Why is addition with a real not an elementary row operation?












2












$begingroup$


Many linear algebra courses build upon the concept of elementary row operations, and further develop on their properties and relevance.



My question is, why isn't addition by a real considered an elementary row operation and how can this be argued at the level of the beginning of the course? I know that this operation doesn't share some properties of the elementary row operations. However, linear algebra courses present elementary row operations as operations that don't change the solution set. Well, addition with a real doesn't change the solution set.






linear-algebra







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is "addition by a real"? $(a,b,c) mapsto (a + r, b+r, c+r)$?
    $endgroup$
    – Billy Rubina
    54 mins ago


















2












$begingroup$


Many linear algebra courses build upon the concept of elementary row operations, and further develop on their properties and relevance.



My question is, why isn't addition by a real considered an elementary row operation and how can this be argued at the level of the beginning of the course? I know that this operation doesn't share some properties of the elementary row operations. However, linear algebra courses present elementary row operations as operations that don't change the solution set. Well, addition with a real doesn't change the solution set.






linear-algebra







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is "addition by a real"? $(a,b,c) mapsto (a + r, b+r, c+r)$?
    $endgroup$
    – Billy Rubina
    54 mins ago
















2












2








2





$begingroup$


Many linear algebra courses build upon the concept of elementary row operations, and further develop on their properties and relevance.



My question is, why isn't addition by a real considered an elementary row operation and how can this be argued at the level of the beginning of the course? I know that this operation doesn't share some properties of the elementary row operations. However, linear algebra courses present elementary row operations as operations that don't change the solution set. Well, addition with a real doesn't change the solution set.






linear-algebra







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Many linear algebra courses build upon the concept of elementary row operations, and further develop on their properties and relevance.



My question is, why isn't addition by a real considered an elementary row operation and how can this be argued at the level of the beginning of the course? I know that this operation doesn't share some properties of the elementary row operations. However, linear algebra courses present elementary row operations as operations that don't change the solution set. Well, addition with a real doesn't change the solution set.






linear-algebra




linear-algebra






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 1 hour ago









Paul92Paul92

31014




31014








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is "addition by a real"? $(a,b,c) mapsto (a + r, b+r, c+r)$?
    $endgroup$
    – Billy Rubina
    54 mins ago
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is "addition by a real"? $(a,b,c) mapsto (a + r, b+r, c+r)$?
    $endgroup$
    – Billy Rubina
    54 mins ago










1




1




$begingroup$
What is "addition by a real"? $(a,b,c) mapsto (a + r, b+r, c+r)$?
$endgroup$
– Billy Rubina
54 mins ago






$begingroup$
What is "addition by a real"? $(a,b,c) mapsto (a + r, b+r, c+r)$?
$endgroup$
– Billy Rubina
54 mins ago












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

Take for example the augmented matrix
$$(begin{array}{cc|c} 1 & -1 & 0 end{array}).$$
This has a solution of $(x, y) = t(1, 1)$.



Add the real number $1$ to the row:
$$(begin{array}{cc|c} 2 & 0 & 1 end{array}).$$
This has a solution of $(x, y) = (1/2, 0) + t(0, 1)$, which is a completely different line of solutions.



So, adding a real does indeed change the solution set.



More generally, there are other operations that do preserve the solution set, but only three are called "elementary". The reason why we restrict ourselves to just three operations is because these three operations are sufficient to transform between any two matrices of the same dimensions with the same solution set. Every row operation that preserves solution sets is a combination of elementary row operations!






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    So the point is: adding $1$ to the row is equivalent to adding $x+y$ to one side of the equation (by adding $1$ to the coefficients of $x$ and $y$), while adding $1$ to the other side.
    $endgroup$
    – timtfj
    36 mins ago





















0












$begingroup$

Expanding on the first part of Theo Bendit's answer: if we represent the equation $$ax+by=c$$ by the matrix row $$(begin{array}{cc|c} a & b & c end{array})$$
and add a constant $k$ to the row, the result
$$(begin{array}{cc|c} a+k & b+k & c+k end{array})$$
is equivalent to the equation



$$(a+k)x+(b+k)y=c+k.$$



Comparing with the original equation, we see we've added $k(x+y)$ to one side and $k$ to the other—producing a completely different equation.



So adding a constant isn't a valid row operation.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3087816%2fwhy-is-addition-with-a-real-not-an-elementary-row-operation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5












    $begingroup$

    Take for example the augmented matrix
    $$(begin{array}{cc|c} 1 & -1 & 0 end{array}).$$
    This has a solution of $(x, y) = t(1, 1)$.



    Add the real number $1$ to the row:
    $$(begin{array}{cc|c} 2 & 0 & 1 end{array}).$$
    This has a solution of $(x, y) = (1/2, 0) + t(0, 1)$, which is a completely different line of solutions.



    So, adding a real does indeed change the solution set.



    More generally, there are other operations that do preserve the solution set, but only three are called "elementary". The reason why we restrict ourselves to just three operations is because these three operations are sufficient to transform between any two matrices of the same dimensions with the same solution set. Every row operation that preserves solution sets is a combination of elementary row operations!






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      So the point is: adding $1$ to the row is equivalent to adding $x+y$ to one side of the equation (by adding $1$ to the coefficients of $x$ and $y$), while adding $1$ to the other side.
      $endgroup$
      – timtfj
      36 mins ago


















    5












    $begingroup$

    Take for example the augmented matrix
    $$(begin{array}{cc|c} 1 & -1 & 0 end{array}).$$
    This has a solution of $(x, y) = t(1, 1)$.



    Add the real number $1$ to the row:
    $$(begin{array}{cc|c} 2 & 0 & 1 end{array}).$$
    This has a solution of $(x, y) = (1/2, 0) + t(0, 1)$, which is a completely different line of solutions.



    So, adding a real does indeed change the solution set.



    More generally, there are other operations that do preserve the solution set, but only three are called "elementary". The reason why we restrict ourselves to just three operations is because these three operations are sufficient to transform between any two matrices of the same dimensions with the same solution set. Every row operation that preserves solution sets is a combination of elementary row operations!






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      So the point is: adding $1$ to the row is equivalent to adding $x+y$ to one side of the equation (by adding $1$ to the coefficients of $x$ and $y$), while adding $1$ to the other side.
      $endgroup$
      – timtfj
      36 mins ago
















    5












    5








    5





    $begingroup$

    Take for example the augmented matrix
    $$(begin{array}{cc|c} 1 & -1 & 0 end{array}).$$
    This has a solution of $(x, y) = t(1, 1)$.



    Add the real number $1$ to the row:
    $$(begin{array}{cc|c} 2 & 0 & 1 end{array}).$$
    This has a solution of $(x, y) = (1/2, 0) + t(0, 1)$, which is a completely different line of solutions.



    So, adding a real does indeed change the solution set.



    More generally, there are other operations that do preserve the solution set, but only three are called "elementary". The reason why we restrict ourselves to just three operations is because these three operations are sufficient to transform between any two matrices of the same dimensions with the same solution set. Every row operation that preserves solution sets is a combination of elementary row operations!






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Take for example the augmented matrix
    $$(begin{array}{cc|c} 1 & -1 & 0 end{array}).$$
    This has a solution of $(x, y) = t(1, 1)$.



    Add the real number $1$ to the row:
    $$(begin{array}{cc|c} 2 & 0 & 1 end{array}).$$
    This has a solution of $(x, y) = (1/2, 0) + t(0, 1)$, which is a completely different line of solutions.



    So, adding a real does indeed change the solution set.



    More generally, there are other operations that do preserve the solution set, but only three are called "elementary". The reason why we restrict ourselves to just three operations is because these three operations are sufficient to transform between any two matrices of the same dimensions with the same solution set. Every row operation that preserves solution sets is a combination of elementary row operations!







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 1 hour ago

























    answered 1 hour ago









    Theo BenditTheo Bendit

    17.4k12149




    17.4k12149












    • $begingroup$
      So the point is: adding $1$ to the row is equivalent to adding $x+y$ to one side of the equation (by adding $1$ to the coefficients of $x$ and $y$), while adding $1$ to the other side.
      $endgroup$
      – timtfj
      36 mins ago




















    • $begingroup$
      So the point is: adding $1$ to the row is equivalent to adding $x+y$ to one side of the equation (by adding $1$ to the coefficients of $x$ and $y$), while adding $1$ to the other side.
      $endgroup$
      – timtfj
      36 mins ago


















    $begingroup$
    So the point is: adding $1$ to the row is equivalent to adding $x+y$ to one side of the equation (by adding $1$ to the coefficients of $x$ and $y$), while adding $1$ to the other side.
    $endgroup$
    – timtfj
    36 mins ago






    $begingroup$
    So the point is: adding $1$ to the row is equivalent to adding $x+y$ to one side of the equation (by adding $1$ to the coefficients of $x$ and $y$), while adding $1$ to the other side.
    $endgroup$
    – timtfj
    36 mins ago













    0












    $begingroup$

    Expanding on the first part of Theo Bendit's answer: if we represent the equation $$ax+by=c$$ by the matrix row $$(begin{array}{cc|c} a & b & c end{array})$$
    and add a constant $k$ to the row, the result
    $$(begin{array}{cc|c} a+k & b+k & c+k end{array})$$
    is equivalent to the equation



    $$(a+k)x+(b+k)y=c+k.$$



    Comparing with the original equation, we see we've added $k(x+y)$ to one side and $k$ to the other—producing a completely different equation.



    So adding a constant isn't a valid row operation.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      Expanding on the first part of Theo Bendit's answer: if we represent the equation $$ax+by=c$$ by the matrix row $$(begin{array}{cc|c} a & b & c end{array})$$
      and add a constant $k$ to the row, the result
      $$(begin{array}{cc|c} a+k & b+k & c+k end{array})$$
      is equivalent to the equation



      $$(a+k)x+(b+k)y=c+k.$$



      Comparing with the original equation, we see we've added $k(x+y)$ to one side and $k$ to the other—producing a completely different equation.



      So adding a constant isn't a valid row operation.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Expanding on the first part of Theo Bendit's answer: if we represent the equation $$ax+by=c$$ by the matrix row $$(begin{array}{cc|c} a & b & c end{array})$$
        and add a constant $k$ to the row, the result
        $$(begin{array}{cc|c} a+k & b+k & c+k end{array})$$
        is equivalent to the equation



        $$(a+k)x+(b+k)y=c+k.$$



        Comparing with the original equation, we see we've added $k(x+y)$ to one side and $k$ to the other—producing a completely different equation.



        So adding a constant isn't a valid row operation.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Expanding on the first part of Theo Bendit's answer: if we represent the equation $$ax+by=c$$ by the matrix row $$(begin{array}{cc|c} a & b & c end{array})$$
        and add a constant $k$ to the row, the result
        $$(begin{array}{cc|c} a+k & b+k & c+k end{array})$$
        is equivalent to the equation



        $$(a+k)x+(b+k)y=c+k.$$



        Comparing with the original equation, we see we've added $k(x+y)$ to one side and $k$ to the other—producing a completely different equation.



        So adding a constant isn't a valid row operation.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 3 mins ago

























        answered 11 mins ago









        timtfjtimtfj

        1,638318




        1,638318






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3087816%2fwhy-is-addition-with-a-real-not-an-elementary-row-operation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Ponta tanko

            Image
            Usona ponta tanko M60A1 Ponta tanko estas, simile kiel kirasita savveturilo, inter specialaj kirasitaj transportiloj. Kiel pontaj tankoj eblas konsideri ĉiujn memmovigaj rimedoj ebligantaj superi obstaklojn ĝis larĝeco 24 metroj rekte en spaco de bataloperacoj. Ties ĉefa tasko estas ebligi al la propraj taĉmentoj daŭrigi en rapida antaŭenirado sen senbezona reteniĝo. El tio pli-malpli rezultas taktikaj-teknikaj postuloj, kiujn ili devas plenumi. Precipe temas pri kapablo operacii komune kun unue-sinsekvaj taĉmentoj kaj transpontigi obstaklojn dum kelke da minutoj. This page is only for reference, If you need detailed information, please check here
            Read more

            Tantalo (mitologio)

            Image
            Ĉi tiu artikolo temas pri mitologio. Por aliaj signifoj vidu la paĝon Tantalo (apartigilo) . Tantalo , laŭ Gioacchino Assereto. Laŭ la helena mitologio, Tantalo (el la greka Τάνταλος , ŝancelanta aŭ tre malfeliĉa ) estis filo de Zeŭso kaj la oceanidino Pluto, laŭ la plej divastigata versio. Li estis reĝo de Frigio [1] aŭ de la monto Sipilo, en Lidio (Malgrandazio) [2] kaj post sia morto li suferis eternan torturadon ĉe la Tartaro, la plej profunda parto de Hadeso, rezervita por la plej perversaj homoj. Tamen, kelkaj rakontoj asertas ke li estis reĝo de Argo aŭ de Korinto [3] , aŭ ke li migris norden el la monto Sipilo por akiri la tronon de Paflagonio, el kie Ilo forpelis lin pro tio, ke Tantalo forkaptis kaj seksperfortis lian fraton Ganimedon [4] , kaj tiel ofendis la diojn. Verŝajne li ankaŭ regis urbon en okcidenta Anatolio, kiun oni nomis Tantalis [5] pro li, aŭ Sipilo , pro la monto sur kies flanko ankoraŭ staras ĝiaj ruinaĵoj [6] . Laŭ la geografiisto Strabo,...
            Read more

            Erzsébet Schaár

            Image
            Erzsébet Schaár Memportreto de Erzsébet Schaár en Pécs Personaj informoj Naskiĝo 27-an de julio 1908 ( 1908-07-27 ) en Budafok Morto 29-an de aŭgusto 1975 ( 1975-08-29 ) (67-jara) en Budapeŝto Ŝtataneco Hungario Profesio skulptisto Familianoj Edz(in)o Tibor Vilt v   •   d   •   r Erzsébet Schaár [erĵEbet ŝAr], laŭ hungarlingve kutima sinsekvo Schaár Erzsébet estis hungara skulptisto. Ŝia edzo estis Tibor Vilt. Déryné Széppataki Róza en Miskolc fare de Erzsébet Schaár Erzsébet Schaár [1] naskiĝis la 27-an de julio 1908 en Budafok, ŝi mortis la 29-an de aŭgusto 1975 en Budapeŝto. Enhavo 1 Biografio 2 Elektitaj solaj ekspozicioj 3 Elektitaj kolektivaj ekspozicioj 4 Elektitaj skulptaĵoj 5 Elektitaj disĉiploj 6 Fontoj 7 Referencoj Biografio | Erzsébet Schaár studis en Industriarta Lernejo, poste en Reĝa Belarta Altlernejo (1924-1926). Ŝia ĉefinstruisto estis Zsig...
            Read more