chord roots and inversions and so see the second example as an inversion of vi7 or Am7.



Sometimes the chord is labeled C6 or Cadd6 as a plain C major triad with an added sixth.



enter image description here



That label is popular in jazz and pop music. It also has some historic significance when prior to the theory of chord roots and Roman numeral analysis figured bass would have presented this chord as rooted on C with a perfect fifth and major sixth above the bass.



enter image description here



Importantly the different labeling changes the analysis of harmonic function! In the key of C the first case is a vi chord and with the jazz/pop label it's a tonic I chord. The figured bass would be the equivalent of an inverted chord and definitely not a tonic C chord.



In the above I deliberately compared Am7 as vi6/5 and C6 to highlight the ambiguity when swapping between the different labels. But in reality I would say the commonest classical appearance of the inverted chord is ii6/5 a kind of subdominant rather than a vi. In pop style the add6 chord can often be a decorated tonic I chord.




Am I missing something basic about how chords are perceived for guitar, or are there just many sloppy guitarists?




You may encounter some people who are unaware of analysis by chord inversions, keys, functional harmony, etc. Personally, I would have trouble with lessons from someone who didn't know the various labels and theoretical approaches. But it really depends on the exact content of what is presented. Maybe you can translate some pop things in Roman numeral analysis. If it's a hopeless muddle, look for better material. Plenty of rock/pop musicians know theory.






share|improve this answer


























  • I'm familiar (although not fluent) w/ modern roman numeral notation and love it. It didn't make sense to me that playing the guitar would somehow ignore the impact of how an inversion might change the chord so that it no longer sounds like it is the same root. Your answer gives me the theory I need, Hugli's gives me the practical side. I wish I could give you both a checkmark.

    – labyrinth
    3 hours ago
















3














If I follow your description, you are talking about a chord with tones A C E G.



In modern Roman numeral analysis, in C major that would be...



Root position...



enter image description here



First inversion...



enter image description here



You understand chord roots and inversions and so see the second example as an inversion of vi7 or Am7.



Sometimes the chord is labeled C6 or Cadd6 as a plain C major triad with an added sixth.



enter image description here



That label is popular in jazz and pop music. It also has some historic significance when prior to the theory of chord roots and Roman numeral analysis figured bass would have presented this chord as rooted on C with a perfect fifth and major sixth above the bass.



enter image description here



Importantly the different labeling changes the analysis of harmonic function! In the key of C the first case is a vi chord and with the jazz/pop label it's a tonic I chord. The figured bass would be the equivalent of an inverted chord and definitely not a tonic C chord.



In the above I deliberately compared Am7 as vi6/5 and C6 to highlight the ambiguity when swapping between the different labels. But in reality I would say the commonest classical appearance of the inverted chord is ii6/5 a kind of subdominant rather than a vi. In pop style the add6 chord can often be a decorated tonic I chord.




Am I missing something basic about how chords are perceived for guitar, or are there just many sloppy guitarists?




You may encounter some people who are unaware of analysis by chord inversions, keys, functional harmony, etc. Personally, I would have trouble with lessons from someone who didn't know the various labels and theoretical approaches. But it really depends on the exact content of what is presented. Maybe you can translate some pop things in Roman numeral analysis. If it's a hopeless muddle, look for better material. Plenty of rock/pop musicians know theory.






share|improve this answer


























  • I'm familiar (although not fluent) w/ modern roman numeral notation and love it. It didn't make sense to me that playing the guitar would somehow ignore the impact of how an inversion might change the chord so that it no longer sounds like it is the same root. Your answer gives me the theory I need, Hugli's gives me the practical side. I wish I could give you both a checkmark.

    – labyrinth
    3 hours ago














3












3








3







If I follow your description, you are talking about a chord with tones A C E G.



In modern Roman numeral analysis, in C major that would be...



Root position...



enter image description here



First inversion...



enter image description here



You understand chord roots and inversions and so see the second example as an inversion of vi7 or Am7.



Sometimes the chord is labeled C6 or Cadd6 as a plain C major triad with an added sixth.



enter image description here



That label is popular in jazz and pop music. It also has some historic significance when prior to the theory of chord roots and Roman numeral analysis figured bass would have presented this chord as rooted on C with a perfect fifth and major sixth above the bass.



enter image description here



Importantly the different labeling changes the analysis of harmonic function! In the key of C the first case is a vi chord and with the jazz/pop label it's a tonic I chord. The figured bass would be the equivalent of an inverted chord and definitely not a tonic C chord.



In the above I deliberately compared Am7 as vi6/5 and C6 to highlight the ambiguity when swapping between the different labels. But in reality I would say the commonest classical appearance of the inverted chord is ii6/5 a kind of subdominant rather than a vi. In pop style the add6 chord can often be a decorated tonic I chord.




Am I missing something basic about how chords are perceived for guitar, or are there just many sloppy guitarists?




You may encounter some people who are unaware of analysis by chord inversions, keys, functional harmony, etc. Personally, I would have trouble with lessons from someone who didn't know the various labels and theoretical approaches. But it really depends on the exact content of what is presented. Maybe you can translate some pop things in Roman numeral analysis. If it's a hopeless muddle, look for better material. Plenty of rock/pop musicians know theory.






share|improve this answer















If I follow your description, you are talking about a chord with tones A C E G.



In modern Roman numeral analysis, in C major that would be...



Root position...



enter image description here



First inversion...



enter image description here



You understand chord roots and inversions and so see the second example as an inversion of vi7 or Am7.



Sometimes the chord is labeled C6 or Cadd6 as a plain C major triad with an added sixth.



enter image description here



That label is popular in jazz and pop music. It also has some historic significance when prior to the theory of chord roots and Roman numeral analysis figured bass would have presented this chord as rooted on C with a perfect fifth and major sixth above the bass.



enter image description here



Importantly the different labeling changes the analysis of harmonic function! In the key of C the first case is a vi chord and with the jazz/pop label it's a tonic I chord. The figured bass would be the equivalent of an inverted chord and definitely not a tonic C chord.



In the above I deliberately compared Am7 as vi6/5 and C6 to highlight the ambiguity when swapping between the different labels. But in reality I would say the commonest classical appearance of the inverted chord is ii6/5 a kind of subdominant rather than a vi. In pop style the add6 chord can often be a decorated tonic I chord.




Am I missing something basic about how chords are perceived for guitar, or are there just many sloppy guitarists?




You may encounter some people who are unaware of analysis by chord inversions, keys, functional harmony, etc. Personally, I would have trouble with lessons from someone who didn't know the various labels and theoretical approaches. But it really depends on the exact content of what is presented. Maybe you can translate some pop things in Roman numeral analysis. If it's a hopeless muddle, look for better material. Plenty of rock/pop musicians know theory.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 4 hours ago

























answered 4 hours ago









Michael CurtisMichael Curtis

8,998533




8,998533













  • I'm familiar (although not fluent) w/ modern roman numeral notation and love it. It didn't make sense to me that playing the guitar would somehow ignore the impact of how an inversion might change the chord so that it no longer sounds like it is the same root. Your answer gives me the theory I need, Hugli's gives me the practical side. I wish I could give you both a checkmark.

    – labyrinth
    3 hours ago



















  • I'm familiar (although not fluent) w/ modern roman numeral notation and love it. It didn't make sense to me that playing the guitar would somehow ignore the impact of how an inversion might change the chord so that it no longer sounds like it is the same root. Your answer gives me the theory I need, Hugli's gives me the practical side. I wish I could give you both a checkmark.

    – labyrinth
    3 hours ago

















I'm familiar (although not fluent) w/ modern roman numeral notation and love it. It didn't make sense to me that playing the guitar would somehow ignore the impact of how an inversion might change the chord so that it no longer sounds like it is the same root. Your answer gives me the theory I need, Hugli's gives me the practical side. I wish I could give you both a checkmark.

– labyrinth
3 hours ago





I'm familiar (although not fluent) w/ modern roman numeral notation and love it. It didn't make sense to me that playing the guitar would somehow ignore the impact of how an inversion might change the chord so that it no longer sounds like it is the same root. Your answer gives me the theory I need, Hugli's gives me the practical side. I wish I could give you both a checkmark.

– labyrinth
3 hours ago











3















I've noticed that many videos and chord charts don't have any regard for the bass note that I would think of as the root on the piano.




Bass and root are two different things. They can be the same when a chord is played in root position, but a chord played in an inversion is still the same chord.




they will say that a chord is a 6th, but it just doesn't sound right at all to me since it is really the minor 7th inversion




If the sixth is in the bass it's identical to a minor seventh in root position. But ALL major sixths are some inversion of a minor seventh chord. Whether you call it a sixth or a minor seventh depends on the context, and the inversion to be played is a separate decision.



Chords aren't perceived any differently on the guitar than they are on any other instrument. How they're voiced on the guitar depends on the situation. As a guitarist, if I'm in an ensemble that has a bass player my choice of voicing isn't going to determine the inversion being played, because the bassist is almost certainly going to come in below me - so I will tend to grab the voicing that results in the least motion up or down the fretboard. If I'm in a solo situation the voicing decision might depend on realizing a particular bass line. That could mean playing a root position voicing, but it might not.



If you aim to be a competent guitarist you need to learn how to play chords in every inversion, because there will be times you need a specific one. If you only learn chords in root positions you're going to be doing a lot more work than you need to, because you'll be constantly moving up and down the neck, and you probably won't sound that good... long strings of root position chords become boring.




are there just many sloppy guitarists?




Well, yes, there are. But that's not a consequence of the voicings they choose.






share|improve this answer
























  • I want to learn all the inversions/voicings of each chord. But I disagree that they sound the same. I already know that AGCE (m7th) feels very different from CEGA (6th), even though they are the same notes. But from what I see on youtube, most guitarists are either unaware, or apathetic about how inverting the 6th can make it sound more like a minor 7th. I was wondering if that was just considered no big deal on guitar or something else.

    – labyrinth
    4 hours ago











  • @labyrinth -- be careful with "most guitarists...." YouTube is not a good benchmark to start, and I find that there are plenty of un-subtle players on all chording instruments who don't use inversions effectively. Your comment, "...inverting the 6th can make it sound more like a minor 7th" is obvious, but not always true. An inversion will sound different depending on the context, and depending on the details of the chord voicing (i.e. beyond the bass note). AGCE and CEGA are neither m7 or M6 in the absence of context, or assumptions.

    – David Bowling
    3 hours ago











  • @labyrinth - I didn't say all the voicings sound the same. I said they are all the same chord.

    – Tom Serb
    36 mins ago
















3















I've noticed that many videos and chord charts don't have any regard for the bass note that I would think of as the root on the piano.




Bass and root are two different things. They can be the same when a chord is played in root position, but a chord played in an inversion is still the same chord.




they will say that a chord is a 6th, but it just doesn't sound right at all to me since it is really the minor 7th inversion




If the sixth is in the bass it's identical to a minor seventh in root position. But ALL major sixths are some inversion of a minor seventh chord. Whether you call it a sixth or a minor seventh depends on the context, and the inversion to be played is a separate decision.



Chords aren't perceived any differently on the guitar than they are on any other instrument. How they're voiced on the guitar depends on the situation. As a guitarist, if I'm in an ensemble that has a bass player my choice of voicing isn't going to determine the inversion being played, because the bassist is almost certainly going to come in below me - so I will tend to grab the voicing that results in the least motion up or down the fretboard. If I'm in a solo situation the voicing decision might depend on realizing a particular bass line. That could mean playing a root position voicing, but it might not.



If you aim to be a competent guitarist you need to learn how to play chords in every inversion, because there will be times you need a specific one. If you only learn chords in root positions you're going to be doing a lot more work than you need to, because you'll be constantly moving up and down the neck, and you probably won't sound that good... long strings of root position chords become boring.




are there just many sloppy guitarists?




Well, yes, there are. But that's not a consequence of the voicings they choose.






share|improve this answer
























  • I want to learn all the inversions/voicings of each chord. But I disagree that they sound the same. I already know that AGCE (m7th) feels very different from CEGA (6th), even though they are the same notes. But from what I see on youtube, most guitarists are either unaware, or apathetic about how inverting the 6th can make it sound more like a minor 7th. I was wondering if that was just considered no big deal on guitar or something else.

    – labyrinth
    4 hours ago











  • @labyrinth -- be careful with "most guitarists...." YouTube is not a good benchmark to start, and I find that there are plenty of un-subtle players on all chording instruments who don't use inversions effectively. Your comment, "...inverting the 6th can make it sound more like a minor 7th" is obvious, but not always true. An inversion will sound different depending on the context, and depending on the details of the chord voicing (i.e. beyond the bass note). AGCE and CEGA are neither m7 or M6 in the absence of context, or assumptions.

    – David Bowling
    3 hours ago











  • @labyrinth - I didn't say all the voicings sound the same. I said they are all the same chord.

    – Tom Serb
    36 mins ago














3












3








3








I've noticed that many videos and chord charts don't have any regard for the bass note that I would think of as the root on the piano.




Bass and root are two different things. They can be the same when a chord is played in root position, but a chord played in an inversion is still the same chord.




they will say that a chord is a 6th, but it just doesn't sound right at all to me since it is really the minor 7th inversion




If the sixth is in the bass it's identical to a minor seventh in root position. But ALL major sixths are some inversion of a minor seventh chord. Whether you call it a sixth or a minor seventh depends on the context, and the inversion to be played is a separate decision.



Chords aren't perceived any differently on the guitar than they are on any other instrument. How they're voiced on the guitar depends on the situation. As a guitarist, if I'm in an ensemble that has a bass player my choice of voicing isn't going to determine the inversion being played, because the bassist is almost certainly going to come in below me - so I will tend to grab the voicing that results in the least motion up or down the fretboard. If I'm in a solo situation the voicing decision might depend on realizing a particular bass line. That could mean playing a root position voicing, but it might not.



If you aim to be a competent guitarist you need to learn how to play chords in every inversion, because there will be times you need a specific one. If you only learn chords in root positions you're going to be doing a lot more work than you need to, because you'll be constantly moving up and down the neck, and you probably won't sound that good... long strings of root position chords become boring.




are there just many sloppy guitarists?




Well, yes, there are. But that's not a consequence of the voicings they choose.






share|improve this answer














I've noticed that many videos and chord charts don't have any regard for the bass note that I would think of as the root on the piano.




Bass and root are two different things. They can be the same when a chord is played in root position, but a chord played in an inversion is still the same chord.




they will say that a chord is a 6th, but it just doesn't sound right at all to me since it is really the minor 7th inversion




If the sixth is in the bass it's identical to a minor seventh in root position. But ALL major sixths are some inversion of a minor seventh chord. Whether you call it a sixth or a minor seventh depends on the context, and the inversion to be played is a separate decision.



Chords aren't perceived any differently on the guitar than they are on any other instrument. How they're voiced on the guitar depends on the situation. As a guitarist, if I'm in an ensemble that has a bass player my choice of voicing isn't going to determine the inversion being played, because the bassist is almost certainly going to come in below me - so I will tend to grab the voicing that results in the least motion up or down the fretboard. If I'm in a solo situation the voicing decision might depend on realizing a particular bass line. That could mean playing a root position voicing, but it might not.



If you aim to be a competent guitarist you need to learn how to play chords in every inversion, because there will be times you need a specific one. If you only learn chords in root positions you're going to be doing a lot more work than you need to, because you'll be constantly moving up and down the neck, and you probably won't sound that good... long strings of root position chords become boring.




are there just many sloppy guitarists?




Well, yes, there are. But that's not a consequence of the voicings they choose.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 4 hours ago









Tom SerbTom Serb

8599




8599













  • I want to learn all the inversions/voicings of each chord. But I disagree that they sound the same. I already know that AGCE (m7th) feels very different from CEGA (6th), even though they are the same notes. But from what I see on youtube, most guitarists are either unaware, or apathetic about how inverting the 6th can make it sound more like a minor 7th. I was wondering if that was just considered no big deal on guitar or something else.

    – labyrinth
    4 hours ago











  • @labyrinth -- be careful with "most guitarists...." YouTube is not a good benchmark to start, and I find that there are plenty of un-subtle players on all chording instruments who don't use inversions effectively. Your comment, "...inverting the 6th can make it sound more like a minor 7th" is obvious, but not always true. An inversion will sound different depending on the context, and depending on the details of the chord voicing (i.e. beyond the bass note). AGCE and CEGA are neither m7 or M6 in the absence of context, or assumptions.

    – David Bowling
    3 hours ago











  • @labyrinth - I didn't say all the voicings sound the same. I said they are all the same chord.

    – Tom Serb
    36 mins ago



















  • I want to learn all the inversions/voicings of each chord. But I disagree that they sound the same. I already know that AGCE (m7th) feels very different from CEGA (6th), even though they are the same notes. But from what I see on youtube, most guitarists are either unaware, or apathetic about how inverting the 6th can make it sound more like a minor 7th. I was wondering if that was just considered no big deal on guitar or something else.

    – labyrinth
    4 hours ago











  • @labyrinth -- be careful with "most guitarists...." YouTube is not a good benchmark to start, and I find that there are plenty of un-subtle players on all chording instruments who don't use inversions effectively. Your comment, "...inverting the 6th can make it sound more like a minor 7th" is obvious, but not always true. An inversion will sound different depending on the context, and depending on the details of the chord voicing (i.e. beyond the bass note). AGCE and CEGA are neither m7 or M6 in the absence of context, or assumptions.

    – David Bowling
    3 hours ago











  • @labyrinth - I didn't say all the voicings sound the same. I said they are all the same chord.

    – Tom Serb
    36 mins ago

















I want to learn all the inversions/voicings of each chord. But I disagree that they sound the same. I already know that AGCE (m7th) feels very different from CEGA (6th), even though they are the same notes. But from what I see on youtube, most guitarists are either unaware, or apathetic about how inverting the 6th can make it sound more like a minor 7th. I was wondering if that was just considered no big deal on guitar or something else.

– labyrinth
4 hours ago





I want to learn all the inversions/voicings of each chord. But I disagree that they sound the same. I already know that AGCE (m7th) feels very different from CEGA (6th), even though they are the same notes. But from what I see on youtube, most guitarists are either unaware, or apathetic about how inverting the 6th can make it sound more like a minor 7th. I was wondering if that was just considered no big deal on guitar or something else.

– labyrinth
4 hours ago













@labyrinth -- be careful with "most guitarists...." YouTube is not a good benchmark to start, and I find that there are plenty of un-subtle players on all chording instruments who don't use inversions effectively. Your comment, "...inverting the 6th can make it sound more like a minor 7th" is obvious, but not always true. An inversion will sound different depending on the context, and depending on the details of the chord voicing (i.e. beyond the bass note). AGCE and CEGA are neither m7 or M6 in the absence of context, or assumptions.

– David Bowling
3 hours ago





@labyrinth -- be careful with "most guitarists...." YouTube is not a good benchmark to start, and I find that there are plenty of un-subtle players on all chording instruments who don't use inversions effectively. Your comment, "...inverting the 6th can make it sound more like a minor 7th" is obvious, but not always true. An inversion will sound different depending on the context, and depending on the details of the chord voicing (i.e. beyond the bass note). AGCE and CEGA are neither m7 or M6 in the absence of context, or assumptions.

– David Bowling
3 hours ago













@labyrinth - I didn't say all the voicings sound the same. I said they are all the same chord.

– Tom Serb
36 mins ago





@labyrinth - I didn't say all the voicings sound the same. I said they are all the same chord.

– Tom Serb
36 mins ago











2














It is like you say. With a bass guitar that plays the root note all would be less complicated. The guitar has six strings. Some tones are doubled and most of the chords appear in an inversion if you play all strings. It depends which pattern you want to choose. You as a pianist will be able to derive any chord pattern of a guitar chord containing exactly those tones you want to have. So you can continue looking around, may be you find the one chord you're looking for or you develop it yourself. The best way is to know which chord you want to transfer from the piano, notate it draw the pattern yourself and you'll know what strings you have to play or not. Ask what is the root of the chord and derive the sixth or seventh chord.






share|improve this answer
























  • I wish I could give you the check for accepted, too. This is very helpful for how to proceed practically. I'm comfortable pulling the notes from the piano, and notating it on the frets will be good practice for me.

    – labyrinth
    3 hours ago
















2














It is like you say. With a bass guitar that plays the root note all would be less complicated. The guitar has six strings. Some tones are doubled and most of the chords appear in an inversion if you play all strings. It depends which pattern you want to choose. You as a pianist will be able to derive any chord pattern of a guitar chord containing exactly those tones you want to have. So you can continue looking around, may be you find the one chord you're looking for or you develop it yourself. The best way is to know which chord you want to transfer from the piano, notate it draw the pattern yourself and you'll know what strings you have to play or not. Ask what is the root of the chord and derive the sixth or seventh chord.






share|improve this answer
























  • I wish I could give you the check for accepted, too. This is very helpful for how to proceed practically. I'm comfortable pulling the notes from the piano, and notating it on the frets will be good practice for me.

    – labyrinth
    3 hours ago














2












2








2







It is like you say. With a bass guitar that plays the root note all would be less complicated. The guitar has six strings. Some tones are doubled and most of the chords appear in an inversion if you play all strings. It depends which pattern you want to choose. You as a pianist will be able to derive any chord pattern of a guitar chord containing exactly those tones you want to have. So you can continue looking around, may be you find the one chord you're looking for or you develop it yourself. The best way is to know which chord you want to transfer from the piano, notate it draw the pattern yourself and you'll know what strings you have to play or not. Ask what is the root of the chord and derive the sixth or seventh chord.






share|improve this answer













It is like you say. With a bass guitar that plays the root note all would be less complicated. The guitar has six strings. Some tones are doubled and most of the chords appear in an inversion if you play all strings. It depends which pattern you want to choose. You as a pianist will be able to derive any chord pattern of a guitar chord containing exactly those tones you want to have. So you can continue looking around, may be you find the one chord you're looking for or you develop it yourself. The best way is to know which chord you want to transfer from the piano, notate it draw the pattern yourself and you'll know what strings you have to play or not. Ask what is the root of the chord and derive the sixth or seventh chord.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 4 hours ago









Albrecht HügliAlbrecht Hügli

2,814220




2,814220













  • I wish I could give you the check for accepted, too. This is very helpful for how to proceed practically. I'm comfortable pulling the notes from the piano, and notating it on the frets will be good practice for me.

    – labyrinth
    3 hours ago



















  • I wish I could give you the check for accepted, too. This is very helpful for how to proceed practically. I'm comfortable pulling the notes from the piano, and notating it on the frets will be good practice for me.

    – labyrinth
    3 hours ago

















I wish I could give you the check for accepted, too. This is very helpful for how to proceed practically. I'm comfortable pulling the notes from the piano, and notating it on the frets will be good practice for me.

– labyrinth
3 hours ago





I wish I could give you the check for accepted, too. This is very helpful for how to proceed practically. I'm comfortable pulling the notes from the piano, and notating it on the frets will be good practice for me.

– labyrinth
3 hours ago










labyrinth is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















labyrinth is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













labyrinth is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












labyrinth is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81014%2froots-of-6th-chords-on-the-guitar-for-different-inversions-voicings%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Ponta tanko

Tantalo (mitologio)

Erzsébet Schaár