Measuring uncertainty in an LSTM network using dropout in keras/tensorflow
$begingroup$
I've created a simple LSTM network for testing
model = tf.keras.Sequential()
model.add(layers.LSTM(32, input_shape = (timesteps, data_dim), recurrent_dropout = 0.2))
model.add(layers.Dense(1))
model.compile(loss = 'mae', metrics = ['accuracy'], optimizer = tf.train.AdamOptimizer())
I am using dropout method as researched by Yarin Gal here and Lingxue Zhu here
and my function for dropout looks like this:
f = K.function([model.layers[0].input, K.learning_phase()],
[model.layers[-1].output])
after training I'm using the function above in the "predict_with_dropout"
def predict_with_dropout(x, f=f, n_iter=100):
result = np.zeros((n_iter,))
#print(f([x,1]))
for iter in range(n_iter):
result[iter] = f([x, 1])[0]
return result
results =
for point in test_X:
results+= [predict_with_dropout([point])]
results_avg = np.apply_along_axis(np.mean, 1, results)
variance = np.apply_along_axis(np.var, 1, results)
This code is working as expected and as I understand it the "predict_with_dropout" function is using the f-function to re-train the LSTM model 100 times and within those 100 times it is dropping out certain cells of the model.
Is this the correct implementation of the papers or am I missing something?
If it is correct - is there any way to speed this up?
python neural-network tensorflow lstm dropout
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I've created a simple LSTM network for testing
model = tf.keras.Sequential()
model.add(layers.LSTM(32, input_shape = (timesteps, data_dim), recurrent_dropout = 0.2))
model.add(layers.Dense(1))
model.compile(loss = 'mae', metrics = ['accuracy'], optimizer = tf.train.AdamOptimizer())
I am using dropout method as researched by Yarin Gal here and Lingxue Zhu here
and my function for dropout looks like this:
f = K.function([model.layers[0].input, K.learning_phase()],
[model.layers[-1].output])
after training I'm using the function above in the "predict_with_dropout"
def predict_with_dropout(x, f=f, n_iter=100):
result = np.zeros((n_iter,))
#print(f([x,1]))
for iter in range(n_iter):
result[iter] = f([x, 1])[0]
return result
results =
for point in test_X:
results+= [predict_with_dropout([point])]
results_avg = np.apply_along_axis(np.mean, 1, results)
variance = np.apply_along_axis(np.var, 1, results)
This code is working as expected and as I understand it the "predict_with_dropout" function is using the f-function to re-train the LSTM model 100 times and within those 100 times it is dropping out certain cells of the model.
Is this the correct implementation of the papers or am I missing something?
If it is correct - is there any way to speed this up?
python neural-network tensorflow lstm dropout
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I've created a simple LSTM network for testing
model = tf.keras.Sequential()
model.add(layers.LSTM(32, input_shape = (timesteps, data_dim), recurrent_dropout = 0.2))
model.add(layers.Dense(1))
model.compile(loss = 'mae', metrics = ['accuracy'], optimizer = tf.train.AdamOptimizer())
I am using dropout method as researched by Yarin Gal here and Lingxue Zhu here
and my function for dropout looks like this:
f = K.function([model.layers[0].input, K.learning_phase()],
[model.layers[-1].output])
after training I'm using the function above in the "predict_with_dropout"
def predict_with_dropout(x, f=f, n_iter=100):
result = np.zeros((n_iter,))
#print(f([x,1]))
for iter in range(n_iter):
result[iter] = f([x, 1])[0]
return result
results =
for point in test_X:
results+= [predict_with_dropout([point])]
results_avg = np.apply_along_axis(np.mean, 1, results)
variance = np.apply_along_axis(np.var, 1, results)
This code is working as expected and as I understand it the "predict_with_dropout" function is using the f-function to re-train the LSTM model 100 times and within those 100 times it is dropping out certain cells of the model.
Is this the correct implementation of the papers or am I missing something?
If it is correct - is there any way to speed this up?
python neural-network tensorflow lstm dropout
New contributor
$endgroup$
I've created a simple LSTM network for testing
model = tf.keras.Sequential()
model.add(layers.LSTM(32, input_shape = (timesteps, data_dim), recurrent_dropout = 0.2))
model.add(layers.Dense(1))
model.compile(loss = 'mae', metrics = ['accuracy'], optimizer = tf.train.AdamOptimizer())
I am using dropout method as researched by Yarin Gal here and Lingxue Zhu here
and my function for dropout looks like this:
f = K.function([model.layers[0].input, K.learning_phase()],
[model.layers[-1].output])
after training I'm using the function above in the "predict_with_dropout"
def predict_with_dropout(x, f=f, n_iter=100):
result = np.zeros((n_iter,))
#print(f([x,1]))
for iter in range(n_iter):
result[iter] = f([x, 1])[0]
return result
results =
for point in test_X:
results+= [predict_with_dropout([point])]
results_avg = np.apply_along_axis(np.mean, 1, results)
variance = np.apply_along_axis(np.var, 1, results)
This code is working as expected and as I understand it the "predict_with_dropout" function is using the f-function to re-train the LSTM model 100 times and within those 100 times it is dropping out certain cells of the model.
Is this the correct implementation of the papers or am I missing something?
If it is correct - is there any way to speed this up?
python neural-network tensorflow lstm dropout
python neural-network tensorflow lstm dropout
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 5 mins ago
LMPLMP
61
61
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "557"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
LMP is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f51122%2fmeasuring-uncertainty-in-an-lstm-network-using-dropout-in-keras-tensorflow%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
LMP is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
LMP is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
LMP is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
LMP is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f51122%2fmeasuring-uncertainty-in-an-lstm-network-using-dropout-in-keras-tensorflow%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown