Why is LGA's Instrument Approach Procedure VOR-H misaligned with the runway?
$begingroup$
I was looking at LGA's Instrument Approach Procedures, and I noticed that on this IAP plate the final segment (CHUGG to MAFAS) is misaligned with the runway. How should I interpret this? Shouldn't be aligned with the runway, in order for the aircraft to be able to land?
landing iaps
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was looking at LGA's Instrument Approach Procedures, and I noticed that on this IAP plate the final segment (CHUGG to MAFAS) is misaligned with the runway. How should I interpret this? Shouldn't be aligned with the runway, in order for the aircraft to be able to land?
landing iaps
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was looking at LGA's Instrument Approach Procedures, and I noticed that on this IAP plate the final segment (CHUGG to MAFAS) is misaligned with the runway. How should I interpret this? Shouldn't be aligned with the runway, in order for the aircraft to be able to land?
landing iaps
$endgroup$
I was looking at LGA's Instrument Approach Procedures, and I noticed that on this IAP plate the final segment (CHUGG to MAFAS) is misaligned with the runway. How should I interpret this? Shouldn't be aligned with the runway, in order for the aircraft to be able to land?
landing iaps
landing iaps
asked 10 hours ago
Vector ZitaVector Zita
53712
53712
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Not all approached are aligned with a specific runway; some like this VOR approach into KLGA is not and just uses circling minimums.
It is anticipated that the aircrew will, after reaching the MAP at MDA, visually confirm that they have the intended runway of landing in sight, thence circle to land on it visually at or above the circling minimums published. The landing runway would be given by ATC or requested by the flight crew thence approved by ATC.
Nonprecision approaches with circling minimums only are quite common. They are created this way only if:
The final approach course alignment with the
runway centerline exceeds 30°.
The descent gradient is greater than 400 ft/NM from
the FAF to the threshold crossing height (TCH). When
this maximum gradient is exceeded, the circling
only approach procedure may be designed to meet
the gradient criteria limits. This does not preclude a
straight-in landing if a normal descent and landing
can be made in accordance with the applicable CFRs.
A runway is not clearly defined on the airfield.
See the FAA’s Instrument Procedures Handbook.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Because the VOR facility is not on the runway but it is on the field.
VOR approaches use VOR facilities and in this case DME measurements to identify fixes and get you down. However not all VOR's are stationed in line with runways. As such the radials may not always precisely align with the runway. In this case its parallel to the runway, in other cases like at my home airport KDYL it may bring you in at a slight angle.
This is also a Circling approach so it not necessarily intended to get you onto runway 13 (note no runway is listed on the plate) its merely intended to get you below the cloud layer and circle into another runway (however if you look at the notes circling to Runway 4 is not available).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "528"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f60031%2fwhy-is-lgas-instrument-approach-procedure-vor-h-misaligned-with-the-runway%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Not all approached are aligned with a specific runway; some like this VOR approach into KLGA is not and just uses circling minimums.
It is anticipated that the aircrew will, after reaching the MAP at MDA, visually confirm that they have the intended runway of landing in sight, thence circle to land on it visually at or above the circling minimums published. The landing runway would be given by ATC or requested by the flight crew thence approved by ATC.
Nonprecision approaches with circling minimums only are quite common. They are created this way only if:
The final approach course alignment with the
runway centerline exceeds 30°.
The descent gradient is greater than 400 ft/NM from
the FAF to the threshold crossing height (TCH). When
this maximum gradient is exceeded, the circling
only approach procedure may be designed to meet
the gradient criteria limits. This does not preclude a
straight-in landing if a normal descent and landing
can be made in accordance with the applicable CFRs.
A runway is not clearly defined on the airfield.
See the FAA’s Instrument Procedures Handbook.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Not all approached are aligned with a specific runway; some like this VOR approach into KLGA is not and just uses circling minimums.
It is anticipated that the aircrew will, after reaching the MAP at MDA, visually confirm that they have the intended runway of landing in sight, thence circle to land on it visually at or above the circling minimums published. The landing runway would be given by ATC or requested by the flight crew thence approved by ATC.
Nonprecision approaches with circling minimums only are quite common. They are created this way only if:
The final approach course alignment with the
runway centerline exceeds 30°.
The descent gradient is greater than 400 ft/NM from
the FAF to the threshold crossing height (TCH). When
this maximum gradient is exceeded, the circling
only approach procedure may be designed to meet
the gradient criteria limits. This does not preclude a
straight-in landing if a normal descent and landing
can be made in accordance with the applicable CFRs.
A runway is not clearly defined on the airfield.
See the FAA’s Instrument Procedures Handbook.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Not all approached are aligned with a specific runway; some like this VOR approach into KLGA is not and just uses circling minimums.
It is anticipated that the aircrew will, after reaching the MAP at MDA, visually confirm that they have the intended runway of landing in sight, thence circle to land on it visually at or above the circling minimums published. The landing runway would be given by ATC or requested by the flight crew thence approved by ATC.
Nonprecision approaches with circling minimums only are quite common. They are created this way only if:
The final approach course alignment with the
runway centerline exceeds 30°.
The descent gradient is greater than 400 ft/NM from
the FAF to the threshold crossing height (TCH). When
this maximum gradient is exceeded, the circling
only approach procedure may be designed to meet
the gradient criteria limits. This does not preclude a
straight-in landing if a normal descent and landing
can be made in accordance with the applicable CFRs.
A runway is not clearly defined on the airfield.
See the FAA’s Instrument Procedures Handbook.
$endgroup$
Not all approached are aligned with a specific runway; some like this VOR approach into KLGA is not and just uses circling minimums.
It is anticipated that the aircrew will, after reaching the MAP at MDA, visually confirm that they have the intended runway of landing in sight, thence circle to land on it visually at or above the circling minimums published. The landing runway would be given by ATC or requested by the flight crew thence approved by ATC.
Nonprecision approaches with circling minimums only are quite common. They are created this way only if:
The final approach course alignment with the
runway centerline exceeds 30°.
The descent gradient is greater than 400 ft/NM from
the FAF to the threshold crossing height (TCH). When
this maximum gradient is exceeded, the circling
only approach procedure may be designed to meet
the gradient criteria limits. This does not preclude a
straight-in landing if a normal descent and landing
can be made in accordance with the applicable CFRs.
A runway is not clearly defined on the airfield.
See the FAA’s Instrument Procedures Handbook.
edited 10 hours ago
answered 10 hours ago
Carlo FelicioneCarlo Felicione
41.7k376152
41.7k376152
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Because the VOR facility is not on the runway but it is on the field.
VOR approaches use VOR facilities and in this case DME measurements to identify fixes and get you down. However not all VOR's are stationed in line with runways. As such the radials may not always precisely align with the runway. In this case its parallel to the runway, in other cases like at my home airport KDYL it may bring you in at a slight angle.
This is also a Circling approach so it not necessarily intended to get you onto runway 13 (note no runway is listed on the plate) its merely intended to get you below the cloud layer and circle into another runway (however if you look at the notes circling to Runway 4 is not available).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Because the VOR facility is not on the runway but it is on the field.
VOR approaches use VOR facilities and in this case DME measurements to identify fixes and get you down. However not all VOR's are stationed in line with runways. As such the radials may not always precisely align with the runway. In this case its parallel to the runway, in other cases like at my home airport KDYL it may bring you in at a slight angle.
This is also a Circling approach so it not necessarily intended to get you onto runway 13 (note no runway is listed on the plate) its merely intended to get you below the cloud layer and circle into another runway (however if you look at the notes circling to Runway 4 is not available).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Because the VOR facility is not on the runway but it is on the field.
VOR approaches use VOR facilities and in this case DME measurements to identify fixes and get you down. However not all VOR's are stationed in line with runways. As such the radials may not always precisely align with the runway. In this case its parallel to the runway, in other cases like at my home airport KDYL it may bring you in at a slight angle.
This is also a Circling approach so it not necessarily intended to get you onto runway 13 (note no runway is listed on the plate) its merely intended to get you below the cloud layer and circle into another runway (however if you look at the notes circling to Runway 4 is not available).
$endgroup$
Because the VOR facility is not on the runway but it is on the field.
VOR approaches use VOR facilities and in this case DME measurements to identify fixes and get you down. However not all VOR's are stationed in line with runways. As such the radials may not always precisely align with the runway. In this case its parallel to the runway, in other cases like at my home airport KDYL it may bring you in at a slight angle.
This is also a Circling approach so it not necessarily intended to get you onto runway 13 (note no runway is listed on the plate) its merely intended to get you below the cloud layer and circle into another runway (however if you look at the notes circling to Runway 4 is not available).
edited 10 hours ago
answered 10 hours ago
DaveDave
64.7k4119233
64.7k4119233
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f60031%2fwhy-is-lgas-instrument-approach-procedure-vor-h-misaligned-with-the-runway%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown