Is it a Cyclops number? “Nobody” knows!












1












$begingroup$


Task:



Given an integer input, figure out whether or not it is a Cyclops Number.



What is a Cyclops number, you may ask? Well, it's a number whose binary representation only has one 0 in the center!



Test Cases:



Input | Output

--------------

1     | falsy

5     | truthy

12    | falsy    

27    | truthy

85    | falsy

101   | falsy

119   | truthy


Input: An integer or equivalent types. (int, long, decimal, etc.)
Output:




  • Truthy or falsy (e.g. true or false, 0 or 1)..


Challenge Rules:




  • Input that is less than 0 is assumed to be falsy.


  • If the length of the binary representation of the number is even, then the number cannot be a Cyclops number.



General Rules:




  • This is code-golf, so the shortest answers in bytes wins!.


  • Default loopholes are forbidden.


  • Standard rules apply for your answer with default I/O rules.




This is my first Programming Puzzles & Code Golf challenge, so any feedback on how I should improve would be much appreciated!






code-golf number decision-problem binary







share|improve this question









New contributor




Tau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You've essentially made two separate challenges, one a decision problem and one about outputting the next number of a sequence. This will not do what you want, which is invite more answers, but instead put off users who now need to consider three options about what to program before posting. I'd recommend removing the option, and in the future you can try posting to our sandbox first where hopefully you will get helpful feedback before posting. Good luck!
    $endgroup$
    – FryAmTheEggman
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @SriotchilismO'Zaic thanks for the feedback! I have edited the post.
    $endgroup$
    – Tau
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'd also recommend removing the hard coding restriction. By default solutions would need to handle all cyclops numbers in theory, and there are clearly infinitely many of them, so they couldn't all be hardcoded.
    $endgroup$
    – FryAmTheEggman
    57 mins ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note: This is A129868
    $endgroup$
    – tsh
    54 mins ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Should 119 be true?
    $endgroup$
    – Quintec
    37 mins ago
















1












$begingroup$


Task:



Given an integer input, figure out whether or not it is a Cyclops Number.



What is a Cyclops number, you may ask? Well, it's a number whose binary representation only has one 0 in the center!



Test Cases:



Input | Output

--------------

1     | falsy

5     | truthy

12    | falsy    

27    | truthy

85    | falsy

101   | falsy

119   | truthy


Input: An integer or equivalent types. (int, long, decimal, etc.)
Output:




  • Truthy or falsy (e.g. true or false, 0 or 1)..


Challenge Rules:




  • Input that is less than 0 is assumed to be falsy.


  • If the length of the binary representation of the number is even, then the number cannot be a Cyclops number.



General Rules:




  • This is code-golf, so the shortest answers in bytes wins!.


  • Default loopholes are forbidden.


  • Standard rules apply for your answer with default I/O rules.




This is my first Programming Puzzles & Code Golf challenge, so any feedback on how I should improve would be much appreciated!






code-golf number decision-problem binary







share|improve this question









New contributor




Tau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You've essentially made two separate challenges, one a decision problem and one about outputting the next number of a sequence. This will not do what you want, which is invite more answers, but instead put off users who now need to consider three options about what to program before posting. I'd recommend removing the option, and in the future you can try posting to our sandbox first where hopefully you will get helpful feedback before posting. Good luck!
    $endgroup$
    – FryAmTheEggman
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @SriotchilismO'Zaic thanks for the feedback! I have edited the post.
    $endgroup$
    – Tau
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'd also recommend removing the hard coding restriction. By default solutions would need to handle all cyclops numbers in theory, and there are clearly infinitely many of them, so they couldn't all be hardcoded.
    $endgroup$
    – FryAmTheEggman
    57 mins ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note: This is A129868
    $endgroup$
    – tsh
    54 mins ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Should 119 be true?
    $endgroup$
    – Quintec
    37 mins ago














1












1








1





$begingroup$


Task:



Given an integer input, figure out whether or not it is a Cyclops Number.



What is a Cyclops number, you may ask? Well, it's a number whose binary representation only has one 0 in the center!



Test Cases:



Input | Output

--------------

1     | falsy

5     | truthy

12    | falsy    

27    | truthy

85    | falsy

101   | falsy

119   | truthy


Input: An integer or equivalent types. (int, long, decimal, etc.)
Output:




  • Truthy or falsy (e.g. true or false, 0 or 1)..


Challenge Rules:




  • Input that is less than 0 is assumed to be falsy.


  • If the length of the binary representation of the number is even, then the number cannot be a Cyclops number.



General Rules:




  • This is code-golf, so the shortest answers in bytes wins!.


  • Default loopholes are forbidden.


  • Standard rules apply for your answer with default I/O rules.




This is my first Programming Puzzles & Code Golf challenge, so any feedback on how I should improve would be much appreciated!






code-golf number decision-problem binary







share|improve this question









New contributor




Tau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




Task:



Given an integer input, figure out whether or not it is a Cyclops Number.



What is a Cyclops number, you may ask? Well, it's a number whose binary representation only has one 0 in the center!



Test Cases:



Input | Output

--------------

1     | falsy

5     | truthy

12    | falsy    

27    | truthy

85    | falsy

101   | falsy

119   | truthy


Input: An integer or equivalent types. (int, long, decimal, etc.)
Output:




  • Truthy or falsy (e.g. true or false, 0 or 1)..


Challenge Rules:




  • Input that is less than 0 is assumed to be falsy.


  • If the length of the binary representation of the number is even, then the number cannot be a Cyclops number.



General Rules:




  • This is code-golf, so the shortest answers in bytes wins!.


  • Default loopholes are forbidden.


  • Standard rules apply for your answer with default I/O rules.




This is my first Programming Puzzles & Code Golf challenge, so any feedback on how I should improve would be much appreciated!






code-golf number decision-problem binary




code-golf number decision-problem binary






share|improve this question









New contributor




Tau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Tau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 33 mins ago







Tau













New contributor




Tau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 1 hour ago









TauTau

1165




1165




New contributor




Tau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Tau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Tau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You've essentially made two separate challenges, one a decision problem and one about outputting the next number of a sequence. This will not do what you want, which is invite more answers, but instead put off users who now need to consider three options about what to program before posting. I'd recommend removing the option, and in the future you can try posting to our sandbox first where hopefully you will get helpful feedback before posting. Good luck!
    $endgroup$
    – FryAmTheEggman
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @SriotchilismO'Zaic thanks for the feedback! I have edited the post.
    $endgroup$
    – Tau
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'd also recommend removing the hard coding restriction. By default solutions would need to handle all cyclops numbers in theory, and there are clearly infinitely many of them, so they couldn't all be hardcoded.
    $endgroup$
    – FryAmTheEggman
    57 mins ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note: This is A129868
    $endgroup$
    – tsh
    54 mins ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Should 119 be true?
    $endgroup$
    – Quintec
    37 mins ago














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You've essentially made two separate challenges, one a decision problem and one about outputting the next number of a sequence. This will not do what you want, which is invite more answers, but instead put off users who now need to consider three options about what to program before posting. I'd recommend removing the option, and in the future you can try posting to our sandbox first where hopefully you will get helpful feedback before posting. Good luck!
    $endgroup$
    – FryAmTheEggman
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @SriotchilismO'Zaic thanks for the feedback! I have edited the post.
    $endgroup$
    – Tau
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'd also recommend removing the hard coding restriction. By default solutions would need to handle all cyclops numbers in theory, and there are clearly infinitely many of them, so they couldn't all be hardcoded.
    $endgroup$
    – FryAmTheEggman
    57 mins ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note: This is A129868
    $endgroup$
    – tsh
    54 mins ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Should 119 be true?
    $endgroup$
    – Quintec
    37 mins ago








1




1




$begingroup$
You've essentially made two separate challenges, one a decision problem and one about outputting the next number of a sequence. This will not do what you want, which is invite more answers, but instead put off users who now need to consider three options about what to program before posting. I'd recommend removing the option, and in the future you can try posting to our sandbox first where hopefully you will get helpful feedback before posting. Good luck!
$endgroup$
– FryAmTheEggman
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
You've essentially made two separate challenges, one a decision problem and one about outputting the next number of a sequence. This will not do what you want, which is invite more answers, but instead put off users who now need to consider three options about what to program before posting. I'd recommend removing the option, and in the future you can try posting to our sandbox first where hopefully you will get helpful feedback before posting. Good luck!
$endgroup$
– FryAmTheEggman
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
@SriotchilismO'Zaic thanks for the feedback! I have edited the post.
$endgroup$
– Tau
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
@SriotchilismO'Zaic thanks for the feedback! I have edited the post.
$endgroup$
– Tau
1 hour ago




1




1




$begingroup$
I'd also recommend removing the hard coding restriction. By default solutions would need to handle all cyclops numbers in theory, and there are clearly infinitely many of them, so they couldn't all be hardcoded.
$endgroup$
– FryAmTheEggman
57 mins ago




$begingroup$
I'd also recommend removing the hard coding restriction. By default solutions would need to handle all cyclops numbers in theory, and there are clearly infinitely many of them, so they couldn't all be hardcoded.
$endgroup$
– FryAmTheEggman
57 mins ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Note: This is A129868
$endgroup$
– tsh
54 mins ago




$begingroup$
Note: This is A129868
$endgroup$
– tsh
54 mins ago




2




2




$begingroup$
Should 119 be true?
$endgroup$
– Quintec
37 mins ago




$begingroup$
Should 119 be true?
$endgroup$
– Quintec
37 mins ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$


Japt, 25 19 10 bytes



¢èT ¶1©¢ês


That's more like it...



Checks if there is only one 0 in the binary representation and that the binary representation is a palindrome.



Try it online!






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    found an even shorter way, based on your solution :)
    $endgroup$
    – Embodiment of Ignorance
    7 mins ago





















2












$begingroup$

Japt, 8 bytes



¤øT ©¢ês


Based off of Quintec's solution.



Try it Online!



Old regex-based solution, 15 bytes



¤f/^(1*)01$/ l


Returns 1 for true, 0 for false.



Try it Online!






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Well played, I should really learn regular expressions sometime. :) +1
    $endgroup$
    – Quintec
    32 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Quintec Regex is awesome :)
    $endgroup$
    – Embodiment of Ignorance
    32 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    Update: found shorter way :)
    $endgroup$
    – Quintec
    23 mins ago



















0












$begingroup$


Perl 6, 23 bytes





{.base(2)~~/^(1*)0$0$/}


Try it online!



Regex based solution






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$


    JavaScript (Node.js), 33 bytes





    f=(p,q)=>p%2?f(p>>1,q+q|1):p==q+q


    Try it online!



    This one will report falsy for 0. But the RegExp based one works for 0.





    JavaScript (Node.js), 35 bytes





    p=>p.toString(2).match(/^(1*)01$/)


    Try it online!






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
      StackExchange.snippets.init();
      });
      });
      }, "code-snippets");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "200"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });






      Tau is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodegolf.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f181128%2fis-it-a-cyclops-number-nobody-knows%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2












      $begingroup$


      Japt, 25 19 10 bytes



      ¢èT ¶1©¢ês


      That's more like it...



      Checks if there is only one 0 in the binary representation and that the binary representation is a palindrome.



      Try it online!






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        found an even shorter way, based on your solution :)
        $endgroup$
        – Embodiment of Ignorance
        7 mins ago


















      2












      $begingroup$


      Japt, 25 19 10 bytes



      ¢èT ¶1©¢ês


      That's more like it...



      Checks if there is only one 0 in the binary representation and that the binary representation is a palindrome.



      Try it online!






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        found an even shorter way, based on your solution :)
        $endgroup$
        – Embodiment of Ignorance
        7 mins ago
















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      Japt, 25 19 10 bytes



      ¢èT ¶1©¢ês


      That's more like it...



      Checks if there is only one 0 in the binary representation and that the binary representation is a palindrome.



      Try it online!






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$




      Japt, 25 19 10 bytes



      ¢èT ¶1©¢ês


      That's more like it...



      Checks if there is only one 0 in the binary representation and that the binary representation is a palindrome.



      Try it online!







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 25 mins ago

























      answered 51 mins ago









      QuintecQuintec

      1,9781726




      1,9781726












      • $begingroup$
        found an even shorter way, based on your solution :)
        $endgroup$
        – Embodiment of Ignorance
        7 mins ago




















      • $begingroup$
        found an even shorter way, based on your solution :)
        $endgroup$
        – Embodiment of Ignorance
        7 mins ago


















      $begingroup$
      found an even shorter way, based on your solution :)
      $endgroup$
      – Embodiment of Ignorance
      7 mins ago






      $begingroup$
      found an even shorter way, based on your solution :)
      $endgroup$
      – Embodiment of Ignorance
      7 mins ago













      2












      $begingroup$

      Japt, 8 bytes



      ¤øT ©¢ês


      Based off of Quintec's solution.



      Try it Online!



      Old regex-based solution, 15 bytes



      ¤f/^(1*)01$/ l


      Returns 1 for true, 0 for false.



      Try it Online!






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        Well played, I should really learn regular expressions sometime. :) +1
        $endgroup$
        – Quintec
        32 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        @Quintec Regex is awesome :)
        $endgroup$
        – Embodiment of Ignorance
        32 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        Update: found shorter way :)
        $endgroup$
        – Quintec
        23 mins ago
















      2












      $begingroup$

      Japt, 8 bytes



      ¤øT ©¢ês


      Based off of Quintec's solution.



      Try it Online!



      Old regex-based solution, 15 bytes



      ¤f/^(1*)01$/ l


      Returns 1 for true, 0 for false.



      Try it Online!






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        Well played, I should really learn regular expressions sometime. :) +1
        $endgroup$
        – Quintec
        32 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        @Quintec Regex is awesome :)
        $endgroup$
        – Embodiment of Ignorance
        32 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        Update: found shorter way :)
        $endgroup$
        – Quintec
        23 mins ago














      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$

      Japt, 8 bytes



      ¤øT ©¢ês


      Based off of Quintec's solution.



      Try it Online!



      Old regex-based solution, 15 bytes



      ¤f/^(1*)01$/ l


      Returns 1 for true, 0 for false.



      Try it Online!






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$



      Japt, 8 bytes



      ¤øT ©¢ês


      Based off of Quintec's solution.



      Try it Online!



      Old regex-based solution, 15 bytes



      ¤f/^(1*)01$/ l


      Returns 1 for true, 0 for false.



      Try it Online!







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 7 mins ago

























      answered 35 mins ago









      Embodiment of IgnoranceEmbodiment of Ignorance

      1,516123




      1,516123












      • $begingroup$
        Well played, I should really learn regular expressions sometime. :) +1
        $endgroup$
        – Quintec
        32 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        @Quintec Regex is awesome :)
        $endgroup$
        – Embodiment of Ignorance
        32 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        Update: found shorter way :)
        $endgroup$
        – Quintec
        23 mins ago


















      • $begingroup$
        Well played, I should really learn regular expressions sometime. :) +1
        $endgroup$
        – Quintec
        32 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        @Quintec Regex is awesome :)
        $endgroup$
        – Embodiment of Ignorance
        32 mins ago










      • $begingroup$
        Update: found shorter way :)
        $endgroup$
        – Quintec
        23 mins ago
















      $begingroup$
      Well played, I should really learn regular expressions sometime. :) +1
      $endgroup$
      – Quintec
      32 mins ago




      $begingroup$
      Well played, I should really learn regular expressions sometime. :) +1
      $endgroup$
      – Quintec
      32 mins ago












      $begingroup$
      @Quintec Regex is awesome :)
      $endgroup$
      – Embodiment of Ignorance
      32 mins ago




      $begingroup$
      @Quintec Regex is awesome :)
      $endgroup$
      – Embodiment of Ignorance
      32 mins ago












      $begingroup$
      Update: found shorter way :)
      $endgroup$
      – Quintec
      23 mins ago




      $begingroup$
      Update: found shorter way :)
      $endgroup$
      – Quintec
      23 mins ago











      0












      $begingroup$


      Perl 6, 23 bytes





      {.base(2)~~/^(1*)0$0$/}


      Try it online!



      Regex based solution






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        0












        $begingroup$


        Perl 6, 23 bytes





        {.base(2)~~/^(1*)0$0$/}


        Try it online!



        Regex based solution






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$


          Perl 6, 23 bytes





          {.base(2)~~/^(1*)0$0$/}


          Try it online!



          Regex based solution






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




          Perl 6, 23 bytes





          {.base(2)~~/^(1*)0$0$/}


          Try it online!



          Regex based solution







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 28 mins ago









          Jo KingJo King

          24.4k357126




          24.4k357126























              0












              $begingroup$


              JavaScript (Node.js), 33 bytes





              f=(p,q)=>p%2?f(p>>1,q+q|1):p==q+q


              Try it online!



              This one will report falsy for 0. But the RegExp based one works for 0.





              JavaScript (Node.js), 35 bytes





              p=>p.toString(2).match(/^(1*)01$/)


              Try it online!






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$


                JavaScript (Node.js), 33 bytes





                f=(p,q)=>p%2?f(p>>1,q+q|1):p==q+q


                Try it online!



                This one will report falsy for 0. But the RegExp based one works for 0.





                JavaScript (Node.js), 35 bytes





                p=>p.toString(2).match(/^(1*)01$/)


                Try it online!






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$


                  JavaScript (Node.js), 33 bytes





                  f=(p,q)=>p%2?f(p>>1,q+q|1):p==q+q


                  Try it online!



                  This one will report falsy for 0. But the RegExp based one works for 0.





                  JavaScript (Node.js), 35 bytes





                  p=>p.toString(2).match(/^(1*)01$/)


                  Try it online!






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$




                  JavaScript (Node.js), 33 bytes





                  f=(p,q)=>p%2?f(p>>1,q+q|1):p==q+q


                  Try it online!



                  This one will report falsy for 0. But the RegExp based one works for 0.





                  JavaScript (Node.js), 35 bytes





                  p=>p.toString(2).match(/^(1*)01$/)


                  Try it online!







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 13 mins ago

























                  answered 26 mins ago









                  tshtsh

                  9,32511652




                  9,32511652






















                      Tau is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      Tau is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                      Tau is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      Tau is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                      If this is an answer to a challenge…




                      • …Be sure to follow the challenge specification. However, please refrain from exploiting obvious loopholes. Answers abusing any of the standard loopholes are considered invalid. If you think a specification is unclear or underspecified, comment on the question instead.


                      • …Try to optimize your score. For instance, answers to code-golf challenges should attempt to be as short as possible. You can always include a readable version of the code in addition to the competitive one.
                        Explanations of your answer make it more interesting to read and are very much encouraged.


                      • …Include a short header which indicates the language(s) of your code and its score, as defined by the challenge.



                      More generally…




                      • …Please make sure to answer the question and provide sufficient detail.


                      • …Avoid asking for help, clarification or responding to other answers (use comments instead).





                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodegolf.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f181128%2fis-it-a-cyclops-number-nobody-knows%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      -

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Ponta tanko

                      Image
                      Usona ponta tanko M60A1 Ponta tanko estas, simile kiel kirasita savveturilo, inter specialaj kirasitaj transportiloj. Kiel pontaj tankoj eblas konsideri ĉiujn memmovigaj rimedoj ebligantaj superi obstaklojn ĝis larĝeco 24 metroj rekte en spaco de bataloperacoj. Ties ĉefa tasko estas ebligi al la propraj taĉmentoj daŭrigi en rapida antaŭenirado sen senbezona reteniĝo. El tio pli-malpli rezultas taktikaj-teknikaj postuloj, kiujn ili devas plenumi. Precipe temas pri kapablo operacii komune kun unue-sinsekvaj taĉmentoj kaj transpontigi obstaklojn dum kelke da minutoj. This page is only for reference, If you need detailed information, please check here
                      Read more

                      Tantalo (mitologio)

                      Image
                      Ĉi tiu artikolo temas pri mitologio. Por aliaj signifoj vidu la paĝon Tantalo (apartigilo) . Tantalo , laŭ Gioacchino Assereto. Laŭ la helena mitologio, Tantalo (el la greka Τάνταλος , ŝancelanta aŭ tre malfeliĉa ) estis filo de Zeŭso kaj la oceanidino Pluto, laŭ la plej divastigata versio. Li estis reĝo de Frigio [1] aŭ de la monto Sipilo, en Lidio (Malgrandazio) [2] kaj post sia morto li suferis eternan torturadon ĉe la Tartaro, la plej profunda parto de Hadeso, rezervita por la plej perversaj homoj. Tamen, kelkaj rakontoj asertas ke li estis reĝo de Argo aŭ de Korinto [3] , aŭ ke li migris norden el la monto Sipilo por akiri la tronon de Paflagonio, el kie Ilo forpelis lin pro tio, ke Tantalo forkaptis kaj seksperfortis lian fraton Ganimedon [4] , kaj tiel ofendis la diojn. Verŝajne li ankaŭ regis urbon en okcidenta Anatolio, kiun oni nomis Tantalis [5] pro li, aŭ Sipilo , pro la monto sur kies flanko ankoraŭ staras ĝiaj ruinaĵoj [6] . Laŭ la geografiisto Strabo,...
                      Read more

                      Erzsébet Schaár

                      Image
                      Erzsébet Schaár Memportreto de Erzsébet Schaár en Pécs Personaj informoj Naskiĝo 27-an de julio 1908 ( 1908-07-27 ) en Budafok Morto 29-an de aŭgusto 1975 ( 1975-08-29 ) (67-jara) en Budapeŝto Ŝtataneco Hungario Profesio skulptisto Familianoj Edz(in)o Tibor Vilt v   •   d   •   r Erzsébet Schaár [erĵEbet ŝAr], laŭ hungarlingve kutima sinsekvo Schaár Erzsébet estis hungara skulptisto. Ŝia edzo estis Tibor Vilt. Déryné Széppataki Róza en Miskolc fare de Erzsébet Schaár Erzsébet Schaár [1] naskiĝis la 27-an de julio 1908 en Budafok, ŝi mortis la 29-an de aŭgusto 1975 en Budapeŝto. Enhavo 1 Biografio 2 Elektitaj solaj ekspozicioj 3 Elektitaj kolektivaj ekspozicioj 4 Elektitaj skulptaĵoj 5 Elektitaj disĉiploj 6 Fontoj 7 Referencoj Biografio | Erzsébet Schaár studis en Industriarta Lernejo, poste en Reĝa Belarta Altlernejo (1924-1926). Ŝia ĉefinstruisto estis Zsig...
                      Read more