Interpreting heat using information entropy












3












$begingroup$


In an answer to the post about Microscopic Definition of Heat and Work, Ronan says,




$$<dE> = sum epsilon_idp_i + p_idepsilon_i$$



We can see that the change in average energy is partly due to a change
in the distribution of probability of occurrence of microscopic state
$epsilon_i$ and partly due to a change in the eigen values $epsilon_i$ of the
N-particles microscopic eigen states.




then the first term corresponds to heat:
$$TdS = sum epsilon_idp_i.$$
I am having a hard time imagining what it means.
If the following is true:




  1. probabilities $p_i$ can not change the shape of Gibbs distribution if we assume that the new state is in equilibrium

  2. $sum p_i = 1$


then the temperature must have risen (without any work done)! Is that correct, or can anything else happen?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    In an answer to the post about Microscopic Definition of Heat and Work, Ronan says,




    $$<dE> = sum epsilon_idp_i + p_idepsilon_i$$



    We can see that the change in average energy is partly due to a change
    in the distribution of probability of occurrence of microscopic state
    $epsilon_i$ and partly due to a change in the eigen values $epsilon_i$ of the
    N-particles microscopic eigen states.




    then the first term corresponds to heat:
    $$TdS = sum epsilon_idp_i.$$
    I am having a hard time imagining what it means.
    If the following is true:




    1. probabilities $p_i$ can not change the shape of Gibbs distribution if we assume that the new state is in equilibrium

    2. $sum p_i = 1$


    then the temperature must have risen (without any work done)! Is that correct, or can anything else happen?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      In an answer to the post about Microscopic Definition of Heat and Work, Ronan says,




      $$<dE> = sum epsilon_idp_i + p_idepsilon_i$$



      We can see that the change in average energy is partly due to a change
      in the distribution of probability of occurrence of microscopic state
      $epsilon_i$ and partly due to a change in the eigen values $epsilon_i$ of the
      N-particles microscopic eigen states.




      then the first term corresponds to heat:
      $$TdS = sum epsilon_idp_i.$$
      I am having a hard time imagining what it means.
      If the following is true:




      1. probabilities $p_i$ can not change the shape of Gibbs distribution if we assume that the new state is in equilibrium

      2. $sum p_i = 1$


      then the temperature must have risen (without any work done)! Is that correct, or can anything else happen?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      In an answer to the post about Microscopic Definition of Heat and Work, Ronan says,




      $$<dE> = sum epsilon_idp_i + p_idepsilon_i$$



      We can see that the change in average energy is partly due to a change
      in the distribution of probability of occurrence of microscopic state
      $epsilon_i$ and partly due to a change in the eigen values $epsilon_i$ of the
      N-particles microscopic eigen states.




      then the first term corresponds to heat:
      $$TdS = sum epsilon_idp_i.$$
      I am having a hard time imagining what it means.
      If the following is true:




      1. probabilities $p_i$ can not change the shape of Gibbs distribution if we assume that the new state is in equilibrium

      2. $sum p_i = 1$


      then the temperature must have risen (without any work done)! Is that correct, or can anything else happen?







      thermodynamics statistical-mechanics entropy






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 3 hours ago









      thehorseisbrownthehorseisbrown

      5517




      5517






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          When you heat a single-phase system without performing any work, then yes, the temperature must increase, which is interpreted as a change in the dispersion of energy levels.



          Some alternatives are:




          • A two-phase system, described by expanding the fundamental relation $dU=T,dS-P,dV+Sigma_imu_i,dN_i$ to include the final term, where $mu$ is the chemical potential and $N$ is the amount of stuff and where the temperature stays constant (in a first-order transition) even though the amount of each phase changes.


          • Doing work on a system, in which the energy levels might vary even though their dispersion is unchanged. An example is accelerating a mass, in which the speed of each constitute particle changes by a constant amount even though its speed relative to the center of mass remains the same, as does the temperature.







          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "151"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f459083%2finterpreting-heat-using-information-entropy%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4












            $begingroup$

            When you heat a single-phase system without performing any work, then yes, the temperature must increase, which is interpreted as a change in the dispersion of energy levels.



            Some alternatives are:




            • A two-phase system, described by expanding the fundamental relation $dU=T,dS-P,dV+Sigma_imu_i,dN_i$ to include the final term, where $mu$ is the chemical potential and $N$ is the amount of stuff and where the temperature stays constant (in a first-order transition) even though the amount of each phase changes.


            • Doing work on a system, in which the energy levels might vary even though their dispersion is unchanged. An example is accelerating a mass, in which the speed of each constitute particle changes by a constant amount even though its speed relative to the center of mass remains the same, as does the temperature.







            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              4












              $begingroup$

              When you heat a single-phase system without performing any work, then yes, the temperature must increase, which is interpreted as a change in the dispersion of energy levels.



              Some alternatives are:




              • A two-phase system, described by expanding the fundamental relation $dU=T,dS-P,dV+Sigma_imu_i,dN_i$ to include the final term, where $mu$ is the chemical potential and $N$ is the amount of stuff and where the temperature stays constant (in a first-order transition) even though the amount of each phase changes.


              • Doing work on a system, in which the energy levels might vary even though their dispersion is unchanged. An example is accelerating a mass, in which the speed of each constitute particle changes by a constant amount even though its speed relative to the center of mass remains the same, as does the temperature.







              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                4












                4








                4





                $begingroup$

                When you heat a single-phase system without performing any work, then yes, the temperature must increase, which is interpreted as a change in the dispersion of energy levels.



                Some alternatives are:




                • A two-phase system, described by expanding the fundamental relation $dU=T,dS-P,dV+Sigma_imu_i,dN_i$ to include the final term, where $mu$ is the chemical potential and $N$ is the amount of stuff and where the temperature stays constant (in a first-order transition) even though the amount of each phase changes.


                • Doing work on a system, in which the energy levels might vary even though their dispersion is unchanged. An example is accelerating a mass, in which the speed of each constitute particle changes by a constant amount even though its speed relative to the center of mass remains the same, as does the temperature.







                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                When you heat a single-phase system without performing any work, then yes, the temperature must increase, which is interpreted as a change in the dispersion of energy levels.



                Some alternatives are:




                • A two-phase system, described by expanding the fundamental relation $dU=T,dS-P,dV+Sigma_imu_i,dN_i$ to include the final term, where $mu$ is the chemical potential and $N$ is the amount of stuff and where the temperature stays constant (in a first-order transition) even though the amount of each phase changes.


                • Doing work on a system, in which the energy levels might vary even though their dispersion is unchanged. An example is accelerating a mass, in which the speed of each constitute particle changes by a constant amount even though its speed relative to the center of mass remains the same, as does the temperature.








                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered 3 hours ago









                ChemomechanicsChemomechanics

                4,91531023




                4,91531023






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f459083%2finterpreting-heat-using-information-entropy%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Ponta tanko

                    Tantalo (mitologio)

                    Erzsébet Schaár